Freeman Megamerge

cobhguy28 wrote: »

This is why courts should not leave unqualified people like Ben into them. She should now sue Ben for his bad advice that landed her in jail as she would of been intitled to do if she had used a solicitor.

Is she did then who will she get to represent her ? Gerry Beades?

Onevision wrote: »

I notice that Dr. not's video report on yesterday, put up in the early hours, has been removed already.

Over a defamation complaint no less!

Robbo wrote: »

The most recent Ballyhea protest. Yes, that's Joan Collins TD holding an effigy of Ben's most recent client.

She's rather a long way away from her Dublin 8, 10 and 12 constituency.

She has a face on her that'd turn milk....

cobhguy28 wrote: »

I don't know what to make of a post on Bens Facebook page. It states that claires is now free, however if you look at the comments Ben say she is free because she gave undertaken not to go Near her home so she purged her contempt. So Ben lost the case she went to jail for nothing and you have about 50 comments congratulating him on a great job he did, what are these people smoking.

Freeman baccy?

Looking at some of the recent posts on the Hub’s facebook page give a bit more insight as to their actual objectives.

While all the while posturing about helping people in distress and being the heaven sent super heros .. it is all just about finding ways not to pay back any money they owe.

Lord Byron had a heart felt post where he claims that bank just decided one morning to destroy his life by having the audacity to look for the €0.75m he owed them. He was only trying to make a better life for his family when he realised that the money he got had to be paid back. On top of this he also has a judgement against him for not paying his taxes to the tune of about €137k.

So rather than actually work for a living to try and deal with his debts he decided the best course of action would be to ‘volunteer’ his expert legal knowledge full time to helping others to get free houses.

And this little post earlier this week would indicate that they more interested in ways to just not repay any money regardless of ability to pay .. freeloaders I’d call them.

The more I read of him and his fellow hubbers makes me increasingly sick .. each and everyone of the main guys owe money on debts, tax defaults etc; the cynic in me keeps coming back to the idea that these guys are using desperate people to trial and error made up legal arguments in the hope that something will stick that they can use for their own personal circumstance.



“Oppsss: looks like we finally have someone in the courts, our Court reporter relates this piece.
Observations
KBC bank got a 6 month adjournment to come back to see if customer is complying. Test period- (Occurred to me, why not agree to test case and pay for 6 months)!!! Get case struck out and then default again!!!!!
And they will.
Merry Christmas guys, right woman on the right job: all groups have an ‘M’, we have ours.”

Ray is all about the 'official letter' nonsense isn't he?

He is like head lice in a primary school ... You think you've got rid of it and then it crops up again and the whole class have to get treated.

whippet wrote: »

Lord Byron had a heart felt post where he claims that bank just decided one morning to destroy his life by having the audacity to look for the €0.75m he owed them. He was only trying to make a better life for his family when he realised that the money he got had to be paid back. On top of this he also has a judgement against him for not paying his taxes to the tune of about €137k.

For the life of me, I can't seem to see this one. Would be interested in reading it

here is a little light hearted reading on how the worlds of DDI - Freeman - Courts and Make-believe all mix together

The Blog of the one and only Ray Hall

Also, we haven't heard a whole pile recently from Tom and the most explosive book ever - which will rock the establishment to the core - but have a look at the picture from a recent signing event .. the book seems to be in the right section in this shop

GavMan wrote: »

Some gowl.

Wonder if Lord Byron has paid up?

ironically Lord Byron has been sharing that post about the Roofer who can't get paid from the pub ... for a man that advocates the non-payment of any debt .. she surely can talk from both sides of the one mouth

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

Sadly all deleted by now, but last night the hub followers encouraged each other to attack the fb page of the pub in question and someone provided a link.
So as you'd expect lots of 'wont eat here again until he pays his debts' reviews/messages were posted, with the usual 50 people thanking them.
Took about an hour for someone to point out that it was actually the wrong Cookes bar and a totally innocent business, one of the key giveaways being that it didn't have a thatched roof.

it goes to prove that the 'follower' of the Hub and the other groups don't actually read in to anything that they are asked to believe and just assume these bastions of morality are beyond reproach.

Lord Byron was also posting some rambling nonsense that proves beyond any doubt that commercial rates are not payable at all ... i'd say he'd struggle to get a milkman to deliver to him on credit with his full time dedication to the science of Debt Alchemy.