Possible predictions of false flag spectaculars at London's 2012 Olympics.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 11:13am

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I never said it did.
A good hot day along with a Giant screening of a major event and you will always have a large turn out at any city park.

more than an actual event in the stadium??? you're a not very intelligent at all, I know you think you are but you really aren't. I think it's very clear to everybody from this thread that you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Good luck to you, I'm off to enjoy the games.

looksee · 30-07-2012 11:24am

Monty Burnz wrote: »

An interesting article about the London 2012 CT here in the Guardian. This sounds familiar:
Quote:
The evidence for such a plot is vague: exhibit A is the 2012 Olympic logo. Rearrange the four angular numerals of the bizarre design, the theorists say, and it really spells "zion". There's even a dot to go over the "i". This is a sign that "they" plan to build the new Jerusalem right here in England's green and pleasant land, just as William Blake's poem predicted. The "dark satanic mills" of the Lea Valley will become the epicentre of the New World Order. Conspiracy theorists insist there is nothing anti-semitic in their use of the word "zion", although the suspicion is there.
/QUOTE]

Nobody among all you cynics has noticed that one part of the prediction has in fact come true, did ye not watch the opening ceremony? Quite how the NWO is going to run things from the middle of the olympic arena is not clear, but this is better evidence than anything else that has been discussed. And ET was there too. And Mary Poppins - oh wait...

Brown Bomber · 30-07-2012 11:25am

al28283 wrote: »

more than an actual event in the stadium??? you're a not very intelligent at all, I know you think you are but you really aren't. I think it's very clear to everybody from this thread that you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Good luck to you, I'm off to enjoy the games.

I have no idea what you are talking about. He simply said that a giant screen of a major sports event on a nice day will attract a lot of viewers.

What is "not intelligent" about saying that? It's common sense.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 11:25am

al28283 wrote: »

more than an actual event in the stadium??? you're a not very intelligent at all, I know you think you are but you really aren't. I think it's very clear to everybody from this thread that you really have no idea what you are talking about.
Good luck to you, I'm off to enjoy the games.

Can you not make a point without personal abuse of a poster,

I thought that that was against the carter of this forum.

Some people don't understand the concept of a Conspiracy Theory and should not be here.

Chazz Michael Michaels · 30-07-2012 11:25am

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

So, if the Olympics passes with no attack, will you be back on here to admit you got it wrong?

Don't run to the hills on me, now...

Brown Bomber · 30-07-2012 11:27am

looksee wrote: »

Monty Burnz wrote: »

An interesting article about the London 2012 CT here in the Guardian. This sounds familiar:
Quote:
The evidence for such a plot is vague: exhibit A is the 2012 Olympic logo. Rearrange the four angular numerals of the bizarre design, the theorists say, and it really spells "zion". There's even a dot to go over the "i". This is a sign that "they" plan to build the new Jerusalem right here in England's green and pleasant land, just as William Blake's poem predicted. The "dark satanic mills" of the Lea Valley will become the epicentre of the New World Order. Conspiracy theorists insist there is nothing anti-semitic in their use of the word "zion", although the suspicion is there.
/QUOTE]

Nobody among all you cynics has noticed that one part of the prediction has in fact come true, did ye not watch the opening ceremony? Quite how the NWO is going to run things from the middle of the olympic arena is not clear, but this is better evidence than anything else that has been discussed. And ET was there too. And Mary Poppins - oh wait...

Hilarious.

Brown Bomber · 30-07-2012 11:28am

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

Don't run to the hills on me, now...

You going to admit that your assinine statement that Zionism is "totally different" was wrong?

Chazz Michael Michaels · 30-07-2012 11:39am

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

Don't run to the hills on me, now...

You going to admit that your assinine statement that Zionism is "totally different" was wrong?

No, because it wasn't, but I know there is no hope of ever convincing you, because any coherent argument presented by me will eventually be countered by some video (the lazy mans idea of 'debate') or pictures of a pentagram over a star of david that forms a swastika or or something similar. Faced with the prospect of that, I choose to not engage with you on this question. Anyway, this thread is about predictions of attacks on the Olympics, and you keep trying to drag it off topic. Maybe you have some obsession with the Jews, I dunno. I don't care.

Keep the chat Olympics 'terrorist' disaster based, ok?

Brown Bomber · 30-07-2012 11:44am

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

No, because it wasn't, but I know there is no hope of ever convincing you, because any coherent argument presented by me will eventually be countered by some video (the lazy mans idea of 'debate') or pictures of a pentagram over a star of david that forms a swastika or or something similar. Faced with the prospect of that, I choose to not engage with you on this question. Anyway, this thread is about predictions of attacks on the Olympics, and you keep trying to drag it off topic. Maybe you have some obsession with the Jews, I dunno. I don't care.

Keep the chat Olympics 'terrorist' disaster based, ok?

Bull****. I gave the reasons for my counterclaim. I believe you brought up Nazism and Zionism and now your getting stroppy because you get caught out and blurting out strawmen because you can't rationalise your claim.

DB21 · 30-07-2012 12:01pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Some people don't understand the concept of a Conspiracy Theory and should not be here.

How very ironic, because in my field of study, a theory requires evidence for it to be so. Now, where is your undebatable evidence?

Chazz Michael Michaels · 30-07-2012 12:43pm

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

No, because it wasn't, but I know there is no hope of ever convincing you, because any coherent argument presented by me will eventually be countered by some video (the lazy mans idea of 'debate') or pictures of a pentagram over a star of david that forms a swastika or or something similar. Faced with the prospect of that, I choose to not engage with you on this question. Anyway, this thread is about predictions of attacks on the Olympics, and you keep trying to drag it off topic. Maybe you have some obsession with the Jews, I dunno. I don't care.

Keep the chat Olympics 'terrorist' disaster based, ok?

Bull****. I gave the reasons for my counterclaim. I believe you brought up Nazism and Zionism and now your getting stroppy because you get caught out and blurting out strawmen because you can't rationalise your claim.

It's a conspiracy...

Torakx · 30-07-2012 12:50pm

Yes a theory requires evidence for it to be so, but it does not require evidence to be a theory in itself.
This is the meaning of the word theory afaik.

Did anyone watch the opening ceremony..note i said ceremony

Hmm let me see, what did it have.....
To start a load of people singing to the tree of life.There was mention of Jerusalem during this part.
Symbolic child abduction was also a suprise.

Was some interesting signals coming from the buearocrat dancers,but maybe coincedence. like the bahumat signal (above and below).

It was about 5am when i flicked through it this morning, so i was tired and only breezed through.Im sure somebody is working on decoding it as we speak.

Also of note, while typing this, my keyboard news display is telling me a newspaper in Israel is saying the americans have presented or will present a plan to strike Iran(due to nuclear capabilities).
And also an american presidential candidate Romney declares Jerusalem capital of the jewish state and that american has a "solemn duty and a moral imperative" to block Iran from nuclear capabilities.

Good timing

For what its worth if there is an attack on london, it probably wont be from the skies im sure we all agree.
Id be staying clear of the underground and public transport though...just in case.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 12:58pm

al28283 wrote: »

Do you think the VIPs are staying away because they believe an attack will happen on the games? Simple question, Yes or No??

This might possibly answer the above..

Rather a case of: anything that can go wrong HAS GONE WRONG

Long BEFORE the games started there was recklessness :

Police deny London Olympics security compromised after dossier left on train Metro.co.uk
By METRO WEB REPORTER - 17th January, 2012 ...
http://www.metro.co.uk/olympics/887587-police-deny-london-olympics-security-compromised-after-dossier-left-on-train#ixzz226ZXNKyM

and long BEFORE G4S hit the headlines `security` was very questionable :

British newspaper smuggles fake bomb into Olympic park
May 07, 2012
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2012/05/british-newspaper-smuggles-fake-bomb-into-olympic-park/1

To summarise there is a combination of reasons explaining why there`are now so many emptry seats.....

Bad media publicity (security shambles)

The Internet (conspiracy theories gone viral spurned on by that Rothschild document predicting a scenario of 13,000 deaths during the 2012 Olympics and also that BBC Code 9 documentary)

VIPs having (allegedly) put tickets onto the black market.

Owryan · 30-07-2012 2:14pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This might possibly answer the above..

Rather a case of: anything that can go wrong HAS GONE WRONG

Long BEFORE the games started there was recklessness :

Police deny London Olympics security compromised after dossier left on train Metro.co.uk
By METRO WEB REPORTER - 17th January, 2012 ...
http://www.metro.co.uk/olympics/887587-police-deny-london-olympics-security-compromised-after-dossier-left-on-train#ixzz226ZXNKyM

and long BEFORE G4S hit the headlines `security` was very questionable :

British newspaper smuggles fake bomb into Olympic park
May 07, 2012
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2012/05/british-newspaper-smuggles-fake-bomb-into-olympic-park/1

To summarise there is a combination of reasons explaining why there`are now so many emptry seats.....

Bad media publicity (security shambles)

The Internet (conspiracy theories gone viral spurned on by that Rothschild document predicting a scenario of 13,000 deaths during the 2012 Olympics and also that BBC Code 9 documentary)

VIPs having (allegedly) put tickets onto the black market.

They appear more like clusterfups than a "master conspiracy"

Chazz Michael Michaels · 30-07-2012 2:15pm

According to The Guardian, the 'reserved' seats have now been made available to the public - and have sold out.

ah well.

Owryan · 30-07-2012 2:18pm

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

According to The Guardian, the 'reserved' seats have now been made available to the public - and have sold out.

ah well.

Thats great news....................the uber classes will be untouched when the false flag spectacular does/doesnt happen .

Either way RTDH will be right.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 2:21pm

Owryan wrote: »

Either way RTDH will be right.

That's the great thing about never speaking for yourself and not answering simple questions.
Putting forward every theory you can find, expecially ones that contradict eachother also helps.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 2:50pm

al28283 wrote: »

That's the great thing about never speaking for yourself and not answering simple questions.
Putting forward every theory you can find, expecially ones that contradict eachother also helps.

If you bothered reading the OP,

The whole idea of this thread was post and discuss various conspiracy theories that have appeared on the Internet related to possible false flag attacks and draw your own conclusions.

You don't seem to comprehend that and instead attack and the poster.

Did I ever mention that I had to prove any of the theories? NO.

Yes plenty of stuff that has has been gathered on this thread has contradict each other, so what. they are different theories. :rolleyes:

And yes I have an ignore policy for certain posters.

Chazz Michael Michaels · 30-07-2012 2:56pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

al28283 wrote: »

That's the great thing about never speaking for yourself and not answering simple questions.
Putting forward every theory you can find, expecially ones that contradict eachother also helps.

If you bothered reading the OP,

The whole idea of this thread was post and discuss various conspiracy theories that have appeared on the Internet related to possible false flag attacks and draw your own conclusions.

You don't seem to comprehend that and instead attack and the poster.

Did I ever mention that I had to prove any of the theories? NO.

Yes plenty of stuff that has has been gathered on this thread has contradict each other, so what. they are different theories. :rolleyes:

And yes I have an ignore policy for certain posters.

Hmm, you know, when you make proclamations such as predicting the imminent deaths of thousands of people, you better be clear with the fact that the onus is on YOU to defend those claims or retract them. What you are describing is simply childish. Then again, you could be a child, for all I know.

hooradiation · 30-07-2012 2:59pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Did I ever mention that I had to prove any of the theories? NO.

This might give you an insight into why some people find your antics to be so contemptible.

While others might post things that are as silly as what you post, and sometimes worse, they at least make an effort to stand over what they've posted and certainly don't hide from people asking questions.

Meanwhile you're the RSS feed from hell.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:00pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

And yes I have an ignore policy for certain posters.

And all questions.

In the OP you mentioned that these were theories which you had come up with.
You should be able to back them up with something, anything at all.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 3:10pm

hooradiation wrote: »

This might give you an insight into why some people find your antics to be so contemptible.

While others might post things that are as silly as what you post, and sometimes worse, they at least make an effort to stand over what they've posted and certainly don't hide from people asking questions.

Meanwhile you're the RSS feed from hell.

I couldn't give a damn how silly or trivial material may be if it contain any sort of subliminal messaging related to topic.

And yes again I will ignore condescending and derogatory comments from certain posters.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:11pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I couldn't give a damn how silly or trivial material may be if it contain any sort of subliminal messaging related to topic.

It doesn't. If it has you have failed to show it or explain how.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 3:19pm

al28283 wrote: »

And all questions.

In the OP you mentioned that these were theories which you had come up with.
You should be able to back them up with something, anything at all.

Back them up with what?

Obama LOL.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:27pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Back them up with what?

Obama LOL.

See what I mean? What exactly do you mean posting this as a response?
It's completely unrelated to what we are talking about.

anything, anything at all relevant to what you are talking about.

For example, what does White House press releases have to do with what we are talking about? Nothing at all. Yet you post a link to a story about it and think that is making some kind of point. It is not at all relevant to the topic.

All it points to is your extremely clouded way of thinking. You think the fact that a story says the White House may give stories a biased slant that proves all your nonsense is true? It doesn't. The fact that you think it does just show how your mind works, it is clouded, disjointed and lacking any sense of logic. You are joining the dots between a thousand different links and coming up with nonsense. You cannot even keep your mind on track for even a few posts.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 3:32pm

al28283 wrote: »

See what I mean? What exactly do you mean posting this as a response?
It's completely unrelated to what we are talking about.

anything, anything at all relevant to what you are talking about.

For example, what does White House press releases have to do with what we are talking about? Nothing at all. Yet you post a link to a story about it and think that is making some kind of point. It is not at all relevant to the topic.

All it points to is your extremely clouded way of thinking. You think the fact that a story says the White House may give stories a biased slant that proves all your nonsense is true? It doesn't. The fact that you think it does just show how your mind works, it is clouded, disjointed and lacking any sense of logic. You are joining the dots between a thousand different links and coming up with nonsense. You cannot even keep your mind on track for even a few posts.

What's the point of having a Conspiracy Forum if solid proof had to be required as a basis of every theory. :rolleyes:

Most of the theories posted on this thread are self explanatory and need very little explaining.

JustinDee · 30-07-2012 3:36pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

What's the point of having a Conspiracy Forum if solid proof had to be required as a basis of every theory. :rolleyes:

You'll find that when people make accusations, no matter how tasteless or utterly daft they are, proof is needed. Otherwise, it is nothing more than imagination, fiction, paranoid hearsay, coincidental tosh etc.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:37pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

What's the point of having a Conspiracy Forum if solid proof had to be required as a basis of every theory. :rolleyes:

Did you seriously just ask that?
Every theory should have some sort of basis for it. Otherwise it's just fiction.
It doesn't have to be solid proof but just completely unfounded posting nonsense and saying it might save lives is ridiculous.

There are legitimate CT's which do have evidence for and against which do warrant a serious discussion and Posters like you, without any understanding of how to present or back up an idea make them all seem ridiculous.

hooradiation · 30-07-2012 3:39pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I couldn't give a damn how silly or trivial material may be if it contain any sort of subliminal messaging related to topic.

And yes again I will ignore condescending and derogatory comments from certain posters.

Yeah, champ, that's not really helping.

Assuming you're not just this forums equivalent of JC in A&A - why are you so consistently sabotaging your attempts to warn people about these threats you find credible.

Ignoring people you don't like, refusing to stand over anything, refusing to even entertain the notion that people will not accept things simply on your say so.... it's like you're going out of your way to make sure nobody ever takes anything you say seriously.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:40pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Most of the theories posted on this thread are self explanatory and need very little explaining.

If noone knows what you're talking about and you are unable to explain them when asked, by definition, the theories are not self explanatory.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 3:55pm

al28283 wrote: »

Did you seriously just ask that?
Every theory should have some sort of basis for it. Otherwise it's just fiction.
It doesn't have to be solid proof but just completely unfounded posting nonsense and saying it might save lives is ridiculous.

Most if not all theories related to this topic are based on the concept predictive programming and subliminal messaging so obviously If you dismiss that concept they are going to be ridiculous.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 3:57pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Most if not all theories related to this topic are based on the concept predictive programming and subliminal messaging so obviously If you dismiss that concept they are going to be ridiculous.

i don't dismiss that, can you point to the post where you explained this??? I've asked many times and you never mentioned any predcitive programming. How does Iran attacking London during the games tie in with this predictive programming. Is the Illuminati, the one you claim chose the Olympic logo and mascot to remind us who is in charge, in league with Iran? And this is all to ultimately enslave humanity right? These are all things you've claimed in this thread but they don't seem to be in anyway connected.

How is any of this self explanatory?

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 4:35pm

al28283 wrote: »

i don't dismiss that, can you point to the post where you explained this??? I've asked many times and you never mentioned any predcitive programming. How does Iran attacking London during the games tie in with this predictive programming. Is the Illuminati, the one you claim chose the Olympic logo and mascot to remind us who is in charge, in league with Iran? And this is all to ultimately enslave humanity right? These are all things you've claimed in this thread but they don't seem to be in anyway connected.

How is any of this self explanatory?

This video which was posted on the first page explains in great detail about predictive programming and even gives past examples if you even cared to watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpTMXuh5DxQ

al28283 · 30-07-2012 4:40pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This video which was posted on the first page explains in great detail about predictive programming and even gives past examples if you even cared to watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpTMXuh5DxQ

that video seems to be blocked. Can you explain it?

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 4:53pm

al28283 wrote: »

that video seems to be blocked. Can you explain it?

May I suggest you change your browser, it works fine for me,

Also how come you are the only one that asked for an explanation on predictive programming?

al28283 · 30-07-2012 5:00pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Also how come you are the only one that asked for an explanation on predictive programming?

tried it on 2 browsers, its blocked here on copyright infringement.

I imagine I'm the only one who asked because nobody opens your links anymore. They're always the same kinda thing and you never offer any sort of explanation as to how they relate to the topic. People have become used to you not making any sense and being a bit of a joke. The way you conduct yourself online, your inability to explain yourself or discuss simple topics in a correct and understandable way, has led to noone taking you seriously in any way.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 5:09pm

al28283 wrote: »

tried it on 2 browsers, its blocked here on copyright infringement.

Google Chrome accepts it no problems.

al28283 wrote: »

I imagine I'm the only one who asked because nobody opens your links anymore.

The trolls you are talking about.

al28283 · 30-07-2012 5:13pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The trolls you are talking about.

No, not the trolls. To many people you seem like a troll because that is exactly how you act.

Posting what many would consider to be ridiculous claims and then offering no follow up, no explanations and avoiding questions on the issue is classic troll behaviour, just looking to frustrate and annoy people.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 5:37pm

al28283 wrote: »

No, not the trolls. To many people you seem like a troll because that is exactly how you act.

Posting what many would consider to be ridiculous claims and then offering no follow up, no explanations and avoiding questions on the issue is classic troll behaviour, just looking to frustrate and annoy people.

Ridiculous claims from the same posters that don't bother viewing the links :rolleyes:

Anyway they are not clames they are theories. :rolleyes:

al28283 · 30-07-2012 5:47pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Ridiculous claims from the same posters that don't bother viewing the links :rolleyes:

Anyway they are not clames they are theories. :rolleyes:

take the few moments required to explain that and talk through your ideas and they might understand that.

This is a forum where people come to discuss ideas, not just a noticeboard for whatever links you happened to come across.

King Mob · 30-07-2012 6:09pm

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Bull****. I gave the reasons for my counterclaim. I believe you brought up Nazism and Zionism and now your getting stroppy because you get caught out and blurting out strawmen because you can't rationalise your claim.

I believe his point that people who would care enough to hide the word Zion in the Olympic logo would be a Zionist, some of the tenants of which (namely a Jewish state and various pro-jewish stances) are not the same as Nazism and vice-versa.
As such there would be no plausible reason for why a Zionist would also encode the word "Nazi" and there would be no reason that a Nazi would encode "Zion".
Yet they both are "encoded".

But I think you understood this point quite well, but couldn't pass up a chance to use the thread as another soapbox against your favourite target.

Run_to_da_hills · 30-07-2012 6:20pm

al28283 wrote: »

take the few moments required to explain that and talk through your ideas and they might understand that.

This is a forum where people come to discuss ideas, not just a noticeboard for whatever links you happened to come across.

The nature of this thread in particular as a noticeboard type as it consists of a multitude of self explaining conspiracies related to false flag spectaculars at the Olympic Games.

I would certainly have an interest in this subject in light of reading that prophetic and apocalyptic Rothschild document that most of these theories are based on.

kryogen · 30-07-2012 6:27pm

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The nature of this thread in particular as a noticeboard type as it consists of a multitude of self explaining conspiracies related to false flag spectaculars at the Olympic Games.

I would certainly have an interest in this subject in light of reading that prophetic and apocalyptic Rothschild document that most of these theories are based on.

What you are looking for is a blog then, start a blog where you can just post your random links without ever having to engage anybody.

This, sadly for you, is a message board, topics here are supposed to be discussed, not just blogged.

RoboClam · 30-07-2012 7:32pm

I have to close this but I may reopen it at some point. I don't want to have to hand out infractions, because everyone is being fairly civil thus far, but this is not a "talk about RTTH" thread.

Possible predictions of false flag spectaculars at London's 2012 Olympics.

Comments