Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Celtic catholic church

  • 29-08-2003 11:21am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6


    Up to the Synod of Cashel there was a celtic catholic church in Ireland - in communion with the catholic church in other countries, including Italy (Rome), but led by it's own Gaelic bishops.

    I believe that's the way the catholic church in Ireland should go - back to it's freedom. We were once a British colony, and we have done very well on our with good relationships with the UK.

    Rome also has us as a spiritual colony, we should put an end to that - and continue free and with good relationships.

    Tomás


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 494 ✭✭Lukin Black


    I've heard about this before, but am not really sure what was the difference/significance? Any links, or recommended reading?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 tomaskennedy


    "How the Irish Saved Civilisation" is a great book on this subject.

    There are some similarities between the Roman church and the Celtic church - with some big differences.

    The celtic was community and not institutional, based on relationships and not a command structure, for example.

    Priests were married as well as celebate.

    Tomás:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 494 ✭✭Lukin Black


    Oh the irony! I was given a copy of that book, but never got round to reading it. I'll have to give it a read then :D

    I did a quick google and was a bit shocked at the third link down :eek:

    There's a brief synopsis here too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 tomaskennedy


    Yes, Dr. Ian does put his spin on it!!

    The Roman church insists that the celtic church was always roman, and Dr. Ian insists that there was no connection at all.

    Between is the truth! Of course there was a connection between the church in Ireland and the church in Rome, fellowship, but not domination as there is now (weakening... as we know).

    Tomás+


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    Whilst the Celtic Church has a romantic aura painted about it, this would still not fail to disguise the fact that left unchecked this would have the nucleus for a schismatic movement. The basic aim of the Church is to keep a vibrant complete faith, for it to fail to allow this centre to hold would produce numerous fragmentary groups to emerge, each promoting it’s own sliver of truth.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 tomaskennedy


    I agree with Manach that division is not desirable. The celtic catholic church was and is in communion with the rest of the church, and is loyal to the historic teaching of the church. The main differences are that it is celtic in culture, and not roman - why would it be as it's not roman?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭Yoda


    One nice thing about the Catholic Churches (Roman, Anglican, and the various Orthodox varieties) is that they maintain a tradition of ordination and confirmation by laying on of hands by bishops in the apostolic succession.

    Of course it is possible to do that without having to give alliegence and taxes to the Bishop of Rome and his rather unprogressive agenda.

    In the absence of a Celtic Catholic church here it seems that a great many Roman Catholics are defecting to Anglican Catholicism. Or so I have heard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Originally posted by Yoda
    One nice thing about the Catholic Churches (Roman, Anglican, and the various Orthodox varieties) is that they maintain a tradition of ordination and confirmation by laying on of hands by bishops in the apostolic succession.

    Of course it is possible to do that without having to give alliegence and taxes to the Bishop of Rome and his rather unprogressive agenda.

    In the absence of a Celtic Catholic church here it seems that a great many Roman Catholics are defecting to Anglican Catholicism. Or so I have heard.

    Not that I have noticed..

    Just last night someone was telling me of a Anglican service specially for Limerick City.... "Of course the RCs never come" he said.


    It's probabily the case though that St. Patrick was sent, not to "bring Christianity to Ireland" (ireland already had churches), but to bring Papal / Roman authority. Wasn't he actually Welsh?

    1500 years ago is probabily too long and too much revision since of History to really know much about the "Pre-Roman See" Church in Ireland.

    Certianally even in Rome at once stage Celibacy was optional as is still in Eastern Orthodox (I think only Bishops etc have to be celibate).

    Certinaly long after Patrick the Church in Ireland still had a very Celtic flavor.

    Wasn't there a much later council at Lindisfarne or someplace else nr Yorkshire that finally "papered over" the division between practices in "Celtic" and "Roman" Church in the British Isles. I forget the date.

    Might have been as late as 1100s?


Advertisement