Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford University discussion

18911131477

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭fiachr_a


    Waterford United would be higher in the world ranking than Waterford Uni!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭reni10


    Why don't WIT and UCC merge instead and just call it University South/Southeast?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Thankfully WIT pullout, Carlow IT is really bad and would bring WIT down a lot if it went ahead.

    As for the FG/LAB plebs not rolling back, they will need something to get votes in 2016 and this will come up again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    Hilarious is the day Labour decides to restrict chances of education for people. I'll laugh at anyone that tells me Labour has any values. Why are politicians so unable to do their job? If the Government was a properly run business WIT would WU by now. This stinks of politicians holding on to funding for the Universities in their own regions or areas. What are the reasoned objections Labour and Fine Gael have to WIT becoming WU? There was no mention of these before the elections... or even since.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    Hilarious is the day Labour decides to restrict chances of education for people. I'll laugh at anyone that tells me Labour has any values. Why are politicians so unable to do their job? If the Government was a properly run business WIT would WU by now. This stinks of politicians holding on to funding for the Universities in their own regions or areas. What are the reasoned objections Labour and Fine Gael have to WIT becoming WU? There was no mention of these before the elections... or even since.

    http://youtu.be/htobTBlCvUU


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭tramoreman


    got this from wlrfm website

    IT Carlow TUI members express concern at merger with WIT.

    http://www.wlrfm.com/news-single.php?cat=1&id=13031


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭fiachr_a


    O Riain wrote: »
    W.I.T really need to issue a statement on this
    Here's your statement!

    http://businessetc.thejournal.ie/jerry-kennelly-tweak-1744432-Oct2014/


  • Registered Users Posts: 957 ✭✭✭comeraghs


    This is very simple.

    WATERFORD IT is almost at the level to meet the criteria set by the government to be upgraded. Carlow is light years away from being ready.

    WIT should be judged on its merits and not held back by refusing to be used as a pawn by Howlin & Hogan to deliver parish pumps to their constituencies.

    NOBODY in Waterford should vote for FG or Labour UNLESS WIT is upgraded within the next 12 months.

    No more empty promises and excuses, UNIVERSITY FOR WATERFORD NOW.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 762 ✭✭✭PeteFalk78


    comeraghs wrote: »
    WATERFORD IT is almost at the level to meet the criteria set by the government to be upgraded. Carlow is light years away from being ready.

    Is that just your opinion or do you have anything to back it up?

    Just because WIT have been campaigning for University status for nearly 20 years it doesn't mean they are close. Tell that to the DOE and specifically Jan O'Sullivan who gave the WIT president a serious dressing down yesterday over their pullout http://www.thejournal.ie/it-carlow-waterford-1741496-Oct2014/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭wellboytoo


    PeteFalk78 wrote: »
    Is that just your opinion or do you have anything to back it up?

    Just because WIT have been campaigning for University status for nearly 20 years it doesn't mean they are close. Tell that to the DOE and specifically Jan O'Sullivan who gave the WIT president a serious dressing down yesterday over their pullout http://www.thejournal.ie/it-carlow-waterford-1741496-Oct2014/

    Quoting the Journal .Ie is akin to quoting the Dandy!
    Jan o Sullivan is a politician quoting the party Line so what would you expect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 762 ✭✭✭PeteFalk78


    wellboytoo wrote: »
    Quoting the Journal .Ie is akin to quoting the Dandy!
    Jan o Sullivan is a politician quoting the party Line so what would you expect.

    Take your pick, all the papers have it.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/waterford-it-told-it-will-not-get-standalone-university-status-1.1974411

    Well all educational institution have to subsequently follow the party line. However some posters here don't see that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    PeteFalk78 wrote: »
    Is that just your opinion or do you have anything to back it up?

    Just because WIT have been campaigning for University status for nearly 20 years it doesn't mean they are close. Tell that to the DOE and specifically Jan O'Sullivan who gave the WIT president a serious dressing down yesterday over their pullout http://www.thejournal.ie/it-carlow-waterford-1741496-Oct2014/

    Who is Jan O Sullivan to dress down the head of WIT? She had a couple of years Montessori teaching...


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    It's a tough call for WIT. A college that has built itself up for so many years, hoping to become a University and promised a University. Assuming, based on this, that the strong lobbying against it and the obvious fiscal problems associated with the Education Sector at the moment and for existing Universities would not take center stage.

    Fast forward, the government comes up with a compromise because it appears that becoming a full university is simply out of the question. WIT have been in talks with CIT for years - before the process of applying for this new university arose. It's a very messy and unprofessional way to pull out of an agreement and talks, but what's done is done. WIT have been told clearly by Labour : It's all or nothing. You either merge with Carlow, or you don't get University status.

    For me, if the merger meant what Waterford would loose it's position as one of the stronger ITs in the country or if it meant that it's main base or HQ would no longer be in Waterford - than they should stay as an IT and forget about their dream for a University. Because no government now is going to give it University. Fianna Fail never did, and never would. Sinn Fein don't give a hoot about Waterford or the Region, just Cullinane desperately trying to make a name for himself so he can finally get a seat in the Dail. Independents, despite peoples weird love in for them, will obviously struggle on policy when it comes to national issues as there all just there to battle for their own backyard (each local rep with a different view) and will all have different policies and approaches that will simply result in a mess. As it has in previous government formations and as it is now in the Technical Group who are tearing strips out of each other (which makes me wonder what Halligan is at, it's like he has no desire to be in government but instead just sit on the backbenches rubbishing the government at the time).

    If DIT can get on with negotiations for a regional Tech University, than WIT should be able too IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    ^^^^^I'm sorry Sully this is not a Labour policy, this is a Government policy. Fianna Fail might give us a University it would regain their two seat base at least in Waterford, might even get them 3 seats for a couple of elections. They're desperate to rebuild their base and Waterford was generally a 2 seat constituency for them. All I know is Fine Gael promised and didn't deliver... this doesn't mean nobody else will just that for the moment Fine Gael promise and guarantees are not followed through with regards giving Waterford a University. And no I'm not going to vote Fiana Fail

    Edit: they weren't told they wouldn't get Uni status... the thing on the table was technological uni


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    ^^^^^I'm sorry Sully this is not a Labour policy, this is a Government policy. Fianna Fail might give us a University it would regain their two seat base at least in Waterford, might even get them 3 seats for a couple of elections. They're desperate to rebuild their base and Waterford was generally a 2 seat constituency for them. All I know is Fine Gael promised and didn't deliver... this doesn't mean nobody else will just that for the moment Fine Gael promise and guarantees are not followed through with regards giving Waterford a University. And no I'm not going to vote Fiana Fail

    Edit: they weren't told they wouldn't get Uni status... the thing on the table was technological uni

    I never said it wasn't a government policy? I've made that clear earlier on that both parties were at fault. It was a Labour Minister who gave the 'dressing down' to WIT and who proposed the policy, backed by government.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    Sully wrote: »
    I never said it wasn't a government policy? .
    Sully wrote: »
    WIT have been told clearly by Labour

    No mention of Fine Gael in your post yet you mentioned every other political party including independents.

    Did you edit your post??? lol


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    No mention of Fine Gael in your post yet you mentioned every other political party including independents.

    Did you edit your post??? lol

    Well.. this is awkward!
    Sully wrote: »
    The blame is clearly with both parties, i'm not denying that.
    Sully wrote: »
    A college that has built itself up for so many years, hoping to become a University and promised a University.

    ...

    Fast forward, the government comes up with a compromise because it appears that becoming a full university is simply out of the question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    Sully wrote: »
    Well.. this is awkward!

    Where in the post did you say that, in the one I quoted because its not there... of course you might re-edit it and put it in there. Fine Gael failed on its promises. This doesn;t mean anyone else will, why are you criticising every other party and brining labour up again and again while Fine Gael are barely mentioned... I'm confused as to why it is that way. I think its very much to do with a failure of Fine Gael as the senior partner and not Labour determined to stop a University

    Eit: What other party promised a University for WIT anyway. Also I was on about the original quote, I know it can get very confusing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    Sully wrote: »
    Fast forward, the government comes up with a compromise because it appears that becoming a full university is simply out of the question.

    Not if the promise FG made was delivered on. And if we as a City adopt that defeatist attitude we will never see one.

    Still banging the FG drum. Incredibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    Sully wrote: »
    Fast forward, the government comes up with a compromise because it appears that becoming a full university is simply out of the question.


    Lets cut the BS Sully

    By the government you mean FG
    they failed to give us what they promised, like a lot of other pre election promises and previous talks (lets be honest even according to their exulted leader FG are an immoral and unethical party)

    Why is it out of the question???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Fate Amenable To Change


    Having 5 points made will result in one being addressed. The one chosen will be the easiest one to use to change the subject.

    All I know is that plenty of promises have been made by FG for a University for Waterford and we seem to now be further away after their election and many years down the line. This Government and therefore FGs election has been negative for a University for Waterford.


  • Registered Users Posts: 957 ✭✭✭comeraghs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Figerty


    comeraghs wrote: »

    Must be an election looming.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 972 ✭✭✭Digital Society


    Isnt it incredible how dumb and gullible some people can be.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    Isnt it incredible how dumb and gullible some people can be.

    Absolutely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭O Riain


    If FG don't gain some serious ground on the University issue then, combined with the Water Charge fiasco, they will lose all their seats here in Waterford.

    Same goes for labour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    O Riain wrote: »
    If FG don't gain some serious ground on the University issue then, combined with the Water Charge fiasco, they will lose all their seats here in Waterford.

    Same goes for labour.

    Please God.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,472 ✭✭✭AdMMM


    O Riain wrote: »
    If FG don't gain some serious ground on the University issue then, combined with the Water Charge fiasco, they will lose all their seats here in Waterford.

    Same goes for labour.
    As a farmers party, they'll retain at least the one seat. Also the further West you go in the county, the less of an issue the university is because of the proximity to UCC and CIT.

    Labour, however, are up the creak without a paddle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    Interesting blog post by Ferdinand von Prondzynski, former president of DCU


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    fricatus wrote: »
    Interesting blog post by Ferdinand von Prondzynski, former president of DCU

    Great blog. The key (concluding) sentence:

    "In the case of Ireland, it is very doubtful whether the whole idea of a ‘technological university’ makes sense in the first place. Waterford Institute of Technology is a fine institution with significant elements of quality. It should be judged in its bid for university status on the basis of those qualities. Forcing it to merge with another institution in which those elements are largely absent is no way to pursue this agenda".

    Over to our "political representatives". Who, as usual, are strangely mute on the issue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    7upfree wrote: »
    Great blog. The key (concluding) sentence:

    "In the case of Ireland, it is very doubtful whether the whole idea of a ‘technological university’ makes sense in the first place. Waterford Institute of Technology is a fine institution with significant elements of quality. It should be judged in its bid for university status on the basis of those qualities. Forcing it to merge with another institution in which those elements are largely absent is no way to pursue this agenda".

    Over to our "political representatives". Who, as usual, are strangely mute on the issue.

    Agreed, and someone called Cormac in the comments section makes an excellent argument, which adds even more weight to the case for an upgrade:
    Cormac wrote:
    Btw, I notice that you’re still saying “One institute that has for some time been attempting to become a university is Waterford Institute of Technology.”
    This is misleading because it omits the highly relevant fact that it is the city of Waterford and surrounding region that have been driving the campaign for a university in the southeast..and they’re not doing it for fun, but because of the brain-drain of students and industry to Dublin.

    This aspect of the Waterford situation makes it very different to that of other institutions such as Cork IT or indeed DIT, a point that always seems to be missed by commentators.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭ec18


    fricatus wrote: »
    Agreed, and someone called Cormac in the comments section makes an excellent argument, which adds even more weight to the case for an upgrade:

    He's a lecturer in WIT :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    ec18 wrote: »
    He's a lecturer in WIT :D

    Good on him... it's a point that's so often overlooked, just as he says.

    It's not Cormac O Raifeartaigh the physicist by any chance, is it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭ec18


    fricatus wrote: »
    Good on him... it's a point that's so often overlooked, just as he says.

    It's not Cormac O Raifeartaigh the physicist by any chance, is it?


    It is indeed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭fuzzy dunlop


    7upfree wrote: »
    Great blog. The key (concluding) sentence:

    "In the case of Ireland, it is very doubtful whether the whole idea of a ‘technological university’ makes sense in the first place. Waterford Institute of Technology is a fine institution with significant elements of quality. It should be judged in its bid for university status on the basis of those qualities. Forcing it to merge with another institution in which those elements are largely absent is no way to pursue this agenda".

    Over to our "political representatives". Who, as usual, are strangely mute on the issue.

    It just further illustrates that the whole TU drive/merger is another fiasco heaped upon a long litany of fiascos. It wasn't that long ago that we were still driving for a seperate university as well as IT. It jhas been compromise upon compromise by us which has just left us in a positiion where WIT can be asset stripped to support smaller institutions in Carlow, Wexford and possibly Kilkenny. Think a a repeat of the Regional Hopspital debacle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭Einhard


    People here are complaining about the parish pump politics of Hogan and Howlin in trying to shoehorn campuses for their own constituencies into the Waterford University project, but are ignoring the fact that their desire for university status quite often smacks of the same parish pump mentality.

    Very rarely have I seen reasoned debate on why Ireland needs another university; there's very little said about the educational advantages for the island accruing from an upgraded WIT; and there's even less about the advantages for Irish industry, commerce, and the science.

    Instead it's often all about Waterford- how Waterford will benefit from an upgrade. And that cannot even be a minor consideration in a rational discussion university status. The core focus must be on how this would impact on Ireland and the third level sector here- would it be positive or negative.

    In an ideal world I'd be all for a university in Waterford. However, there is only so much money in the pot. If Waterford gets university status, then either the budget for the sector would have to be increased- which won't happen- or the existing institutions will have their cut. With Ireland's third level institutions struggling at the moment, a cut in funds would have a deletirious affect across the board. Rather than enhancing Ireland's reputation, such an upgrade could well diminish it.

    Perhaps there are considerations I'm overlooking here, and if so, I'd be happy to have my position changed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭wellboytoo


    Einhard wrote: »
    People here are complaining about the parish pump politics of Hogan and Howlin in trying to shoehorn campuses for their own constituencies into the Waterford University project, but are ignoring the fact that their desire for university status quite often smacks of the same parish pump mentality.

    Very rarely have I seen reasoned debate on why Ireland needs another university; there's very little said about the educational advantages for the island accruing from an upgraded WIT; and there's even less about the advantages for Irish industry, commerce, and the science.

    Instead it's often all about Waterford- how Waterford will benefit from an upgrade. And that cannot even be a minor consideration in a rational discussion university status. The core focus must be on how this would impact on Ireland and the third level sector here- would it be positive or negative.

    In an ideal world I'd be all for a university in Waterford. However, there is only so much money in the pot. If Waterford gets university status, then either the budget for the sector would have to be increased- which won't happen- or the existing institutions will have their cut. With Ireland's third level institutions struggling at the moment, a cut in funds would have a deletirious affect across the board. Rather than enhancing Ireland's reputation, such an upgrade could well diminish it.

    Perhaps there are considerations I'm overlooking here, and if so, I'd be happy to have my position changed.

    A very simple one, if you are from the southeast it is much more expensive to go to University because you have to live away from home, simples


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭O Riain


    Einhard wrote: »
    People here are complaining about the parish pump politics of Hogan and Howlin in trying to shoehorn campuses for their own constituencies into the Waterford University project, but are ignoring the fact that their desire for university status quite often smacks of the same parish pump mentality.

    Very rarely have I seen reasoned debate on why Ireland needs another university; there's very little said about the educational advantages for the island accruing from an upgraded WIT; and there's even less about the advantages for Irish industry, commerce, and the science.

    Instead it's often all about Waterford- how Waterford will benefit from an upgrade. And that cannot even be a minor consideration in a rational discussion university status. The core focus must be on how this would impact on Ireland and the third level sector here- would it be positive or negative.

    In an ideal world I'd be all for a university in Waterford. However, there is only so much money in the pot. If Waterford gets university status, then either the budget for the sector would have to be increased- which won't happen- or the existing institutions will have their cut. With Ireland's third level institutions struggling at the moment, a cut in funds would have a deletirious affect across the board. Rather than enhancing Ireland's reputation, such an upgrade could well diminish it.

    Perhaps there are considerations I'm overlooking here, and if so, I'd be happy to have my position changed.

    It's a University for the entire population of the South East, not just for Waterford. That includes South Tipp, Kilkenny, Waterford, Wexford and Carlow. The region has a population of almost 500,000 people yet no University.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,510 ✭✭✭Max Powers


    O Riain wrote: »
    It's a University for the entire population of the South East, not just for Waterford. That includes South Tipp, Kilkenny, Waterford, Wexford and Carlow. The region has a population of almost 500,000 people yet no University.

    beat me to it O Rian. A population greater than the west too.
    It easy for those 'in the club' to say we dont need another one. The lack of funding for Unis is not the only issue contributing to their slipping down the rankings. On a side note, those rankings are not the be all, I read in an article, out of all the Unis in the world, ours do really well and are in the top few %. Is it realistic to have a Cambridge, MIT in Ireland, probably not, we just simply do not have the € for a country our size and probably never will. How about concentrating on providing solid education instead


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    Einhard wrote: »
    Very rarely have I seen reasoned debate on why Ireland needs another university; there's very little said about the educational advantages for the island accruing from an upgraded WIT; and there's even less about the advantages for Irish industry, commerce, and the science.

    The real question in Ireland is the distribution of our universities. There are four in the Dublin area and three in the rest of the country. This is patently wrong, and why we don't kick up a massive fuss about this is a mystery to me. Only a quarter of the population lives in Dublin, and even if you take the Greater Dublin Area as your measure, it's still only 40%, so there's a massive imbalance there.

    There can't be universities everywhere of course, but what we should ensure is that they are spread out in such a way that they are close to as much as the population as possible. A map of Ireland showing the catchment areas of the universities reveals significant gaps in the south-east and north-west, with smaller gaps in the midlands and north-east.

    These areas are essentially excluded from participating in the academic life of the nation at university level, which surely stops them from realising their true potential. I remember Garret Fitzgerald in one of his columns pondering why two cities of similar size in the '80s, Galway and Waterford, had such divergent paths when it came to their growth and the success of the local economy, and it struck me as odd that such an analytical man didn't immediately point to the fact that Galway had both an IT and a university, whilst Waterford had only an IT.

    I seem to remember someone else (I can't remember who) saying that part of Galway's success was because it had "two world-class theatre companies". If that isn't the most patronising nonsense I've ever read, I don't know what is! But even that makes sense if you see it as an effect rather than a cause, because a university makes a unique contribution to the intellectual and artistic life of a place through the creativity of its academics and students, way beyond the obvious economic benefits.

    If Waterford and the wider south-east can live up to their potential, it will benefit Ireland immensely. We don't want to be also-rans in this country, and we don't have to be. We've got this far on our own. We just need government to stop hindering our progress now!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    fricatus wrote: »
    The real question in Ireland is the distribution of our universities. There are four in the Dublin area and three in the rest of the country. This is patently wrong, and why we don't kick up a massive fuss about this is a mystery to me. Only a quarter of the population lives in Dublin, and even if you take the Greater Dublin Area as your measure, it's still only 40%, so there's a massive imbalance there.

    There can't be universities everywhere of course, but what we should ensure is that they are spread out in such a way that they are close to as much as the population as possible. A map of Ireland showing the catchment areas of the universities reveals significant gaps in the south-east and north-west, with smaller gaps in the midlands and north-east.

    These areas are essentially excluded from participating in the academic life of the nation at university level, which surely stops them from realising their true potential. I remember Garret Fitzgerald in one of his columns pondering why two cities of similar size in the '80s, Galway and Waterford, had such divergent paths when it came to their growth and the success of the local economy, and it struck me as odd that such an analytical man didn't immediately mention that Galway had both an IT and a university, whilst Waterford had only an IT.

    I seem to remember someone else (I can't remember who) saying that part of Galway's success was because it had "two world-class theatre companies". If that isn't the most patronising nonsense I've ever read, I don't know what is! But even that makes sense on a certain level, because a university makes a unique contribution to the intellectual and artistic life of a place through the creativity of its academics and students, which goes beyond the obvious economic benefits.

    If Waterford and the wider south-east can live up to their potential, it will benefit Ireland immensely. We don't want to be also-rans in this country, and we don't have to be. We've got this far on our own. We just need government to stop hindering our progress now!

    UCG and UL. Sixty miles apart. Nuff said. How many times do the economic and health benefits of a UW have to be pointed out to some people!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 587 ✭✭✭Dum_Dum


    Einhard wrote: »
    ... In an ideal world I'd be all for a university in Waterford. However, there is only so much money in the pot. If Waterford gets university status, then either the budget for the sector would have to be increased- which won't happen- or the existing institutions will have their cut.
    ...
    Ah yes - the magic money pot! We know all about this pot in Waterford. When all the goodies have been handed out - suddenly this pot appears from nowhere! It's really the bowl of scraps, handed down from the feast table with the usual well fed, ruddy faced suspects gorging at it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    Einhard wrote: »
    In an ideal world I'd be all for a university in Waterford. However, there is only so much money in the pot. If Waterford gets university status, then either the budget for the sector would have to be increased- which won't happen- or the existing institutions will have their cut.

    No new institution is being set up. WIT would just carry its budget with it from the IoT sector into the university sector. It would probably need marginal extra funding to bring it up to university standards, and probably also some capital funding, but the sort of money we're talking about is no justification for holding up a necessary development.

    And if some institutions have some of their funding cut for this, then why not? If it's spread across seven of them, then it shouldn't cause unbearable pain. And anyway, the whole way that sector is funded needs review - university fees will probably have to come back sooner or later. It's an ongoing problem and cannot be used as a justification for holding us back yet again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    fricatus wrote: »
    No new institution is being set up. WIT would just carry its budget with it from the IoT sector into the university sector. It would probably need marginal extra funding to bring it up to university standards, and probably also some capital funding, but the sort of money we're talking about is no justification for holding up a necessary development.

    And if some institutions have some of their funding cut for this, then why not? If it's spread across seven of them, then it shouldn't cause unbearable pain. And anyway, the whole way that sector is funded needs review - university fees will probably have to come back sooner or later. It's an ongoing problem and cannot be used as a justification for holding us back yet again.

    Well said. There is a concerted effort in the political world and the educational establishment to prevent this. The arguments against are null and void.

    Anyone trying to negate this upgrade is just waffling TBH.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    7upfree wrote: »
    Well said. There is a concerted effort in the political world and the educational establishment to prevent this. The arguments against are null and void.

    Anyone trying to negate this upgrade is just waffling TBH.

    These things change anyway over time... the money thing only became an issue after 2008 because the Exchequer had been awash with cash up until then.

    The excuse being used at that time was that university enrolment was falling, and that we didn't need so many places - and certainly not a new university! Of course not, because everyone was just doing plumbing and carpentry apprenticeships, or working as estate agents!

    Now, demand for university places is rising, because people have realised once again that the best way to ensure you'll be employed in the future is to get as well educated as you can.

    It's the perfect time to make WIT a university, the region needs one, and there's an institution already there which is ready to make the leap. Vested interests are all that is holding this back.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 694 ✭✭✭imacman


    fricatus wrote: »
    These things change anyway over time... the money thing only became an issue after 2008 because the Exchequer had been awash with cash up until then.

    The excuse being used at that time was that university enrolment was falling, and that we didn't need so many places - and certainly not a new university! Of course not, because everyone was just doing plumbing and carpentry apprenticeships, or working as estate agents!

    Now, demand for university places is rising, because people have realised once again that the best way to ensure you'll be employed in the future is to get as well educated as you can.

    It's the perfect time to make WIT a university, the region needs one, and there's an institution already there which is ready to make the leap. Vested interests are all that is holding this back.

    well said , lets take the politics out of this


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭fiachr_a


    If WIT turns into a university then the points will automatically go up. That will mean a lot of local students won't be able to get in anymore. Waterford students will end up going to somewhere like Carlow IT instead. This new university won't benefit everyone in the city.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    fiachr_a wrote: »
    If WIT turns into a university then the points will automatically go up. That will mean a lot of local students won't be able to get in anymore. Waterford students will end up going to somewhere like Carlow IT instead. This new university won't benefit everyone in the city.

    That's the point isn't it? A university that any local can get into is not worth the candle! You need to push the benchmark standard up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 972 ✭✭✭Digital Society


    That's the point isn't it? A university that any local can get into is not worth the candle! You need to push the benchmark standard up.

    An increase in the intelligence of the average student would be seen as an improvement alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Figerty


    fricatus wrote: »
    No new institution is being set up. WIT would just carry its budget with it from the IoT sector into the university sector. It would probably need marginal extra funding to bring it up to university standards, and probably also some capital funding, but the sort of money we're talking about is no justification for holding up a necessary development.

    And if some institutions have some of their funding cut for this, then why not? If it's spread across seven of them, then it shouldn't cause unbearable pain. And anyway, the whole way that sector is funded needs review - university fees will probably have to come back sooner or later. It's an ongoing problem and cannot be used as a justification for holding us back yet again.

    So what you are saying is that all Waterford needs is a name change? If it was it that easy it would have been done by not. Nobody outside Waterford believes in it.

    Ireland does not need another university that will only drag down the other seven as you are suggesting. In other words, pull them further down the rankings.

    How far is Waterford from Cork, Dublin or Limerick by car
    I checked.. It's 1 hour 49 min according to Google maps.
    It's 1 hour 42 minutes from UCC
    It's 1 hours 55 from to UL.

    Get real people, Waterford isn't stuck somewhere like Nebraska. The regional argument is bogus.

    If you put all the students in the University sector into one National University we would have the population of a reasonably large US University.

    Perhaps Waterford would need to look to itself to see what it can do for itself. I know of companies who won't set up their because of the local mindset, some of which harks back to overly unionised factories.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement