Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NFL Betting Thread 2014/2015

1246719

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    Went 1-1 yesterday +0.808 Pts.
    Overall 6-2 for week 1 +17.393 Pts.

    Got too cautious yesterday after a poor Sunday.

    Fancied the Lions so took them -6 and Stafford over 298.5 yards. But then I was thinking that because I envisioned the Lions to storm to an early lead, that Manning would go over a paltry 236.5 yards in playing catch up. How wrong I was! :eek::eek:

    Then in the Chargers game I took the Bolts +3 but also the overs as I thought Rivers could put up a few points. So overall about a point or two up on the night when it should have been more :(:(


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 12,333 ✭✭✭✭JONJO THE MISER


    TNF Baltimore -4 to beat Pittsburgh at 2.360 for 3 Pts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    I guessed the spreads this week before checking, was close enough in a lot of cases but based on what I thought and even bearing in mind that I was plain wrong on some, I think I’ll be backing Jacksonville, Kansas, and Atlanta plus the points. I don’t really like any favs. I’d also back Chicago if they move to +7.5 but I don’t think they will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    I'm all over the Jags aswell. The Redskins looked pathetic against the Texans and RG3 looks way off. Think the Jags defence should be able to get to him.

    Others I like are 49ers at home to the Bears and Saints at the Browns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    I am not gone on the Saints;
    out of their dome, up north
    laying that many points
    change of timezone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    I think the Bengals might have too much for the Falcons actually. They registered three sacks against the Ravens and constantly had Flacco fleeing for his life. The Falcons offensive line did a more than admirable job last week against the Saints but I think they'll be in for a rude awakening this week.

    That and the Packers -8 are my main two bets. Geno Smith looked good but I'm hoping for a bounce back to form for the Green Bay offence and I think the defence (without being brilliant, which they are not) will do enough to stifle Geno.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,946 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    skippymac6 wrote: »
    I think the Bengals might have too much for the Falcons actually. They registered three sacks against the Ravens and constantly had Flacco fleeing for his life. The Falcons offensive line did a more than admirable job last week against the Saints but I think they'll be in for a rude awakening this week.

    That and the Packers -8 are my main two bets. Geno Smith looked good but I'm hoping for a bounce back to form for the Green Bay offence and I think the defence (without being brilliant, which they are not) will do enough to stifle Geno.
    The big things in the Packers/Jets game is the two lines. Green Bay's offensive line looked awful last week. The Jets DL looked poor too. I think this is a game where in-running betting is the way to go. You will know who is winning that battle very early and then go back the other team.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I would almost consider GB to win and the over (46pts I think?) over GB -8. on one hand I don't have a tonne of faith in the Jets offense, but on the other Dom Capers "red sea" defensive scheme will give anyone a chance to put up close to 30.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    Billy86 wrote: »
    I would almost consider GB to win and the over (46pts I think?) over GB -8. on one hand I don't have a tonne of faith in the Jets offense, but on the other Dom Capers "red sea" defensive scheme will give anyone a chance to put up close to 30.

    Yeah I can see the apprehension but I think the Packers O-Line will give rodgers enough time to pick apart the Jets weak secondary. I can see them getting a double digit lead early and forcing the Jets to put it on the shoulders of Geno and I can't see that going too well.

    On the flipside of that, if the Jets establish their running game and keep it tight then they have a squeak. However, I am going for the former scenario and Packers -8.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭padraig_f


    Don't really like a side tonight, gonna go over the total of 44. Just looking at Steelers-Browns there....Steelers offense looked good, but couldn't stop Hoyer & co. Steelers ended up with 503 yards vs. Cleveland's 389.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    Had a small bet on Steelers to win by 1-6 points at 4/1. Think it'll be a tight affair again as with all these divisional games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Bills to win 1.88, Jags +6 1.92, SF -7 2.0, Panthers to win 1.74 1 unit each.


  • Registered Users Posts: 805 ✭✭✭SameOleJay


    Jake Matthews out of the Bengals game. Anyone touching Atlanta might want to hold fire now one Game Carimi is in line to start.

    inDuEHYqYZgOb.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Struggling to find anything I like today to be honest. It looks like it may well be the first week in a long time I don't touch anything on NFL.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I'm kind of in the same boat to be honest. Thought I might get far better value on the Bills than there is, but all in all its tough to find anything there.

    If the Packers offensive and defensive lines hold up well (just hold their own rather than dominate) in the first few drives against the Jets I might feel tempted to whack on GB beating the spread. But I want to get at least a glimpse first, because we were appalling against the run last week while NY look like they've put a really good unit together on that end, and their defensive line if lethal while Sherrod at RT in particular scares the crap out of me for us. If it looks like we can do enough to force Geno Smith to have to go over 30 pass attempts, we should clean up easy though.

    Really does seem a night for betting in running on the whole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Im thinkin a treble of titans -3.5,seahawks -4.5and NO -6


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle


    Went for a few small accumulators.

    Lions M/L
    Jags +6.0
    Jets +7.5
    Falcons +5.5

    Arian Foster anytime
    Matt Forte anytime
    Justin Hunter anytime

    Edelman - over 67.5
    Cardinals/Giants under 42.5
    Texans -3

    Texans M/L
    Rams/Bucs over 37.5
    Lions/Panthers under 44


  • Posts: 8,647 [Deleted User]


    49ers worth a gamble with Marshall and Jeffery injured?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Threw a fiver on rams,jags,falcons to win at 33/1. Worth a punt I reckon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭padraig_f


    Paully D wrote: »
    Struggling to find anything I like today to be honest. It looks like it may well be the first week in a long time I don't touch anything on NFL.

    Ban request :)

    Ah, I'm kinda the same, nothing much standing out. Reduced number of singles and did a bunch of cheap accumulators on leans.

    Singles

    Vikings +5.5 vs. Patriots, Vikings ML @ 3.0
    Browns +6.5 vs. Saints
    MNF Eagles ML vs. Colts @ 2.45

    I don't think running-backs matter that much, and the Vikings line is an overreaction. They looked good last week mainly because they had a good defense and competent QB. Browns I'm not crazy about, but big spread at home.

    6pm accum
    - Dolphins +1, Titans -3, Jags +6
    - Giants +1.5, Bengals -5.5, Panthers -2.5

    9pm accum
    - Chiefs +11.5, Bucs -6, Texans -3


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Seahawks -4.5 is the only one that really stands out to me. Jets +7.5 and Saints -6 leans.

    Tough week IMO. I'll have a small punt on the treble as 1) I can't resist and 2) for interest. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,212 ✭✭✭shamrock55


    Im gonna throw 50 on seahawks, texans, pats, and 49rs to win 230


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Carson Palmer's officially out today. Just managed to get on the Giants -1 at odds against (11/10) on Betfair.

    ab95eb7c46d93ab08efcba5ee9a72ff0.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Trent Richardson is 5/6 to run for under 40.5 yards tomorrow night. Get your bets in ding ding ding ding ding ding ding!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭padraig_f


    Line moves today (think this is usually sharp money)...

    Big move on Vikings, so think I got that right, down from +5.5/6 down to nearly +3 now.

    Giants +1.5 down to -2
    Browns from +6.5 down to +5.5
    Chargers from +5.5 to +4.5
    Rams +6, down to +4.5
    Jets from +7.5 to +7

    Bit of money on Texans and Titans both pushing towards -3.5 (was -3).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,946 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I like four today, they are

    Seahawks
    Titans
    Saints
    Redskins

    Gonna do all four in a straight accum with handicaps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Getting a push on a 7-point Packers win looks like value to me, even if it's the sharps on the other side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,946 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I like four today, they are

    Seahawks
    Titans
    Saints
    Redskins

    Gonna do all four in a straight accum with handicaps.
    Adding the Cards to this, couldn't believe they were +2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Adding the Cards to this, couldn't believe they were +2.

    Drew Stanton though. Hasn't taken a snap of competitive football in 4 years and was abysmal when he did get the odd game.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Unbelievable. I made two last minute, impulsive bets.

    €10 on Steven Jackson to run over 42.5 yards,
    Richardson to run under 40.5 yards (tomorrow) and Jamaal Charles to run over 73.5 yards. Jackson did his end, but Charles went off injured early so lost that one. 5.1/1 odds.

    €5 on Rams to win, Newton to throw over 222.5 yards and the Chiefs +12.5 with under 52.5 in the game. Broncos made a goal line stand to secure the win and that bet winning by only 7, Newton went around 290 and the Rams won on a last minute FG. 15.6/1, €83 return.

    Onky noticed now that I forgot to hit the final 'submit' button on the winner! :mad:

    Fecking raging, at least the comeback at the Jets helps a little. Feel a right tit about now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Unbelievable. I made two last minute, impulsive bets.

    €10 on Steven Jackson to run over 42.5 yards,
    Richardson to run under 40.5 yards (tomorrow) and Jamaal Charles to run over 73.5 yards. Jackson did his end, but Charles went off injured early so lost that one. 5.1/1 odds.

    €5 on Rams to win, Newton to throw over 222.5 yards and the Chiefs +12.5 with under 52.5 in the game. Broncos made a goal line stand to secure the win and that bet winning by only 7, Newton went around 290 and the Rams won on a last minute FG. 15.6/1, €83 return.

    Onky noticed now that I forgot to hit the final 'submit' button on the winner! :mad:

    Fecking raging, at least the comeback at the Jets helps a little. Feel a right tit about now.

    Absolutely sick when that happens. At least the Pack won, if they hadn't then you'd be fit to cry!

    Had two accums go down and had a saver of three anytime TD's on which landed when Nelson obliged. Was waiting on Andre Johnson for another treble and I was so close to picking Hopkins instead with Cobb and Harvin.

    On the 49ers -6.5 at 5/6 in the late game. Bears will have to improve big time from last weekend whilst the 49ers are in their new home so I'm hoping they'll have a little extra in them tonight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Threw a bet on 49ers to win, over 48.5 at 13/10. Starting to think I should have gone over 48.5 and 49ers at -6.5 at 12/5 but the Bears receivers on the 49ers corners could cause problems.

    I did remember to place the bet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Bills to win 1.88, Jags +6 1.92, SF -7 2.0, Panthers to win 1.74 1 unit each.

    Load of bottlers. Looked sure to beat the handicap and lost outright.

    Loss: -.19 units.

    Of the early lines I like the look of Saints -9.5 vs. Vikings and Panthers -3.5 vs. Steelers (prob just back Panthers to win though for 3rd week running).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭padraig_f


    Had a bad day, guess the loss of AP did make a difference to the Vikings, put Cassel into more passing situations. Blocked field goal returned for a touchdown didn't help either.

    Will need the Eagles tonight, bet them money line.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle


    Went for a few small accumulators.

    Lions M/L
    Jags +6.0
    Jets +7.5
    Falcons +5.5

    Arian Foster anytime
    Matt Forte anytime
    Justin Hunter anytime

    Edelman - over 67.5
    Cardinals/Giants under 42.5
    Texans -3


    Texans M/L
    Rams/Bucs over 37.5
    Lions/Panthers under 44

    The one in bold came in which guaranteed a profit. So close to having the last one come in too if not for that ending in the Rams/Bucs game :o


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 805 ✭✭✭SameOleJay


    Saints cost me a 19/1 six-field. That was my only effort.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    Got a split on my two handicap bets. Bengals easily covering the -5.5 but the packers letting me down on the -8.

    Only other bet was an accumulator that the Saints decided to muck up with their last couple of minutes collapse to Brian Hoyer!

    Seemed like a tricky week to call games to be honest though. Good few games not going the way I would have thought.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    2 record weeks in Vegas – they were drowning in cash. 7 has been the key number in 2 games – Denver -7.5 hugely supported against the Colts and win by 7, Green Bay -7.5 well backed and win by 7. Lessons to be learned chaps.

    Clients of tipsters, who often oppose precisely these types of favs, will be doing well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    Bateman wrote: »
    2 record weeks in Vegas – they were drowning in cash. 7 has been the key number in 2 games – Denver -7.5 hugely supported against the Colts and win by 7, Green Bay -7.5 well backed and win by 7. Lessons to be learned chaps.

    Clients of tipsters, who often oppose precisely these types of favs, will be doing well.

    Yeah this week especially would have been carnage for the punters. Even fancied underdogs like the Jags got hammered and given Luck had never lost back to back ATS then those looking for a saver from last night's game would've got done too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    The overs doesn't even seem to have been backed last night as I think the line moved downwards so money must have been taken on the unders.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    Looking at the early lines this week nothing major stands out. Saints -9 at home to the Vikings could be one that I like. I feel the Saints will have a big bounce back match and with Peterson out again for the Vikes their offence could struggle.

    Also over 45 points in the Colts vs Jags match. The Colts will have conceded at least 30 points in their first two games and they shoudl be able to score at least 25 points on the Jags D. It's a game that they need desperately and it will be on the offence to get the job done I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    I am doing the lines each week before checking them now. Needless to say when you're out, chances are it's you and not Vegas that is wrong but a worthwhile excercise all the same. I think Green Bay should be favs and I think the Giants (shoot me!) should be favs. I certainly didn't have the Pats giving up as many points as they are.

    I am gradually getting into the mindset of liking less favs and more dogs. From looking at my past betting, this should give me more of a chance of winning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭skippymac6


    Bateman wrote: »
    I am doing the lines each week before checking them now. Needless to say when you're out, chances are it's you and not Vegas that is wrong but a worthwhile excercise all the same. I think Green Bay should be favs and I think the Giants (shoot me!) should be favs. I certainly didn't have the Pats giving up as many points as they are.

    I am gradually getting into the mindset of liking less favs and more dogs. From looking at my past betting, this should give me more of a chance of winning.

    Yeah I also do that. Had the Giants as 1 point favs and the Packers as 2 point favs. The only other one that I had as a fav that is not are the Rams at home to the Cowboys. I can see the logic of the Cowboys being favourites, but I was impressed by the Rams last week.

    Everything else I had priced up was roughly within a point or two the two exceptions being the Bengals who I had as 9pt favs at home the Titans are actually only 6pt favs and the Eagles who I again had as 9pt favs at home to the Redskins that are again only being asked to give up 6pts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Yeah - I also thought the Eagles should have been a TD fav.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    Bateman wrote: »
    I am doing the lines each week before checking them now. Needless to say when you're out, chances are it's you and not Vegas that is wrong but a worthwhile excercise all the same. I think Green Bay should be favs and I think the Giants (shoot me!) should be favs. I certainly didn't have the Pats giving up as many points as they are.
    .

    The whole Vegas thing is overblown. Plenty of the Europeans are now getting their lines up before Vegas. Vegas these days is really only copying the moves by Pinnacle and other such firms which are basically Asians at this stage. The true pricing of games are coming moreso from Asia these days, similar to soccer, and its only a matter of time before the opinion in Vegas becomes defunct altogether. You should obviously always try price the games yourself, but don't be put off when theyre different to some bookies. For instance Bwin priced up week 2 before week 1 was played and made an absolute cock up on some games, 3-4 points out on the handicap in some cases. I endured a thoroughly frustrating couple of days trying to find a way to back them but was unable. Generally the best time to place bets is early in the week when the lines are out, and just before kickoff when the influx of mug money has had its effect


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,818 ✭✭✭Bateman


    Yeah agree with a lot of that, however there were 3 games off the boards in Vegas as of yesterday evening, and neither Pinnacle or "the Europeans" were taking any chances by listing them.

    Saints-Vikings I could understand no quotes for, but the Arizona and Cinci games?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    The line I'm really liking so far is the Carolina -3. Being at home that line suggests that he Steelers and Panthers are equal but I'd have the Panthers ahead of them by at least a few points. They've a strong defence and Cam was only just back from injury last week so he should come on for that game too. The Ravens showed that if you shut down Antonio Brown you limit the Steelers through the air in a big way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    Bateman wrote: »
    Yeah agree with a lot of that, however there were 3 games off the boards in Vegas as of yesterday evening, and neither Pinnacle or "the Europeans" were taking any chances by listing them.

    Saints-Vikings I could understand no quotes for, but the Arizona and Cinci games?

    BetV and bwin had spreads up for all 3. A few more too not listed on oddschecker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    1 unit each. Falcons -6.5 1.99, Cowboys +1 1.96, Saints -10.5 2.05, Panthers to win 1.56.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 12,333 ✭✭✭✭JONJO THE MISER


    Atlanta -6.5 vs Tampa at 1.980 for max 5 Pts.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement