Wannabe Freemason is now a CT mod.

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 3:53pm #1

Ok, I love a joke now and again but seriously, what the f**k? Is this a really bad joke? Yehaks has been so openly critical of CTers and denies any and all CTs on that forum and now someone at the top as seen fit to make him a moderator.

As conspiracies go, this one is just so obvious it's not even funny. Great job, this whole website has just been sussed.

Obvious conspiracy is obvious.

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 4:11pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Ok, I love a joke now and again but seriously, what the f**k? Is this a really bad joke? Yehaks has been so openly critical of CTers and denies any and all CTs on that forum and now someone at the top as seen fit to make him a moderator.

As conspiracies go, this one is just so obvious it's not even funny. Great job, this whole website has just been sussed.

Obvious conspiracy is obvious.

First of all, having someone objective and not a CTer helps the range of moderatorship, just like there are non-muslim mods in Islam forum
Secondly, go talk to a doctor

Duiske · 11-09-2010 4:12pm

Are you fuking serious? This is a joke right? One of the biggest skeptics/deniers on these forums is now a mod? Well, I think I'm just about done posting here. Good luck. Now I know this site is run by Freemasons. I start posting threads and stuff exposing them and all of a sudden a wannabe Freemason is a mod. Worst conspiracy ever, I'm outta here.

Change of heart eh ? Welcome back.

My name is URL · 11-09-2010 4:22pm

Of all the people who regularly post in the CT forum, yekahs is probably the most moderate. It's a rare occasion where I fully agree with mods =p, but even I can see that he was the right choice for the job.

Would you prefer to have someone from the extreme of either side appointed? How would that benefit the forum? I think you're over-reacting big-time to this

Tom Dunne · 11-09-2010 4:25pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Great job, this whole website has just been sussed

In what way has the website been sussed?

I don't know what you are talking about.

Yitzhak Rabin · 11-09-2010 4:26pm

Hi Demonspawn,

Sorry to hear you didn't like the decision to make me a mod. But its really irrelevant what side of the spectrum you come from when it comes to being a mod. All you have to have is an ability to enforce the charter, regardless of who is breaking the rules.

I feel that I am objective in this regard. If you could see my reported post history, you would see that I have reported far far more posts from sceptics than proponents of CTs.

Also, you say I am not open to any CTs. This is simply not true. I have started threads which I put forward CTs. I have changed my viewpoints on a number of issues since I began posting here.

As for the freemason thing. I have been completely upfront about everything there. I have let the members of this forum know of my intentions before my family!!

You are entitled to your opinion, but all I can do is say, that I will aim to be completely objective in any mod decision I have to make, and I look forward to continuing to post on this forum and explore all the CTs I am interested in.

Brown Bomber · 11-09-2010 4:27pm

bluewolf wrote: »

First of all, having someone objective and not a CTer helps the range of moderatorship, just like there are non-muslim mods in Islam forum
Secondly, go talk to a doctor

No, not just like. Completely different.

There are muslim and non-muslim mods in Islam.

There is exclusively skeptic mods in conspiracy theories.

Edit. So there is no "range of moderatorship". It is fair to assume from your comments that you are in favour of a "range of moderatorshp" in the forum so for all intents and purposes you have agreed with the OT.

For what its worth however, I do think Yekahs will make a fair and capable mod - best of luck to you, genuinely.

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 4:32pm

Brown Bomber wrote: »

No, not just like. Completely different.

There are muslim and non-muslim mods in Islam.

There is exclusively skeptic mods in conspiracy theories.

Ok, I didn't know that

Edit. So there is no "range of moderatorship". It is fair to assume from your comments that you are in favour of a "range of moderatorshp" in the forum so for all intents and purposes you have agreed with the OT.

That there's a conspiracy and the website is run by freemasons?

not a chance
I'd agree with "guys I'm not happy with another skeptic mod maybe we could have a look at making a CT mod instead?" but not this

randylonghorn · 11-09-2010 4:46pm

bluewolf wrote: »

That there's a conspiracy and the website is run by freemasons?
not a chance

You *would* say that though, wouldn't you?!

/looks over shoulder

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 4:51pm

bluewolf wrote: »

That there's a conspiracy and the website is run by freemasons?
not a chance

There's a link to the Grand Lodge of Antrim in yekah's signature. There's a rumor that DeVore is a Freemason. You must think we're all thick or something.

Tom Dunne · 11-09-2010 4:53pm

demonspawn wrote: »

There's a link to the Freemasons handbook in yekah's signature. There's a rumor that DeVore is a Freemason. You must think we're all thick or something.

Thick isn't the word that springs to mind.

Zombienosh · 11-09-2010 4:53pm

on 9/11 no less, disaster.

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 4:54pm

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Thick isn't the word that springs to mind.

Insults and mockery are the first defense, right? Make the person look foolish so others don't bother investigating. I know how it all works.

Actually, the lies are the first defense. Make yourselves look like some ordinary men's club, charitable and kind, when behind the scenes we know what really goes on. When the lies fail you resort to character assassination.

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 4:55pm

demonspawn wrote: »

There's a link to the Grand Lodge of Antrim in yekah's signature. There's a rumor that DeVore is a Freemason. You must think we're all thick or something.

There's a rumour you're a freemason.

Fun, isn't it?
And no, I think you have mental issues and I shouldn't be winding you up, but...

Tom Dunne · 11-09-2010 4:57pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Make the person look foolish so others don't bother investigating. I know how it all works.

I don't think it's me that is making you look foolish.

aidan_walsh · 11-09-2010 4:57pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Insults and mockery are the first defense, right? Make the person look foolish so others don't bother investigating. I know how it all works.

Actually, the lies are the first defense. Make yourselves look like some ordinary men's club, charitable and kind, when behind the scenes we know what really goes on. When the lies fail you resort to character assassination.

I don't think you answered his earlier question yet.

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 5:01pm

I wonder if demonspawn is in the freemasons and engaging in undercover anti-propaganda. You know, make the "everyone is in the freemasons!" people look like they're crazy, so nobody will accuse anyone of being in the freemasons.

Ok demonspawn, we're on to you now
:pac:

dr.bollocko · 11-09-2010 5:02pm

yekahs wrote: »

Hi Demonspawn,

Sorry to hear you didn't like the decision to make me a mod. But its really irrelevant what side of the spectrum you come from when it comes to being a mod. All you have to have is an ability to enforce the charter, regardless of who is breaking the rules.

I feel that I am objective in this regard. If you could see my reported post history, you would see that I have reported far far more posts from sceptics than proponents of CTs.

Also, you say I am not open to any CTs. This is simply not true. I have started threads which I put forward CTs. I have changed my viewpoints on a number of issues since I began posting here.

As for the freemason thing. I have been completely upfront about everything there. I have let the members of this forum know of my intentions before my family!!

You are entitled to your opinion, but all I can do is say, that I will aim to be completely objective in any mod decision I have to make, and I look forward to continuing to post on this forum and explore all the CTs I am interested in.

Good luck with the CT gig dude. I wouldn't waste any further keyboard strokes worrying though.

gizmo · 11-09-2010 5:23pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Insults and mockery are the first defense, right? Make the person look foolish so others don't bother investigating. I know how it all works.

Actually, the lies are the first defense. Make yourselves look like some ordinary men's club, charitable and kind, when behind the scenes we know what really goes on. When the lies fail you resort to character assassination.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT0WEFs2S90

:eek:

tbh · 11-09-2010 5:25pm

With all due respect, the mental health of some posters would be better served by their access to this site being withdrawn, IMHO.

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 5:29pm

tbh wrote: »

With all due respect, the mental health of some posters would be better served by their access to this site being withdrawn, IMHO.

And there it is, what we've all been waiting for.

Tom Dunne · 11-09-2010 5:32pm

tbh wrote: »

With all due respect, the mental health of some posters would be better served by their access to this site being withdrawn, IMHO.

You can't silence me.

I have friends, you know. Friends in high places. Very high.

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 5:34pm

Tom Dunne wrote: »

You can't silence me.

I have friends, you know. Friends in high places. Very high.

Flying in planes? :pac:

Nevyn · 11-09-2010 5:35pm

Look Tom the coppers warned you already not to be tricking your 'friends' into standing in the cage of a cherry picker and holding them hostage 20ft in the air.

Tom Dunne · 11-09-2010 5:46pm

Thaedydal wrote: »

Look Tom the coppers warned you already not to be tricking your 'friends' into standing in the cage of a cherry picker and holding them hostage 20ft in the air.

It was 40 foot and they went willingly.

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 5:49pm

Look at all the moderators and their fanboys here trying to discredit me. Anyone else see that as incredibly suspicious? I hope so. If what I'm saying had no truth they would have no interest in this thread, would they?

tbh · 11-09-2010 5:55pm

You seems to be expressing the belief that everyone is out to get you. Tell me, how long have you felt like this?

coffee_cake · 11-09-2010 5:57pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Look at all the moderators and their fanboys here trying to discredit me. Anyone else see that as incredibly suspicious? I hope so. If what I'm saying had no truth they would have no interest in this thread, would they?

You posted a link to this thread, what else were we to do but follow it?

tbh wrote: »

You seems to be expressing the belief that everyone is out to get you. Tell me, how long have you felt like this?

Since his breakdown I would imagine
Which makes me feel a little guilty
but oh well

demonspawn · 11-09-2010 5:57pm

tbh wrote: »

You seems to be expressing the belief that everyone is out to get you. Tell me, how long have you felt like this?

Nope, nobody is out to get me. I'm out to get you lot. Don't you see that? Freemasons and their kind are the scum of this Earth and their time is up.

smashey · 11-09-2010 5:58pm

demonspawn wrote: »

Nope, nobody is out to get me. I'm out to get amuse you lot. Don't you see that?

Fixed that for you.

/conspiracy

Nevyn · 11-09-2010 6:00pm

Look any group/society which refuses to reveal all their members and practices get slated.
Too many people seem to think that every thing should be open and open to everyone like christianity and if they don't they get accused of all sorts.

Same things apply to those who are of a lineaged Wiccan tradition.
Just cos they are select and occult (meaning hidden/secret knowledge) it doesn't mean they are up to nefarious deeds.

Everyone else please give over with implying they have some sort of mental illness.
It is personal abuse and denigrating to those who do have mental illnesses.

Wannabe Freemason is now a CT mod.

Comments