ACitizenErased wrote: » https://twitter.com/DarrenEuronews/status/1367497688485363722?s=20
stefanovich wrote: » The EU are starting to behave very irrationally. von der Leyen is way out of her depth and should quit before she causes more chaos.
timsey tiger wrote: » It is not a statement it is a question. It turns out thet the UK actually signed their contract the day after the EU not months before as has been widely reported and it was very similar. The UK are also paying more per dose and have stuck their noses in all over so who knows what levers have been pulled.
ACitizenErased wrote: » AstraZeneca can't meet deliveries and decide to send 250k abroad yet the EU is irrational?
stefanovich wrote: » AZ are a private company with multiple contracts with multiple countries. The EU contract is weak. They are not playing by the rules and just trying to cover up their incompetence. This sort of hostile behaviour is reckless.
ACitizenErased wrote: » You've read the contract? Half of it was redacted
stefanovich wrote: » Politico did a comparison. I've already posted it a few times! AZ will avoid litigation. The EU contract only required "best effort". I wonder what was redacted and on whose request? Who are they hiding the detail from? Us?
ACitizenErased wrote: » As if they wouldn't redact it, a private business never ever publishes contracts
ACitizenErased wrote: » Or the GP in your town is wrong?
hotmail.com wrote: » Latest figures shows that 97% of the population hasn't been vaccinated yet, according to RTE report.
[Deleted User] wrote: » This system announced today is a disaster, they should have left it to gps to identify cohort 4. My father had to ring his diabetes clinic ( he had an issue with his machine). They confirmed that his levels were stable so he will not be in cohort 4. Technically his bmi is over 40 but they said that is nothing to do with them and they know nothing about referring him. Him and I imagine many others will fall through the cracks now that it is out of gps hands.
Deleted User wrote: » By that measure the UK rate is only 1.5%
Dressoutlet wrote: » I phoned my GP. He explained that he would call all people on the system that fell into group 4. He said it says Hospital because it is a vaccine clinic that is set up for them. Tell your father to call his GP for clarification
average_runner wrote: » But how many in the UK have some protection compare to some protection here.
AdamD wrote: » How is it irrational? Why would they EU allow Astrazenica to send supplies from the EU to elsewhere whilst consistently missing deliveries to the EU itself?
IRISHSPORTSGUY wrote: » Why is it always European factories that Australia and Canada have to rely on? America's greediness needs to be highlighted more tbh.
stefanovich wrote: » The EU gave late approval. How many doses should AZ have manufactured at risk beforehand? Blocking the shipment and threatening article 16. She's just going bananas now.
Deleted User wrote: » That's not what the OP said. If the had said 94% it would be comparing apples with apples
josip wrote: » But how many in Israel have some protection compared to some protection in the UK? But but but...
seamus wrote: » If France was suffering from rolling blackouts while French power stations continued to export electricity to the UK, you wouldn't call it irrational for the government to step in. This is no different, but it's a handy distraction for those who hate the EU. It would be nice if we could keep the politicking out of this thread. The EU fired a shot across AZ's bow a few weeks ago that they would block vaccine exports if it came to that. AZ have now been fvcking around and reneging on their EU commitments. So it makes sense that the EU would do what it has to.