Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread

15960626465193

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Did he actually mention "building a squad"?

    Jesus ****ing Christ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    MLC61 wrote: »
    Why do the majority of posters favour change in order to rest players for the English game? Why is the English game any more important than the Scots game?

    It makes sense to me to pick your best team for the next game and then evaluate following that game on the health of the players.

    Scotland will be as hard to beat as England and surely we should target the home win first.

    Given the injury enforced absentees I don't honestly think that Kidney could change too much else.
    Its a bit easier to beat Scotland at home than England away imo

    That said Scotland at home is much more important because it will have a bigger effect on our world rankings if we lose and we need to finish the year in the top 8 for seeding purposes for the RWC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭OldRio


    MLC61 wrote: »
    Why do the majority of posters favour change in order to rest players for the English game? Why is the English game any more important than the Scots game?

    It makes sense to me to pick your best team for the next game and then evaluate following that game on the health of the players.

    Scotland will be as hard to beat as England and surely we should target the home win first.

    Given the injury enforced absentees I don't honestly think that Kidney could change too much else.

    Its called being proactive and not reactive.
    Using your resources sensibly.
    Resting players and blooding others.

    Most managers do this.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    RoundBox11 wrote: »
    What other changes could he have made tho?? Putting in Tom Court or mcfadden wouldnt have been "unconservative". it just would have limited out bench

    Ross and D'arcy could have switched with Court and McFadden and been put on the bench. Similarly with POM and Ferris/SOB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Did he actually mention "building a squad"?

    Jesus ****ing Christ.

    I didn't see the press conference so I have no idea, I was only making reference to what he used to come out with before, ie building a squad for RWC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,699 ✭✭✭bamboozle


    i'd expected Ferris to be rested, cannot expect his body to get through 4 weeks of 6 nations rugby the way he plays. at least it will be good to see Ryan and McCarthy in the 2nd row for a point on saturday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    MLC61 wrote: »
    Why do the majority of posters favour change in order to rest players for the English game? Why is the English game any more important than the Scots game?

    It makes sense to me to pick your best team for the next game and then evaluate following that game on the health of the players.

    Scotland will be as hard to beat as England and surely we should target the home win first.

    Given the injury enforced absentees I don't honestly think that Kidney could change too much else.

    Scotland in Dublin will be easier to beat than England in Twickenham. Most of the team will be playing four matches in four weeks, and two in six days. They'll be knackered. I'd have given Ferris' knees a break and let us have a look at POM, given McFadden a run at 12 and maybe given Court a start at LH where we know he's useful. The 'spine' of the team would still be unchanged but you'd have new guys coming in and maybe adding a bit of freshness.

    Did Kidney actually say he was 'building a squad'? If so, it's just further proof that he's lost the plot.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I didn't see the press conference so I have no idea, I was only making reference to what he used to come out with before, ie building a squad for RWC.

    Ah, ok. I don't really want to put myself through watching it, though I wouldn't put it past him to say something along those lines given his history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I didn't see the press conference so I have no idea, I was only making reference to what he used to come out with before, ie building a squad for RWC.

    He was asked about the injuries and said something like thats why we build a squad.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭MLC61


    OldRio wrote: »
    Its called being proactive and not reactive.
    Using your resources sensibly.
    Resting players and blooding others.

    Most managers do this.

    That's two different issues -
    1. Blooding new players in order to build a squad,
    2. Resting players.

    The blooding new players is Fantasy Football stuff and keeps fans forums ticking - why doesn't he swap xx for yy and play zz in the other position. Daydreaming and good fun.

    My question was on the resting issue - why rest them for the English game over the Scottish game?


  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭RoundBox11


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Ross and D'arcy could have switched with Court and McFadden and been put on the bench. Similarly with POM and Ferris/SOB.


    Putting Court at TH instead of Ross is asking for trouble. Court is good at loosehead but hes barely international standard at TH. Wed be minced in the scrum. If you were including Court youd have to drop Healy, one of our best ball carriers/workhorses/defenders.

    Resting Ferris or O'Brien against one of the best backrows out there is asking for trouble also. Theyl be giving us trouble anyway without resting two of the best back rowers in the world.

    Putting Mcfadden in for mDarce would have been ok, but with BOD and O'Connel gone already we need all the experience we can get right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    So Thornley was wrong about Toner. Trouble in paradise?

    And we should be favouring the England game over this game because there are a lot more ranking points at stake in that one.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    MLC61 wrote: »
    My question was on the resting issue - why rest them for the English game over the Scottish game?

    Because Scotland are worse then England and we have them at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭Leslie91


    Shoulda dropped Trimble he has been v poor. There was no chance of him dropping DOC with POC out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Legion2008


    MLC61 wrote: »
    Why do the majority of posters favour change in order to rest players for the English game? Why is the English game any more important than the Scots game?

    It makes sense to me to pick your best team for the next game and then evaluate following that game on the health of the players.

    Scotland will be as hard to beat as England and surely we should target the home win first.

    Given the injury enforced absentees I don't honestly think that Kidney could change too much else.

    In a sense the scottish game is a far more important game to win than the English game ... if we were to lose to Scotland the loss in IRB ranking points would be significant and would bring is too close to dropping out of the top 8 by the end of the year .... if that was to happen then we would end up as 3rd seeds in the 2015 world cup. Indeed if Scotland were to beat us by more than 15 points they would actually overtake us in the rankings and we would drop to 9th in the world which would be our lowest ever position.

    A loss to England would not be as bad as they are currently ranked higher than us. The following website provides a calculator where you can see the impact on ranking points: http://www.aaatos.net/rankings.py#


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭OldRio


    MLC61 wrote: »
    That's two different issues -
    1. Blooding new players in order to build a squad,
    2. Resting players.

    The blooding new players is Fantasy Football stuff and keeps fans forums ticking - why doesn't he swap xx for yy and play zz in the other position. Daydreaming and good fun.

    My question was on the resting issue - why rest them for the English game over the Scottish game?

    Blooding new players is fantasy football stuff ??
    No it isn't.
    If the squad is managed correctly players can be rested for some matches and play in others.
    So when we play England we will have played 3 games in less than 3 weeks.
    Rest some of the players USE the squad. Its a big squad, use it.
    Manage, thats what some coaches do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    **** Ireland, the players are gonna be flogged come the HEC quarters.

    The ones that are available for the QFs that is... :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    **** Ireland, the players are gonna be flogged come the HEC quarters.

    Who cares, we've got BRAD THORN.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    RoundBox11 wrote: »
    Putting Court at TH instead of Ross is asking for trouble. Court is good at loosehead but hes barely international standard at TH. Wed be minced in the scrum. If you were including Court youd have to drop Healy, one of our best ball carriers/workhorses/defenders.

    Resting Ferris or O'Brien against one of the best backrows out there is asking for trouble also. Theyl be giving us trouble anyway without resting two of the best back rowers in the world.

    Putting Mcfadden in for mDarce would have been ok, but with BOD and O'Connel gone already we need all the experience we can get right now.

    Putting Court in for Healy with Healy on the bench is equally as good. Healy is very abbrasive and so far has played til the 73, 69, and 74th minute of each game.

    The thing about changing Ross is that he's played every minute of the 6 Nations so far, he will be out on his feet come the England game.

    Denton, Rennie, and Barclay are a good back row but wouldn't be one of the best in the world.


  • Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭dtpc191991


    Tbh the only real problem I have with this team is D'Arcy and O'Leary. We could do with blooding a new 12 and O'Leary shouldn't be anywhere near the Irish Jersey, we have better options in Marshall and Boss.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Whilst I agree I'd love to see Marshall get a cap, I just can't see him coming off the bench in a possible fix-the-game scenario and coping well under pressure.

    Boss is the logical replacement, but I'm glad he wasn't picked as Leinster would be tight and possibly knackered with half-backs for the Ospreys game.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Boss isn't available, he's in NZ apparently. So Leinster might yet be fecked there anyway.

    Marshall is pretty much the text-book example of impact player.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,140 ✭✭✭fitz


    .ak wrote: »
    Whilst I agree I'd love to see Marshall get a cap, I just can't see him coming off the bench in a possible fix-the-game scenario and coping well under pressure.

    And O'Leary is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    fitz wrote: »
    And O'Leary is?

    I cringe at saying this, but he's a safer pair of hands.

    ugh, there, I said it...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Legion2008 wrote: »
    Indeed if Scotland were to beat us by more than 15 points they would actually overtake us in the rankings and we would drop to 9th in the world which would be our lowest ever position.
    This just shows how bad the rankings are. Scotland had a terrible world cup and have had a terrible 6 Nations to date (results-wise). How they could somehow leapfrog us after we had a reasonable WC and one narrow defeat in the 6N is beyond comprehension.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Current IRB Standings.

    IRELAND / SCOTLAND
    80.3
    / 74.94

    Home Win - 15
    80.46 / 74.776

    Home win. 15+
    80.546 / 74.694

    DRAW
    79.464 / 75.776

    AWAY WIN - 15
    78.464 / 75.776

    AWAY WIN +15
    77.546 / 77.694

    We could drop out of the top 8


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Current IRB Standings.

    IRELAND / SCOTLAND
    80.3
    / 74.94

    Home Win - 15
    80.46 / 74.776

    Home win. 15+
    80.546 / 74.694

    DRAW
    79.464 / 75.776

    AWAY WIN - 15
    78.464 / 75.776

    AWAY WIN +15
    77.546 / 77.694

    We could drop out of the top 8

    Only if we lose by more than 15 points at home?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭ray jay


    Tox56 wrote: »
    Only if we lose by more than 15 points at home?
    Yes, and in that case it would be a fitting punishment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Legion2008


    ray jay wrote: »
    Yes, and in that case it would be a fitting punishment.

    and with our remaining fixtures of the year we'd be hard pushed to get back into the top 8

    Away to Enlgand
    Away to New Zealand (3 times)
    Home to South Africa
    Home to Argentina

    (is there a 3rd Nov International ... can't find it listed anywhere)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Legion2008 wrote: »
    and with our remaining fixtures of the year we'd be hard pushed to get back into the top 8

    Away to Enlgand
    Away to New Zealand (3 times)
    Home to South Africa
    Home to Argentina

    (is there a 3rd Nov International ... can't find it listed anywhere)

    And which of these games are going to be used to blood Marshall and various other young players? Because of course doing so in the 6N is total lunacy... :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Legion2008 wrote: »
    and with our remaining fixtures of the year we'd be hard pushed to get back into the top 8

    Away to Enlgand
    Away to New Zealand (3 times)
    Home to South Africa
    Home to Argentina

    (is there a 3rd Nov International ... can't find it listed anywhere)

    The New Zealand games will have minimal negative effect on our rankings; the fact that they are so far ahead of us and have home advantage means we could lose all three and only drop a fraction of a point.

    However, we should be looking to beat South Africa and Argentina at home; since Argentina are likely to be our main competition for eighth spot, beating them would count double, if you get me. Beating SA would be hitting the jackpot in terms of rankingsm but it's all going to come down to the Argentina game really.

    I had it in my head that we were playing one of the Pacific Islands this year, but I may be wrong on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭MLC61


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Because Scotland are worse then England and we have them at home.

    From what I have seen to date, Scotland pose a greater threat to us than England. Also in classic management speak, surely we shouldn't look further than our next game?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭JustinDee


    The New Zealand games will have minimal negative effect on our rankings; the fact that they are so far ahead of us and have home advantage means we could lose all three and only drop a fraction of a point.

    However, we should be looking to beat South Africa and Argentina at home; since Argentina are likely to be our main competition for eighth spot, beating them would count double, if you get me. Beating SA would be hitting the jackpot in terms of rankingsm but it's all going to come down to the Argentina game really.

    I had it in my head that we were playing one of the Pacific Islands this year, but I may be wrong on that.
    Autumn Internationals will be announced after the Six Nations has finished.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    MLC61 wrote: »
    Also in classic management speak, surely we shouldn't look further than our next game?

    Usually but with 4 games in 4 weeks against different levels of opposition this mighten be the best way to look at it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Declan Kidney has announced his team to play South Africa in November:

    Healy, Best, Ross, DOC, POC, Ferris, O'Brien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, Earls, D'Arcy, BOD, Bowe, Kearney

    Cronin, Court, Ryan, Wallace, Reddan, O'Gara, Fitzgerald


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 779 ✭✭✭padraig.od


    Declan Kidney has announced his team to play South Africa in November:

    Healy, Best, Ross, DOC, POC, Ferris, O'Brien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, Earls, D'Arcy, BOD, Bowe, Kearney

    Cronin, Court, Ryan, Wallace, Reddan, O'Gara, Fitzgerald

    I'd say David Wallace will be straight back in :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    Declan Kidney has announced his team to play South Africa in November:

    Healy, Best, Ross, DOC, POC, Ferris, O'Brien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, Earls, D'Arcy, BOD, Bowe, Kearney

    Cronin, Court, Ryan, Wallace, Reddan, O'Gara, Fitzgerald

    Ah no. He'll be sacked by then with a bit of luck!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Declan Kidney has announced his team to play South Africa in November:

    Healy, Best, Ross, DOC, POC, Ferris, O'Brien, Heaslip, Murray, Sexton, Earls, D'Arcy, BOD, Bowe, Kearney

    Cronin, Court, Ryan, Wallace, Reddan, O'Gara, Fitzgerald
    Mike Ross might be rested by then. Hayes to get a recall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,361 ✭✭✭✭phog


    @emerald rugby tweeted
    @RoryBest2 will equal Keith Woods record this sat as most capped Irish hooker. That's some achievement!

    Congrats to Rory and the record to be broken the following week, hopefully with two wins under his belt as captain.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭desertcircus


    I honestly don't get this. Assuming that the average pro's Test career is eight years (which is probably optimistic), you're looking at pulling through a full squad of thirty over that time frame. Add two just in case, and we arrive at a need to produce 32 Test internationals - not 32 players who happen to have won a couple of caps - every eight years, or four new long-term picks every year. Of course, there's World Cup years, and the following year is ranking-points year, so those are crucially important and blooding players has to take a backseat. Let's say we blood two major new Test players in each of those years. In an eight-year cycle, that means the two off-years are your chance to produce serious contenders for the jersey. You need six new major players in each of these years; players you've tested in the right circumstances, not just players you've thrown in because of injury. In Ireland's case, this means that we need to produce twelve players between 2013 and 2014; to do that, we'll need to give at least sixteen players a serious chance to prove themselves (what that means is at least three games, picked to give them a chance; there's no point in giving a promising 22-year-old thirteen a starting cap against New Zealand) in those two years. I can't emphasise how important this is; it's the difference between being able to cope with an injury and having more or less no idea what's going to happen in the event of one. It's the difference between a succession plan and a total panic.

    Paul O'Connell is out for the rest of the Six Nations, and we honestly have no idea who'll perform best in a green jersey out of Dan Tuohy, Mike McCarthy, Devin Toner and Ryan Caldwell, because we've made virtually zero effort to give those players a chance to show what they can do. We don't know whether to select Peter O'Mahony or Chris Henry, because the management team might never have even bothered playing Sean O'Brien if it hadn't been for an injury crisis. Both Conor Murray and Eoin Reddan got their serious shots at the number nine jersey only once their predecessor had imploded spectacularly, at which point they were handed their first real chance at the biggest competition in the world. Brian O'Driscoll is out and Gordon Darcy is in poor form and we have absolutely no idea what to do about the midfield because the management have quite literally never planned for it. It's a shocking, abysmal failure to look past the next game, and as long as it remains the same we'll shoot no higher than a few Triple Crowns and a Six Nations title once every few decades. We might as well forget the World Cup completely.

    By the end of 2014, the Ireland management need to know how Sherry, Strauss, Hagan, Toner, McCarthy, Tuohy, Ruddock, Ryan, Henry, Marshall, Madigan, O'Malley, McFadden, Spence, Cave, Gilroy, Kearney Jr, Zebo and Jones are likely to do in an Ireland jersey at the deep end. We should be looking into the Six Nations 2015 knowing EXACTLY what those players' strengths and weaknesses are at Test level, who they need to be partnered with if they're still wet behind the ears, and what kind of gameplan they're best suited to.

    In reality, of the nineteen players named above, I'll be genuinely astonished if half of them get five games in those two years without getting their chance due to injury to the established first (and probably second) choices.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    As far as selections and gameplan is concerned we've seen absolutely no vision over the past 2 years. Some of the selections in particular have been downright baffling. Murrays rapid promotion, Paddy Wallace as back 3 cover for the entire 2011 6N, SOB being behind Leamy for the 2010 AI's when he's the form player in the country. 2 locks injured now and still Tuohys nowhere to be seen. Its morale sapping stuff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭ambid


    Good put down from Rory Best to some random prat on twitter who was giving him grief. First correct his spelling, then rise above the abuse.
    Rory Best ‏ @RoryBest2
    @dh4005:how are you captaining ireland I jut don't get Declan kidney #noaffence” FYI its offence but none taken #ifurgoingtoslaglearn2spell"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭duckysauce


    ambid wrote: »
    Good put down from Rory Best to some random prat on twitter who was giving him grief. First correct his spelling, then rise above the abuse.

    sweet :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    ligind


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    Even his put downs are done in an unassuming manner.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    shuffol wrote: »
    As far as selections and gameplan is concerned we've seen absolutely no vision over the past 2 years. Some of the selections in particular have been downright baffling. Murrays rapid promotion, Paddy Wallace as back 3 cover for the entire 2011 6N, SOB being behind Leamy for the 2010 AI's when he's the form player in the country. 2 locks injured now and still Tuohys nowhere to be seen. Its morale sapping stuff.

    I'm going to play Devils Advocate here.

    Paddy Wallace covers 12 and 15 (he's played a fair bit there for Ulster) and the back line for most of that 6 Nations was Fitzgerald, Earls, BOD, D'arcy, and Bowe.

    If D'arcy has to come off it's a direct swap with Wallace. If BOD comes off Wallace comes on at 12 and D'arcy moves to 13. If Fitzgerald gets injured it's a direct swap for Wallace. If Bowe or Earls gets injured then Wallace comes on at 15 and Fitzgerald moves to the wing. So all the backline positions are covered in the event of an injury with only the one or two changes.

    If Trimble were on the bench he realistically only covers wing. If Fitzgerald got injured Earls could cover with Trimble coming to the wing. If D'arcy got injured though the cover would have to be Fitzgerald. So the backline then would have three changes in it: Trimble to wing, Earls to fullback, and Fitzgerald to 12. That's alot of changes for the one injury.

    While Leamy was on the bench for the SA, NZ, and Arg games they both got the same amount of starts i.e. they both played against Samoa.

    Who are the two locks that are injured? I can only think of POC. McCarthy was in the initial RWC training squad and also played against the English Saxons so it is assumed he is ahead of Tuohy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    That scenario is completely let down by the fact Wallace hasn't a hope of playing 15 at international level.

    I think it was more like Wallace on at 12 and D'Arcy covering the wings with Earls covering full back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    That scenario is completely let down by the fact Wallace hasn't a hope of playing 15 at international level.

    I think it was more like Wallace on at 12 and D'Arcy covering the wings with Earls covering full back.

    This. But didn't Wallace come on to the wing at some stage? And I seem to remember it ending badly.

    Wallace covers 12...he's a good 12. But that's it. I'd rather have a person who only plays wing on the bench than someone who can just play 12.


  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭Leinster7


    I honestly don't get this. Assuming that the average pro's Test career is eight years (which is probably optimistic), you're looking at pulling through a full squad of thirty over that time frame. Add two just in case, and we arrive at a need to produce 32 Test internationals - not 32 players who happen to have won a couple of caps - every eight years, or four new long-term picks every year. Of course, there's World Cup years, and the following year is ranking-points year, so those are crucially important and blooding players has to take a backseat. Let's say we blood two major new Test players in each of those years. In an eight-year cycle, that means the two off-years are your chance to produce serious contenders for the jersey. You need six new major players in each of these years; players you've tested in the right circumstances, not just players you've thrown in because of injury. In Ireland's case, this means that we need to produce twelve players between 2013 and 2014; to do that, we'll need to give at least sixteen players a serious chance to prove themselves (what that means is at least three games, picked to give them a chance; there's no point in giving a promising 22-year-old thirteen a starting cap against New Zealand) in those two years. I can't emphasise how important this is; it's the difference between being able to cope with an injury and having more or less no idea what's going to happen in the event of one. It's the difference between a succession plan and a total panic.

    Paul O'Connell is out for the rest of the Six Nations, and we honestly have no idea who'll perform best in a green jersey out of Dan Tuohy, Mike McCarthy, Devin Toner and Ryan Caldwell, because we've made virtually zero effort to give those players a chance to show what they can do. We don't know whether to select Peter O'Mahony or Chris Henry, because the management team might never have even bothered playing Sean O'Brien if it hadn't been for an injury crisis. Both Conor Murray and Eoin Reddan got their serious shots at the number nine jersey only once their predecessor had imploded spectacularly, at which point they were handed their first real chance at the biggest competition in the world. Brian O'Driscoll is out and Gordon Darcy is in poor form and we have absolutely no idea what to do about the midfield because the management have quite literally never planned for it. It's a shocking, abysmal failure to look past the next game, and as long as it remains the same we'll shoot no higher than a few Triple Crowns and a Six Nations title once every few decades. We might as well forget the World Cup completely.

    By the end of 2014, the Ireland management need to know how Sherry, Strauss, Hagan, Toner, McCarthy, Tuohy, Ruddock, Ryan, Henry, Marshall, Madigan, O'Malley, McFadden, Spence, Cave, Gilroy, Kearney Jr, Zebo and Jones are likely to do in an Ireland jersey at the deep end. We should be looking into the Six Nations 2015 knowing EXACTLY what those players' strengths and weaknesses are at Test level, who they need to be partnered with if they're still wet behind the ears, and what kind of gameplan they're best suited to.

    In reality, of the nineteen players named above, I'll be genuinely astonished if half of them get five games in those two years without getting their chance due to injury to the established first (and probably second) choices.

    And this is why we won't get past the quarter finals on the next RWC. The IRFU are most at fault for this lack of vision not only in their selection of Kidney as manager but their seeming inability and lack of courage to fire him when we continue to faulter and stagnate after 3years....


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kate Harsh Lightning


    Leinster7 wrote: »
    And this is why we won't get past the quarter finals on the next RWC. The IRFU are most at fault for this lack of vision not only in their selection of Kidney as manager but their seeming inability and lack of courage to fire him when we continue to faulter and stagnate after 3years....

    would you ever settle? You post the same thing on every single thread. We get it, in fact I agree with you on most points, but you're like a wee little jack russell begging for attention.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement