Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

FileSystems

  • 23-08-2004 2:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,459 ✭✭✭


    I have been reading lately into Filesystems, and wondering if people can give their thoughts [or good - impartial sites ?].
    I've seen speed benchmarks, and various other benchmarks, and Resier/JFS seems to come out on top each time, ext2/3 seems to come out towards the bottom for each test, usually.

    I'm half thinking of moving to Resier [building few servers in week or so], and wondering what the downside is, so to speak ?
    Every site I've gone to for reviews etc, seems to speak highly of Reiser - without listing any bad points.

    ext2 is grand, but I want journaling, and ext3 + quota's not the best ...
    Reiser afaik doesn't break quota's.
    I'd regard quota's as essential.

    Any suggestions would be nice - I will not move to Reiser4, as still testing etc.

    I know types of files etc come into play here; what I'll be running on server : mail/apache/fileserver/tomcat [*cough* thats a whole new thread]/mysqld/various PHP stuff/+++
    Servers will be handling upwards of 50-100 people, so will need room for expansion & running extra services/new role's ... so FS would have to be pretty versitile.
    I would expect majority of files would be smallish in size, with not too many large files.

    Any further details, just ask,

    Regards,

    Sean


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 188 ✭✭slartibardfast


    reiserfs relies on external patches for quota support, which I don't like for two reasons these patches are less tested and second the waiting for them to be sync'd with the latest kernels,

    Go for XFS it's almost as fast as reiser3.6 (apart from while deleting), much faster than ext3 and it's quota support and acl support is excellent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,459 ✭✭✭seanos


    Thanks for your opinion, will continue trying to gather data while waiting for few more opinions - could be nice debate ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭nadir


    im still using journalised ext2. I may give xfs a go on my next machine. Ive been hearing bad things about reiserfs lately, although that was with a sun machine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭vigos


    this months Linux Format has a good article on filesystems, including benchmarks and their suitability towards differents systems i.e. server,desktop etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,459 ✭✭✭seanos


    Yes, which I have & read.
    I don't believe there is enough detail there, which inspired this thread ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 834 ✭✭✭fragile


    Reiser4 has just been released, there is a discussion about it over on OSnews.com, it is claimed that it is the fastest filesystem


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 188 ✭✭slartibardfast


    it *is* the fastest, and it most likely will become the *safest* (hello atmoic fs!)
    But at the moment it is unusable as it doesn't have quota support, yet!

    I use reiser4 for a games partition for NWN load times :D, been very reilable too!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    XFS, then again been an IRIX user i'm biased ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    Having run XFS on both my desktop machine and a busy server for the last few months I have to say that it's excellent.


Advertisement