Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The dreaded Nespresso

  • 14-10-2008 12:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,513 ✭✭✭✭


    Was visiting the in-laws last weekend.
    Someone gave them a Migimix Nespresso machine (used).
    I was asked to figure it out.

    I tried an espresso with a purple capsule.
    Crema like a pint of Beamish.
    It even took time to settle!
    Taste wasn't bad - a little sour - but not bad (don't know how old the capsules were).

    Much as I loath to admit it:
    A Nespresso machine makes better coffee than the average person gets out of their Gaggia with their pre ground coffee and no clue.
    Or even better than my brother with good beans and a rubbish grinder that doesn't grind fine enough for his Gaggia baby.

    Now if only we could sort out the fact that one is tied to buying coffee from Nestle:mad:
    The price of the capsules:mad:
    The unrecyclableity (not a real word?) of the capsules:mad:
    Oh, and did I say, the fact that it's Nestle:mad:

    Ah, I'll sick to my Gaggia but they do make good coffee for the less enthusiastic.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 566 ✭✭✭TKK


    I've seen one of those capsule machines where you can get a reuseable capsule via ebay into which you can put your own coffee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    With expectations of what constitutes a good coffee among the average punter so low, it's no wonder these things seem to be selling so well.

    I imagine the creama was like a pint of Beamish alright - pale.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    RE*AC*TOR wrote: »
    With expectations of what constitutes a good coffee among the average punter so low, it's no wonder these things seem to be selling so well.

    I imagine the creama was like a pint of Beamish alright - pale.

    nope the cream is golden brown. nespresso isn't that bad to be fair, and the capsules basically cost 20 cents a pop. if like me you like an espresso from time to time, then this is not a bad way to do it. nowhere near perfect but not bad at all, and with the 20 odd variety of capsules on offer, you can pretty much find something you'll enjoy.

    and as for the unrecyclability, they can be recycled like all other aluminium products


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    I'm just being difficult.

    Well, sort of...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    if you're a purist, fair enough, this might not be for you. I really enjoy a good espresso from time to time and am happy to go and buy one, for the rest of the time a decent short shot of coffee like nespresso works well for me


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,330 ✭✭✭Gran Hermano


    I had one of these Nespresso machines in the room in a hotel I stayed in earlier this year - I do not rate them at all and I tried several different
    capsule types.

    some people like drinking nespresso
    some people like drinking instant
    some people like drinking their own urine

    ... I'll continue drinking proper coffee ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,513 ✭✭✭✭the beer revolu


    mmmm

    thought this would stir up some passion:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,330 ✭✭✭Gran Hermano


    mmmm

    thought this would stir up some passion:)

    If we didn't have passion (or taste) we'd drink nespresso


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,513 ✭✭✭✭the beer revolu


    I love the whole fuss of making proper espresso at home (except when I'm making coffee for 6 or 8 people!) but it's not for everybody and many people do it at home very badly.

    I do hate the whole Nespresso aggressive marketing and such (only Nespresso coffee machines in Brown Thomas Cork now) but if the system was available in a generic form (ie buy machine from anybody and the coffee from anybody) then I would recommend it for people who aren't passionate about making coffee but want 'café style' coffee at home.
    Results are better than the average Irish café.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,513 ✭✭✭✭the beer revolu



    and as for the unrecyclability, they can be recycled like all other aluminium products


    Someone told me that they couldn't be recycled (maybe wrong)
    and I was under the impression that they cost more like 30 cents a pop?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    Someone told me that they couldn't be recycled (maybe wrong)
    and I was under the impression that they cost more like 30 cents a pop?

    okay just checked the website and you're right, capsules are more like 30 cents but my wife (she buys them, as she drinks most of them) assures me there are promos all the time, buy 2 get 1 free etc...

    also according to the website, the capsules are 100% recyclable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    Charlie Brooker on Nespresso and marketing

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/nov/26/drink.comment

    Says it all really. It's about "the lifestyle".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    stimpson wrote: »
    Charlie Brooker on Nespresso and marketing

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/nov/26/drink.comment

    Says it all really. It's about "the lifestyle".

    that's a really crappy article, with its premise wrong just so he could say he went and had a look at their website. plenty of shops sell the capsules. I certainly agree that the marketing is absolute crap, and after looking at it once, i'll never look at it again.
    people want ease of use and simplicity. this does that very well. if the coffee's not good enough for people fair enough, but to judge a product by its marketing crap is laughable, and a bit sad...sign of the times though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    You've obviously not read Charlie Brooker before. It is written with a cynical slant. The point is that if people just wanted ease of use and simplicity they would be drinking instant coffee. Nespresso is Gold Blend for the noughites - style over substance.

    Personally, my issue with it is that you have no idea what's in the pods. How do you know the crema is not produced by adding surfactants to the pods??

    The reason I grind my own beans is the reason I brew my own beer - I know exactly what goes into it. The head on my beer is formed by the reaction between yeast and sugar not from a concoction of chemicals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    stimpson wrote: »
    You've obviously not read Charlie Brooker before. It is written with a cynical slant. The point is that if people just wanted ease of use and simplicity they would be drinking instant coffee. Nespresso is Gold Blend for the noughites - style over substance.

    Personally, my issue with it is that you have no idea what's in the pods. How do you know the crema is not produced by adding surfactants to the pods??

    The reason I grind my own beans is the reason I brew my own beer - I know exactly what goes into it. The head on my beer is formed by the reaction between yeast and sugar not from a concoction of chemicals.

    i get ya!! it tastes 100 times better than gold blend though:pac:

    i guess i'm not too picky when it comes to coffee and beer, but food would be a different matter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭Slaphead07


    Ah, I'll sick to my Gaggia but they do make good coffee for the less enthusiastic.

    The few times I've had a Nespresso, at meetings, shops and a mate's gaff (and he's a Michelin Star chef!) it's been ok. Certainly no worse than what's sold in most cafés as espresso. In fairness it is somewhat better than "Gold Blend for the noughties" and I was glad not to have been offered instant but it's no substitute for a proper cup of coffee either.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr Magnolia


    Slaphead07 wrote: »
    The few times I've had a Nespresso, at meetings, shops and a mate's gaff (and he's a Michelin Star chef!) it's been ok.

    I'm a bit shocked that he'd be using a Nespresso. What does he use at the restaurant* and how does he think it compares? How does he think it compares to other good coffee such as your own brew with the Gaggia Syncrony?


    *I assume he has a good set-up at he restaurant if it's rated with a star(s) by Michelin?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    I've had crap coffee in Michelin starred restaurants. It's common enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭Slaphead07



    *I assume he has a good set-up at he restaurant if it's rated with a star(s) by Michelin?

    He left the restaurant business quite some time ago. Obviously he's still an excellent chef and I was just a little surprised to see him using what I'd regard as a fashion item.

    How does he think it compares to other good coffee such as your own brew with the Gaggia Syncrony?
    Well remembered!
    Obviously the Syncrony isn't the best possible brew either, a compromise I'm happy to accept for now, but it's far far superior to Nespresso stuff. He enjoys a good coffee but he's not that bothered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    Oh dear God...



    Not only is Clooney an hypocritical corporate shill, the ad is directed by Michael Gondry.

    I wish I'd never joined this thread. (I'll still be going to the new Coen brothers flick this weekend though)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    The capsules may be marked 100% recyclable - but my local council don't accept any form of plastic other than bottles.

    Nespresso machines, and their like, are hugely popular over here in Belgium. Easily 1/2 of the coffee section in any supermarket is given over different forms of pods.

    I've had some coffee from those machines as some cafes here use them, and to be honest, it's fine. Nothing great, nothing bad. Average.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    dudara wrote: »
    The capsules may be marked 100% recyclable - but my local council don't accept any form of plastic other than bottles.

    I could be wrong, but anywhere that sells nespresso capsules should take them back as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    dudara wrote: »
    The capsules may be marked 100% recyclable - but my local council don't accept any form of plastic other than bottles.

    Nespresso machines, and their like, are hugely popular over here in Belgium. Easily 1/2 of the coffee section in any supermarket is given over different forms of pods.

    I've had some coffee from those machines as some cafes here use them, and to be honest, it's fine. Nothing great, nothing bad. Average.

    the capsules are aluminium and go in the green bins


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Morgans


    I remember reading Hestor Blumenthal has a nespresso machine in The Fat Pig restaurant.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/the-cult-of-nespresso-could-it-really-be-the-best-cup-of-coffee-money-can-buy-395944.html

    Not a huge fan of coffee but from what it reads like on here, the purists seem to take pride in their role of coffee snobs and regardless what Nespresso coffee tastes like it will be poo-pooed by the cognescenti. Convenience, cleanliness and consistency bedamned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    Oh dear god. Ok we get it! Out of all the options for mediocre coffee, Nespresso is the most convenient. Grand.

    Le Piat D'Or has always been very consistent too. Why bother with other wine?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Morgans


    It just struck me that it is strange that someone who suffers for his food and drink to the extent that Hestor Blumenthal does is satisfied with the spawn from nespresso. Yet from reading these forum is seems to be universally disgusted as being cheap poor rubbish. What piqued my interest was that recently I had a coffee after dinner that really hit the spot and it was nespresso based. Which shocked me after reading the stuff on here.

    Again, labelling Nespresso as simply convenient is part of the criticism. Throughout this thread you questioned the crema on the nespresso, even though the OP had made it clear that it was very acceptable another labelled it the new Gold Blend, and again you re-iterated your frustration in calling nespresso the most convenient mediocre coffee.

    I'm sure there are people out there who crab Bollinger and Dom Perignon champagne and wouldnt allow anything other than Krug to pass their lips. And I'm sure that is part of the fun of being passionate about coffee/wine/beer. Just because its is a step away from the most pure way of making coffee, the actual quality coming from nespresso machines appears to be underplayed by most on here. Each to their own of course.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr Magnolia


    Loads of people rave about starbucks too, doesn't mean it's the be all and end all. If you take an average of all the espressos served in cafes around the country then nespresso is probably above average. If people are happy with nespresso - that's genuinely great. I know full well that it doesn't compare with anything I'm brewing at home, or what most of the other regulars here are brewing up.

    The Fat Pig uses Nespresso, maybe they're just using it because they couldn't be arsed training their staff in the use of better machines. You can buy the best coffee in the world, if you haven't got a good barista to look after the pour then you're most likely going not going to get a good espresso.

    Now the marketing sceptic in me reckons they're using Nespresso because of the wonderful royalties that they're from getting from Nestle for that piece of advertising gold, but hey, who am I to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Morgans


    Mr Magnolia. I think that attitude is very fair, and I think that you are very right to be cynical about nespresso being able to point to Heston Blumenthal as a supporter. If Mr Blumenthal served Starbucks as his coffee you'd have to question.

    Nespresso above average but not suitable for purists. And not good enough for the most discerning coffee drinkers is a fair assessment I would suggest. I'm sure those who brew their own can and do make superior coffee. If people thinking that by buying a Nespresso that they are getting the ultimate coffee experience, then they are idiotic. From my experience in restaurants that serve Nespresso, its a good way above Starbucks, Gold Blend etc.

    That is a long way from the idea that Nespresso is muck that seems to be universally accepted through the forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    The point is that it's not just a step away from how to make a proper cup of coffee - it's miles away. You have limited bean choices, it's not freshly roasted, it's not freshly ground, you don't know what else is in the capsules, it's made at too high a presure (19 bar I believe) and sold by a company almost universally regarded as one of the most evil of all multinationals.

    I'm unlikely to go out an purchase a Nespresso machine just because Blumenthal has one, he seems to get column inches in the Nespresso magazine and I'm sure it's sold to the Fat Pig demographic. How can he loose?

    I stand over my comparisons to Gold Blend as far as marketing goes. I'm sure it's a far superior drink to Gold Blend in the way that lighter fluid is a far superior drink to meths. Well, maybe thats overstating the case a little :) If you were on a Ferarri forum and suggested that a Ford Mondeo was a almost as good because it was better than avarage you'd be laughed at.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Morgans


    Ok. I'll add lighter fluid to the list of drinks that nespresso is compared to. :D

    I think the wine (le piat d'Or was mentioned earlier) is far better example. Nepsresso isnt Blue Nun or the boxed wine of the 80s but its hardly the greatest example of coffee in the world.

    While I agree with Mr Magnolia in being skeptical about Hestor Blumenthal's motivations, it still would be a huge departure from everything Ive seen and read about the man, something out of character for him to serve up "lighter fluid" to his customers, regardless of the possible perks. I think its a big leap to think that because he is serving Nespresso its becuase he is sponsored to do so. Maybe, just maybe its not as bad as some purists believe or this forum suggests.

    I am not a nespresso salesman :D, and the idea the capsules are more expensive online than in BT is off.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr Magnolia


    I haven't seen much of Hestor Blumenthal to be honest. I do watch a a considerable number of programs on food, he's someone that doesn't appeal to me generally though.

    What I did pick up from a show of his on 'the perfect cheese burger' was the depths he went to to ensure every integral element of the burger was of the highest quality and prepared in most accurtate manner. This is comparable to what a lot of the regular users here dedicate their time to in coffee preparation; sourcing recommended/tried&tested beans, roasting them to the desired profile, grinding them to an accurate level, ensuring the machine is operating at the desired temperature/pressure, distribution of the grind in the basket, tamp pressure, flow rates etc. etc...

    For Hestor Blumenthal to go to similar depths with his food and then serve up Nespresso is beyond me.

    Also, liebfraumilch FTW!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭Slaphead07


    Nespresso may not be the purest coffee around but the reality is that it's not that bad at all. I've only ever had it about 5 times but I always been surprised at how drinkable it was.
    The first time I was in BTs getting descaler and some pretty young girl asked if I'd like to sample something, a bit forward I thought but I have the good boxers on so..... anyway, she showed me her selection of little metal capsules each with their own distinctive flavour and I picked the first one on the basis that it would all be muck anyway. It was ok, full espresso flavour with little bitterness... "try another sir?" Well they don't call me Mr Two Times for nothing... I tried a different flavour and it was much the same.... ok. Bottom line? I didn't feel the need to walk over to D&Cs for a real espresso.
    Maybe their ad campaign should be.... "Nespresso- it's better than instant anyway"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34 MarcoB


    RE*AC*TOR wrote: »
    I've had crap coffee in Michelin starred restaurants. It's common enough.
    I have heard a barista saying espresso based milk drinks should not be sold in restaurants, as they are usually made in the backroom and would/should be too cold by the time they are served. But in Ireland & the UK they steam the milk to death to keep it hot, since customers are used to sipping a drink over a chat. While in Italy I hear in coffeshops it is served immediately and drank immediately by customers.
    Loads of people rave about starbucks too, doesn't mean it's the be all and end all. If you take an average of all the espressos served in cafes around the country then nespresso is probably above average.
    Exactly people know the "brand", so know what to expect. Most hotels or cafes serve very poor drinks, usually steamed to death. I found the nespresso consistent.
    stimpson wrote: »
    it's made at too high a presure (19 bar I believe)
    You could similarly say the Clover brews coffee far too quicky, it is not in accordance with published "guidelines", but these guidelines have to change with new technologies. It probably did not come out as good at lower pressures, (or it came out even worse if you prefer ;))
    What I did pick up from a show of his on 'the perfect cheese burger' was the depths he went to to ensure every integral element of the burger was of the highest quality and prepared in most accurtate manner.
    A lot of mcdonalds fans would probably not like his "perfect burger", I know people who eat only easy singles. The biggest selling beers would be regarded as muck by beer experts. They are consitent though, and people travelling abroad know what to get if they order a big mac, pint of bud or nespresso no matter if they are in London or Timbuktu.

    Also I expect some purists may have the decision already made up in their minds before drinking it, a proper blind tasting would be better. I design coffee machines and have been told time and time again how machine appearance is very important, and that coffee can "taste great from a great looking machine".

    I also think many get nespressos at home or in the office under the perception that only cappucino or lattes are "real" coffee anymore, and turn their nose up at filter coffee. I visited the european coffee brewing centre in Norway, there were literally hundreds of machines in the place. The main guy testing machines & coffee was still using his trusty 30 year old filter/pourover brewer at lunchtime saying it was still the best output.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    MarcoB wrote: »
    You could similarly say the Clover brews coffee far too quicky, it is not in accordance with published "guidelines", but these guidelines have to change with new technologies. It probably did not come out as good at lower pressures, (or it came out even worse if you prefer ;))

    The Clover is a different type of machine for a different type of coffee. We're talking about Espresso.

    Some of us have gone to the trouble of adjusting the OPV in our machines from the 12 bar set at the factory (for ESE pod certification) to 9 bar to ensure proper extraction and you really can taste the difference in the shot. I fail to see how Nespresso machines can produce a real espresso shot with this high a pressure.
    I design coffee machines and have been told time and time again how machine appearance is very important, and that coffee can "taste great from a great looking machine".

    So how the machine looks is more important than the coffee it produces?? So are you saying it really is style over substance?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34 MarcoB


    stimpson wrote: »
    The Clover is a different type of machine for a different type of coffee. We're talking about Espresso.
    I know it is not espresso, but what would you call the coffee a clover produces? Many would call it a french press style. My point is the guidelines for new technology may not match the current "recommended guidelines" for particular brewing methods. The clover probably uses far more coffee and brews far too quickly in accordance with traditional french press recommendations.

    That is my point with the Nespresso, it is a different system trying to emulate a traditional espresso, and it seems the makers found that 19bar gave the best results. Like clover found out you have to use more coffee if brewing in such short times.
    I fail to see how Nespresso machines can produce a real espresso shot with this high a pressure.
    A similar statement could be said about the clover, regarding its high dose or quick brewtime, that it cannot produce a "real" french press coffee.
    So how the machine looks is more important than the coffee it produces?? So are you saying it really is style over substance?
    I just said looks are important, and some would value style over substance in a lot of products, nothing new there. Look at ipod sales when better units might be out there, I know people who bought apple macs over a PC because they "look nice". I am sure Nestle did their research and calculated that hiring George Clooney would sell more machines, that some people would value the association more than the quality of the coffee.

    I said I have been told coffee can "taste great from a great looking machine". There is not much to look at when drinking a filter coffee, I would compare the visual aspect of the machine to plate presentation of food in a restaurant, or latte art, the visual presentation can affect peoples enjoyment and the percieved quality of the product. In this case they may look at a nice machine and expect a nice coffee out of it, conciously or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    MarcoB wrote: »
    That is my point with the Nespresso, it is a different system trying to emulate a traditional espresso, and it seems the makers found that 19bar gave the best results.

    But they maintain that it's "the perfect espresso" - not an emulation.

    The question is how do Nestle define best results?? I assume it's like supermarkets purchasing vegetables based on how they look, not how they taste. If they find the crema has more volume at 19 bar and it works well in focus groups because people think more equals better, then that's what they will do, quality of the coffee is secondary.

    At the end of the day, it's about making a tasty beverage. Formation of good crema from a real espresso machine is a sign of good extraction and there is far more to be learned from the crema than just looking at volume. You can detect problems with the grind, the temperature, the freshness of the bean, uniformity of the tamp. It may produce better coffee than instant. It my be indistinguishable to most people from real espresso. In fact, it's probably better coffee than most people could make with a real grinder and real espresso machine. If people are happy to settle for a homogeneous coffee that's fine.

    But for me it's about fresh beans. I can't see how pre-ground coffee in air tight capsules, packed in a factory months previously can hold a candle to freshly roasted beans ground seconds before the shot is pulled. And the thing that worries me is that if they can produce such good results with old coffee, then what else goes into the pods to make it work???

    So Marco, you say you design coffee machines - do you design Nespresso machines? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    The crema comment was only a joke as someone said it look like a pint of Beamish.

    Crema CAN be an indication of good espresso, but I've made plenty of good looking espressos in my time that tasted not great.

    I've never tasted Nespresso, maybe I will someday. It's not on my to-do list. Preground (stale) coffee, extracting at 19bar pressure is not something that interests me to be honest. If you like Nespresso more power to you.

    I will say one last thing, however. The bar for "good" espresso is set incredibly low. What constitutes espresso in 90% plus of cafés in Ireland is little more than dreck.

    As for Heston Blumenthal - here's a quote from him:

    "Like any other busy restaurant, we have neither the space, time or staff to devote to large, traditional espresso machines, nor the skills required to achieve perfection time after time."

    I never order coffee after a meal in ANY restaurant. I know it'll be crap. Port FTW!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭Victor_M


    I have been pleasantly surprised by the output from a Nespresso machine, like most on here I presumed it was going to be rubbish and a marketing gimmick.

    For those out there who want a hassle free reasonably tasty coffee as they run out the door, its probably the most convenient solution.

    I personally like the process involved in making a nice shot in the morning, the mess, the noise from the grinder, the tamping etc, Nespresso will always just be a grand coffee to anyone who has ever tasted a great coffee, but as the vast majority of people I suspect have never tasted a great coffee they don't know any different.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,330 ✭✭✭Gran Hermano


    And if you buy a Nespresso you'll never get a 'great' coffee.
    Seems like certain people fond of Nespresso are happy being 'average' ;)

    Maybe I should free up the space on my kitchen counter, throw out all
    the coffee equipment I've collected over the years, regain the 10 hours
    per week I spend reading up on coffee, roasting coffee, making coffee and
    shopping for beans and other coffee items. Maybe i should convince
    myself that freshly roasted, freshly ground and properly made espresso
    is not worth the effort and maybe I should just settle for mediocore and
    average. Maybe Nespresso is good because George Clooney and such
    others know what they are talking about as opposed to just banking their
    fees for advertising a product.

    I found the article in the Independent a load of pony, the only part I'd
    agree with is it's first line "It's a marketing man's dream..." that's all
    a Nespresso is in my opinion. The author of that article over exaggerates
    what is involved in making an espresso in a domestic setting.
    You do not need a machine the size of a Nissan Micra nor does it take
    half an hour to clean up after using a traditional/proper espresso machine.
    If you can't make a traditional espresso without 'covering every surface in
    discarded coffee grounds" maybe it's time to bring your guide dog for a walk.

    As I already mentioned I had a Nespresso machine with a wide selection of
    capsules provided in-room in a hotel I stayed in for 2 weeks this summer.
    I tried it on several occasions and it didn't cut the mustard.

    If you're used to drinking instant or badly made espresso a Nespresso
    will most likely appeal to you (as long as you're happy with being Mr Average)
    If you have tasted real espresso you'll be best to avoid the Naff-presso.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭antoniosicily


    Now, let's take this seriously.

    I agree that the bar for espresso in Ireland is really low, I've been in Ireland for three years now and I remember only 4 or 5 good espresso, the other things were just rubbish; espresso is SHORT, it's not hot water that tastes of coffee, the smallest cup you have (the one for espresso), no more than two fingers; even two fingers of coffee in Italy would be considered a long espresso.

    Talking of quality, I really don't know what you're doing when you people are at home, for what it concerns me you can even plant and grow coffee, that won't make your coffee better, industrial toasting of coffee is better than your own toasting, due to temperatures (first of all), and other things.
    In Italy almost every city has a place called torrefaction and some people buy the coffee there, the best espresso is the result of a mix of coffee types.

    Anyway, trying to stay in topic, I've a nespresso myself and I drink around 3 espresso a day, in my opinion it makes the best coffee you can make at home and FAR MORE BETTER than what you can get in a typical restaurant in Ireland. It's close to the one which you can drink in a bar in Italy but it's not the same because they do lots of coffee a day and their machines are always on and making coffee (and they're also better than a nespresso though).

    Coffee in pods don't mean 'stale' coffee, guys we are in 2008, there are ways to preserve the aromas, again, grinding the coffee by yourself won't result in a better coffee because you make everything at home.

    If you still have doubts you can invite me and I'd be more than happy to drink and test =)

    Cheers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    Thanks for the invite Antonio.

    But many of the things you say are half truths or clichés. There is far more wrong with coffee in Ireland than the volume (although that is a big problem). Lack of technique, lack of proper hygeine, stale stale coffee etc.

    Industrial roasting of coffee of course SHOULD be better. If the roaster is a good one it almost certainly WILL be better. A lot also comes down to the quality of the beans though, many industrial roasters use low quality (filler) beans. I've had home roasted espresso at home that beats the pants off even the better espresso available out there. There is a place for home-roasting, but if I had a choice I would go for beans roasted by a professional at the top of his game, who uses top quality beans, etc. (these are harder to find - and certainly do not include the majority of roasters).

    The best espresso is NOT always a mix of coffee. Some single origin espressos are stunning. I was at an espresso tasting event in London just this week. There were 5 espresso "blends" on offer, and the overwhelming winner (about 80% of the people chose it as their favourite) was a single origin. The other 4 coffees were blends.

    Nespresso is most likely better than you get in restaurants in Ireland, that is not in debate.
    Coffee in pods does mean stale coffee. You can use various techniques to slow the process, but coffee will still stale over time no matter what you do to it. Just pick up a can of Illy beans off a supermarket shelf - they flush their cans with Nitrogen, and are world leaders into researching how to keep coffee fresh longer. But if you make coffee with a can of illy or with some truly fresh beans the difference is easy to see.

    It doesn't matter if it's 2008 or 1950, coffee is still coffee, the parts that make up the flavour are still volatile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭Morgans


    RE*AC*TOR wrote: »
    Nespresso is most likely better than you get in restaurants in Ireland, that is not in debate.

    Well that was my problem with the attitude to Nespresso on here. As i said earlier, I have no doubt that Nespresso does not satify purists, but now it seems that the hyperbole used to describe its outputs - lighter fluid, gold blend muck etc - is softening. I don't doubt the the thousands of euro worth of machinery that the coffee aficionado has on their kitchen counter will not be replaced by the approx 200-300 nespresso machine. It is strange the amount of bad press given to nespressos on here by people who havent tried their product. Maybe if they were willing to spend the money to get the correct roaster, grinder etc, and have the time to experiment with pressure and time settings, they might find out what the perfect cup of coffee tastes like. Nespresso seems to provides a viable alternative to the person who likes coffee (to a level maybe superior to coffee house coffee) but doesnt have the time, discipline, energy needed to perfect the art. I wouldnt think it ever was designed to convert the coffee aficionados.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭boardswalker


    This thread reminds me of the standard question when teaching TQM - which is better a Rolls Royce or a mini. The preferred answer is that it depends on what the customer is looking for.
    If the customer wants the absolutely best tasting espresso and is prepared to put signifcant work in then the Gaggia or equivalent is the best.
    If the customer wants a decent espresso with minimal effort then nespresso wins hands down.
    So if you have way too much time on your hands then buy the Gaggia! (looking frantically for symbol for tongue in cheek!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,608 ✭✭✭Victor_M


    This thread reminds me of the standard question when teaching TQM - which is better a Rolls Royce or a mini. The preferred answer is that it depends on what the customer is looking for.
    If the customer wants the absolutely best tasting espresso and is prepared to put signifcant work in then the Gaggia or equivalent is the best.
    If the customer wants a decent espresso with minimal effort then nespresso wins hands down.
    So if you have way too much time on your hands then buy the Gaggia! (looking frantically for symbol for tongue in cheek!)

    In fairness that pretty much sums it up.
    I get laughed at by most of my friends and family who see the effort I go to to serve up a decent coffee, even the whole pre warming of the cups is a laughing matter to most, but to me (who is a slightly obsessive compulsive perfectionist it has to be said) it one of the most important steps (why bother going to all the trouble to serve a cold coffee)

    Sometimes ignorance is bliss, if I didn't know that there was a much better alternative to Starbucks I'd still be happy to guzzle my grande latte thinking it was coffee nirvana, instead of muttering to myself that I can make a better latte at home and wondering why the hell have I just paid 5 Euro for this muck:p

    As with most things in life, there is a disproportionate amount of either effort or cost required to get the best of anything, not just coffee (laws of diminishing returns and all that), some people see this effort as more than worthwhile, basically , unless you are going to do it right there is no point in doing it at all!

    But most people as I said are happy to take the easy option and this is where Nespresso/microwaves/frozen dinners/take aways etc come into it, you always get a more satisfying, tasty result if you prepare at home, using fresh ingredients and the right equipment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34 MarcoB


    stimpson wrote: »
    But they maintain that it's "the perfect espresso" - not an emulation.
    I would not expect anything else from their marketing people! They have developed a machine that attempts to make what a human usually does under different operating conditions. Do you have an exact definition of what an espresso is? it seems you might have guidelines that exclude their product immediately from qualifying as an espresso. And therefore it is a simple case of your definition differing from theirs. Cadburys label dairy milk as chocolate, yet it does not fall under many peoples definition of real chocolate since it has far too little cocoa. Many beer lovers would not consider Budweiser to be a real beer, as it contains rice.
    stimpson wrote: »
    The question is how do Nestle define best results?? I assume it's like supermarkets purchasing vegetables based on how they look, not how they taste. If they find the crema has more volume at 19 bar and it works well in focus groups because people think more equals better, then that's what they will do, quality of the coffee is secondary.
    That could well be the case, and I presume they will do whatever gets the biggest profit. If people are used to drinking poor espressos, then they might consider that the norm, so if an Nespresso produces an identically poor coffee then the person might have said it did a good job, i.e. emulating what they are used to getting. Many home beer brewers will try and get kits to emulate the Budweiser that they know & love.

    They may have compacted the ground beans in some way to keep them fresher, in which case it might need more pressure to work well. As people keep saying they do not know what is in the pods, they probably do not fully understand all of the mechanics and physics involved either.

    In my workplace we have traditional machines, filter brewers, bean to cup automatic machines, and lots of good coffee freely available to everybody BUT one worker still brings in "tesco value instant coffee", no joke, it is simply what they prefer, others have their gold blend etc.

    stimpson wrote: »
    So Marco, you say you design coffee machines - do you design Nespresso machines? :)
    :D Mainly bulk filter brewers. Sometimes we are given a machine (or even a cold coffee sample) which a customer currently uses, with their particular coffee and we are asked to adjust one of our machines in such a way to replicate the coffee. I am not that good at comparing/tasting coffees. We do have an employee who is a WBC judge though who will give a guide as to what must be changed. We would compare the TDS (totally dissolved solids), pH, brewing temperatures, sprayhead design, basket design etc and try to mimic what they are currently getting.

    You said earlier you adjust your machine from its factory settings. I can understand this, a lot of the time factory settings are not intended to produce the best coffee. Many customers want to simply maximise profit, so some machines factory settings are to squeeze every last bit out of the bean, to produce the most, rather than the best coffee. Some of our machines have settings to maximise coffee quality, e.g. temperature control, while some customers value this others turn the feature off since they can limit the machine in other ways (e.g. getting hot water to clean floors with)

    I have done SCAE gold cup testing on several machines, along with ECBC testing. Amongst various parameters, the SCAE "gold cup" requires a particular coffee/water ratio, and a lot of coffee shops simply do not use enough coffee to qualify. They finely grind the coffee, over roast, extend the brew times etc all to squeeze the maximum out of the coffee. The long brew times & high temperatures are often over the gold cup requirements too.

    Of course some customers have coffee quality as the top priority, I am currently designing at unit to dispense water at exact temperatures, to suit particular coffee, it can dispense 1litre at +/-0.1C of your desired setting. Usually these are basrista owned outlets who have a very good reputation.
    Victor_M wrote: »
    I get laughed at by most of my friends and family who see the effort I go to....
    But most people as I said are happy to take the easy option and this is where Nespresso/microwaves/frozen dinners/take aways etc come into it, you always get a more satisfying, tasty result if you prepare at home, using fresh ingredients and the right equipment.
    Yes, a lot of people's main or sole requirement when drinking coffee is to get a caffeine hit. Just like people drink Bud to get drunk, and eat junk/bland food to fuel themselves. Taste & quality is not of such a high concern to many people, and so they find it amusing how some people do dedicate a lot of time to it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 coffeeman


    Forums like this one really make me laugh:D..........Why you ask?
    Well i'll tell ya.......

    BECAUSE NOBODY KNOWS THEIR FACTS!!

    Fact 1: Nothing but 100% freshly ground coffee in the capsules,
    Fact 2: Capsules 100% recyclable
    Fact 3: Crema produced by 19bar pressure pump
    Fact 4: Clean,quality coffee,consistent coffee,ease of use,
    Fact 5: Great customer service in Cork Boutique
    Fact 6: Work with "Rain Forest Alliance"to source their beans

    Have been a member of Nespresso for over 1year and am very happy, anybody who has any doubts please visit their website www.nespresso.com before making judement.

    ........and NO i don't work for Nespresso:) simply a very satisfied customer


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr Magnolia


    Welcome to boards. As I said in my first post on this thread, I've no problem with people who enjoy nespresso, if they're happy then that's fine.

    coffeeman wrote: »

    Fact 1: Nothing but 100% freshly ground coffee in the capsules,

    Can you link to an article back that up please, interesting reading for me?
    Fact 2: Capsules 100% recyclable

    Think that was pointed out earlier in the thread, fair enough though.
    Fact 3: Crema produced by 19bar pressure pump

    This is not a _good_ thing. Ideal coffee extraction for espresso happens between 8.5 and 9 barg. It's hotly contested but this is a widely accepted parameter. 19 barg is waaay too high.
    Fact 4: Clean,quality coffee,consistent coffee,ease of use,

    Mostly fine, the quality statement is highly contentious, each to theirs.
    Fact 5: Great customer service in Cork Boutique

    Never used them, I'll take your word for it.
    Fact 6: Work with "Rain Forest Alliance"to source their beans

    Very good, don't know what that means they do with the Rain Forest Alliance though.
    ........and NO i don't work for Nespresso simply a very satisfied customer

    I hope so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭stimpson


    The Rainforest Alliance allow their logo to be used with as little as 30% Alliance grown coffee. They do not guarantee a minimum price (as Fair Trade do) and the only specify that labourers must be paid the national minimum wage. Can you say "marketing exercise"??

    Where does it say they only put ground coffee in the pods? I can't seem to find it on the website. They do claim that it stays fresh for 9 months. I wonder how they define fresh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    What a load of balls.

    I call shill.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 9,658 Mod ✭✭✭✭mayordenis


    I wouldn't beat my greatest enemy to death with one of these, There's murder and then there's socially unacceptable insults.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement