Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Queen's Visit Q&A Megamerge

Options
  • 12-05-2011 12:36am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭


    The gardaí are saying that "For security reasons, there will be periodic searches of pedestrians and vehicles by members of An Garda Síochána at key locations." in Dublin when the queen of England is here.

    What are the laws allowing such an invasion of privacy?

    Between the Govt taking your savings and now stopping and searching you on the street without reason, it seems the top of a slippery slope.


«134567

Comments

  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,478 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    It is somewhat dubious and they can be certainly challenged on it.

    One possible power is under section 21 of the Public Order Act:

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1994/en/act/pub/0002/sec0021.html#sec21

    I suppose that they could also say that they suspect anyone who is at the event of attempting to commit an offence against the state:

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1939/en/act/pub/0013/sec0030.html#sec30

    And of course if you consent to such a search then it is permitted (in the same way that if a random person walked up to you on the street asked to search you and you agreed to it then there would be no problem).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    If you say no can you be arrested?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    I
    I suppose that they could also say that they suspect anyone who is at the event of attempting to commit an offence against the state:

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1939/en/act/pub/0013/sec0030.html#sec30
    where would I find an up to date schedule of special criminal court offences? I know tax dodging has been elevated to the ranks, thanks to Slab.
    And of course if you consent to such a search then it is permitted (in the same way that if a random person walked up to you on the street asked to search you and you agreed to it then there would be no problem).
    If I refuse unless a reason is given, is this valid? I'd refuse anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Its likely the public order act will be used and each public appearance will be designated an event for the purpose of the act. This gives gardai a greater range of powers than usual including power to restrict access to an area. Section 22 also gives a power of search for people in the vicinity of the event.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭naoise80


    If I refuse unless a reason is given, is this valid? I'd refuse anyway

    How do you ever manage to get on a flight?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭usernamegoes


    Do we have any SC decisions on the constitutional issues of 'periodic searches' of persons. Surely, a attending an event does not give rise to a cause to search under any legislation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Gillan and Quinton v. The United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 28 is interesting on this type of point... the UK Terrorism Laws are very different than anything we have here, but the ruling sows that these types of powers (found in the Terrorism Act in the UK) were in breach of human rights (Art 5 & 8 IIRC).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Do we have any SC decisions on the constitutional issues of 'periodic searches' of persons. Surely, a attending an event does not give rise to a cause to search under any legislation.

    Section 22 of the POA
    2.—(1) Where in relation to an event—


    (a) a barrier has been erected under section 21 and it appears to a member of the Garda Síochána that a person on foot or in a vehicle is seeking to cross or pass the barrier, or has crossed or passed the barrier, for the purpose of going to the place where the event is taking place or is about to take place, or


    (b) it appears to a member of the Garda Síochána that a person is about to enter, or has entered, the place where the event is taking place or is about to take place,


    and the person has, or the member of the Garda Síochána suspects with reasonable cause that the person has, in his possession—


    (i) any intoxicating liquor, or


    (ii) any disposable container, or


    (iii) any other article which, having regard to the circumstances or the nature of the event, could be used to cause injury,


    the member may exercise any one or more of the following powers—


    (I) search or cause to be searched that person or any vehicle in or on which he may be in order to ascertain whether he has with him any such liquor, container or other article,


    (II) refuse to allow that person to proceed to the event or to proceed further, as the case may be, unless that person surrenders permanently to a member of the Garda Síochána as directed by the member such liquor, container or other article.


    (2) Where a member of the Garda Síochána refuses to allow a person to proceed to the event or to proceed further by virtue of subsection (1) (II) and the person does not surrender the alcoholic liquor, disposable container or other article concerned, the member may require the person to leave the vicinity in an orderly and peaceful manner as directed by the member.


    (3) A person who, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, fails to comply with a requirement under subsection (2) shall be guilty of an offence.


    (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £500.


  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭dj_


    That's fine for an event but unless I am mistaken they are going to be searching people in the run up to the visit too.

    Does the whole week before count as the event too?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 13,381 Mod ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    I think they said that they will be closing off areas, so within that, I guess that they can consider this the event area, so the powers would apply.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 84 ✭✭dj_


    Paulw wrote: »
    I think they said that they will be closing off areas, so within that, I guess that they can consider this the event area, so the powers would apply.


    I guess that makes sense. Loads of Guards around Cork yesterday and today and I heard off-hand they were searching people here too. And I don't think any areas have been closed off yet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    dj_ wrote: »
    That's fine for an event but unless I am mistaken they are going to be searching people in the run up to the visit too.

    Does the whole week before count as the event too?

    Yes the "event" can start before the actual gig. For example Slane concert starts at 12 on Saturday but the barriers are erected from Friday evening.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    This is crazy stuff. So is it legal to refuse a search or not? Can I just say "no thanks" and head off in the opposite direction?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Another thing what constitutes a strip search? If they ask you to remove your shoes, or does it have to be clothing, socks for instance?

    I know when they do/did stop and search up north they often get you to take off your shoes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 120 ✭✭PaudyW


    yeah does anyone know what happens if you refuse search, not really happy with visit or paying for it, wont be going to it but was wondering if you be arrested or just moved along


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    Another thing what constitutes a strip search? If they ask you to remove your shoes, or does it have to be clothing, socks for instance?

    I know when they do/did stop and search up north they often get you to take off your shoes.

    I think shoes, hats, coats, scarves and gloves would be the extent of how far it would go without returning you to the station.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 13,381 Mod ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    CiaranC wrote: »
    This is crazy stuff. So is it legal to refuse a search or not? Can I just say "no thanks" and head off in the opposite direction?

    You can refuse to be searched, but they can then escort you from the secure area. That's my understanding from the wording of the law.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    The secure area is outlined in today's Irish Times I believe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    The secure area is outlined in today's Irish Times I believe.
    Let me guess, it extends from the GPO to the west side of Connemara :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    CiaranC wrote: »
    Let me guess, it extends from the GPO to the west side of Connemara :p

    I think it can only extend a mile from where she will be.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    CiaranC wrote: »
    Let me guess, it extends from the GPO to the west side of Connemara :p
    It's not too bad IIRC - it's the whole IFSC, down parnell street, down OCS, then West along the North Quays into the Phoenix Park, down by Heuston, Temple Bar, Trinity, etc.

    Probably missing a bit but I only caught a glance at the picture they had this morning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Sound like some of the legislation that our glorious leaders snuck in when the very existence of the state (lol) was under threat from subversives. Funny how that stuff never gets repealed :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Bambi wrote: »
    Sound like some of the legislation that our glorious leaders snuck in when the very existence of the state (lol) was under threat from subversives. Funny how that stuff never gets repealed :confused:
    Could just be common law ... don't know though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Bambi wrote: »
    Sound like some of the legislation that our glorious leaders snuck in when the very existence of the state (lol) was under threat from subversives. Funny how that stuff never gets repealed :confused:

    It's the public order act. It's been in existence for a long time and is used at every big concert, sports event and major event.


  • Registered Users Posts: 969 ✭✭✭murrayp4


    Does anyone know what legislation/common law is being used to justify these searches. It sounds like it may be contrary to the principal proportionality...
    Usually the POA requires the Garda to have a reasonable suspicion that a person is carrying a scheduled object before a search can be legally carried out.

    Also..what in law is a 'secure zone', as it seems to be used as a justification for these searches


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    murrayp4 wrote: »
    Does anyone know what legislation/common law is being used to justify these searches. It sounds like it may be contrary to the principal proportionality...

    That depends. Have you read the thread?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    Heres the definition of "event" in Section 21, referred to in section 22, above
    21.—(1) If it appears to a member of the Garda Síochána not below the rank of superintendent that it is necessary in the interests of safety or for the purpose of preserving order to restrict the access of persons to a place where an event is taking or is about to take place which attracts, or is likely to attract, a large assembly of persons (in this Part referred to as the “event”), he may authorise any member of the Garda Síochána to erect or cause to be erected a barrier or a series of barriers on any road, street, lane, alley or other means of access to such a place in a position not more than one mile therefrom for the purpose of regulating the access of persons or vehicles thereto.
    Seems to me this only allows them set up where the Queen of England is and where there is also a crowd at any given time. It doesnt give carte blanche to lock down the city, they must be using some anti-terrorism legislation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    CiaranC wrote: »
    Heres the definition of "event" in Section 21, referred to in section 22, above


    Seems to me this only allows them set up where the Queen of England is and where there is also a crowd at any given time. It doesnt give carte blanche to lock down the city, they must be using some anti-terrorism legislation.

    A mile is a long distance.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 13,381 Mod ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    CiaranC wrote: »
    Seems to me this only allows them set up where the Queen of England is and where there is also a crowd at any given time. It doesnt give carte blanche to lock down the city, they must be using some anti-terrorism legislation.

    They can close down all areas where the Queen will be, and where a crowd may assemble. So, if she goes from the Phoenix Park to the convention centre, they can close down all roads in between and make that whole area a designated event area, and the surrounding area up to a mile away.

    From your quoted text - "a place where an event is taking or is about to take place"


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭CiaranC


    Seems a bit of a stretch to me, clearly the spirit of the legislation is not designed to lock down an entire city over the course of a week.


Advertisement