TaurenDruid wrote: » So despite all of her threats to various journalists (not hypocritical at all to be trying to silence people!) she's only sueing three people at present - that's Village magazine, pro-science and pro-vaccine David Grimes, and Panti Bliss? Classy woman.
pjohnson wrote: » You must have missed people telling you they arent "woke" and then answering your survey. If you tried to read you would know this Gem. Reading has never been your strong point.
Deleted User wrote: » Stephen is a racist, as are other people on this thread. That's a fact. If they think people can only move from one white country to another as it's easier to integrate, that is inherently racist.
pjohnson wrote: » In the thread.
cookie1977 wrote: » (Or evidenced in this thread)
Overheal wrote: » It’s in the thread.
cookie1977 wrote: » Go read the whole thread.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » In fact you have been provided with numerous examples in this thread of his racism and bigotry.
pablohoney87 wrote: » He has echoed it numerous times across multiple threads. Proof enough?
Overheal wrote: » It is demonstrably true, you just have to get the thumb out and read the thread, it’s bad manners to jump late into a thread and be this obtuse about it.
Overheal wrote: » Again it’s in this thread,
Kimsang wrote: » Why don't you reference where people have been racist, instead of doubling down by calling people you don't agree with unable to read. You're doubling down is gone beyond a joke now. I am calling the ones who call people racist without evidence woke. Can you prove me otherwise?
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » On what basis is she suing panti?
ollkiller wrote: » The american economy was "booming" in the last 2 years of Obama's presidency and has continued as such during Trumps reign. Economic cycles happen and they have feck all to do with who is president. Next no one votes for the Taoiseach. The party that wins decides who is leader. As regards you'd prefer Trump to Leo. Nothing i can say about that.
Stark wrote: » I think it's just a rite of passage for Irish conservatives these days.
Sir Oxman wrote: » Can the cat sh1t/boring personal stuff stop please? Thanks. I subbed to this thread to laugh my arse off at the online/offline antics of the dear leader especially since the great free speech advocate herself blocked me on Twatter for daring to ask her highness a question. Back to the chemtrail and measles lovin nutster please.
Blueshoe wrote: » You don't get to make the call catmandoo
Overheal wrote: » Listen, Kanye: it’s in the thread. Tried to explain it to you, you didn’t like the answer because it involved doing your own legwork. You’re still on this kick though like you’re trying to explain how you aren’t a gay fish or why your girlfriend isn’t a hobbit. Those are South Park references to the uninitiated. It’s probably 1500+ posts back now, not our fault you didn’t keep up.
Kimsang wrote: » More doubling down? You are hilarious. You've made this accusation now 6+ times in this thread without once saying why you call someone racist. Keep doubling down this is hilarious. Or would you rather show some proof and prove you and right and end the conversation?...... na, because you are wrong.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » do you seriously expect posters to look back over thousands of posts to satisfy a johnny-come-lately?
Kimsang wrote: » The ones that call people racist in this thread without evidence. I have already posted a long list of those people saying 'its in the thread' you must have missed it.Here it is in the thread: https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=111079864&postcount=3598
Mr E wrote: » Mod: @Kimsang: what do you want the mods to do? Go through 3766 posts to prove or disprove? The "it's in the thread" posters need to put up or shut up, quite frankly. Otherwise this will go around in circles.
Kimsang wrote: » I would like to see this post removed:https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=110492920&postcount=8 As well as future implications of 'racist' best sanctioned by mods unless the poster who makes the claim can supply evidence and quote what definition of racist they are using.
Odhinn wrote: » Essentially you're saying that everyone who states yer man is racist are "woke" - not the most solid argument. I don't think he's a racist - more an islamophobe as far as I can gather.
Overheal wrote: » See my previous post. The post you linked to is accurate, frankly I don’t see why the mods should remove it.
Kimsang wrote: » If you call me a fascist because I'm praising Donald Trump, I could say "well if fascism means supporting the US president, then call me a fascist" It doesn't mean I admit to being a fascist, but rather means I am critiquing your definition of fascism. Exactly the same as Stephen's statement, he was criticizing the word racism. Some people are only willfully ignorant when it suits. Is it fair to call someone a racist when their views aren't "clear"?
Kimsang wrote: » I would like to see this post removed:https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=110492920&postcount=8
Overheal wrote: » So I have proof though, I’ve explained it to you before (few hundred posts ago now) and in the spirit of the mod warning perhaps you should stop derogatorily calling people “woke” when you don’t have proof of the negative that your above definition appears to rely on. IMHO.
davedanon wrote: » Isn't this backseat modding?
Kimsang wrote: » You seem to be a fair person, so I'll assume you have fairly misinterpreted me. I'm saying anyone who calls anyone racist without proof are woke. Because they are the ones that have expanded the definition.
Overheal wrote: » Your post is irrelevant as over the course of 3000+ posts Stephen made his views clear. Are you his attorney?
Kimsang wrote: » Are you saying his views are racist? Can you prove that?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c599644a213e5f18742e0afff85076a6.svg)
