More Crap on Adams, Mod Warning in OP.

Happyman42 wrote: »

She knows who the alleged rapist is, she named the men allegedly involved and the courts are still open to her.
The advice to her to air this in media and to go, primarily, after Gerry Adams will prove disastrous for her healing I fear.
Whatever about what these men or GA might have done in the aftermath of her rape, the biggest crime was her rape, and no amount of bile from Sindo journalists or political opponents of SF is going to get her justice for that. Her alleged rapist is still a free man.

Who cares about the rapist when there is political capital to be made out of it - and seemingly that's what she wants

Its puzzling why her ire seems to be concentrated on Gerry Adams now,why is it not directed on her attacker who she still has a chance of bringing to court and then she could have got Gerry Adams role in this out in the open in a court which she seems to want more than anything now.


There is a massive push out there to discredit Sinn Fein and this is ratcheted up each time they soar in the poles but people are seeing through an Irish media who are completely biased against SF bordering on trying to subvert the democratic state with their coverage on SF.


The work and exchange and supply of imformation between political opponents of SF and the media is frightening.
The positive things that SF are doing are going completely unreported and they being dismissed in all articles as having no economic policy's whatsoeverever though Pierce Doherty has given out complete reports and analysis to back up his policy's,but the media will ignore this and just give out the same line between the "populist and looney to suit their agenda.


People are beginning to see through the Irish medias treatment against one democratic political party in this country to the point now that any story that comes out about SF is not believed anymore whether it be true or not and it is not good for a democratic system to have voters voting for a party because there is a vicious media bias against that party.


The fact that this girl has gone to the likes of Michael Martin and Eilish o Hanlon who is involved with the Sindependant and all that entails(harrises,ex Harrises,Fannings exFannings and all who were against peace agreements in NI and have never got over the fact that they were wrong that arms would be given up and that an agreement could be reached and put out articles about SF at the time in their paper to deliberately upset talks) is very strange route to take and I would say Charlie Flannagan and Joan Burton are raging that they didn't get their opportunity to make political capital out of this girls case.


Who's agendas are we working towards here because it certainly does not seem to be for taking an alleged rapist to justice.

Sierra Oscar wrote: »

This is absolute rubbish to be honest. If the leader of any other political party was accused of conspiring to coverup multiple rapes then they would not only be hounded out of the position of leader, but also out of the Dáil. This is the media doing their job in holding political leaders to account. Now that might not go hand in hand with Sinn Féin and its tendency to operate in a shady and secretive manner, but they should get used to it if they want to be treated the same as any other party.

Sinn Féin and its supporters need to stop the 'medjia' conspiracy nonsense if they want to be taken seriously. I don't know how many times I have read something along the lines of 'ah sure isn't it convenient timing for this to hit the papers!' over the last few days. When exactly would it be convenient? If the media wanted to do a hatchet job then they would pursue this during an election campaign, not midway during the election cycle.



That is some hatchet job you are trying to carry out, akin to character assassination. Even the language you are using, referring to Mairia as a 'girl' as if she is some sort of silly little child. The reason Mairia seems to have gone to the media is because she could never get any questions answered satisfactorily when dealing internally within Sinn Féin. She was subjected to a Kangaroo court by the IRA army council. It seems Sinn Féin just want this controversy to disappear, and now that it isn't its activists are out in force to try and discredit and completely undermine Mairia's character - following the tune set by its parliamentary party - instead of trying to actually ensure she gets her questions answered.

Sick.

Where is the hachet job,because I called her a girl,get real?
Because I asked what was her agenda in going to Michael Martin and and the usual political opponents of SF instead of going to someone who is impartial and genuine abought her plight who would advise her to go after her alleged rapist attacker and then she would get her chance to expose GA.
What is the "sick" quote about and why are you are trying to insinuate something that isn't there to justify that comment to suit your prejudice's
.
Im not surprised that you as a moderater on boards cannot see the hostile media bias agenda against SF because I see it every day here on boards from a mostly hostile anti SF moderaters who let anti SF posters away with comments that are not tolerated from posters who stand up for them because of their own prejuidices.

Banjo String wrote: »

Lol.

You mean to tell me you're so opinionated on the whole subject and haven't actually watched it

Just like Mary Lou so......

Sierra Oscar wrote: »

Ah here. You and everyone else knows that there is a difference between canvassing for a candidate during an election and actually working for a party. I have no problem putting my hand up and saying I have campaigned for Fianna Fáil candidates in the past. It doesn't mean that I would do so in the morning though. At least I am upfront about my affiliations.

Still though more whataboutery from you. I notice you didn't answer my question either that actually relates to the topic of the thread.

I hope everyone else can see the blatant tactics being employed by Sinn Féin'ers. You are trying to hurl questions at me and undermine my character - all in an attempt to deflect from the very serious questions that the party and its entire leadership have yet to answer.

You lot are at the same game trying to destroy Mairia Cahill's character too.

So now we see your real agenda,you are a FF activist.touched a nerve did I mentioning Michael?.
You lot are at the same game as the rest of them,pretend to care about this person and whats happened to her but really its an opportunity for the sleeveen party,now THAT is sick.


By the way,never voted for SF in my life,voted for Alan Kelly in the last election.

michael999999 wrote: »

I wouldn't give my money to that rag from INM, and put money in Denis o Brien's pocket. Have you not read the Moriarty tribunal?

I read it in the shop and buy the Sunday Business Post :pac:

Rightwing wrote: »

FF are finished. Only an idiot would vote for them. So a niche exists. But SF need to clean up their act. Adams isn't the man for the job.

The country is full of idiots who will vote FF back in soon enough.

Skid X wrote: »

His Brother was convicted of Rape. Of his own Daughter.

Are you insinuating that the conviction was part of a conspiracy to blacken the flawless reputation of Saint Gerry :rolleyes:

his brother was convicted and hope he rots in jail but unfortunatly he will probally be released early.... but media went into overkill because of his famous / infamous brother . how many familys out their have had brothers/ sisters / fathers / mothers convicted of serious crimes and would you try and blame the rest of family for it ?