Can sum1 do a ping check for me?

Stormfox1020

Hey if any of you have Eircom, or Netsource can you plz do a ping check to this server for mohaa, the ip is 216.127.86.26:12204 , if you need more info let me know, Thanx a million






Storm

Lockup

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 237ms, Maximum = 309ms, Average = 277ms

Netsource of course:D

bizmark

crist 277ms

thats only 100 better that 56k

dwayneburke

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=317ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=334ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 217ms, Maximum = 334ms, Average = 299ms


NETSOURCE!!!!!

melachi

Originally posted by bizmark
crist 277ms

thats only 100 better that 56k

Um, you need to take into consideration that the server is in the US.

2 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms c104-1.bas1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.104.1
]
3 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms fe0-1.edge1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.155.1
05]
4 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms pos5-0-0.core2.adl.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.19
2.246]
5 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms pos1-0-0.core1.the.london.eircom.net [159.134.19
1.102]
6 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms ge9-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.mfnx.net [195.66.226.76]
7 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.185.156.2]
8 109 ms 109 ms 110 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
9 100 ms 99 ms 110 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lga2.us.above.net [208.184.232.198]

10 119 ms 99 ms 109 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.246]
11 118 ms 119 ms 119 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.above.net [208.184.232.165]
12 136 ms 135 ms 129 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
13 130 ms 130 ms 129 ms 216.200.251.29.ev1.net [216.200.251.29]
14 129 ms 129 ms 129 ms 207.218.245.38
15 136 ms 129 ms 129 ms 216.127.86.26

United states server, hence the high ping.

Why anyone would want to play on a US server when they can play on a UK server with 100 ping less I've no idea.
Kind of deletes the purpose of being adsl and gaming ?

I'm on the EIRCOM err cheapest package. Don't know what stupid name they've got for it
I'm happy with it and the pings are stable day and night.

ando

C:\>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=290ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=290ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=311ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 290ms, Maximum = 320ms, Average = 302ms


do I have to tell you who it is?

Snaga

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
C:\>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 219ms, Maximum = 235ms, Average = 223ms
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
C:\>tracert 216.127.86.26

Tracing route to 216.127.86.26 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 93 ms 110 ms 93 ms ts523.cwt.esat.net [193.95.136.201]
2 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms vlan501.rt501.cwt.esat.net [193.95.137.124]
3 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms vlan51.rt001.cwt.esat.net [193.95.130.137]
4 93 ms 94 ms 94 ms ge1-0.core002.cwt.esat.net [193.95.129.2]
5 234 ms 141 ms 109 ms pos1-0.br002.ldn.esat.net [193.95.131.18]
6 109 ms 109 ms 125 ms ge9-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.mfnx.net [195.66.226.76]
7 110 ms 109 ms 125 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.185.156.2]
8 188 ms 187 ms 188 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
9 187 ms 188 ms 171 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lga2.us.mfnx.net [208.184.232.198]

10 187 ms 188 ms 187 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [216.200.127.145]

11 203 ms 203 ms 188 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.mfnx.net [208.184.232.165]
12 203 ms 219 ms 219 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
13 203 ms 219 ms 219 ms 216.200.251.61.ev1.net [216.200.251.61]
14 203 ms 219 ms 219 ms 207.218.245.38
15 219 ms 218 ms 219 ms 216.127.86.26

Trace complete.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

IOL Nolimits 56k - erm netsource isnt looking so good now is it

dod

C:\>tracert 216.127.86.26

Tracing route to 216.127.86.26 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 120 ms 111 ms 110 ms ts005.bmt.esat.net [193.95.142.227]
2 100 ms 111 ms 110 ms vlan101.rt001.bmt.esat.net [193.95.141.1]
3 100 ms 110 ms 111 ms ge1-0.core002.bmt.esat.net [193.95.140.2]
4 110 ms 120 ms 121 ms pos2-1.core002.cwt.esat.net [193.95.131.21]
5 130 ms 130 ms 131 ms pos1-0.br002.ldn.esat.net [193.95.131.18]
6 120 ms 201 ms 140 ms ge9-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.mfnx.net [195.66.226.76]
7 120 ms 131 ms 130 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.185.156.2]
8 201 ms 200 ms 200 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
9 200 ms 210 ms 201 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lga1.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.233]
10 200 ms 201 ms 190 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [216.200.127.145]

11 221 ms 240 ms 291 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.mfnx.net [208.184.232.165]
12 751 ms 240 ms 230 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
13 220 ms 230 ms 281 ms 216.200.251.61.ev1.net [216.200.251.61]
14 230 ms 231 ms 230 ms 207.218.245.38
15 241 ms 230 ms 230 ms 216.127.86.26

Trace complete.

C:\>

melachi

Netsource never looked good

Sloth

It's not netsource's fault, the signal goes off to the uk and then all the way off to America. You'll get the same results no matter what bb package your on.

Microsoft(R) Windows DOS
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001.

C:\DOCUME~1\KEVINO~1>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=49
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 177ms, Average = 174ms

C:\DOCUME~1\KEVINO~1>tracert 216.127.86.26

Tracing route to 216.127.86.26 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 65 ms 60 ms 57 ms rt004dub.netsource.ie [213.79.63.254]
2 65 ms 64 ms 59 ms rt001kil.netsource.ie [212.17.32.101]
3 64 ms 62 ms 61 ms t3-4-2-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [64.213.22.253]
4 71 ms 73 ms 70 ms pos9-0-2488M.cr1.LON3.gblx.net [67.17.66.5]
5 72 ms 74 ms 75 ms so6-0-0-2488M.ar2.LON3.gblx.net [67.17.66.2]
6 75 ms 75 ms 72 ms 902.ge6-1.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [208.185.188.65
]
7 73 ms 76 ms 76 ms pos5-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.above.net [208.185.156.14]
8 74 ms 72 ms 74 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.185.156.2]
9 148 ms 146 ms 150 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
10 152 ms 150 ms 147 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lga1.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.233]
11 164 ms 157 ms 145 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.246]
12 162 ms 157 ms 161 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.above.net [208.184.232.165]
13 177 ms 173 ms 178 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
14 169 ms 172 ms 181 ms 216.200.251.29.ev1.net [216.200.251.29]
15 177 ms 174 ms 176 ms 207.218.245.38
16 176 ms 172 ms 176 ms 216.127.86.26

Trace complete.

(Netsource SME)

Clover

eircom i-stream radsl

Microsoft(R) Windows 98
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.

C:\WINDOWS>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 134ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 135ms





Microsoft(R) Windows 98
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.

C:\WINDOWS>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 135ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 135ms

checked it twice + same result.

bkehoe

Clover, you seem to have RADSL. I've istream enhanced (ADSL) and my pings are almost exactly the same as Sloth's who is also on ADSL (Netsource).

Tracing route to 216.127.86.26 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.0.1.10
2 2 ms 3 ms 2 ms 10.0.1.20
3 7 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.0.1.100
4 56 ms 61 ms 58 ms virtual.bas1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.155.
4]
5 59 ms 58 ms 60 ms fe0-1.edge1.dbn.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.155.8
9]
6 75 ms 76 ms 76 ms pos5-0-0.core1.the.london.eircom.net [159.134.19
1.14]
7 76 ms 78 ms 76 ms ge9-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.mfnx.net [195.66.226.76]
8 78 ms 78 ms 78 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.185.156.2]
9 148 ms 147 ms 149 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
10 147 ms 147 ms 149 ms so-1-0-0.cr1.lga1.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.233]
11 148 ms 147 ms 151 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.246]
12 165 ms 165 ms 166 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.mfnx.net [208.184.232.165]
13 178 ms 176 ms 177 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
14 177 ms 174 ms 177 ms 216.200.251.29.ev1.net [216.200.251.29]
15 176 ms 175 ms 177 ms 207.218.245.38
16 178 ms 176 ms 179 ms 216.127.86.26

Trace complete.

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 174ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 176ms

Lockup

No big deal it seems either from US or UK. This is a tracert to clarity at 11:45am today.

Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms rfc1918.space.should.not.be.used.on.publicips [1
92.168.0.1]
2 149 ms 195 ms 206 ms rt004dub.netsource.ie [213.79.63.254]
3 140 ms 150 ms 161 ms rt001kil.netsource.ie [212.17.32.101]
4 184 ms 224 ms 217 ms t3-4-2-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [64.213.22.253]
5 212 ms 202 ms 186 ms pos9-0-2488M.cr1.LON3.gblx.net [67.17.66.5]
6 242 ms 218 ms 218 ms pos6-0-622M.ar2.LON2.gblx.net [67.17.66.10]
7 126 ms 132 ms 148 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.66.224.59]
8 187 ms 201 ms 212 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
9 192 ms 186 ms 161 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

Trace complete.

Maybe Netsource along with the filters and login details should also have provided a bucket to vomit into every time you use there RADSL service?

Stormfox1020

God Bless the souls who have Netsource RADSL, But there is a sign of hope considering its only a 2 month rolling contract or you could just upgrade to SME ADSL, No cap, Stable 60-70 pings, for 40 euros more, well its up to but to me thats the way to go. But thanks for doing the ping check for me

Storm

Sloth

Nooo....I'm happy with my 2:1 contention ratio, lets keep Netsource Business as the best kept secret ever
And yes I mean 2:1 as theres only one other person on my exchange with it.

Stormfox1020

lol, 2:1 damn. When my exchange is enabled ill be only one on it cuz theres hardly any buisnesses except like a butcher, and a shop and the rest are farmers. lol 1:1 Ratio

Clover

bkehoe i'm on the i-stream starter ( 54 yo-yo's ) pack . i thought it was adsl + not radsl, but the pings are good so i'll stay on it.

Rancid

A guy I know on Esat's business adsl (€109 per month) got 129...

Wish Esat would enable Phibsborough exchange and *I* could too...:(

bkehoe

Starter is RADSL .

Snaga

Originally posted by Sloth
It's not netsource's fault, the signal goes off to the uk and then all the way off to America. You'll get the same results no matter what bb package your on.

Sure it is, were talking about the radsl package not the SME package which seems just fine (my original trace goes via london to the us too, so why is it 100ms less?).

As noone here has provided a traceroute to the original IP from a netsource RADSL connection, Illl take the post by Lockup for comparison with a 56k modem connection.....

See above for Lockups traceroute, this ones mine.

---

C:\>tracert 195.149.21.11

Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 110 ms 109 ms 94 ms ts524.cwt.esat.net [193.95.136.202]
2 94 ms 125 ms 94 ms vlan501.rt502.cwt.esat.net [193.95.137.125]
3 109 ms 94 ms 94 ms vlan54.rt002.cwt.esat-x.com [193.95.130.161]
4 94 ms 93 ms 94 ms ge0-0.core002.cwt.esat.net [193.95.129.18]
5 125 ms 109 ms 125 ms pos1-0.br002.ldn.esat.net [193.95.131.18]
6 125 ms 109 ms 203 ms lon1-10.nildram.net [195.66.226.59]
7 203 ms 125 ms 109 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.149.20.130]
8 109 ms 109 ms 110 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
9 109 ms 125 ms 110 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

Trace complete.

---

The problem here(For Lockup) is that his first major hop hits 150ms straight away and never goes below that. While Im getting pings to the server itself at 110 - 125ms with the odd hop above that. There is a ~100ms difference between the RADSL package and my 56k modem in the latency to the first ip posted from the states and between 50 and 60ms difference to the clarity server over at jolt..

We know whats most likely causing it, the lack of backhaul bandwidth from the eircom exchanges to netsources core network. (as the 150ms hop is most likely the latency between the customer and netsources equipment, as its tunnelled over eircoms equipment we wont see the latency just between him and the exchange, but as eircom radsl customers arent having this problem the only point that differs in all cases is the backhaul.. )

Serbian

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=967ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=650ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=557ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=859ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 557ms, Maximum = 967ms, Average = 758ms

---

Tracing route to 216.127.86.26 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 14 ms 91 ms 11 ms 62.221.16.65
2 57 ms 501 ms 495 ms 195.26.12.61
3 116 ms 90 ms 33 ms f0-1-7.XP-Interxion.UK.COLT.NET [217.173.96.253]
4 41 ms 175 ms 184 ms DUB-DUB-T3P000612-s5-0-1-1.dub-1.ewn.dub.UK.COLT
.NET [217.173.96.217]
5 194 ms 34 ms 29 ms 217.173.97.121
6 215 ms 69 ms 36 ms pos1-0-oscar.LON.router.COLT.NET [212.74.64.18]
7 145 ms 39 ms 35 ms pos8-3.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [208.185.188.37]
8 32 ms 196 ms 242 ms pos5-0.mpr2.lhr1.uk.above.net [208.185.156.14]
9 53 ms 167 ms 34 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.185.156.2]
10 143 ms 109 ms 358 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
11 272 ms 219 ms 241 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lga2.us.above.net [208.184.232.198]
12 358 ms 707 ms 357 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.lga2.us.above.net [208.185.0.246]
13 346 ms 311 ms 586 ms pos0-0.er1.atl4.us.above.net [208.184.232.165]
14 358 ms 580 ms 207 ms so-3-0-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.25]
15 331 ms 324 ms 135 ms 216.200.251.61.ev1.net [216.200.251.61]
16 575 ms 255 ms 269 ms 207.218.245.38
17 440 ms 340 ms 160 ms 216.127.86.26

Trace complete.

---

That's on Irish Broadband. Netsource looks great to me :rolleyes:

Stormfox1020

Melachi How often do you play games over the internet im worrying about going over the cao with eircom cuz i play at least 4 hours a day of like BF1942, ill probably go for netsource SME higher pings but unlimited downloads. Sloth how do you find playin on American servers? You shouldnt lag to much with 170 ?

Dustaz

Your download cap will be fine when playing games. Search this forum for the info.


Why the hell are you playing on US servers? Theres Irish BF1942 servers and plenty of english MOHAA servers. Youll get a much better ping and you wont have to put up with americans

Stormfox1020

Lol i guess but i jus moved here from USA so all my fav servers are USA ones. Dustaz do u have Eircom Starter im gona go for that one

Stormfox1020

I jus play alot of games online and dont wana big surprize on my bill

Sangre

Irish broadband 512k


Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 145ms, Average = 136ms

Not too shabby.

Sloth

You can play on jolt with pings of 70ms or you can play on American servers with pings of 170ms. It's not really a tough choice.

Stormfox1020

Does 170 ping lag?

Anima

yes

Turner

I got average of 130ms
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping 216.127.86.26

Pinging 216.127.86.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=50
Reply from 216.127.86.26: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 216.127.86.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 133ms, Average = 130ms

C:\>



and yes it is an american server...

Name: Unknown
IP Address: 216.127.86.26
Location: Houston (29.761N, 95.361W)
Network: EVRY-BLK-10

OrgName: Everyones Internet, Inc.
OrgID: EVRY
Address: 2600 Southwest Frwy., Suite 500
City: Houston
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 77098
Country: US

NetRange: 216.127.64.0 - 216.127.95.255
CIDR: 216.127.64.0/19
NetName: EVRY-BLK-10
NetHandle: NET-216-127-64-0-1
Parent: NET-216-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.EV1.NET
NameServer: NS2.EV1.NET
Comment:
RegDate:
Updated: 2002-05-08.


Chief.

Stormfox1020

What service are you on cheif, Eircom I- Stream?

Turner

i-stream solo.

Sloth

Nice pings, at first look I thought they were off IBB or Esat BT.

Lockup

Thats excellent actually. I weighed up the pros and cons with Netsource and Eircoms Radsl service. Seem to regert more and more each day the fact that I choose Netsource.

Stormfox1020

Is solo the one with the 6GB cap or the 4GB cap?? I thought the 6GB cap one was ADSL not RADSL? But yes those pings are nice.