Baros not for sale

kdevitt

I know this was being mentioned yesterday - his agent just said he's not going anywhere
***

"I've talked to Liverpool manager Gerard Houllier and his stance is very clear. Milan is going nowhere," said agent Pavel Paska.

He also added: "Houllier is counting on a Michael Owen-Milan Baros attack next season."

p.pete

That's good news, although unless Mellor is better than I think he is I would still like another striker in there.

GuanYin

Originally posted by p.pete
I would still like another striker in there.

Sure how many strikers can you put on the pitch...*


* Taking into account that a GK, Hamann, Gerrard and at least 6 defenders will be in the team first.

jonno

Well that's a weight off. So if GH sees that attacking option does that mean he's giving up on Cisse:( And also where is Heskey going to fit in seen as how he sees his future at the club

p.pete

Originally posted by sykeirl
Sure how many strikers can you put on the pitch...*


* Taking into account that a GK, Hamann, Gerrard and at least 6 defenders will be in the team first.

That would make a maximum of 2.

Do the math ffs. We need an extra striker for the squad not necesarily to put all 3 on the pitch (unless we don't buy a left sided midfielder;) )

GuanYin

Originally posted by p.pete
That would make 2.

it would if I hadn't used the "at least" get out clause!

Originally posted by p.pete
(unless we don't buy a left sided midfielder;) )

Hehehe, silly p.pete, at Liverpool we call them "Left fullbacks"

p.pete

Originally posted by sykeirl

Hehehe, silly p.pete, at Liverpool we call them "Left fullbacks"

I thought the only club that you could use the "we" word in relation to was Notts Forest?

I'll edit my above post to be a maximum of 2 - would that suit sir?

GuanYin

Originally posted by p.pete
I thought the only club that you could use the "we" word in relation to was Notts Forest?

I'll edit my above post to be a maximum of 2 - would that suit sir?

A) Its Nottm Forest

It was a "royal" we

C) "a maximum of 2" is fine (tho' for brevity, I'd go with "at most 2"), as long as we're being pedantic

p.pete

Originally posted by sykeirl
A) Its Nottm Forest

It was a "royal" we

C) "a maximum of 2" is fine (tho' for brevity, I'd go with "at most 2"), as long as we're being pedantic

Excuse me, its Notts County isn't it? I'm always mixing up them clubs.

The royal version would surely have been "at Liverpool one calls them "Left fullbacks" ". Honestly, no lernin.

I got the impression you wanted to be pedantic from your earlier post, so I'm glad that one is sorted at least.

super_furry

I can't see the need for Cisse myself and wouldn't be disappointed if we don't get him. St Michael and Baros should be Liverpool's front two, with both Mellor and Heskey as the second choice.