Skip to content
  • Register
    • Advertisement
    If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
    Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

    Father and daughter expect child together

    1356

    Comments

    • #62
      grumula
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 grumula
      ✭✭


      Dave! wrote: »
      If they didn't have the baby, and the male had a vasectomy, would the relationship still be sick? And why?

      Looking for rational reasons why, not just visceral repulsion ;)

      agreed, if the child production angle is taken outa the scenario there's a hell of a lot more to talk about,
      trying to remember the name of that australian philosopher bloke who does talks on this type of thing, arrgh, killing me, christopher something?


    • #63
      Captain_Generic
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,408 Captain_Generic
      ✭✭✭


      Deleted User wrote: »
      Seen an interesting documentary on this before.. Showed a few twins where it happened.

      You could just bate in the mirror


    • #64
      slarkin123
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 slarkin123
      ✭✭


      I'm not shocked about this, it seems to be becoming a frequent thing. I am shocked that there is a name for it and its recognized as a disease.


    • #65
      jackiebaron
      Closed Accounts Posts: 3,038 jackiebaron
      ✭✭✭


      robwen wrote: »
      sick bastards jail is to good for them they`d enjoy the rape too much in there, they should be just killed & removed from this earth just like the peadophiles

      Yeah this couple has committed such a heinous crime and are such a menace to society that they should face the death penalty. Do you actually do any thinking prior to spewing out such drivel?


    • #66
      johnn
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,772 johnn
      ✭✭✭


      This definitely reminds me of some similar kind of relationship, I just can't put my finger on it


    • Advertisement
    • #67
      Rayna Wailing Luck
      Posts: 0 Rayna Wailing Luck
      CMod ✭✭✭✭


      I dont think they should have the kid but other than that, if they wanna be odd off they go


    • #68
      hondasam
      Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 hondasam
      ✭✭✭✭


      It is wrong on all levels because the knew the were father and daughter.


    • #69
      johnn
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,772 johnn
      ✭✭✭


      bluewolf wrote: »
      I dont think they should have the kid but other than that, if they wanna be odd off they go

      No need for this type of ignorance, they're bringing a child into the world ffs :rolleyes: just cause it doesn't effect you doesn't make it right.


    • #70
      Scanlas The 2nd
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,144 Scanlas The 2nd
      ✭✭✭


      I say each to their own but once you start putting a baby at risk it's a different story.

      I wonder if the people who usually say each to their own would say the same thing assuming their was no risk of pregnancy.


    • #71
      Rayna Wailing Luck
      Posts: 0 Rayna Wailing Luck
      CMod ✭✭✭✭


      johnn wrote: »
      No need for this type of ignorance, they're bringing a child into the world ffs :rolleyes: just cause it doesn't effect you doesn't make it right.

      What on earth are you trying to say


    • Advertisement
    • #72
      hondasam
      Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 hondasam
      ✭✭✭✭


      robwen wrote: »
      sick bastards jail is to good for them they`d enjoy the rape too much in there, they should be just killed & removed from this earth just like the peadophiles

      while I don't think it is right I also do not agree with your comment. the are not paedophiles.


    • #73
      Bottle_of_Smoke
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 Bottle_of_Smoke
      ✭✭✭


      Dave! wrote: »
      If they didn't have the baby, and the male had a vasectomy, would the relationship still be sick? And why?

      Looking for rational reasons why, not just visceral repulsion ;)

      If there were a 100% safe contraception it would be fine. I don't think even vasectomy is 100%, think tubes can reattach or something


    • #74
      [Deleted User]
      Posts: 17,378 [Deleted User]
      ✭✭✭✭


      Captain_Generic wrote: »
      You could just bate in the mirror

      Yea, but now they can do it together so it would be like quadruplets..


    • #75
      flash1080
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,017 flash1080
      ✭✭✭


      this is arse wrote: »
      i don't see much difference between this and a homosexual relationship

      I got banned from AH for less than this comment.


    • #76
      hondasam
      Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 hondasam
      ✭✭✭✭


      this is arse wrote: »
      i don't see much difference between this and a homosexual relationship

      I don't understand what you mean by this comment.


    • #77
      Dave!
      Closed Accounts Posts: 27,856 Dave!
      ✭✭✭✭


      Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: »
      If there were a 100% safe contraception it would be fine. I don't think even vasectomy is 100%, think tubes can reattach or something
      hmmm, but then what about two unrelated people who get together, but one of them has a hereditary medical condition which is likely to be passed onto any offspring?

      I'm not sure what birth defects tend to result from incest, whether they're just cosmetic, or debilitating, or what. But for example haemophilia is hereditary, and I think autism has a large genetic component too, so you could have a child, knowing that their risk of these disorders is increased.

      So if we're being consistent, shouldn't we want these people to avoid reproduction too?

      </devil's advocate>


    • #78
      [Deleted User]
      Posts: 17,378 [Deleted User]
      ✭✭✭✭


      flash1080 wrote: »
      I got banned from AH for less than this comment.

      He didn't say what he thought about homosexual or incestual relationships so it's a nothing statement. He might be a fan of both or hate both.


    • #79
      Sinfonia
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 Sinfonia
      ✭✭✭


      The Article in the OP wrote:
      The couple claim that their attraction is the result of something called Genetic Sexual Attraction[...]GSA can affect parents separated from their own children at birth, as well as siblings. It does not refer to a genetic sexual attraction, but to the fact that people are genetically connected.
      Zuh?


    • #80
      johnn
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,772 johnn
      ✭✭✭


      flash1080 wrote: »
      I got banned from AH for less than this comment.

      Ban this lad for back-seat modding :rolleyes:


    • #81
      johnn
      Closed Accounts Posts: 1,772 johnn
      ✭✭✭


      bluewolf wrote: »
      What on earth are you trying to say

      You implied earlier that incest was your bag.


    • Advertisement
    • #82
      Mint Sauce
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 Mint Sauce
      ✭✭✭✭


      I stopped reading once I seen 'Irish Sun'. Up Untill that point I was thinking, 'Wrong, Sick, Ugh'.


    • #83
      Dave!
      Closed Accounts Posts: 27,856 Dave!
      ✭✭✭✭


      johnn wrote: »
      Ban this lad for back-seat modding :rolleyes:
      But... but... but... :eek:


    • #84
      [Deleted User]
      Posts: 17,378 [Deleted User]
      ✭✭✭✭


      johnn wrote: »
      Ban this lad for back-seat modding :rolleyes:

      Ironic statement is ironic.


    • #85
      Wolfe Tone
      Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 Wolfe Tone
      ✭✭✭✭


      Sick.... WTF is wrong with some people?


    • #86
      flash1080
      Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,017 flash1080
      ✭✭✭


      johnn wrote: »
      Ban this lad for back-seat modding :rolleyes:

      Ban this lad for back-seat modding :rolleyes:


    • #87
      My name is URL
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,237 My name is URL
      ✭✭✭✭


      Dave! wrote: »
      hmmm, but then what about two unrelated people who get together, but one of them has a hereditary medical condition which is likely to be passed onto any offspring?

      [...]

      shouldn't we want these people to avoid reproduction too?

      Yes.. why not?


    • #88
      [Deleted User]
      Posts: 17,378 [Deleted User]
      ✭✭✭✭


      Wolfe Tone wrote: »
      Sick.... WTF is wrong with some people?

      Genetic Sexual Attraction.


    • #89
      Rayna Wailing Luck
      Posts: 0 Rayna Wailing Luck
      CMod ✭✭✭✭


      johnn wrote: »
      You implied earlier that incest was your bag.

      No i didnt, stop trolling


    • #90
      Wolfe Tone
      Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 Wolfe Tone
      ✭✭✭✭


      Deleted User wrote: »
      Genetic Sexual Attraction.
      Yeah but they still have free will.


    • Advertisement
    • #91
      strobe
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 strobe
      ✭✭✭


      My name is URL wrote: »
      Yes.. why not?

      Eugenics ftw!


    Welcome!

    It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
    Sign In
    Register
    Advertisement