IMPORTANT INFO RE SWINE FLU

Baxter scientists patented the “swine flu” vaccine two years before outbreak of “novel swine flu” virus * Austrian Baxter scientist involved in H1N1 vaccine patent also advises WHO

By birdflu666

Otfried Kistner, the head of virology at Baxter’s Austrian subsidiary in Orth an der Donau, which contaminated 72 kilos of vaccine material with the live bird flu virus and sent it to 16 labs this February, was part of the Austrian-based Baxter team that applied for a provisional patent for the “swine flu” H1N1 vaccine in August 2007, almost two years before the first “swine flu” outbreak in Mexico City in April2009 in a location about 50 kilometers from a Baxter facility.

Baxter’s Vaccine Patent Application US 2009/0060950 A1 gives “Kistner et al” as the applicant for the patent for the H1N1 vaccine that was provisionally filed on August 28, 2007.

http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/vaccines/Baxter%20Vaccine%20Patent%20Application.pdf

Also Kistner is an advisor to WHO and took part in the WHO meeting in Geneva 2005 on the Evaluation and Development of Influenza Pandemic Vaccines.

http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:VwWbwsW7dc4J:www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/influenza/Kistner.pdf+ottfried+kistner&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

It was WHO which supplied Baxter with the live bird flu virus that Baxter used to contaminate 72 kilos of vaccine material, sending it to 16 labs in four countries, neary sparking a pandemic in Febuary.

Source for story: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/baxter-team-patents-the-swine-flu-vaccine-two-years-before-swine-flu-outbreak-austrian-baxter-scientist-involved-in-h1n1-vaccine-patent-also-advises-who/

Baxter scientists who patented the H1N1 “swine flu” vaccine in August 2007 have shares in Baxter and so stand to profit directly from “recommending” H1N1 flu jab to WHO in conflict of interest


Baxter, the vaccine company found to have contaminated 72 kilos of vaccine material with live bird flu virus supplied by WHO in Austria in February 2009, so nearly triggering a pandemic, has announced an increase of 7.9 per cent in second quarter profits and is looking forward to a boost in earnings from the H1N1 flu jab, which has been mandated by WHO in response to the “swine flu” pandemic, reports WSJ and CLG.
It was Baxter executives, along with their counterparts in Novartis, GSK and Sanofi, who participated in the vaccine advisory group meeting of WHO on July 7th that recommended H1N1 vaccines for the world’s population.

These H1N1 vaccines were developed by Baxter scientists based in Austria who also have shares in Baxter, and so stand to make a direct profit from the demand created by WHO’s instructions to governments to vaccinate all their populations against the H1N1.

Also, Baxter’s Austrian-based science team led by Otfried Kistner filed the provisional application for the H1N1 vaccine in August 2007, reports CLG, almost two years before the HIN1 virus appeared in April and which the Paris based World Organization for Animal Health reported had never been seen before.

The fact that the virus had never been seen before in animal or human strongly suggests the notion that Baxter was instrumental in biosprospecting for and bioengineering the virus in the first place.
That would explain why Baxter was in a position to file a patent in August 2007. The existence of this patent also reinforces the notion that it was Baxter that released the “swine flu” virus in April. After all, where did it this previously unseen virus come from if not from the lab of the company that patented it 2 years earlier? A Baxter facility is close to the location where the “swine flu” first mysteriously appeared in Mexico City.
The Baxter H1N1 application is filed by a team of Austrian, German staff including Otfried Kistner, Ph.D., and P. Noel Barrett, Ph.D., for the Baxter H5N1 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Clinical Study Team, who also report they have shares in Baxter in a clincial study on that same H1N1 vaccine published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

CLG reports: “Baxter Vaccine Patent Application US 2009/0060950 A1 –’In particular preferred embodiments the composition or vaccine comprises more than one antigen…..such as influenza A and influenza B in particular selected from of one or more of the human H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7 subtypes, of the pig flu H1N1, H1N2, H3N1 and H3N2 subtypes, of the dog or horse flu H7N7, H3N8 subtypes or of the avian H5N1, H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H9N2, H5N2, H4N8, H10N7, H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5 subtypes.’

Also, Ehrlich, Kistner and Barret published a clinical trial in the New England Journal of Medicine ((Previous Volume 358:2573-2584 June 12, 2008 Number 24) on the safety of an H5N1 whole-virus vaccine produced on Vero cell cultures and its ability to induce antibodies capable of neutralizing various H5N1 strains, in which they concluded that the use of adjuvants did not improve the antibody response.

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/358/24/2573

And yet Baxter and WHO recommended oil-in-water adjuvants for the H1N1 “vaccines”.
These adjuvants have been associated with many diseases.
“SAGE recommended that promoting production and use of vaccines such as those that are formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines was important,” says the WHO pandemic briefing note of July 13th.

http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_vaccine_20090713/en/index.html

In addtion, WHO announced on July 16th that countries with “swine flu” cases no longer need to report them.

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 briefing note 3
Changes in reporting requirements for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection
16 JULY 2009 | GENEVA — As the 2009 pandemic evolves, the data needed for risk assessment, both within affected countries and at the global level, are also changing.
At this point, further spread of the pandemic, within affected countries and to new countries, is considered inevitable.
This assumption is fully backed by experience. The 2009 influenza pandemic has spread internationally with unprecedented speed. In past pandemics, influenza viruses have needed more than six months to spread as widely as the new H1N1 virus has spread in less than six weeks.
The increasing number of cases in many countries with sustained community transmission is making it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for countries to try and confirm them through laboratory testing.

Moreover, the counting of individual cases is now no longer essential in such countries for monitoring either the level or nature of the risk posed by the pandemic virus or to guide implementation of the most appropriate response measures.

And yet the same WHO calims that the “swine flu” has spread internationally with unprecedented speed. How can WHO know this if it drops the requirement for countries to suppply data on the speed and spread of that same virus? How can it track how the virus is mutating without data from countries?

In the July 13th briefing note, WHO places emphasise on collecting data for a “post-marketing surveillance” and so it is justifiable to ask why WHO does not want data for a pre marketing surveillance?

“Since new technologies are involved in the production of some pandemic vaccines, which have not yet been extensively evaluated for their safety in certain population groups, it is very important to implement post-marketing surveillance of the highest possible quality. In addition, rapid sharing of the results of immunogenicity and post-marketing safety and effectiveness studies among the international community will be essential for allowing countries to make necessary adjustments to their vaccination policies.”

Source: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/baxter-scientists-who-patented-baxters-h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-in-august-2008-have-shares-in-baxter-and-stand-to-profit-directly-from-recommending-baxter-h1n1-flu-jab-to-who/

Law can force Norwegians to take H1N1 vaccine from GSK


Norwegains could be forced to take the H1N1 vaccine under a law that allows mandatory vaccination to be enforced. §3-8

http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-19940805-055-003.html

The Norwegian government has contracted Glaxo Smith Kline to supply 9.4 million doses or two doses for each person in the country. GSK is rushing the H1N1 vaccine through trials, sparking concerns over safety.

http://www.vg.no/helse/artikkel.php?artid=568596

Some of the facts about the situation in Norway reveal the close financial and personal links between the head of the privatised Norwegian authority responsible for vaccinations, the vaccine industry and its promoters, fuelling fears of a conflict of interest:

1) The supreme vaccination agency in Norway is Folkehelseinstiuttet (FHI):
http://www.fhi.no/eway/

2) Camilla Stoltenberg, Director of Division of Epidemiology since 2002, is the sister of our prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg.

3) Jens Stoltenberg is travelling hand in hand with Bill Gates on vaccination campaigns, marketing vaccination.

4) FHI’s accounts are exempted from public scrutiny due to their being a private player in the vaccination market.

5) FHI has ordered 9,4 million doses of pandemic vaccine for the Norwegian people, two doses per head, from Glaxo. The price: 650 million NKR.

6) The vaccine is supposed to be ready for use in Nov/Dec 2009.

7) There has been no mandatory vaccination programme for many years so the authorities will be very nervous if they have to enforce vaccination on the Norwegian people. But if pressed hard enough by WHO and CDC, I guess they will feel that they have no choice but to follow up.

Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

There we are, along with the other 193 countries who may soon find themselves answering to the WHO.

This will happen in the event of a "pandemic emergency", this will probably be announced sometime in Autumn as we have been told to expect a surge in the number of cases at this time. Countries around the world are already getting ready for this. Most countries have either bought or ordered enough vaccines to vaccinate every single citizen at least twice, and an increasing number of governments are passing legislation that will allow the police to be used in the event of a mandatory vaccination.

Here's the latest news:

CLG UPDATES – China puts in place efficient flu monitoring system while WHO abandons all monitoring requirements * UK government looks set to keep schools open against expert advice and to force vaccinate children in autumn * “Swine flu pandemic” will “tip” UK economy over the brink in worst decline in 90 years

http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/china-puts-in-place-efficient-monitoring-system-to-check-spread-of-swine-flu-uk-government-looks-set-to-insist-on-keeping-schools-open-against-expert-advice-swine-flu-pandemic-will-ti/

meglome wrote: »

Nothing worse than people who ask difficult questions, ones that might not fit with a preconceived world view.

If you feel the question is important ask it yourself.

For anyone who's interested there's a show on tonight at 1 pm – 3 pm CST (which I think is 7 o clock GMT, it may be 6) where Jane Burgermeister, JoAnne Cremer, Elizabeth Book, Rebecca Campbell and either Dr Carley or Patrick Jordan will be discussing the vaccine story with Bill Ryan.

Follow link on homepage here:

http://www.projectcamelot.org/