Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Defragging too much

  • 05-01-2006 11:28am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭


    I heard a couple of years ago that you shouldn't defrag too often as it can shorten the Life of your disks, Is this true or rubbish ?
    We are using a network defrag utility and need to run it fairly often on some servers and Workstation.

    21/25



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,084 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    It would probably damage the life of cheap-ass hard drives I reckon. The ones that fail after so many hours of use that is. Google use that kind as it's more cost effective to buy loads of cheap hard drives and run an effective backup/recovery strategy than it is to buy a few expensive hard drives. Modern hard drives that you pay good money for though shouldn't be affected too much.

    Modern filesystems claim to need less defragging that filesystems of old. Although I think that claim is bull**** for NTFS. It's supposed to hold somewhat true for Linux filesystems such as ext2/3 and reiserfs etc. though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭Matthewthebig


    On a similar note

    whenever i defrag my hard drive it says that some files could not be defragged and to look at the report, however when i view the report there is nothing and it still won't defrag

    Does anyone know what could be causing this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,084 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    What defrag program are you using? Some files are used by system processes and are more difficult to get access to (Diskeeper and the like are better able to handle these). Some defrag programs require you reboot in order to finish the defrag process on startup. Directory entries and the pagefile are examples of files that are difficult to defrag.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭Matthewthebig


    I am using the one on XP SP2

    i assume i should use a third party one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,084 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    If you want a really thorough defrag then yes. Diskeeper is my recommended choice. The XP defrag utility is actually a stripped down version of an earlier Diskeeper release

    XP defrag should still be good for your basic defrag though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭Matthewthebig


    thank you muchly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    & launch from Safe Mode (Or at boot time) for optimal result.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭Duffman


    Karoma wrote:
    & launch from Safe Mode (Or at boot time) for optimal result.

    Use something like Diskeeper from a normal boot, it will run a boot time defrag to move whatever it missed.

    Don't use safe mode unless you don't want to use your computer again for a few days :P DMA is disabled so disk access speeds are painfully slow.


Advertisement