Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"It's Alive!"

  • 30-12-2005 3:38pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭


    Okay, good god, what is the deal with these films. I mean it's a trilogy of movies, a trilogy of crap movies. And okay we've all seen bad movies. My gripe is that this one must have done well enough to let them make a second and third movie and it was also distributed by movie giants Warner Brothers.

    Anyone seen them? It's basically the chronicles of a poor misfortune family to birth a mutant killer baby.

    The most hilarious thing is that despite the fact it has the grace of an episode of Barney it must have done somewhat well to warrant a trilogy of movies.

    For instance. One scene exits on the mother giving birth, with the staff commenting its an abnormally large baby. And then, the next scenes sees us in the delivery room, blood everywhere, staff violently murdered.

    There is no evidence of the infant.

    So naturally, as you do like, the police assume the baby born must be a killer mutant baby??! Sounds credible, right? Someone musta gotten the big bucks for this script. Which brings me onto the next bit:

    The father is driving home the very next evening, ONE DAY LATER, and hears on the radio: "Police suspect a mutant infant is responsible for the killings at the local hospital...."

    I mean jesus, the film was, I must admit, a fantastic laugh the morning after a drinking session. But as a film itself it was one of the most god awful things I've ever seen. Did it actually do well?? How was there a trilogy made?? Why does Warner Brothers have anything to do with this????

    Apparently judging from the trilogy box set a babies cry will never be the same again. I dunno, I don't know many babies that sound like wild boars when crying. Maybe that's just me. And the wierd babies I know.

    The mind boggles. I have yet to watch "It's alive! 2" and "It's Alive!: Island of the Alive" to complete this epic trilogy.

    Comments from anyone who's seen this rubbish, please.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Its Alive is written and directed by the great Larry Cohen who also did B-flicks like Q The Winged Serpant and Stuff. Larry is a legend in Hollywood where his ability to crank out a handy script in double quick time is appriciated.

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0169540/

    Mike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 520 ✭✭✭Xcom2


    If you did not like the first one then I guess your in for a treat with the sequel's:p I love these cheesy films and will watch just about anything.

    The nice postman delivered my Kolchak:the night stalker and hardy boy's/nancy drew box set's today(guess I'm not sleeping tonight either).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭LundiMardi


    Okay, good god, what is the deal with these films. I mean it's a trilogy of movies, a trilogy of crap movies. And okay we've all seen bad movies. My gripe is that this one must have done well enough to let them make a second and third movie and it was also distributed by movie giants Warner Brothers.

    Anyone seen them? It's basically the chronicles of a poor misfortune family to birth a mutant killer baby.

    The most hilarious thing is that despite the fact it has the grace of an episode of Barney it must have done somewhat well to warrant a trilogy of movies.

    For instance. One scene exits on the mother giving birth, with the staff commenting its an abnormally large baby. And then, the next scenes sees us in the delivery room, blood everywhere, staff violently murdered.

    There is no evidence of the infant.

    So naturally, as you do like, the police assume the baby born must be a killer mutant baby??! Sounds credible, right? Someone musta gotten the big bucks for this script. Which brings me onto the next bit:

    The father is driving home the very next evening, ONE DAY LATER, and hears on the radio: "Police suspect a mutant infant is responsible for the killings at the local hospital...."

    I mean jesus, the film was, I must admit, a fantastic laugh the morning after a drinking session. But as a film itself it was one of the most god awful things I've ever seen. Did it actually do well?? How was there a trilogy made?? Why does Warner Brothers have anything to do with this????

    Apparently judging from the trilogy box set a babies cry will never be the same again. I dunno, I don't know many babies that sound like wild boars when crying. Maybe that's just me. And the wierd babies I know.

    The mind boggles. I have yet to watch "It's alive! 2" and "It's Alive!: Island of the Alive" to complete this epic trilogy.

    Comments from anyone who's seen this rubbish, please.
    the way you've described it makes me want to see it!! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    I forgot to mention I watched the other two, the second one was, somehow, even worse but the third one was comic genius, the mutant babies have turned into bodybuilders and the film contains the most hilariously random exploding helicopter scene I have ever seen.


  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have the box set sitting in my bed room along side the Basket Case trilogy. Some weekend I plan on watching all six films.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Oh god, don't get me started on Basket Case...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    i'm confused...i though havoK liked bad films?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    BlitzKrieg wrote: »
    i'm confused...i though havoK liked bad films?

    I suppose there's bad, and then there's bad?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    My issue wasn't really with the quality of the film, more with the fact that a major company actually backed this film, and that somehow, it did well enough that they were able to make a terrible sequel, that in turn must have done well enough to spawn yet another sequel. Which was also crap, but in one of those brilliant ways. Even the first film was great for a laugh, I watched it redhairedguy after a night out, it was essential viewing. The second though was just utterly worthless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,844 ✭✭✭✭cormie


    I spent weeks/months downloading this from a crappy source thinking it was something by another "L. Cohen" (Leonard). Was a bit disappointed when I saw it was some cheesy looking film. Haven't watched it yet, funny to see a thread about it as I've never heard about it other than here and downloading it:o


  • Advertisement
Advertisement