Signature Rules Violations

The Snitch™

The following users are in violation of the signature rules:

jammy_dodger
Image dimensions exceed limits (271 x 126)
http://members.boards.ie/youngnastyman/SIG%20DONE.jpg

Mr.Taz
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Tellox
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Samara
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Dr. Loon
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Sarky
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

TomTom
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Gordon
Sig contains more than one image.

de5p0i1er
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

elexes
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

honeymonster
Too many lines in sig.

the_syco
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Spike
Image dimensions exceed limits (215 x 129)
http://www.discountanime.com/np_newsimages/kohdbebop.jpg

CuLT
Image dimensions exceed limits (386 x 120)
http://homepage.eircom.net/~cult/anime/redys_sig_png.png

Mordeth
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Monty - the one and only
Sig contain [quote][/quote] tags.

cartman
Image dimensions exceed limits (316 x 78)
http://members.boards.ie/boober/cartman.gif

B-K-DzR
Sig contains animated gif. Sig contains more than one image.

lordsippa
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

The Snitch™

More signature violations:

sutty
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Leggo
Sig contains more than one image.

WhiteWashMan
Too many lines in sig. Includes font larger than size 2.

Thaed
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

koneko
Sig contains more than one image.

amp
Too many lines in sig.

Silverfish
Too many lines in sig.

Beruthiel
Sig contains more than one image.

Amz
Sig contains more than one image.

Serbian
Image dimensions exceed limits (170 x 129)
http://members.boards.ie/serbian/lex.gif

MDR
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Kharn
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

suppafly
Sig contains more than one image.

Strat
Sig contains more than one image.

Big Chief
Sig image exceeds file size limit (38.6k).

#MEAT#
Sig contains more than one image. Too many lines in sig.

denis_o_leary
Image dimensions exceed limits (120 x 142)
http://members.boards.ie/denis_o_leary/denislogo.jpg

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

Mordeth
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

sod off
4 lines at normal text size beehatch

ecksor

Keep up the good work citizen.

Gordon

The ninja in my sig is not worthy of being called a picture, however the kittencake in my sig is.

Bubbles that's you isn't it?

The Snitch™

More signature violations:

azezil
Too many lines in sig.

Dustaz
Sig contains more than one image.

solice
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

RopeDrink
Sig contains more than one image. Too many lines in sig.

Xian
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

DRakE
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

STaN
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

govinda
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

Dawntreader
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

AngelWhore
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

seamus
Sig contains more than one image. Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Wolf
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Minesajackdaniels
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Benbaz
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

thedrowner
Sig contains more than one image.

The'real'Guvnor
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

The_Scary_Man
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

sharkman
Image dimensions exceed limits (166 x 166)
http://members.boards.ie/sharkman/Sharkman.gif

DeVore *
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

* I assume admins are excempt from obeying the sig rules.[/size

Pigman II

Surely 'Tha Gopher's current sig should fall into this batch as well?

I'm not bothered with the size of it or the fact that he's more or less giving us all 'tha finger' but making pix out of ascii keys is SOOOO 1994!

Boston

tempted to change sig to I'm the snitch

CuLT

Originally posted by Boston
tempted to change sig to I'm the snitch

I'd be surprised if you did considering you too are a devious sig sinner :E .

TomTom

i've seen the error of my ways, well actully i did'nt, had to look really hard to discover it.

Carbiens

i thought SMAT had more or less disbanded

ill try and get you the smat sig if i can find it, so you can really play the part:D

Carbiens

here we go:



its starting all over again *titter*:D

Sangre

Nark.

Runfree

You Snitch!!!!

RunFree

PS. Im sure SMAT has disbanded.

seamus

Originally posted by The Snitch™
seamus
Sig contains more than one image. Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Well, that's just great...except that my signature is smaller and less annoying than yours. Oh well........

:rolleyes:

SMAT were disbanded for a reason.......

Asuka

See the majority of the time, the 'muppet' in SMAT referred to the members rather than their targets.

Having said that, I really dislike big sig muppets, its just that the way to solve the problem is not an ingratiating group of boards idiots.

A

The Snitch™

Retr0gamer
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size.

spandauballet
Too many lines in sig at wrong font size. Sig exceeds character limit per line.

Barry Aldwell
Sig contains more than one image.

BoobeR
Sig contains more than one image.

Ry
Image dimensions exceed limits (145 x 150)

Panda
Font Size in sig exceeds limt.

The Gopher
Sig exceeds character limit per line.

The Sweeper

Roffleroffleroffleroffleroffleroffle

*wheeze*

*breath*

...Roffleroffleroffleroffleroffleroffle


Actually, that's classic.

Runfree

Ummmm what is the story with this???

This some sort of joke???

Ecksor why did you encourage him???

Im sure it should be admins and Mods looking for this.

Could you not make an announcement to tell people to alter there sigs.

RunFree

ps. you are a little snitch!!!

ecksor

I encouraged him because it's hard to run a well-oiled nazi machine without some informants.

Runfree

Suppose it is. But would it not be easier to make an announcement for this kinda thing?

RunFree

elexes

when told to alter my sig as in past i have ... i have yet to be told .so untill such time my sig stands ... pfft works out to about 4 lines if i bother to press enter in it

The_Bullman

Originally posted by Cloud
you can't have both text and images.

Was this rule dropped?

Victor

Originally posted by The_Bullman
Was this rule dropped?

I don't lnow, but I have text and a load of images. I propose The Snitch™ be fired, for not being thorough.

ecksor

Originally posted by Runfree
Suppose it is. But would it not be easier to make an announcement for this kinda thing?

Ok, can you help me out with the wording though.

"Attention everyone, the snitch has nothing better to do with his long weekend than go around boards looking for signature violations. Be amused, be very amused ... "

Sangre

Originally posted by Victor
I don't lnow, but I have text and a load of images. I propose The Snitch™ be fired, for not being thorough.

I propose you add SMAT to your sig.

sceptre

Originally posted by ecksor
Attention everyone, the snitch has nothing better to do with his long weekend than go around boards looking for signature violations.

I suspect he's also rubbing himself and practising an evil laugh while twiddling with ALT+0153 from time to time


PS I am not the Snitch™.

Runfree

Originally posted by ecksor
Ok, can you help me out with the wording though.

"Attention everyone, the snitch has nothing better to do with his long weekend than go around boards looking for signature violations. Be amused, be very amused ... "

Well yea. Something like that. But if you want the Sig Rules to be takenb serious. Announce the name who are violating the rule.

Or maybe just don't do anything at all. It doesn't bother me at all but why should we have some muppet telling us that our sigs are breaking the rules.

RunFree

ecksor

Are you suggesting we should ban him?

Runfree

Originally posted by ecksor
Are you suggesting we should ban him?

No but why should a muppet tell us the Sig Rules. If some one is not happy with a Signature then they should complain to a Admin or perhaps the Mod of that forum to check out the signature.

I have seen quite a few Sigs that break the rules but quite frankly some of them are quite nice and I think if it doesn't bother anyone then they should be allowed to keep them.

The only time when I think a sig should be altered is if the contents are of improper use.

Such contents would include things such as Porn, improper language uses, too long a sig(like if it takes up half your screen) and big pictures(once again ones that take up half the screen).

Other than that I don't have a problem if a pic is a little too big or maybe 2 sentences too long.

Tell me your opinion Ecksor.

RunFree

Victor

Originally posted by Runfree
No but why should a muppet tell us the Sig Rules. If some one is not happy with a Signature then they should complain to a Admin or perhaps the Mod of that forum to check out the

Isn't that what happened?

ecksor

Well, if you don't think he should tell you that people are breaking the signature rules, then either I should ban him or edit/censor the posts. Otherwise what do you think I should do?

This is as good a place as any to let us know.

Runfree

Well I think editing the post might be a good idea.

Just in general I wouldn't like to have my name posted for breaking the rules. The other users of Boards.ie might get a different point of view of me if my name was posted and im sure people dont like gettting a bad reputation for such a small thing.

If he wants to complain he should either PM an Admin or the Mod in charge where he seen the Sig and then the Mod would contact an Admin to report them.

Please do tell me if you think I am wrong but that is my opinion.

RunFree

Boston

runfree, your a pain, way to suck the humor out of a thread.

The only time when I think a sig should be altered is if the contents are of improper use.

what if someone has an image, that has a huge file size, and takes ages to load, what then?

do you think I should do?

ecksor, I'd ike for you to hop up and down on one foot, chanting my name.

DeVore

They are not rules. They are approximations of the logic that goes on in 5 different peoples head when they individually evaluate sigs on a case by case basis.

Its just easier to call them "rules" I guess because "approximations of the logic that goes on in 5 different peoples head when they individually evaluate sigs on a case by case basis" gets really annoying to type after a while.

DeV.

Gordon

Runfree - you are feeding the trolls... one of which is ecksor

Boston

you sig seems to be in violation of the logic that goes on in 5 different peoples head when they individually evaluate sigs on a case by case basis, DeVore

ColinM

Can we have a forum for complaining about people's sigs?
It could be a sub-forum of the admin/feedback forum.
I think Runfree would probably be a good choice of moderator for it. That is my opinion of it at least anyway. Unless anyone disagrees?

Gordon

Interesting idea - I think maybe to add to that: Runfree should also be given special access to the Admin's mobile phone numbers so that he can alert them at all times to any signature, and indeed, other immediate problems needing fixed on boards.

ColinM

Well that might be going to far, Gordon. The admins may not want to be disturbed by phone, especially during the night.
However, that is just my opinion, and I could be wrong. It could be a good idea though too.

DeVore

Thank you for attending TrollCon VII.
This troll convention is over.

DeV.