Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Options
  • 20-03-2013 6:17pm
    #1
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭


    Equity tomorrow. What are people predicting/hoping for with injunctions. I would like some sort of essay on Campus Oil principles and deviation from them or an essay on Anton Piller, Marevas.
    Tagged:


«134567…297

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    mackerf
    Registered Users Posts: 20 ✭mackerf


    RandolphEsq wrote: »
    Equity tomorrow. What are people predicting/hoping for with injunctions. I would like some sort of essay on Campus Oil principles and deviation from them or an essay on Anton Piller, Marevas.

    What are examiners likes/ dislikes in general? Are questions often mixed topics?


  • Options
    #3
    chops018
    Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Good luck to those doing Equity tomorrow. EU was horrible today.


  • Options
    #4
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    mackerf wrote: »

    What are examiners likes/ dislikes in general? Are questions often mixed topics?
    No idea what the examiner likes but I assume minimal waffling. Topics don't seem to overlap.


  • Options
    #5
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    has there ever been a whole question on anton pillar orders before? Theres not all that much to them


  • Options
    #6
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    is it safe to say we can leave qt injuncs out considering they came up in the last sitting?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    ShamblesB wrote: »
    is it safe to say we can leave qt injuncs out considering they came up in the last sitting?

    I will be anyway. Hopefully Marevas and Anton Piller turn up as 2 of the parts to a 3 part question. Campus Oil principles as an essay is my hope for injunctions. I haven't looked at past-papers, except Oct 2012, as I sat it, so don't know how injunctions are usually asked. I did have the examiner as a lecturer though. My own feeling would be that they won't come up as a problem question.


  • Options
    #8
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    yeah an essay on campus oil and where it doesnt apply would be good! Good luck to everyone 2mro, lets hope it goes better than eu today! :)


  • Options
    #9
    UberStressed
    Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭UberStressed


    Good luck tomorow everyone.... Please let this be my last ever FE1 ... Hoping for nice questions on charitable trusts, trusteeship, tracing, joint accounts, rectification and donatia Mortis Causa ... Is it too much to ask?


  • Options
    #10
    TheGreaterFool
    Registered Users Posts: 23 ✭TheGreaterFool


    Cutting extensively here. Is Unconscionable Bargains/Improvident Transactions regularly asked (or at all) or is it safe to focus in on Undue Influence and the third party/guarantee aspect?


  • Options
    #11
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    The maxims were tipped in October and didn't show, I'm seriously hoping for a full 20 mark q on them but 10 will do!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    doing
    Registered Users Posts: 178 ✭✭doing


    Has the Charities Act been commenced yet? Apart from the 4 or 5 provisions Eamon o Cuiv commenced in 2009 that is?


  • Options
    #13
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    Come equity, let us dance.


  • Options
    #14
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    finally a nice paper! :):):)


  • Options
    #15
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    Yeah, happy with that but worried it will be marked hard since it was so easy.


  • Options
    #16
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    hopefully not! Well I gave it my best attempt yet, just hope contract goes well tomorrow and with any luck i passed either eu or company or else have to resit them all! :( what a silly rule!


  • Options
    #17
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    contracts with minors are voidable, unless for necessaries or beneficial services. Does this mean that the minor can enforce it against the other party but not the other way around or just that they can't be enforced at all unless for the above exceptions???


  • Options
    #18
    Gibbonw2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Gibbonw2


    What were the 4 essay contract qs last year anyone, please?


  • Options
    #19
    The212
    Registered Users Posts: 10 ✭The212


    hope study going well for everyone.

    RE Contract tomorrow I am covering

    offer and offer Termination
    acceptance
    consideration
    terms
    privity
    intention
    capacity
    mistake
    misrep
    undue Inf
    damages
    frustration
    clauses

    thoughts?

    what is everyone zoning in on?


  • Options
    #20
    Gibbonw2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Gibbonw2


    Good question re minors but its not really dealt with on most curriculum. I wouldnt waste time with it but courts are usually deferential to minors and adults are for the most part not allowed avoid a contract without either agreement, termination, breach or frustration. So just think of it as a valid contract with the child capable of avoiding it most circumstances with exceptions (necessities, beneficial contracts for services/apprenticeships and possibly periodic payments)


  • Options
    #21
    Gibbonw2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Gibbonw2


    Now can you answer my question!!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #22
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    last year was privity, exemption clauses or eu directives, common mistake and implied terms.


  • Options
    #23
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    The212 wrote: »
    hope study going well for everyone.

    RE Contract tomorrow I am covering

    offer and offer Termination
    acceptance
    consideration
    terms
    privity
    intention
    capacity
    mistake
    misrep
    undue Inf
    damages
    frustration
    clauses

    thoughts?

    what is everyone zoning in on?

    that should be fine! Is it not the whole course? Im leaving out damages and terms, well i know a bit but nothing major and don't have enough time now! Oh i'm not doing the eu bit either, hate the eu after that paper on wed! :)

    guys could someone please tell me the distiction between common mistake and unilateral? Is common mistake bell v lever bros etc and unilateral the sort where the price is misstated etc?


  • Options
    #24
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    ive a funny feeling we will get a problem q on frustration, it didn't come up at all in the last paper!


  • Options
    #25
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    Gibbonw2 wrote: »
    Now can you answer my question!!

    lol! Do you have to give an answer to get one now! :D


  • Options
    #26
    The212
    Registered Users Posts: 10 ✭The212


    thanks for reply ShamblesB! not going near consumer protection! and also probably leave out illegality,void contracts and duress!



    Common mistake - parties are making the same mistake ..Bell v lever Bros, Solle v Butcher

    Unilateral - where one party makes the mistake and the other is aware (or should be aware) of this


  • Options
    #27
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    oh yeah, forgot about illegal and void contracts! I'd say what you have should be fine! Thanks for your help whatever way i've phrased my notes i've made it very confusing! Hopefully it's a nice paper! :D


  • Options
    #28
    sorchauna
    Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭sorchauna


    Im amazed we are only on a second thread now. Equity was a good paper today I just didnt know enough in detail on certain topics but general stuff on everything!


  • Options
    #29
    Glinda!
    Registered Users Posts: 78 ✭✭Glinda!


    Overwhelmed by contract :(:(:(


  • Options
    #30
    chops018
    Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Glinda! wrote: »
    Overwhelmed by contract :(:(:(

    Good luck, and to everyone else doing Contract tomorrow!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #31
    bobsterlfc
    Registered Users Posts: 43 ✭bobsterlfc


    Folks

    Any advice on which of the 3 Schools is best for the FE1 Preps (GCD, Indepedent or City). Looking at doing the October sittings.

    Cheers

    B


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement