partyguinness wrote: » I sincerely hope the Gov is not as foolhardy enough to wait until it is 100% gone before 'opening up'. It is not going to disappear any time soon and vaccines take around 18mts to perfect at the best of times (accordingly my microbiologist scientist buddy who works with a large pharmaceutical company). I suppose if every other country does open up then Ireland's hand will be forced.
Deleted User wrote: » Traffic back to normal pre lockdown levels where I am today, (west of Ireland town).
easypazz wrote: » He thinks half of deaths in Ireland due to COVID are people under 70.He gets hung up on Stockholm because its not a country.He won't understand a lot of what you are saying.
the issue of Covid-19 is not only with the over 70s and those in care homes. Only half the current deaths can be attributed to this cohort.
mille100piedi wrote: » now in italy police are sedating people that are against this crazy rules!https://fromrome.info/2020/05/02/agrigento-citizen-decrying-fake-pandemic-on-megaphone-forcibly-sedated-by-police-in-the-street/
Deleted User wrote: » The only people that are really at risk from Covid 19 are the over 65's. We should be cocooning the hell out of those people. Instead we feel bad for them so encourage them to come out and walk at peak hours. (Lunch time) Terrible advice considering over 90% of deaths in that catergory. Meanwhile, the countries economy falls apart while everyone at very low risk sits at home.We've made a right mess of this and its no wonder other countries are laughing at us.
gmisk wrote: » That website is errr....interesting..... Id love to see Gemtrails sedated here....that shrieking voice would wreck your head
mille100piedi wrote: » you are free to not agree with gemma but if you think it is right that the police sedate everyone that doesn't agree with you it is scaring.
Penfailed wrote: » I'd imagine that post was tongue in cheek. I read it like that anyway.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Who other than the NZ prime minister is laughing at us or has made any derogatory comments over the restrictions measures?
pjohnson wrote: » Look at the amount of fitness enthusiasts that emerged when told to stay in at the start of this. We must be the slimmest and fittest nation in Europe!
mille100piedi wrote: » the website is not important, there are tons of source in italian but I don't think you speak italian?so I found a source in english.It is not important what is written but you can clearly see police and three doctors with a with uniform around him.
Mad_maxx wrote: » the older demographic are far richer globally and far more powerful politically , as another poster stated earlier the government over ruled the HSE with regards when the over seventies could get out for exercise , they were fine with kids being bunkered this past two months
Penfailed wrote: » Is anywhere in the world locking down until there's a vaccine? I haven't heard of anywhere trying that approach.
hopalongcass wrote: » The banks are definitely laughing at us,again,simply its a case of how much is the population willing to take.The countries exiting are feeling the pulse of the nation online and are only willing to milk it as long as the population believes this rubbish. Sadly as proved in the last financial crisis,the hangover of being a subjugated British colony still hangs over us,we are meek unpatriotic pushovers on the world stage and are always the laughing stock of the western world with weak timid leaders who are always the first to hang their own people out to dry. And as long as we have shills like you convincing the people that this is warranted and we have a naive unpatriotic population that fall for it,it will continue until there is enough of us saying enough is enough.Reality is even if the death rate was 20 times what it is now it still would not warrant destroying the economy and taking on this kind of debt.People of all ages would want to be dropping dead all around us on the street to warrant what is happening right now.
Deleted User wrote: » The only people that are really at risk from Covid 19 are the over 65's. We should be cocooning the hell out of those people. Instead we feel bad for them so encourage them to come out and walk at peak hours. (Lunch time) Terrible advice considering over 90% of deaths in that catergory. Meanwhile, the countries economy falls apart while everyone at very low risk sits at home..
Quantum Erasure wrote: » https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/geezgj/1544_year_olds_up_to_40_more_likely_to_die_in/
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Just to get it straight, if there is a deadly disease out there which kills 90% + of over 70s, I do not believe that we should allow over 70s to walk on the streets or in parks. You can not expect compliance of strict measures from young millions of people of the population, people have house parties for crying out. Surely you agree?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Sure the banks love it when economic activity grinds to a halt. But but but the banks...but but but the goberment...but but but sheeple. Virtually every-f**ng-where else is doing it do ye nutters. You can argue the rights and wrongs of the policy, but Ireland is not alone in what is being done, far from it
uli84 wrote: » Keeping kids out of school environment for 6 months non-stop is total madness (yes i know they’d be off jul-aug anyways) I’ve been looking at Portugal as they went through all this at similar time as Ireland and I think their approach of opening secondary schools mid-May and Primary in June is very reasonable and something i was personally hoping for in here. My neighbours’ kid cried when told she wouldn’t be going back before September, I cannot even imagine the situation of kids where there are issues in the household
MOH wrote: » One thing I've decided from a lot of the attitude to Covid-19 is, to hell with the environment. I'm not in a high-risk bracket, but I can understand why restrictions are necessary. But there seems to be tons of younger people whose attitude is since they're not high risk for the disease, why should they be restricted? By that logic, I'm probably going to be dead before the effects of climate change get really bad. So why should I bother doing anything that's primarily going to benefit other people?
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » I am not young myself, but we are kind of discussing elderly as "we know whats best for them". Put yourself in shoes of an 85 year old granddad with 3 grandchildren, he cant hug them now according to govt guidance, there is no indication when he can hug them, and if he asks - he is going to be told "wait for vaccine". This is seriously depressing for any individual. Regardless if they are in good health or bad health.And unfortunately in our entire human race history we have not developed a vaccine against human corona viruses.
LiquidZeb wrote: » Well the banks seemed to do alright after the last crisis they seem to weather every storm. If you don't want to question your betters that's up to you to tug your forelock.