Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bodkin / Headford Road roundabout replacement [Lights are on!]

24567…19

Comments

  • #52
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Arielle Mango Rip-off wrote: »
    Jeasus would you ever stop f***ing complaining. You obviously have not got the ability to drive a car and appear to think no one else in Galway can, from the first time I drove that roundabout years ago I never had a single problem you would swear it was some sort of complex mathematical problem.

    The only issue with that roundabout (and its no different to any other roundabout) is people crossing from the middle lane into the left lane when coming onto the roundabout from the headford road side, but thats nothing to do with the design of the roundabout and everything to do with peoples inability to drive a car.



    The complaint that prompted this particular line of enquiry (still unanswered by fans of the Bodkin) was this earlier post.

    It is self-evident that the Bodkin layout -- whether individual elements or the design as a whole -- is causing confusion.

    If the Bodkin is "no different from any other roundabout" can you point to other Bodkins nationally, internationally or in roads engineering manuals? That's all I'm asking.

    If the design is so common, so intuitive and so well established in roads engineering practice, and not "some sort of complex mathematical problem", you should be able to find at least one source. You may be an expert at driving around the Bodkin but clearly, so far, you are unable to point to any authoritative source that identifies Sprouting Lanes, for example, as good roads engineering practice.

    Personally I have no difficulty with the roundabout itself when driving (the obvious traffic chaos at certain times is a different matter) but I generally avoid it when cycling if I have an alternative route. For example, when doing a regular 12 km one-way cycle commute a while back, I went via Lough Atalia, principally because I hate the QB-style "cycle paths" with a passion and never use them.


  • #53
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Arielle Mango Rip-off wrote: »
    Jeasus would you ever stop f***ing complaining. You obviously have not got the ability to drive a car and appear to think no one else in Galway can, from the first time I drove that roundabout years ago I never had a single problem you would swear it was some sort of complex mathematical problem.

    The only issue with that roundabout (and its no different to any other roundabout) is people crossing from the middle lane into the left lane when coming onto the roundabout from the headford road side, but thats nothing to do with the design of the roundabout and everything to do with peoples inability to drive a car.
    You seem to be disagreeing with him and then making his point for him. Perhaps clarify? The use of roundabouts by motorists in Galway is extremely poor; lack of lane discipline and signalling. You can stand at any roundabout around the city and see it for yourself. I don't necessarily agree with removing roundabouts - the cycling campaign suggested other options to make the roundabouts more accessible to non-motorised traffic but that's the option which has been chosen.


  • #54
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    ciotog wrote: »
    You seem to be disagreeing with him and then making his point for him. Perhaps clarify? The use of roundabouts by motorists in Galway is extremely poor; lack of lane discipline and signalling. You can stand at any roundabout around the city and see it for yourself. I don't necessarily agree with removing roundabouts - the cycling campaign suggested other options to make the roundabouts more accessible to non-motorised traffic but that's the option which has been chosen.

    What lanes?

    Most the the RABs in Galway don't have any lane markings, the only one I can think of that has markings is the subject of this discussion.

    SO instead of being able to follow something thats painted and easily visible, you have to take the seams in the tar as the lanes.

    Why is this an issue - they're too easy to miss/ignore.

    It's a bit rich to criticize something like lane disciline when the lanes themselves are ethereal.


  • #55
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    antoobrien wrote: »
    What lanes?

    Most the the RABs in Galway don't have any lane markings, the only one I can think of that has markings is the subject of this discussion.

    SO instead of being able to follow something thats painted and easily visible, you have to take the seams in the tar as the lanes.

    Why is this an issue - they're too easy to miss/ignore.

    It's a bit rich to criticize something like lane disciline when the lanes themselves are ethereal.
    I'm aware of lane markings on other roundabouts e.g. Font but they can be faint in places I will give you that. However, most of the other roundabouts are two lane so it's not difficult to take either the inside or outside lane as appropriate. We're not talking massive narrow multilane features here where maintaining lane position requires a tight line.


  • #56
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 24,714 ✭ [Deleted User]


    ciotog wrote: »
    You seem to be disagreeing with him and then making his point for him. Perhaps clarify? The use of roundabouts by motorists in Galway is extremely poor; lack of lane discipline and signalling. You can stand at any roundabout around the city and see it for yourself. I don't necessarily agree with removing roundabouts - the cycling campaign suggested other options to make the roundabouts more accessible to non-motorised traffic but that's the option which has been chosen.

    Well its only some drivers that do this so I was not saying every driver in Galway is unable to use roundabouts, its more laziness than anything a lot of the time too imo when people cross lanes.

    However this is nothing to do with roundabout design etc which is what is being blamed by some posters here, which is my point. Any driver worth his salt should have no problem using that particular roundabout in question from a design perspective.


  • #57
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Arielle Mango Rip-off wrote: »
    Well its only some drivers that do this so I was not saying every driver in Galway is unable to use roundabouts, its more laziness than anything a lot of the time too imo when people cross lanes.

    However this is nothing to do with roundabout design etc which is what is being blamed by some posters here, which is my point. Any driver worth his salt should have no problem using the the particular roundabout in question from a design perspective.
    If the purpose of a roundabout is to be used by drivers, and the vast majority of licensed drivers are unable to, then I would argue the roundabout isn't fit for purpose. The conclusion of this thinking would then be that either roundabouts are unsuitable (false) or this roundabout i.e. the way it was designed is unsuitable - which I believe to be true.


  • #58
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    antoobrien wrote: »
    What lanes?

    Most the the RABs in Galway don't have any lane markings, the only one I can think of that has markings is the subject of this discussion.

    SO instead of being able to follow something thats painted and easily visible, you have to take the seams in the tar as the lanes.

    Why is this an issue - they're too easy to miss/ignore.

    It's a bit rich to criticize something like lane disciline when the lanes themselves are ethereal.



    Perhaps.


  • #59
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    ciotog wrote: »
    If the purpose of a roundabout is to be used by drivers, and the vast majority of licensed drivers are unable to, then I would argue the roundabout isn't fit for purpose. The conclusion of this thinking would then be that either roundabouts are unsuitable (false) or this roundabout i.e. the way it was designed is unsuitable - which I believe to be true.




    Are you suggesting roundabouts could be suitable then?

    Because I see little or no evidence anywhere in Ireland that roundabouts are suitable for active commuters.


  • #60
    Head The Wall
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    ciotog wrote: »
    If the purpose of a roundabout is to be used by drivers, and the vast majority of licensed drivers are unable to, then I would argue the roundabout isn't fit for purpose. The conclusion of this thinking would then be that either roundabouts are unsuitable (false) or this roundabout i.e. the way it was designed is unsuitable - which I believe to be true.

    I'll have to disagree with you here, to me it's the drivers that are not fit, driving standards are deplorable in this country and thats because of the crappy testing system we have in place. You are deemed not fit to pass your test and you can drive home afterwards :eek:

    Other roundabouts are obviously easier too navigate so simple minded people can usually figure it out and there is less to go wrong, the problem is when simple roundabouts don't suffice. I wouldn't be blaming the roundabout here, I would blame the driving, the fact that a lot of people can use this roundabout without crashing implies that the design in itself is okay.

    I also don't understand why Iwannahurl needs to see another example of this roundabout somewhere else, what is that going to do to get the people of Ireland drive better? Seeing it elsewhere is not going to be a justification for not understanding it.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 24,714 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Are you suggesting roundabouts could be suitable then?

    Because I see little or no evidence anywhere in Ireland that roundabouts are suitable for active commuters.

    That is the height of bull s**t. Roundabouts are the by far the best method for keeping traffic flow moving. Traffic light in the other hand are nothing but hassle.

    ciotog wrote: »
    If the purpose of a roundabout is to be used by drivers, and the vast majority of licensed drivers are unable to, then I would argue the roundabout isn't fit for purpose. The conclusion of this thinking would then be that either roundabouts are unsuitable (false) or this roundabout i.e. the way it was designed is unsuitable - which I believe to be true.

    But the vast majority of licensed drivers dont have a problem using that roundabout or any other. Thats a myth, which has become quite popular in this forum. Its a minority of drivers who cannot use roundabouts and thats a driver training issue not a design issue or a flaw with roundabouts in general.


  • #62
    GalwayGaillimh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 672 ✭✭✭GalwayGaillimh


    Traffic lights replacing roundabouts in Galway will make peak times a disaster, I can see some people having nervous breakdowns like Michael Douglas in the movie "Falling Down".
    http://youtu.be/aNiKARZBq4s

    But wait and see, once the lights go in the propoganda machine will be saying they are working great like Moneenageisha lol.

    Si Deus Nobiscum Qui Contra Nos



  • #63
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    According to AGS 25% of collisions in Galway City occur on roundabouts.

    I'd be prepared to bet that a disproportionate number of those collisions occur on the Bodkin. But that's just a guess, as I have no detailed stats.

    Your right re that 25% general stat: Roundabout black spot

    Would insurance companies have a better records than the AGS of accident locations?


  • #64
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Are you suggesting roundabouts could be suitable then?

    Because I see little or no evidence anywhere in Ireland that roundabouts are suitable for active commuters.
    Yes, properly sited, with appropriate speed control measures and pedestrian access.


  • #65
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Arielle Mango Rip-off wrote: »
    But the vast majority of licensed drivers dont have a problem using that roundabout or any other. Thats a myth, which has become quite popular in this forum. Its a minority of drivers who cannot use roundabouts and thats a driver training issue not a design issue or a flaw with roundabouts in general.
    I'd disagree that the vast majority don't have a problem - while there's a majority who can correctly use a roundabout they don't have a great lead over those who can't. Everytime I cycle home via the bridge & Headford Road -> Kirwan Roundabout -> N6/Bóthar na dTreabh cycle facility it takes several minutes just to get from the pavement to the traffic island on the Headford Road (Ballinfoyle side) because lots of motorists coming from the other side of the Headford Road are turning from the inside and outside lanes without signalling at any time or signalling incorrectly (signal right when they're turning left). I would be better off going on road through the roundabout to get where I'm going but then I'd be on road on Bóthar na dTreabh when there is a raised cycle facility alongside me. I could see that leading to confrontation as the kerb only drops in a couple of places to allow a cyclist get up to effectively pavement level. I'm also wary of a skid on the kerbstone due to the angle you hit it at.

    You have a good point about driver training and I agree with the need for that to improve but that's a longer term exercise and needs to be coupled with better enforcement of road traffic laws against all road users. However, I still maintain that roundabout is a bad design. I probably won't convince you of that point :) Why I would argue that it's bad design versus driver training in this case is that the required behaviour on that roundabout is quite specific and so you would need prescriptive in training which is even harder to roll out.


  • #66
    Head The Wall
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    ciotog wrote: »
    However, I still maintain that roundabout is a bad design. I probably won't convince you of that point :) Why I would argue that it's bad design versus driver training in this case is that the required behaviour on that roundabout is quite specific and so you would need prescriptive in training which is even harder to roll out.

    Here's an excerpt from the link what_traffic posted above, I would tend to believe the cop here and not just because it suits my stance but because they will look at collisions in most cases impartially.
    However, Chief Superintendent Tom Curley rejected claims from local residents in attendance that the infrastructure was causing this high frequency of collisions, instead blaming the "indiscipline" of drivers who failed to use the roundabouts correctly.

    He called on motorists using the roads to learn the rules concerning roundabout and adhere to them.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Head The Wall wrote: »
    I also don't understand why Iwannahurl needs to see another example of this roundabout somewhere else, what is that going to do to get the people of Ireland drive better? Seeing it elsewhere is not going to be a justification for not understanding it.




    Because consistency and self-explanatory road design helps to optimise safety.

    What I have been seeking (and probably never will get) is a rational explanation and hopefully a roads engineering precedent for the Ethereal Sprouting Lane. I'd be interested to find out whether it's a home-grown sprout or an imported one.


  • #68
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Arielle Mango Rip-off wrote: »
    That is the height of bull s**t. Roundabouts are the by far the best method for keeping traffic flow moving. Traffic light in the other hand are nothing but hassle.

    But the vast majority of licensed drivers dont have a problem using that roundabout or any other. Thats a myth, which has become quite popular in this forum. Its a minority of drivers who cannot use roundabouts and thats a driver training issue not a design issue or a flaw with roundabouts in general.




    1. Incorrect. Galway City roundabouts are not suitable for active commuters such as pedestrians, cyclists and bus users. A number of studies and surveys have repeatedly confirmed this.

    2. Seemingly incorrect, if this 700-post thread is any indication.


  • #69
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    ciotog wrote: »
    Yes, properly sited, with appropriate speed control measures and pedestrian access.




    Any chance you could post an image of a real-life ideal roundabout that satisfies those criteria?

    Bear in mind the volume and speed of traffic on certain roads in Galway City.


  • #70
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Any chance you could post an image of a real-life ideal roundabout that satisfies those criteria?

    Bear in mind the volume and speed of traffic on certain roads in Galway City.
    There are some photos kicking around somewhere, I'll have to hunt for them so it may be a little while before I post that.


  • #71
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    Head The Wall wrote: »
    Here's an excerpt from the link what_traffic posted above, I would tend to believe the cop here and not just because it suits my stance but because they will look at collisions in most cases impartially.
    Your point is well made, I definitely agree that driver behaviour plays a very large part. Earlier in the thread I was talking about lack of lane discipline and signalling as a big problem as well as the issues I encounter when cycling at the Kirwan roundabout (as one example). However I mindful of being seen, as a cycling advocate, to be banging on with the 'motorists are to blame' line. :) So in criticising the design of the Bodkin roundabout I'm making the point that driver behaviour alone isn't the sole factor (while acknowledging it's a major factor) and that the design simply doesn't make using it straightforward. It's a design that I've not seen in common usage and I believe that contributes to drivers not using it properly. Given it's not commonplace I think it's hard to ensure that drivers are properly trained to deal with it. So, if you had a better design which meant drivers could more easily determine the correct usage then it would make it safer overall.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    GalwayGaillimh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 672 ✭✭✭GalwayGaillimh


    I would have to agree that most of the busy city roundabouts are not suitable for pedestrians and cyclists.

    Tunnels or Flyovers at roundabouts for pedestrians and cyclists like on the continent would be a better idea and aid the flow of traffic.

    In the end of the day these junctions should be redesigned to facilitate the fast unimpeded flow of traffic and also to faciliate the safe crossing for cyclists and pedestrians.

    I dont think replacing the current roundabouts with traffic lights will improve the flow of traffic in Galway (Even when the control room for monitoring them goes online) I am sure the new traffic lighted junctions will be of major benefit to the safety of pedestrians and cyclists though.

    Si Deus Nobiscum Qui Contra Nos



  • #73
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    GalwayDotCom wrote: »
    I would have to agree that most of the busy city roundabouts are not suitable for pedestrians and cyclists.

    Tunnels or Flyovers at roundabouts for pedestrians and cyclists like on the continent would be a better idea and aid the flow of traffic.

    In the end of the day these junctions should be redesigned to facilitate the fast unimpeded flow of traffic and also to faciliate the safe crossing for cyclists and pedestrians.

    I dont think replacing the current roundabouts with traffic lights will improve the flow of traffic in Galway (Even when the control room for monitoring them goes online) I am sure the new traffic lighted junctions will be of major benefit to the safety of pedestrians and cyclists though.
    To be honest, the only roundabout I'm uncomfortable on is the Bodkin roundabout (purely because the other traffic is unpredicatable) but I use it when required; typically if I've stopped off at Halfords for some bicycle pr0n :) and am off home (Doughiska) via the Sean Mulvoy Road. The others could be much more friendly by simply bringing cyclists off separated cycle facilities and onto the road to use the roundabout as a vehicle and reducing the speeds on the roundabout. If I use the Kirwan roundabout as an example again, the railings at the crossings on Bóthar na dTreabh stop me getting off the roundabout and back onto the offroad cycle facility. You don't need a complex engineering solution to fix that :) If you look at the changes on the Newcastle Road recently, the cycle lanes now ramp up/down at the junction so it's much safer for cyclists and pedestrians (who no longer have to interact with cyclists on the pavements and on the pelican crossing*)

    * I know there are still cyclists who do this rather than use the facilities properly and they're assholes who should be getting on the spot fines from Gardai.


  • #74
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    god not you again Iwannahurl. Im personally getting sick of you derailing threads with your nit-picking

    In an effort to get this back on topic, here's an update from the council on the works
    Update from Galway City Council

    Due to the ongoing roadworks along the N6 Corridor please note the following:

    N6/Newcastle Upper Junction:

    Next Week (10am to 4pm). Anti-skid works remain outstanding and are planned for next week. This work is weather dependent and therefore exact details are not available.

    N6/Briarhill Roundabout:

    Saturday 5th November: 07:00 to 11:00am

    The N6 approach to the Briarhill Roundabout from the Coolagh Roundabout will be reduced to 1 lane. This is to facilitate the installation of cable ducts across the carriageway.

    Tuesday 8th November to Friday 11th November from 19:00 hours onwards

    Surfacing Works will be taking place. This will require the closure of 1 lane of traffic on the roundabout. Significant delays can be expected. Motorists should take alternative routes where available.

    Note:

    It is anticipated that with the commencement of surfacing works at Briarhill Roundabout next week, the impact of the works on traffic flows in the area will increase significantly as the month progresses. The works are still on course to be completed on 8th December, 2011.

    Galway Transportation Unit wishes to thank all road users for their continued cooperation while these works are underway.


  • #75
    Head The Wall
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    2. Seemingly incorrect, if this 700-post thread is any indication.

    700 posts? How many people in Ireland drive, its in the millions isn't it!


  • #76
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Deleted User wrote: »
    god not you again Iwannahurl. Im personally getting sick of you derailing threads with your nit-picking

    In an effort to get this back on topic, here's an update from the council on the works




    So sorry to pick nits, but as the title says this thread is actually about the Bodkin/Headford Road roundabout. :)


  • #77
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    So sorry to pick nits, but as the title says this thread is actually about the Bodkin/Headford Road roundabout. :)

    DaCor you have to admit it; Iwannahurl got ya here! :D


  • #78
    Iwannahurl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    Head The Wall wrote: »
    700 posts? How many people in Ireland drive, its in the millions isn't it!




    Fair enough. There are just over a million drivers, according to Census 2006.

    I should have specifically mentioned the poll. It's a small self-selecting sample on a single website, but the thread was an interesting focus group if nothing else.


  • #79
    Sponge Bob
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    It's a small self-selecting sample on a single website.

    Just like feckin heroes of the commuting and cycling universe between Galway and Tuam then . :(


  • #80
    KevR
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    If the Bodkin is "no different from any other roundabout" can you point to other Bodkins nationally, internationally or in roads engineering manuals? That's all I'm asking.

    Here you go:
    Link


  • #81
    galwaycyclist
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭galwaycyclist


    KevR wrote: »
    Here you go:
    Link

    Hmm do I see a suggestion of grade separation in here? Not a bodkin alas


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    KevR wrote: »
    Here you go:
    Link

    Since it was missed earlier this one


  • #83
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    KevR wrote: »
    Here you go:
    Link

    In fairness; thats still a poor example. It does not compare in scale with Bodkin/Headford Road roundabout at all. Plus did they not have redesign that junction ( N3/M50 ) recently?


  • #84
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    antoobrien wrote: »
    Since it was missed earlier this one

    Can you even call that a roundabout? How many traffic lights are controlling the various arms at this junction at Islandbridge/Kilmainham?

    Can even Bodkin claim to be a roundabout given that 3/5 arms are traffic light controlled?


  • #85
    KevR
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    what_traffic wrote: »
    In fairness; thats still a poor example. It does not compare in scale with Bodkin/Headford Road roundabout at all. Plus did they not have redesign that junction ( N3/M50 ) recently?

    The actual roundabout is unchanged - they added additional flyovers and slip lanes to make it a more free-flowing junction.

    I doubt an example exactly the same as the Bodkin RAB will be found. Some junctions are unique. I don't exactly think Bodkin RAB is the best junction in the world (even though I personally find it easy to navigate) but I don't see why it being somewhat unique is an issue for some. I think some are suggesting that it is a bad junction because it is unique.


  • #86
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    KevR wrote: »
    The actual roundabout is unchanged - they added additional flyovers and slip lanes to make it a more free-flowing junction.

    Never said it was changed, but the use of this junction has been drastically changed to the usage of the picture in the link that was given!
    KevR wrote: »
    but I don't see why it being somewhat unique is an issue for some. I think some are suggesting that it is a bad junction because it is unique.
    Unique junctions can work, not that Bodkin does as it is a Roundabout with traffic lights which is unique in itself for Galway. However regardless of that argument "Iwannahurl's" question is still valid. Has this exact design ever been used before here? The vast majority of junctions here do have a standard design that are contained within Dept of Transport Design manuals.


  • #87
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Can you even call that a roundabout? How many traffic lights are controlling the various arms at this junction at Islandbridge/Kilmainham?

    When you're actually using it on the ground it is in effect a very large traffic light controlled RAB. Especially if you're trying to come turn right.

    The only real difference between this and the HRR is that this one has lights controlling all the entrances & exits.

    It's as close as I've seen to the HRR since they got rid of the M4/M50 RAB.


  • #88
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    antoobrien wrote: »
    When you're actually using it on the ground it is in effect a very large traffic light controlled RAB. Especially if you're trying to come turn right.

    The only real difference between this and the HRR is that this one has lights controlling all the entrances & exits.

    It's as close as I've seen to the HRR since they got rid of the M4/M50 RAB.

    I know the junction well - used to go to and from work via this junction for 2 years. To claim that its the closest junction design to the Bodkin "Roundabout" is really clutching at straws. For example if your coming from Kilmainham and going to Islandbridge you just go straight through the junction and same if coming and going from Ballyfermot towards Heuston station. How is that in any way like the situation at the Bodkin "Roundabout".
    Is Bodkin "Roundabout" (soon to be extinct) the only one of its kind in the Rep of Ireland?


  • #89
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    what_traffic wrote: »
    I know the junction well - used to go to and from work via this junction for 2 years. To claim that its the closest junction design to the Bodkin "Roundabout" is really clutching at straws. For example if your coming from Kilmainham and going to Islandbridge you just go straight through the junction and same if coming and going from Ballyfermot towards Heuston station. How is that in any way like the situation at the Bodkin "Roundabout".

    That's the only "straight on" bit, but even that is effectively one side of a RAB. The only thing that lets the comparison down is that there's no right turn from the South Circular Rd to St Johns Rd.

    Going along Con Colbert Road to St Johns Road (or vice versa) it's anything but straight on, traffic is directed around the SCR junction. Coming from Islandbridge when turning right it's very noticeably a light controlled RAB.

    I think you're choosing to see it in a light that suits your POV, not looking at the evidence at hand (especially considering the left turn slips avoiding entering the main junction, but not really long enough to avoid it completely).

    Edit

    I'd also add the changes to the M50/N32 junction to being very similar to the HRR.


  • #90
    KevR
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Never said it was changed, but the use of this junction has been drastically changed to the usage of the picture in the link that was given!


    Unique junctions can work, not that Bodkin does as it is a Roundabout with traffic lights which is unique in itself for Galway. However regardless of that argument "Iwannahurl's" question is still valid. Has this exact design ever been used before here? The vast majority of junctions here do have a standard design that are contained within Dept of Transport Design manuals.

    The question is still valid but I personally don't think the answer is at all important in terms the Bodkin RAB being a good junction or not.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    http://www.galwaycity.ie/GeneralNews/281011_04.pdf
    I forgot to include in the OP but there will be changes to the entrance/exit to Dún na Coiribe and to the exit from Dunnes - another set of lights will be added there.


  • #92
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    antoobrien wrote: »
    I think you're choosing to see it in a light that suits your POV, not looking at the evidence at hand (especially considering the left turn slips avoiding entering the main junction, but not really long enough to avoid it completely).
    Right back at ya!


  • #93
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Deleted User wrote: »
    http://www.galwaycity.ie/GeneralNews/281011_04.pdf
    I forgot to include in the OP but there will be changes to the entrance/exit to Dún na Coiribe and to the exit from Dunnes - another set of lights will be added there.

    + changes to the Cycle paths - been converted to on road cycle lanes.
    + the existing pedestrian crossing is to be removed.


  • #94
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Right back at ya!

    Stop doing the intellectual equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes and going "La la la if i do see it and don't hear it its not true la la la"


    To turn left or right off the N4 you have to go around a large roughly circular area, which you also have to do when staying on the N4. Behaves like a traffic light controlled RAB to me.

    Interestingly the engineers left the SCR section unchanged - must be to let the south sides escape the north side as quickly as possible. So there's absolutely nothing hat can be learned from this junction?


  • #95
    ciotog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭ciotog


    antoobrien wrote: »
    To turn left or right off the N4 you have to go around a large roughly circular area, which you also have to do when staying on the N4. Behaves like a traffic light controlled RAB to me.

    Interestingly the engineers left the SCR section unchanged - must be to let the south sides escape the north side as quickly as possible. So there's absolutely nothing hat can be learned from this junction?
    What I took from looking at the images was that lights at all the roundabout arms probably makes the flow far more structured rather than the ad-hoc placement of lights on Bodkin. Does that mean your example is a signal controlled junction or a roundabout though? (said with of a wry smile)


  • #96
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    ciotog wrote: »
    What I took from looking at the images was that lights at all the roundabout arms probably makes the flow far more structured rather than the ad-hoc placement of lights on Bodkin. Does that mean your example is a signal controlled junction or a roundabout though? (said with of a wry smile)

    To me (I've used it from all directions) it behaves like a signal controlled RAB most of the time. the only time it doesn't is if you're going North/South e.g. Islandbridge to Kilmanham (or vice versa).

    The HRR is a very similar setup the the junction I'm talking about and the lights aren't ad-hoc, they're just not comprehensive enough. They're placed to allow movement onto the RAB and then keep exits clear. Somebody tried to strike the best of both worlds and failed miserably. That they aren't kept clear is a policing matter (breaking red lights, entering a junction you can't clear etc).


    I'm looking at making a submission on this (since I've actually seen these plans early enough, unlike the ones for Briarhill - the notice for which was hidden in the access to the tunnel). The basis of it will be based on the observations below.

    IMO there are two big problems - the entrance to GSC off the RAB and the entrances off the headford Rd to Dunnes, Dun na Coirbe, Argos & Lidl, GSC and the retail park.

    I don't know what can be done for argos/lidl.

    To improve this area for pedestrians:
    Close the entrance to GSC & the exit from the retail park
    Add a 4th "entrance" light just before the outbound entrance from the HRR and to the entrance itself
    Link the to the "entrance" traffic lights to pedestrian signals e.g. no traffic should be allowed off HRR outbound for a period of 45s to allow pedestrians cross from HRR to traffic Island on QB - this should be done for all 4 exits (assuming GSC is closed).
    Consolidate the entrances and exits from GSC & the retail park to the existing entrance to the retail park (move the one from GSC) - controlled by lights
    Consolidate the entrances & exits to Dunnes & Dun na Coirbe at the site of the current entrance to Dunnes (eliminating the other entrances/exits & the pedestrian crossing) - controlled by lights

    To improve this junction for wheeled road users the Gardai should actually start doing their jobs and hand out some on the spot fines for breaking the rules of the roads - all of them, not just motorists but pedestrians & cyclists as well.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    what_traffic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    antoobrien wrote: »
    So there's absolutely nothing hat can be learned from this junction?

    Sure there is - but your answering a different question here. At the end of the day this junction at Islandbridge /Kilmainham is still not equivalent to the Bodkin Roundabout. You POV says it is - but I'm afraid your still clutching at straws.


  • #98
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    what_traffic wrote: »
    Sure there is - but your answering a different question here. At the end of the day this junction at Islandbridge /Kilmainham is still not equivalent to the Bodkin Roundabout. You POV says it is - but I'm afraid your still clutching at straws.

    Seriously, you can't see how it acts just like bodkin when trying to turn right from Islandbridge or the N4 (I can't see how you'd turn right from Kilmainham, then again I don't think I've tried)?

    Talk about blinkered.


  • #99
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,572 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    That throwing stick stunt of yours has boomeranged on us all.


  • #100
    antoobrien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    Robbo wrote: »
    That throwing stick stunt of yours has boomeranged on us all.

    ?


  • #101
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,572 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    antoobrien wrote: »
    ?
    Given the circular nature of these threads on blasted roundabouts, I wanted to lampshade the most obvious pun with a similar one, which as a bonus is from the Simpsons (when it was still good) which scores double Internet points.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement