Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Canon Extenders

  • 03-01-2006 12:42am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭


    Hi,

    I've just got an EOS digital SLR and I'm looking at buying additional lense(s) for it. Ideally I'd like to be able to go all the way from 55-600 but since there isn't one I'm stuck.

    I really like the EF 75-300 and I thought that in conjunction with a 1.4 or 2.0 converter the 18-55 lens and a 75-300 would cover me nicely all the way upto 600.

    Since I don't know a lot about converters, are there any drawbacks, will the image quality suffer at all ?

    Cheers,

    Matt


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,084 ✭✭✭dubtom


    Canon converters are made for fast Canon lenses, 70-200 2.8 etc, they won't AF on any lenses slower than 5.6, infact I'm not sure if they will even fit a 70-300 or the other lenses you mentioned. Also Canon converters will not fit any third party lenses. For a cheaper and quite good alternative try Kenko, they will fit most third party except I think Sigma fast lenses and may also AF above 5.6 in very good light. The 2x will degrade your image and hunt quite a bit no matter what brand you use, the 1.4x are generally ok, depending on the light it may hunt but you can get some excellent quality pics with them.


Advertisement