Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

miniGPS versus Comreg

  • 09-07-2003 9:12am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 468 ✭✭


    I've been miniGPS for a few hours (on my Nokia 3650) and so far it has 'collected' 4 cell sites (masts).

    The weird thing is NONE of the cell ID's correspond to any of the cell ID's that are actually around me according to the Comreg Mobile Site Viewer

    Is one of them telling porkies or is there something else I don't understand about mobile mast denotation?


    ~~~~~~
    -Jim.
    http://mmsmemo.blogspot.com


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 468 ✭✭trap4


    Hopefully a few more of you have picked up 3650s at this stage?

    So could someone please download the free trial of MiniGPS and put me out of my misery ;)

    The more I travel and use this software the more it contradicts Comreg's site. What's up?

    -Jim.
    http://mmsmemo.blogspot.com


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭flywheel


    on the ComReg site all i can see are Site IDs, so for O2 and Voda i'm triangulated by Side IDs: 1664, 1640, 1205 and DNRD1, DNABS, 2082 respectively

    from miniGPS
    my the current Cell ID on O2 is 15529
    my the current Cell ID on Voda is 15314

    looks like they are two seperate identifiers - one for the operator's site where their mast is located and the other for the cell the handset is currently attached - so may suggest why the two sets of data (IDs) wouldn't correlate together?

    hth,
    BrianG


Advertisement