pjohnson wrote: » Look at the amount of fitness enthusiasts that emerged when told to stay in at the start of this. We must be the slimmest and fittest nation in Europe!
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Who other than the NZ prime minister is laughing at us or has made any derogatory comments over the restrictions measures?
Penfailed wrote: » I'd imagine that post was tongue in cheek. I read it like that anyway.
mille100piedi wrote: » you are free to not agree with gemma but if you think it is right that the police sedate everyone that doesn't agree with you it is scaring.
gmisk wrote: » That website is errr....interesting..... Id love to see Gemtrails sedated here....that shrieking voice would wreck your head
Deleted User wrote: » Traffic back to normal pre lockdown levels where I am today, (west of Ireland town).
Deleted User wrote: » The only people that are really at risk from Covid 19 are the over 65's. We should be cocooning the hell out of those people. Instead we feel bad for them so encourage them to come out and walk at peak hours. (Lunch time) Terrible advice considering over 90% of deaths in that catergory. Meanwhile, the countries economy falls apart while everyone at very low risk sits at home.We've made a right mess of this and its no wonder other countries are laughing at us.
mille100piedi wrote: » now in italy police are sedating people that are against this crazy rules!https://fromrome.info/2020/05/02/agrigento-citizen-decrying-fake-pandemic-on-megaphone-forcibly-sedated-by-police-in-the-street/
easypazz wrote: » He thinks half of deaths in Ireland due to COVID are people under 70.He gets hung up on Stockholm because its not a country.He won't understand a lot of what you are saying.
the issue of Covid-19 is not only with the over 70s and those in care homes. Only half the current deaths can be attributed to this cohort.
partyguinness wrote: » I sincerely hope the Gov is not as foolhardy enough to wait until it is 100% gone before 'opening up'. It is not going to disappear any time soon and vaccines take around 18mts to perfect at the best of times (accordingly my microbiologist scientist buddy who works with a large pharmaceutical company). I suppose if every other country does open up then Ireland's hand will be forced.
castletownman wrote: » Three cars were destroyed and 70K worth of damage done to a separate property in Gorey over the weekend, by a fella who was temporarily released from prison due to fears of Covid-19 spreading in the prison system. Yet, they don't seem to have taken any measures to protect the elderly in residential care settings. It's a national scandal.
Mad_maxx wrote: » would not cost be a thought getting on a flight today , ive two kids under four and a fiance , we would happily take a holiday if there was anywhere to go to which wasnt locked down
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Sorry sorry sorry sorry, Leo's plan is saying its fine for people who cocoon to go out and get a bit of exercise/sun while maintaining social distancing. County council takes that then and allocates park times to over 70s only. Now we can't go to the park for 2 or 3 hours a day. Who initiated this? I am not saying that you wont get your vitamin D, you get good bit of it if exposed to sun for 15 mins or more. Just to get it straight, if there is a deadly disease out there which kills 90% + of over 70s, I do not believe that we should allow over 70s to walk on the streets or in parks. You can not expect compliance of strict measures from young millions of people of the population, people have house parties for crying out. Surely you agree?
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » We all also make a lot of valid points. Like the one below, btw do you agree on the that point? You havent contributed lately Just to get it straight, if there is a deadly disease out there which kills 90% + of over 70s, I do not believe that we should allow over 70s to walk on the streets or in parks. You can not expect compliance of strict measures from young millions of people of the population, people have house parties for crying out. Surely you agree?
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » This is very worrying, because most cases that have severe covid19 infections all have vitamin D deficiency. Getting to that stage where government is dictating who gets vitamin D and who does not? Does any other country do this nonsense? thats what i wonder. I havent heard of any country having 2km 5km 20km craziness, now you can go to a park and I cant because i am not a certain age? NPHET has lost the plot
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Sorry sorry sorry sorry, Leo's plan is saying its fine for people who cocoon to go out and get a bit of exercise/sun while maintaining social distancing. County council takes that then and allocates park times to over 70s only. Now we can't go to the park for 2 or 3 hours a day. Who initiated this?I am not saying that you wont get your vitamin D, you get good bit of it if exposed to sun for 15 mins or more. Just to get it straight, if there is a deadly disease out there which kills 90% + of over 70s, I do not believe that we should allow over 70s to walk on the streets or in parks. You can not expect compliance of strict measures from young millions of people of the population, people have house parties for crying out. Surely you agree?
gozunda wrote: » Are you being deliberatly obtuse or just posting for the crack? You do know that not all care homes cater for the elderly yeah? That many of those over 70 live also live in their own homes yeah? Trouble seems to be you only read the bits you want ...
gozunda wrote: » the issue of Covid-19 is not only with the over 70s and those in care homes. Only half the current deaths can be attributed to this cohort.
Penfailed wrote: » That's okay. We all make mistakes.
JP100 wrote: » They'll probably be very little options in terms of a holiday from now until the end of summer.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Sorry sorry sorry sorry
mille100piedi wrote: » I am disabled with a muscle genetic disorder and the park beside my home is the only place I go for a walk, but parks are for everybody and nobody can be stopped to go to the park at any time.
Mad_maxx wrote: » absolutely , the over 65,s should be cocooned indefinately , structured recreation within strict parameters can be arranged until we are over this there will be a new normal for vulnerable demographics , it doesnt matter if the government chicken out for a few months more ,eventually things will be forced to reopen but many will still be vulnerable and they must take responsibility for themselves
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » You are very pessimistic. And you offer 0 solutions. I dont know what else to tell you, apart from the fact that you dont have a single peer reviewed scientific published research to back up your pessimism.