Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Series expansion by integrating

  • 31-01-2009 2:25pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1


    If we define operator T be an integration from 0 to x we find:

    Te^x = e^x - 1

    1 = e^x - Te^x

    = (1 - T)e^x

    inverting:

    e^x = 1/(1-T) . 1

    = (1 + T + T² + T³ ...) . 1

    = 1 + x + x²/2! + x³/3! ...

    :pac:

    Also

    cosx = 1/(1+T²) . 1

    sinx = 1/(1+T²) . x


Comments

  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    *Sweet 16* wrote: »
    e^x = 1/(1-T) . 1

    I don't think this is valid, but, I could be wrong. The right side of the equation is an operator while the left side is a function of x. I don't think that can be so, or am I mistaken?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 Kryx


    = (1 - T)e^x

    Not sure you can do that, grouping operator and function!

    The 1 in the bracket would have to become its equivillant in terms of T in the respected constraints. Can't be bothered doing it now.

    Think thats right:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Is there a question here or did you just feel like dropping some maths?

    This kind of thing pops up in deriving numerical schemes for the heat diffusion equation. You can take formal power series of operators rigorously, though all I know is that "It works". Can't say I've ever seen a mathematical rationale for the idea.

    I guess "1" just becomes the identity operator rather than a function here.


Advertisement