What would you do with Tim Tebow?

Hazys · 20-03-2012 5:38pm

Tebow to San Fran...id expect Randy Moss to retire within minutes of that press release.

TimThomas · 20-03-2012 5:43pm

Anyone who thinks the 49ers will take Tebow is nuts. Harbaugh wont touch Tebow.

adrian522 · 20-03-2012 5:55pm

Yeah, I'd say you're right, was just surprised to see that tweet from Schefter. Same goes for Green Bay, don't know what they'd use him for either.

JaMarcus Hustle · 20-03-2012 7:10pm

Mike Kafka is a saint. Won me my most exciting bet ever in preseason 2 years ago

spiralism · 20-03-2012 7:13pm

JaMarcus Hustle wrote: »

Mike Kafka is a saint. Won me my most exciting bet ever in preseason 2 years ago

most exciting ever bet? what about the one about the Pats hammering the Orlovsky led colts?

couldnt resist, sorry :pac:

barbarians · 20-03-2012 7:31pm

If I were the Broncos, I'd keep Tebow.

At best, they'll only get a second round pick for him anyway so they won't be getting much value for him anyway. If Manning is on form there be won't any QB controversy as the Broncos fans are hardly going to start calling for Tebow instead of Manning. Tebow would hardly be a disruptive influence in the locker room and the time spent as a back-up may help him as he'll have more time to practise his throwing and can learn from a modern-day great. Tebow could be used in garbage time at the end of games to practise his throwing in a competitive environment so the Broncos could even have Tebow to take over from Manning when he retires. (Bit unrealistic I know.)

Also, in a doomsday scenario if Manning gets injured again or isn't up to speed at least Tebow will be there as a back-up. No point having a $90 million QB if he can't throw the ball. Nobody really knows will Manning be able to withstand a big hit from a linebacker and play on without his game suffering from it. The Broncos have to play some tough defendes too this season (Steelers,Texans, Ravens) so at least if Manning does get injured again Tebow is there to step in.

Syferus · 20-03-2012 7:37pm

49ers actually makes alot of sense within the context of Harbaugh's conservative passing schemes last year. Tebow could slot into that role and open up the run game as well. Tebow doesn't turn the ball over very often.

With Harbaugh to develop him he couldn't be in a better situation than that. Still a long shot given Smith will eventually sign with the 49ers, but it's certainly intriguing.

HigginsJ · 20-03-2012 7:40pm

Syferus wrote: »

49ers actually makes alot of sense within the context of Harbaugh's conservative passing schemes last year. Tebow could slot into that role and open up the run game as well. Tebow doesn't turn the ball over very often.

With Harbaugh to develop him he couldn't be in a better situation than that. Still a long shot given Smith will eventually sign with the 49ers, but it's certainly intriguing.

Tebow turns the ball over alot. I'm a huge fan but he does throw a high number of interceptions and alot of fumbles.

JaMarcus Hustle · 20-03-2012 7:42pm

spiralism wrote: »

most exciting ever bet? what about the one about the Pats hammering the Orlovsky led colts?

couldnt resist, sorry :pac:

You'll understand if I tell you I've left that off my betting resumé!

davyjose · 20-03-2012 7:44pm

I think he could be worked into Manning's offense as a fullback on 3rd down situations. He can run the ball, he could make trick plays or flea-flickers. And he can learn his trade. Denver should keep the strong running game they had last season. That's what Elway had, and ultimately it's what has limited manning to one ring so far.

spiralism · 20-03-2012 7:44pm

HigginsJ wrote: »

Tebow turns the ball over alot. I'm a huge fan but he does throw a high number of interceptions and alot of fumbles.

Im'a stop you there. Fumbles sure but his INT numbers have been quite low throughout his career (6 this year, Florida he never went above 6), he's careful passing the football.

davyjose · 20-03-2012 7:45pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

Green bay must be looking to turn him into a tight end or use him in situation plays.

Why can't Denver do that? After all, the only difference between sitting behind Rodgers and Manning, is Rodgers has more than 5 years left in his career.

spiralism · 20-03-2012 7:47pm

davyjose wrote: »

I think he could be worked into Manning's offense as a fullback on 3rd down situations. He can run the ball, he could make trick plays or flea-flickers. And he can learn his trade. Denver should keep the strong running game they had last season. That's what Elway had, and ultimately it's what has limited manning to one ring so far.

hear hear on the running game, Davis played a crucial part in Elways two rings with a SB MVP in superbowl 32 and league MVP with his 2,000 yard season in 1998. Though i don't think Tebow stays for the simple reason that Elway never rated him and he's not going to blow this one chance to move him on without causing riots.

davyjose · 20-03-2012 7:49pm

Stev_o wrote: »

Tbh they are the only team that fits Tebow anyway, a big O Line, a fantastic TE and one of the best RB's in the league. Problem is they don't have a defence that can last being on the field so long.

It would get jags fans off their asses too.

HigginsJ · 20-03-2012 7:50pm

spiralism wrote: »

Im'a stop you there. Fumbles sure but his INT numbers have been quite low throughout his career (6 this year, Florida he never went above 6), he's careful passing the football.

And I apologise, should have checked my facts on the INT's. Looked it up there and surprised it was only 6.

Is it my imagination or were at least 3 of them returned for TD's??

Chucky the tree · 20-03-2012 7:51pm

davyjose wrote: »

Why can't Denver do that? After all, the only difference between sitting behind Rodgers and Manning, is Rodgers has more than 5 years left in his career.

I presume Denver don't want to deal with that headache or else just feel he's won't make a very good tight end, also probably feel he'll never make a very good QB anyway. The problem is that the only difference between the two is a huge one.

spiralism · 20-03-2012 7:53pm

HigginsJ wrote: »

And I apologise, should have checked my facts on the INT's. Looked it up there and surprised it was only 6.

Is it my imagination or were at least 3 of them returned for TD's??

Two iirc, 2 fumbles also were ran back @ Buffalo and Detroit

davyjose · 20-03-2012 8:01pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

I presume Denver don't want to deal with that headache or else just feel he's won't make a very good tight end, also probably feel he'll never make a very good QB anyway. The problem is that the only difference between the two is a huge one.

Yeah, I suppose the decision isn't exactly Tebow's to make. I think Elway and Fox are done with Tebowmania. But i can't see how that issue isn't going to follow him north. Can't imagine Rodgers will be too impressed with the move either. But Tebow will disappear if he goes to a place with such a good QB with a decade+ ahead of him. Can't see why he'd go there barring deperation.

I think it could be Jacksonville or bust for him as an NFL star, sadly.

Jolly Red Giant · 20-03-2012 8:10pm

barbarians wrote: »

If I were the Broncos, I'd keep Tebow.

Not going to happen - Tebow will be traded or if it comes to it he will be cut. I expect to see him gone in a trade by the draft at the latest.

barbarians wrote: »

At best, they'll only get a second round pick for him anyway so they won't be getting much value for him anyway.

If someone offered a second round pick Elway would snap their hand off. I'd be thrilled with a third.

barbarians wrote: »

If Manning is on form there be won't any QB controversy as the Broncos fans are hardly going to start calling for Tebow instead of Manning.

You have no idea what Tebowmania is like and the irrationality of Tebow fans - Elway hates it, doesn't want it and is thrilled to bits to be able to get out from under it.

barbarians wrote: »

Tebow would hardly be a disruptive influence in the locker room and the time spent as a back-up may help him as he'll have more time to practise his throwing and can learn from a modern-day great. Tebow could be used in garbage time at the end of games to practise his throwing in a competitive environment so the Broncos could even have Tebow to take over from Manning when he retires. (Bit unrealistic I know.)

Absolutely unrealistic is a better way to describe it. Manning doesn't teach back-ups - Manning takes every snap in practice and keeps the WRs back after practice has ended to work on routes and timings. No back-up has every got a sniff of the ball in practice with Manning around. Tebow couldn't even run the scout team (Brady Quinn and Webber did when Orton was starting) because he couldn't make the throws that the defence would be working to combat.

barbarians wrote: »

Also, in a doomsday scenario if Manning gets injured again or isn't up to speed at least Tebow will be there as a back-up. No point having a $90 million QB if he can't throw the ball.

The offence will be designed around Manning and everything he can do - short drops, quick reads, quick release, no-huddle - everything Tebow can't do - if Manning goes down the last person who could be put in to play QB would be Tebow - Webber would get the call first.

barbarians wrote: »

Nobody really knows will Manning be able to withstand a big hit from a linebacker and play on without his game suffering from it. The Broncos have to play some tough defendes too this season (Steelers,Texans, Ravens) so at least if Manning does get injured again Tebow is there to step in.

Manning is no more vulnerable to being injured than any other player on the field - the fused discs in his neck are no more vulnerable to injury than normal discs (this is the medical advice that the Broncos have received from experts). Playing at 36 after four neck surgeries can take their toll and a viable plan B is sensible - but plan B is not Tebow. The Broncos will look to sign a decent veteran back-up - rumoured to be one of San Diego's Billy Volek, Chicago's Caleb Hanie, Houston's Matt Leinart, St. Louis' A.J. Feeley. The other option is to draft Brandon Weeden in April - this is the option I expect them to take.

davyjose · 20-03-2012 8:20pm

Good post JRG. Billy Volek was released by SD, just saw that. Would be a very good option -- knows the division, seemingly happy tp play back-up, and not a bad player (beat us in the 07/08 playoffs)

Syferus · 20-03-2012 8:20pm

HigginsJ wrote: »

Tebow turns the ball over alot. I'm a huge fan but he does throw a high number of interceptions and alot of fumbles.

Six interceptions in 11 games last season says otherwise. Fumbles aren't as big a problem as you make out - it comes with the territory of being a dual threat QB. The more comfortable and experienced he is the less fumbles he'll make.

Jolly Red Giant · 20-03-2012 8:26pm

davyjose wrote: »

I think it could be Jacksonville or bust for him as an NFL star, sadly.

Philly seem to be emerging as favs - back-up to Vick.

HigginsJ · 20-03-2012 8:32pm

Syferus wrote: »

Six interceptions in 11 games last season says otherwise. Fumbles aren't as big a problem as you make out - it comes with the territory of being a dual threat QB. The more comfortable and experienced he is the less fumbles he'll make.

As I said I felt it was more and should have checked my stats 1st.

Why arent fumbles a big problem? Its exactly the same as an INT. He had 6 of those as well. 12 turnovers in 11 games.

Paully D · 20-03-2012 8:55pm

Jolly Red Giant wrote: »

Philly seem to be emerging as favs - back-up to Vick.

Surely he'll get a starting shot at some team this season. Jacksonville?

SantryRed · 20-03-2012 9:01pm

spiralism wrote: »

Im'a stop you there. Fumbles sure but his INT numbers have been quite low throughout his career (6 this year, Florida he never went above 6), he's careful passing the football.

Or really bad he misses the CB along with the WR.

20-03-2012 9:12pm

SantryRed wrote: »

Or really bad he misses the CB along with the WR.

haha id say you could be spot on reggie brown won a few games playin in the qb position but i wouldnt start him there

Chucky the tree · 20-03-2012 9:20pm

It seems the 49ers are out and the Packers offered a 7th round pick once Tebow will re-do his contract.

HigginsJ · 20-03-2012 9:49pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

It seems the 49ers are out and the Packers offered a 7th round pick once Tebow will re-do his contract.

I really cant see the interest from the Packers. I know they lost Flynn and need a new back-up but Tebow seems a strange choice.

spiralism · 20-03-2012 10:18pm

HigginsJ wrote: »

I really cant see the interest from the Packers. I know they lost Flynn and need a new back-up but Tebow seems a strange choice.

Elway was saying he wants to land Tebow a starting gig and Tebow wants himself to be close to home. Jags or Miami i'd say, both would overpay too at a guess, Khan would to fill seats, Miami would because Jeff Ireland hasn't a clue.

poldebruin · 20-03-2012 10:36pm

I hope he goes somewhere he starts, and I can get to watch him play. I'm still going to go with the obvious choices - Jacksonville or Miami (more likely Jacksonville)

I can't see anybody offering more than a 4 or 5 for him though, which undervalues him IMO, but they know Denver wants him out, and what he will bring to a team restricts the market.

On that note - This will be the third player move that Denver has made where they have not gotten any value for quite a high profile player due to circumstances:

Brandon Lloyd, Kyle Orton and now it looks like Tim Tebow.

Syferus · 20-03-2012 10:55pm

spiralism wrote: »

Elway was saying he wants to land Tebow a starting gig and Tebow wants himself to be close to home. Jags or Miami i'd say, both would overpay too at a guess, Khan would to fill seats, Miami would because Jeff Ireland hasn't a clue.

At least he's pulled the knives out of Tebow's back and promised to give him a snazzy new suit(or). It still doesn't excuse plainly lying to both Tebow and the public, though.

People can dismiss Tebow all they want but were he not to be in a place where he was starting after showing so much last year would smack of a rigid adherence to orthodoxy by coaches. Tebow can answer alot of on-the-field and off-the-field questions for both the Jags and Dolphins.

Chucky the tree · 20-03-2012 11:24pm

Dolphins have ruled themselves out. Not surprising really, I doubt Philbin is eager to turn away from his west coast offense and work with a guy who has very poor passing fundamentals.

spiralism · 20-03-2012 11:26pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

Dolphins have ruled themselves out. Not surprising really, I doubt Philbin is eager to turn away from his west coast offense and work with a guy who has very poor passing fundamentals.

As opposed to the outrageous talents of David Garrard and Matt Moore, lol. Jags it is so.

TimThomas · 20-03-2012 11:28pm

Syferus wrote: »

People can dismiss Tebow all they want but were he not to be in a place where he was starting after showing so much last year would smack of a rigid adherence to orthodoxy by coaches. Tebow can answer alot of on-the-field and off-the-field questions for both the Jags and Dolphins.

Are you Tebow's agent by any chance? You seriously are banging on about the same thing over and over. We get it at this point, don't write off Tebow etc etc.

Dolphins pulling out doesn't bode well for Tebow. It is beginning to look like the Jags and the Jags only who might pony up for him. Anyone else want spend too much on him if they are going to sit him on their bench.

Its mad that many like syferus not so much on here but other boards keep saying that he will start september but when you ask them to name teams they cant and some of the teams they do mention make no sense.

For me the Jags and Miami are the only 2 who would start him right away. Everyone else will be either the bench of camp dogfight for a starting spot.

TimThomas · 20-03-2012 11:30pm

spiralism wrote: »

As opposed to the outrageous talents of David Garrard and Matt Moore, lol. Jags it is so.

Really? Tebow couldn't run a west coast offense if he tried. He needs fixing before he could run an offense like that. Garrard and Moore might not be awesome QBs but Philbin knows they can throw footballs.

Chucky the tree · 20-03-2012 11:30pm

spiralism wrote: »

As opposed to the outrageous talents of David Garrard and Matt Moore, lol. Jags it is so.

I think Matt Moore is pretty solid. Far better completion % than Tebow, better yards per throw and far better QB rating.

mikemac1 · 20-03-2012 11:43pm

spiralism wrote: »

As opposed to the outrageous talents of David Garrard and Matt Moore, lol. Jags it is so.

Moore and Garrard are both good QBs

Dolphins fans can be happy with those two on the roster

eagle eye · 20-03-2012 11:46pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

I think Matt Moore is pretty solid. Far better completion % than Tebow, better yards per throw and far better QB rating.

Matt Moore is Kyle Orton 2.0. He is not good enough and never will be. Tebow is a better than either of them.

FreeOSCAR · 20-03-2012 11:47pm

The Jets are in for him.
Sparanos wildcat love and all that.
Personally I'm all in for us going after him. Need someone to be breathing down Sanchez's neck and Tebow will certainly provide that.

Justin10 · 20-03-2012 11:58pm

Tebow to the Jets wouldnt end up well. If Sanchez dosnt improve fans will be calling for Tebow to start. That wont end up well especially with the money invested in Sanchez now.

FreeOSCAR · 21-03-2012 12:12am

Rochey18 wrote: »

Tebow to the Jets wouldnt end up well. If Sanchez dosnt improve fans will be calling for Tebow to start. That wont end up well especially with the money invested in Sanchez now.

The chants and boo boys will be out this season for Sanchez unless he shows Eli Manning like improvement after his third year.
It's better to have someone even remotely legitimate to come in to challenge Sanchez. At the moment with Drew Stanton and Greg McElroy the Jets don't have that. I would have rathered a Jason Campbell or Kyle Orton but the Jets didn't have the cap space to afford a backup QB in the current over inflated market.
A trade for Tebow for a low pick pick would be ideal. IMO neither are the answer but it certainly has me intrigued.

davyjose · 21-03-2012 12:26am

Agree. Sanchez's head will be on the chopping block by November anyway. Might as well give the fans someone to gwt excited about.
But i still think he's earned the right to be an NFL starter.

JohnnyRyan99 · 21-03-2012 12:35am

Wouldn't like to see Tebow come to The Jets, I hope he goes to The Jags.

Believe in the Sanchize!

JaMarcus Hustle · 21-03-2012 1:10am

FreeOSCAR wrote: »

The Jets are in for him.
Sparanos wildcat love and all that.
Personally I'm all in for us going after him. Need someone to be breathing down Sanchez's neck and Tebow will certainly provide that.

This can only end one way.

Another 3 year extension for Mark Sanchez.

Chucky the tree · 21-03-2012 1:11am

davyjose wrote: »

Agree. Sanchez's head will be on the chopping block by November anyway. Might as well give the fans someone to gwt excited about.
But i still think he's earned the right to be an NFL starter.

Increase the chance to get Matt Berkley?

Syferus · 21-03-2012 1:16am

TimThomas wrote: »

Are you Tebow's agent by any chance? You seriously are banging on about the same thing over and over. We get it at this point, don't write off Tebow etc etc.

Dolphins pulling out doesn't bode well for Tebow. It is beginning to look like the Jags and the Jags only who might pony up for him. Anyone else want spend too much on him if they are going to sit him on their bench.

Its mad that many like syferus not so much on here but other boards keep saying that he will start september but when you ask them to name teams they cant and some of the teams they do mention make no sense.

For me the Jags and Miami are the only 2 who would start him right away. Everyone else will be either the bench of camp dogfight for a starting spot.

You then go on to name the teams I did in your quoted post. Whoops!

Relax bro, there's plenty of time to complain about Tebow when he's taking the Jags on a miraclious streak of wins and netting them all-time attendence highs. Or maybe not? :pac:

It's silly season in the NFL.

TimThomas · 21-03-2012 1:27am

Syferus wrote: »

You then go on to name the teams I did in your quoted post. Whoops!

Good to see you can read properly. And you missed my point on that. I said many like you but not so much on here but while we are on the subject in one of the many posts you keep telling us about how Tebow will start you said the following:

Syferus wrote: »

49ers actually makes alot of sense within the context of Harbaugh's conservative passing schemes last year.

Completely wrong here on so many levels.

Relax bro, there's plenty of time to complain about Tebow when he's taking the Jags on a miraclious streak of wins and netting them all-time attendence highs. Or maybe not? :pac:

3 things wrong with this. Firstly. Why do you feel the need to say relax? Still don't get why people feel the need to use the word relax. Quite relaxed thanks.

Secondly Im not your bro so don't call me it. And thirdly who gives a fook about Tebow anymore other than you of course considering you keep banging on about him. I honestly don't care where he goes. If he was smart he would pick a team that would groom him.

It's silly season in the NFL.

Ah now no need to call yourself silly.

mikemac1 · 21-03-2012 1:37am

Tebow in the media capital of the world

Oh the league would love this, think of all that coverage

Syferus · 21-03-2012 3:42am

I see you're trying the 'let's be needlessly aggressive' approach, or, rather, the Rex Grossman method.

davyjose · 21-03-2012 5:21am

TimThomas wrote: »

And thirdly who gives a fook about Tebow anymore other than you of course considering you keep banging on about him. I honestly don't care where he goes. If he was smart he would pick a team that would groom him.

7 pages in a few hours suggest a few people give a fook.

What would you do with Tim Tebow?

Comments