Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dash cam saves your ass (no Roundabout stuff please :)

1105106108110111153

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    CiniO wrote: »
    How will you all supporters of hypothesis "speed kills" explain fact, that on German motorways where there's plenty of drivers doing speed of excees of 100mph, and often in excess of 200km/h or sometimes excess of 300km/h there isn't any excessive road death compared to motorways in other countries where speed limit applies and people adhere to it?

    Who gives a **** about that? Doing 100 with someone up your hole is just stupid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭pablo128


    Who gives a **** about that? Doing 100 with someone up your hole is just stupid.
    And doing 100 up someones hole is even more stupid. Did you read my original post? I put my foot down to shake him as he was tailgating me at the limit on an empty motorway. When I realised he was matching my speed I slowed down to 50 mph until he overtook and fcuked off into the distance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭rizzodun


    CiniO wrote: »
    How will you all supporters of hypothesis "speed kills" explain fact, that on German motorways where there's plenty of drivers doing speed of excees of 100mph, and often in excess of 200km/h or sometimes excess of 300km/h there isn't any excessive road death compared to motorways in other countries where speed limit applies and people adhere to it?

    Road deaths on German autobahns in Jan - Nov 2013 apparently have gone up compared to same period 2012 by about 8%, as far as I'm aware in Ireland the number of road deaths on motorways in Ireland dropped overall 2012-2013, and there is a constant ongoing debate about introducing speed limits on autobahns.

    pablo128 wrote: »
    And doing 100 up someones hole is even more stupid. Did you read my original post? I put my foot down to shake him as he was tailgating me at the limit on an empty motorway. When I realised he was matching my speed I slowed down to 50 mph until he overtook and fcuked off into the distance.

    Without sounding like the high horse brigade:
    Anyone driving for any length of time would have known that to get the result you desired (yer man off your bumper) would have been to slow down enough to where he'd rather pass you, you decided you'd break the speed limit with a tailgater first, what did you expect? Slowing down would have clearly been the safer option, yet you chose the riskier option over that, the fact he was tailgating you is hardly an excuse.

    Speed kills, that is a fact, it doesn't matter how safe your car is, it can only withstand certain amount of forces, it doesn't matter if your car has a 5 star NCAP rating, it something immovable fast enough, you will come off worse.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    CiniO wrote: »
    How will you all supporters of hypothesis "speed kills" explain fact, that on German motorways where there's plenty of drivers doing speed of excees of 100mph, and often in excess of 200km/h or sometimes excess of 300km/h there isn't any excessive road death compared to motorways in other countries where speed limit applies and people adhere to it?


    Facts and figures please, from reliable sources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Facts and figures please, from reliable sources.


    Well that was a close one, but we were talking about speed.
    This was clearly caused by idiot undertaking.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CiniO wrote: »
    Well that was a close one, but we were talking about speed.
    This was clearly caused by idiot undertaking.
    No, it looked like a car jumped out of the wat of the camera car and into the path of a faster car that was overtaking a trailer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭jimbis


    Nothing too spectacular, was trying out the iPhone in the cradle while I await delivery of my dashcam :D.



    Very wet road, cyclist just out of shot was waiting to turn right but actually stopped and waved me passed so if he had of decided not to be polite to us drivers he could've came off worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    No, it looked like a car jumped out of the wat of the camera car and into the path of a faster car that was overtaking a trailer.

    Well, he can hardly be blamed. How could he expect that someone will be undertaking him on autobahn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Facts and figures please, from reliable sources.

    From Wikipedia

    Safety: international comparison
    A few countries publish the safety record of their motorways; the Federal Highway Research Institute[49] provided IRTAD statistics for the year 2010:

    International Killed per 1 billion veh·km
    Country All roads Motorways
    Austria 7.32 2.15
    Belgium 8.51 2.87
    Czech Republic 16.22 3.38
    Denmark 5.65 1.92
    Finland 5.05 0.61
    France 7.12 1.79
    Germany 5.18 1.98
    Slovenia 7.74 3.77
    Switzerland 5.25 1.04
    United States[50] 6.87 3.62


    Out of those countries, only Finland and Switzerland have considerably safer motorways than Germany. France and Denmark a small bit better.
    Everyone else is worse in regards safety on motorways (Austria, Belgium, Czech Rep, Slovenia, US).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭rizzodun


    CiniO wrote: »
    From Wikipedia

    Safety: international comparison
    A few countries publish the safety record of their motorways; the Federal Highway Research Institute[49] provided IRTAD statistics for the year 2010:

    International Killed per 1 billion veh·km
    Country All roads Motorways
    Austria 7.32 2.15
    Belgium 8.51 2.87
    Czech Republic 16.22 3.38
    Denmark 5.65 1.92
    Finland 5.05 0.61
    France 7.12 1.79
    Germany 5.18 1.98
    Slovenia 7.74 3.77
    Switzerland 5.25 1.04
    United States[50] 6.87 3.62


    Out of those countries, only Finland and Switzerland have considerably safer motorways than Germany. France and Denmark a small bit better.
    Everyone else is worse in regards safety on motorways (Austria, Belgium, Czech Rep, Slovenia, US).

    But yet from the same article
    The leading cause of autobahn accidents is "excessive speed": 6,587 so-called "speed related" crashes claimed the lives of 179 people, which represents almost half (46.3%) of 387 autobahn fatalities in 2012.[47] However, "excessive speed" does not mean that a speed limit has been exceeded, but that police determined at least one party travelled too fast for existing road[48] or weather conditions.[47] On autobahns 22 people died per 1000 injury crashes; a lower rate than the 29 deaths per 1,000 injury accidents on conventional rural roads, which in turn is five times higher than the risk on urban roads – speeds are higher on rural roads and autobahns than urban roads, increasing the severity potential of a crash.[47]


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Cocoon


    It was all happening out there this evening, not sure what happened in the first video moments before I passed.



    And minutes later the red Audi had a quick change of direction..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭ardle1


    Cocoon wrote: »
    It was all happening out there this evening, not sure what happened in the first video moments before I passed.



    And minutes later the red Audi had a quick change of direction..


    I can clearly see in the second video he was doing his best to get in front of you and into that lane rather than take on the coach at the slip road, he does indicate and actually looks at you for a bit of understanding, was he trying to head North(looks like yellow plate)anyway you weren't letting him in!? I think I would have flashed him on in, maybe that's just me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    CiniO wrote: »
    Well that was a close one, but we were talking about speed.
    This was clearly caused by idiot undertaking.


    It's just a dashcam video, to keep the thread on topic and at least mildly interesting.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 44 Cybercommando


    Looked for a general Dashcam thread other than this but can't find one.

    Not sure if I can ask this here but anyway: there are a lot of cheap dashcams on ebay. Any good ones you folks can recommend? Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭red dave


    Looked for a general Dashcam thread other than this but can't find one.

    Not sure if I can ask this here but anyway: there are a lot of cheap dashcams on ebay. Any good ones you folks can recommend? Thanks.

    There's a thread on that here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,934 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    CiniO wrote: »
    Well, he can hardly be blamed. How could he expect that someone will be undertaking him on autobahn.

    Watch the full video...

    White Audi correctly moves right after overtaking the Skoda estate with the bikes on the back to allow the camera car to overtake, which the camera car does

    However the Sharan(?) driver is sitting in the outside (left) lane dawdling with nothing ahead of him or beside him and belatedly moves right as the camera car approaches without seeing the Audi behind him.

    Sharan 100% at fault. Should have been in the middle/far right lane all along


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Watch the full video...
    I watched it again now.
    White Audi correctly moves right after overtaking the Skoda estate with the bikes on the back to allow the camera car to overtake, which the camera car does
    True
    However the Sharan(?) driver is sitting in the outside (left) lane dawdling with nothing ahead of him or beside him
    True
    and belatedly moves right as the camera car approaches without seeing the Audi behind him.
    True.
    But Audi shouldn't be there, as overtaking on the right (undertaking) is prohibited.
    Sharan 100% at fault. Should have been in the middle/far right lane all along

    If there was accident, I think most likely blame would go to both, possibly more percentage of blame put on Audi driver.

    I know in Ireland undertaking is normal everyday thing, but through all my driving in Germany I don't think i've seen one incident of undertaking (except in heavy traffic with lines of cars on every lane).
    No surprise then, that Sharan driver didn't expect someone will be undertaking him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,934 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    CiniO wrote: »
    But Audi shouldn't be there, as overtaking on the right (undertaking) is prohibited.

    But the Audi wasn't undertaking. It had in fact been overtaken by the faster camera car and continued on at the same speed in the centre lane.

    The Sharan pulled in on top of him at the last minute but it should have been in the centre lane all along.

    What you're saying is the Audi should have immediately pulled back out behind the camera car, but there was a several second gap between the camera car overtaking the Audi and coming up on the Sharan. We can't see what the Audi driver saw at that point depending on how far back it was.

    Still reckon the Sharan 100% at fault for being in the wrong lane, and then almost causing an accident when it pulled over without checking mirrors


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 874 ✭✭✭Gosub


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    But the Audi wasn't undertaking. It had in fact been overtaken by the faster camera car and continued on at the same speed in the centre lane.

    The Sharan pulled in on top of him at the last minute but it should have been in the centre lane all along.

    What you're saying is the Audi should have immediately pulled back out behind the camera car, but there was a several second gap between the camera car overtaking the Audi and coming up on the Sharan. We can't see what the Audi driver saw at that point depending on how far back it was.

    Still reckon the Sharan 100% at fault for being in the wrong lane, and then almost causing an accident when it pulled over without checking mirrors
    The Audi driver comes back into camera shot as he has undertaken the camera car. If he had slowed to avoid undertaking, he wouldn't have caused the situation and the other car could have changed lane safely. Having said that, the driver of the Sharan would share blame as he moved into a lane that was occupied by the Audi, even though it shouldn't have been there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,934 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Gosub wrote: »
    The Audi driver comes back into camera shot as he has undertaken the camera car. If he had slowed to avoid undertaking, he wouldn't have caused the situation and the other car could have changed lane safely. Having said that, the driver of the Sharan would share blame as he moved into a lane that was occupied by the Audi, even though it shouldn't have been there.

    OR... you could argue that the Sharan caused the entire thing as it was in the wrong lane to begin with, and moved over without looking - but if it HAD been in the correct centre lane all along, the camera car could have overtaken without slowing down (and thus the Audi catching up), and the Audi could have moved back behind the camera car in good time to overtake as well.

    This is why insurance claims are such fun - both sides have elements of truth :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    But the Audi wasn't undertaking. It had in fact been overtaken by the faster camera car and continued on at the same speed in the centre lane.

    That's exactly what he did as you described, but he was undertaking.
    If you don't agree, that pretty much means that you don't understand what undertaking is.
    He moved to centre lane to allow camera car to overtake, but what he didn't notice was that Sharan was ahead on 3rd lane, and was going slower.
    So Audi driver by keeping driving at the same pace on middle lane, was coming closer and closer to Sharan, and eventually started undertaking him.

    In other words - from Sharan driver point of view. He could have looked in his mirror earlier, and saw no other vehicles on his right. So he assumed that he could change lane to right, and so he did.
    He possibly loooked in the mirror to early before changing lanes, and didn't check it in the last moment, but that's my whole point - he couldn't really expect Audi driver to undertake.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 874 ✭✭✭Gosub


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    OR... you could argue that the Sharan caused the entire thing as it was in the wrong lane to begin with, and moved over without looking - but if it HAD been in the correct centre lane all along, the camera car could have overtaken without slowing down (and thus the Audi catching up), and the Audi could have moved back behind the camera car in good time to overtake as well.

    This is why insurance claims are such fun - both sides have elements of truth :(
    Yeah we're pretty much saying the same thing, except that you think the Audi was blameless. The Audi driver should have seen the situation developing in front of him and taken the appropriate action: slowing down. There was a huge lack of situational awareness on the part of the Audi driver.

    Agreed that the Sharan driver was a dick and shouldn't have been there in the first place. Little comfort if the Audi driver had lost control and caused death as a consequence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    OR... you could argue that the Sharan caused the entire thing as it was in the wrong lane to begin with, and moved over without looking - but if it HAD been in the correct centre lane all along, the camera car could have overtaken without slowing down (and thus the Audi catching up), and the Audi could have moved back behind the camera car in good time to overtake as well.

    This is why insurance claims are such fun - both sides have elements of truth :(


    Well there is a grade of offences.
    Surely occupying wrong lane on motorway (like Sharan did) is not as severe offence as undertaking on the motorway.

    When driving on German autobahn, you would reasonably expect someone will forget to pull right straight away, and will hog overtaking lane for a while.
    You wouldn't expect though someone undertaking, and that's what Sharan driver got caught with. He didn't expect Audi driver to undertake, and that's why he didn't check his mirrors or blind spots properly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    But the Audi wasn't undertaking. It had in fact been overtaken by the faster camera car and continued on at the same speed in the centre lane.

    The Sharan pulled in on top of him at the last minute but it should have been in the centre lane all along.

    What you're saying is the Audi should have immediately pulled back out behind the camera car, but there was a several second gap between the camera car overtaking the Audi and coming up on the Sharan. We can't see what the Audi driver saw at that point depending on how far back it was.

    Still reckon the Sharan 100% at fault for being in the wrong lane, and then almost causing an accident when it pulled over without checking mirrors

    This is what happens when ghobsh1tes meet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Cocoon


    ardle1 wrote: »
    I can clearly see in the second video he was doing his best to get in front of you and into that lane rather than take on the coach at the slip road, he does indicate and actually looks at you for a bit of understanding, was he trying to head North(looks like yellow plate)anyway you weren't letting him in!? I think I would have flashed him on in, maybe that's just me!

    From my perspective I didn't see him look out the window, the dashcam being up again'st the window and being wide angle picked up on it alright. What I did observe was the indicator so I held back having a feeling he wanted to go right and opened the gap for him to change lane but didn't expect him to do so at the last second. At the point where the Audi put on the indicator the road turns hard right and I personally wouldn't attempt to go right from the inside lane at that point especially in slippery conditions as seen from the first video. If you watch to the end of the second video you will see that I also gave a Merc a chance to change lane in front of me but he couldn't make up his mind either.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    Any chance of adding Audi and Sharan to the roundabout list?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,058 ✭✭✭finnharpsboy


    i dont know who got a bigger fright him or me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    i dont know who got a bigger fright him or me

    Good two step from yer man though, if it wasn't for his white runners, he's impossible to see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭GrumpyMe


    Iwannahurl wrote: »
    Action starts after 1:20.

    And ends at 1:50... unless you speak the lingo (Ruski I'd guess) and even then I doubt if that makes it much more exciting...

    I want 4:30 of my life back!:(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Pov06


    Learner driver here so bear with me...

    Installed a dashcam and this was the first footage that I got from it literally 5 minutes out the door.

    So I'm approaching a T-junction with a yield sign for me and this guy sees me and just stops and waves me on to go ahead. Strange so I proceed anyway and just as I begin to move so does he. Not sure am I missing something or what was his intention?



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Looks like he was signalling to someone else, was there anyone to your right (unseen by the camera) at the junction?
    He doesn't appear to be even looking at you...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Pov06


    Looks like he was signalling to someone else, was there anyone to your right (unseen by the camera) at the junction?

    Woman walking on the footpath to the right, but she continued on and after the incident he left the village.

    In reality he was really waving to me, it's not as clear in the video.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭dickwod1


    Pov06 wrote: »
    Learner driver here so bear with me...

    Installed a dashcam and this was the first footage that I got from it literally 5 minutes out the door.

    So I'm approaching a T-junction with a yield sign for me and this guy sees me and just stops and waves me on to go ahead. Strange so I proceed anyway and just as I begin to move so does he. Not sure am I missing something or what was his intention?


    Looks like he was hoping you'd drive out in front of him, For "some reason".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,720 ✭✭✭Hal1


    When i first read this I taught scammer to myself. A silly move for him to stop in the middle of a main road, busy or not. There's a time and a place for courtesy but not when you put other road users at risk. It did appear for a second that he was gesturing at you to move off. The best thing you can do is stick to the ROTR and wave on idiot's like that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    On my first viewing it looked like he was asking for directions. Anyone else?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,617 ✭✭✭ba_barabus


    Hal1 wrote: »
    The best thing you can do is stick to the ROTR and wave on idiot's like that.

    Owing to one or two similar incidents I now do. Which is a shame when some people are genuinely trying to be nice.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ken wrote: »
    On my first viewing it looked like he was asking for directions. Anyone else?.
    That's what I thought as well, as I asked the OP was there someone else out of shot that he may have called to. he looked like he was already stopping before the OP arrived at the junction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 504 ✭✭✭ustari


    Tourist in a rental car perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭GrumpyMe


    Pov06 wrote: »
    Learner driver here...this guy sees me and just stops and waves me on to go ahead. Strange so I proceed anyway and just as I begin to move so does he. Not sure am I missing something or what was his intention?
    So learner driver - lesson #1 Don't let others "drive" for you... ignore his instruction - make up your own mind.
    Pov06 wrote: »
    what was his intention
    You and I and all the other folks here are guessing at what his intention was but one thing is for sure - stopping where he did is not very clever - so taking instruction from someone who can't or at least doesn't drive correctly is a bad idea...
    Hal1 wrote: »
    ...The best thing you can do is stick to the ROTR...
    Great advice - don't take any direction from him - treat him as a "dangerous unpredictable hazard" and proceed with extreme caution...
    Hal1 wrote: »
    ...and wave on idiot's like that.
    Bad advice - don't go around instructing others how to drive... AFAIK - doing that during your test would be at least a major fault if not an instant fail!
    ba_barabus wrote: »
    ...Which is a shame when some people are genuinely trying to be nice.
    Have to say that I don't encourage other road users "to be nice". I encourage others to be predictable. So when they have right of way, they take right of way unless by doing so they would impede the flow of traffic!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭jimbis


    Don't know if this was the BMW drivers plan but I'm hearing about a lot of this lately where drivers who have the right of way are waving a car out, as the car pulls out they drive into them and you don't stand a chance on who's to blame.
    I know of it happening several times around South Dublin alone.

    Probably not what was going on here but be warned. And as above stick to the ROTR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Pov06


    jimbis wrote: »
    Don't know if this was the BMW drivers plan but I'm hearing about a lot of this lately where drivers who have the right of way are waving a car out, as the car pulls out they drive into them and you don't stand a chance on who's to blame.
    I know of it happening several times around South Dublin alone.

    Probably not what was going on here but be warned. And as above stick to the ROTR.

    That's exactly the reason why I have the dashcam installed. I'm 19 and I just paid for car insurance (1.7k) and I couldn't afford to pay the higher premium if something like that DID happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 992 ✭✭✭danger_mouse_tm




    Excuse the shake. The standard mount for my dash cam was tilted too far down for the windshield on my truck. Watch the taxi merging from the left. I let the video run on so you could see the problems I have trying to make progress in lanes of traffic when people like the guy in the Mercedes SUV and the cream coloured dual way bus hold the centre lane and plod along the road.

    http://youtu.be/sYg2IxJHnfU There's the link in case the video doesn't work


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie



    Excuse the shake. Watch the taxi merging from the left. I let the video run on so you could see the problems I have trying to make progress in lanes of traffic when people like the guy in the Mercedes SUV and the cream coloured dual way bus hold the centre lane and plod along the road.

    I'd send that video to Dualway, and point out that there's no reason for their drivers to be hanging around in the middle lane for no apparent reason.

    The plate number on that taxi is clear enough, you could send it on to the taxi regulator as well if you felt that way inclined.

    Now I'm off to be sea-sick from all the shaking :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭rameire




    look left at the very start, you will see a red car in the left most lane, you will also see a car coming towards him,
    this is a one way road, I am assuming this person does this every day.



    why cant they wait to merge



    not so smart, smart.

    🌞 3.8kwp, 🌞 Split 2.28S, 1.52E. 🌞 Clonee, Dub.🌞



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭ardle1


    Very Good.. Not so smart Smart :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭D_BEAR


    Probably NSFW very loud at the end.



  • Registered Users Posts: 335 ✭✭Mick55


    D_BEAR wrote: »
    Probably NSFW very loud at the end.

    Jeez that yoke was slow, probably an aul Lada or something. What a dolt though!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,510 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    seriously stupid trying to overtake that much and esp so slowly, you could tell at the start it just wasn't going to happen


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement