Away With The Fairies wrote: » There has been criminal prosecutions for the transmission of hiv. The same should happen for this virus.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » Again, the extremes. Knowingly infecting somebody with HIV when you knowingly have it is somewhat different to transmitting a virus which you are unaware you have.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » We're in a pandemic, masks help. And yes you do have a desire to infect others with your refusal to wear a mask.
rubadub wrote: » I would go further than that, if you are leaving your house for any reason which is not vital to your survival then you definitely must have a desire to infect others. These pathetic excuses for masks are unacceptable, if you have not invested hundreds or thousands in a proper system you have a desire to infect others. If you drive above 30km/h you have a desire to kill or cripple children. why single out this virus, surely it should be the same for all diseases?
Away With The Fairies wrote: » So that argument is stupid.
rubadub wrote: » not nearly as stupid as saying "you do have a desire to infect others with your refusal to wear a mask.."The most twisted and laughable logic I have seen in a long while, totally fcuked in the head. There are plenty of deaths and injuries due to speed annually, thought this was well known, and that people are asking for tighter limits.
ShyMets wrote: » Trust me. When it comes to a certain poster you haven't seen anything yet:)
rubadub wrote: » not nearly as stupid as saying "you do have a desire to infect others with your refusal to wear a mask.." The most twisted and laughable logic I have seen in a long while, totally fcuked in the head. There are plenty of deaths and injuries due to speed annually, thought this was well known, and that people are asking for tighter limits.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » You came in here, nothing to add to the discussion and write that about me.
Tork wrote: » What a load of silliness over a piece of cloth that most people will only need to wear for a few minutes every now and then
Deleted User wrote: »
Tork wrote: » I was shopping earlier and did a rough head count of how many people were in the supermarket. I counted between 30 and 40, with about 5 mask wearers. No social distancing as such in the store. There was one group of men in their 20s who looked like they were a bunch of friends catching up for a chinwag. One had a mask. We had 23 new cases of the virus in today's update which is higher than it has been for a while. Hopefully it's a blip but it goes to show that we can't become complacent.
sheepsh4gger wrote: » I like the idea of wearing masks just to prevent regular influenza. In fact this is very popular in Japan. The added benefit if privacy.
sheepsh4gger wrote: » A private business has the right to refuse entry to anyone.
is_that_so wrote: » Evidence that some people have embraced this pandemic as if they have died and gone to heaven!
jackboy wrote: » They don’t, they are not allowed to discriminate. They need a good reason to refuse entry.
Tork wrote: » That is not the point and you know it. Covid-19 is highly infectious and can by spread by droplets in the air. The ones expelled from people's mouths even if they're just speaking. They're is more information coming out now to suggest that that is how the virus is largely spread, rather than from surfaces. Telling people to stay away from the shops and other enclosed areas is a lazy solution to this, just because some folk are too stupid or stubborn to wear a mask. We've been through a lockdown which restricted our movements and continues to impinge on our lives. It'll all have been for nothing of we get a second wave. The numbers were kept down because most of us have been living like battery hens for months. That cannot go on indefinitely and we need to find ways to live with this virus until a vaccine is found. If it means popping on a mask for few minutes while going into the supermarket, so be it. As thing stand, those of us wearing masks are effectively pissing against the wind because most people aren't wearing them.
Tork wrote: » Avoiding supermarkets is not the point and you know it. Covid-19 is highly infectious and can by spread by droplets in the air. The ones expelled from people's mouths even if they're just speaking. They're is more information coming out now to suggest that that is how the virus is largely spread, rather than from surfaces. Telling people to stay away from the shops and other enclosed areas is a lazy solution to this, just because some folk are too stupid or stubborn to wear a mask. We've been through a lockdown which restricted our movements and continues to impinge on our lives. It'll all have been for nothing of we get a second wave. The numbers were kept down because most of us have been living like battery hens for months. That cannot go on indefinitely and we need to find ways to live with this virus until a vaccine is found. If it means popping on a mask for few minutes while going into the supermarket, so be it. As thing stand, those of us wearing masks are effectively pissing against the wind because most people aren't wearing them.
is_that_so wrote: » My view all along is that it is a personal responsibility, i.e. you. It is just an advisory and people choose to interpret that as they see fit. We really have no control over what other people will do and we pay them no heed in normal times so why bother now.
railer201 wrote: » In the West we've let all these viruses into our lungs before doing anything about it by way of vaccines. There's lots of other deadly stuff about too such the nitrogen dioxides from motor vehicle exhausts, apart from dirt and dust. Interestingly since donning a mask, a boards cyclist recently posted in another forum that he no longer suffered from hay fever as a result. Perhaps we're late to the party on this one, or should I say the ghoulish masked ball, as it's turned out to be.
Tork wrote: » My observations any time I go into a shop suggest that very few people are wearing masks. Sometimes stronger measures need to be taken. Would people really be going shopping with their bags for life if the shops weren't charging 22c for the single use ones? Would we really have no smoking in pubs?