Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N21 Thread

245678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭fresca


    Highlights are:-
    - 8,500 m in length
    - type-2 dual carriageway
    - 100 kmph speed limit
    - 17 structures
    - 18/24 month project
    - roundabout on N21 (god knows why!!!)
    - grade seperation on M20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭nordydan


    fresca wrote: »
    Highlights are:-
    - 8,500 m in length
    - type-2 dual carriageway
    - 100 kmph speed limit
    - 17 structures
    - 18/24 month project
    - roundabout on N21 (god knows why!!!)
    - grade seperation on M20


    At the very west of the scheme where the roads goes back north for a section, I believe they may tie in the N21 Adara-Abbeyfeale scheme into this dogleg. Under such a scenario, the route takes seems less meandering


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Why Is'nt it type 1 dual? It has traffic higher than all the current inter urbans.:rolleyes:

    What the **** is up with the NRA? Can we have the names of the actual people in the design office. I'm fed up with this carry on at this stage. I'm dead serious. The NRA needs an overhaul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭fresca


    nordydan wrote: »
    At the very west of the scheme where the roads goes back north for a section, I believe they may tie in the N21 Adara-Abbeyfeale scheme into this dogleg. Under such a scenario, the route takes seems less meandering

    That's fine. but in the meantime, while we're waiting for the abbeyfeale-adare upgrade, we'll have a roundabout west of adare on the current n21. doesn't this seem crazy?

    then again, given that the M20 needs to be built before the adare bypass (or maybe all 1 project (with priority to m20)) - it all seems far off in the future...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    Why Is'nt it type 1 dual? It has traffic higher than all the current inter urbans.:rolleyes:

    No it does not, and will not. It does not compare to the M7 or the M4 or the M1 ( all near Dublin) does it??

    To precisely which section of which interurban road are you seeking to compare the N21 around Adare in terms of their current and some putative traffic volumes ???


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    fresca wrote: »
    Highlights are:-
    - 8,500 m in length
    - type-2 dual carriageway
    - 100 kmph speed limit
    - 17 structures
    - 18/24 month project
    - roundabout on N21 (god knows why!!!)
    - grade seperation on M20

    - no local access from R519
    - in-effect a roundabout at both ends

    I think to be fair, type-2 dual carriageway is sufficient.
    I'm beginning to wonder though, will it actually be quicker to go through Adare village itself ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I doubt it, what with 120kmh on the M20 section and 100kmh on the N21 section. Versus 80kmh on the old route and 50kmh through Adare itself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    - no local access from R519
    - in-effect a roundabout at both ends

    I think to be fair, type-2 dual carriageway is sufficient.
    I'm beginning to wonder though, will it actually be quicker to go through Adare village itself ?

    Yes.

    And Type 1 is the best solution for a long term cause. It has DC levels traffic and in opening it will rise to about 25000 at least. So many cars avoid Adare at peak times. The bypass wont actually do much good considering its really windy and having a low speed limit like the existing national primary route.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    I doubt it, what with 120kmh on the M20 section and 100kmh on the N21 section. Versus 80kmh on the old route and 50kmh through Adare itself.


    People don't stick to the 80kmh speed limit on existing national primary routes.:rolleyes:

    Adare road is more direct and shorter. When its bypassed it won't be bottlenecked. You have two roundabouts on the bypass so its not exactly going to be quick.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    No it does not, and will not. It does not compare to the M7 or the M4 or the M1 ( all near Dublin) does it??

    To precisely which section of which interurban road are you seeking to compare the N21 around Adare in terms of their current and some putative traffic volumes ???

    The M8 in most parts only gathers 17,000 AADT. The AADT passing through Adare is in the region of 24K, Type 2 dual carriageway has a capacity of 20K. The M9 has about 16K towards Waterford.
    fresca wrote:
    roundabout on N21 (god knows why!!!)

    The NRA always go for the cheap option on 2+2's look at the Castleisland bypass 3 roundabouts. Compact grade seperaration will be low on these type of projects although there is one on the Dromod to Rooskey scheme on the N4.


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    tech2 wrote: »
    . The AADT passing through Adare is in the region of 24K,

    AADT through Adare is only around 16-17K

    http://www.nra.ie/NetworkManagement/TrafficCounts/TrafficCounterData/html/N21-20.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious



    Yes its been static for years because its a bottleneck.

    Kldare peaked 22,000 a day. It dwindled to 17,000 pre bypass, because traffic avoided the town by diverting to Suncroft, Rathagan, Athy etc.

    When the bypass opens traffic will jump. During summer it does peak about 24,000 a day. The mainstreet of Adare already has that number all year around.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    When the bypass opens traffic will jump. During summer it does peak about 24,000 a day. The mainstreet of Adare already has that number all year around.

    Adare in summer is a destination in itself. The AADT West of Adare ...ie the Bypassed traffic is 12500. 12500 is complete overkill for a Type 1.
    The total estimated AADT level on the scheme in 2015 is
    approximately 10,500 and the remaining volume entering the town from the east is 8,200.

    The model indicated that the proportion of traffic on the N21 from the Limerick direction that is passing through Adare is approximately 60%, while approximately 40% is destined for Adare itself.

    The Bypass does not deal with "Adare Itself" only with those who want to get the hell out of the place :D

    I would be surprised if end to end ( Tralee Limerick) traffic is any more than one third of the 10500 who will use the bypass on average.

    You make sure ring the NRA there and give out like you said you would Mysterious :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    mysterious wrote: »

    When the bypass opens traffic will jump. During summer it does peak about 24,000 a day. The mainstreet of Adare already has that number all year around.

    Source ?

    There isn't a realistic alternative route around Adare.
    My point in all this is that we can't go bulldozing a motorway to every corner of the country, just for the sake of it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Unlike Claregalway vis a vis Galway it is true that many people visit Adare itself and many of those come from the Limerick side and leave that way afterwards.

    The Type 2 bypass is well capable of dealing with the traffic that simply has no business IN Adare and wants to get around it. The same applies to every other town to the west including Castleisland.

    I take tech2s point about the NRA messing with a good road design by overendowing it with roundabouts and taking insufficient grade separation opportunities as they arise.

    I would also commend those looking at a Type 2 from Adare to Tralee to look at the A11 and A12 roads from London to east anglia which roads carry 50k 60k 70k AADT on what are basically Type 2 roads with no proper hard shoulder really. They are more like Type 2 with a bit of hard shoulder than a type 1 and they come with roundabouts at grade albeit big ones. But they take lots of traffic.

    They are all on streetview since last week, have a look.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Source ?

    There isn't a realistic alternative route around Adare.
    My point in all this is that we can't go bulldozing a motorway to every corner of the country, just for the sake of it.


    Oh ffs, get real, the Type 1 and 2 is not going to make any extra impact on ripping up the countryside. If we are going to base your silly assumption on a motorway ripping up the country side, Why should we let a Type 2 DC rip up the countryside.

    Why did the inter urbans that has less traffic than this section get a motorway?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Adare in summer is a destination in itself. The AADT West of Adare ...ie the Bypassed traffic is 12500. 12500 is complete overkill for a Type 1.



    The Bypass does not deal with "Adare Itself" only with those who want to get the hell out of the place :D

    I would be surprised if end to end ( Tralee Limerick) traffic is any more than one third of the 10500 who will use the bypass on average.

    You make sure ring the NRA there and give out like you said you would Mysterious :D


    West of Adare is much higher. It doesn't drop down 3,4K after Adare. Adare is a village. I don't agree with your bias and inaccurate facts on these road matters at all.

    West oF NCW would be about 12,500 approx


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3



    I'm getting Claregalways AADT mixed up with Adares!

    On the alternative route there is none but only narrow local roads. Some drivers take this route around 5-6 in the evening when traffic is backed up to the WS2 part on the Limerick side. I know that some people take the N20 to Croom and then go to Newcastle West via Ballingarry during the summer months to avoid the bottleneck in Adare. This would not be a significant amount however.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    tech2 wrote: »
    I'm getting Claregalways AADT mixed up with Adares!

    On the alternative route there is none but only narrow local roads.

    Claregalway is similar. There is a narrow road in Cregboy but the main alternative is the N84.

    Mysterious. The 12500 cars west of Adare of whom 10500 will use the bypass is a fact so do not accuse me of bias or inacurracy and then bold those words like you just did.

    You seem to assert that there are more than that. Where are they, how many are there exactly ??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Claregalway is similar. There is a narrow road in Cregboy but the main alternative is the N84.

    Mysterious. The 12500 cars west of Adare of whom 10500 will use the bypass is a fact so do not accuse me of bias or inacurracy and then bold those words like you just did.

    You seem to assert that there are more than that. Where are they, how many are there exactly ??

    Its not a fact its youir made up facts.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    Its not a fact its youir made up facts.

    10,500 it is. Have you a number and what is it based on?

    I'll let you magic 1,000 out of a stargate and will credit you with 11,500 as a starting point but you must fully account for the rest ......m'kay :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    10,500 it is. Have you a number and what is it based on?

    I'll let you magic 1,000 out of a stargate and will credit you with 11,500 as a starting point but you must fully account for the rest ......m'kay :cool:


    You made the number, you back it up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    You made the number, you back it up.

    I read the EIS, mea maxima culpa :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Show me the figure.

    I don't trust figures from EIS schemes, because they are always lower than the actual figure. Its why they build roads with lower spec quality. Its precisely why they have a roundabout on both sides.

    Traffic will drop 3,000 a day just past Adare?. Adare is a village on a national primary route not a huge population centre. Common sense as usual will prevail over nonsense bias and selective non facts. The figures are bull****.

    10,500 cars a day wont cause 3 mile tailbacks in Adare. Borris in Ossary has 13,000 cars a day and doesn't suffer from any tailbacks.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    Show me the figure.

    It is in the EIS and that is that. It kind of appears on a page in the EIS , just like that , but only if the page is in front of you I find.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭fresca


    castleisland bypass jan-feb 2010 newsletter on kcc website
    http://www.kerrycoco.ie/en/allservices/roads/n21castleislandbypass/thefile,3567,en.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    This whole new EIS is a scam to make it downgraded. The North section Adare bypass was a normal DC with no roundabouts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    It is in the EIS and that is that. It kind of appears on a page in the EIS , just like that , but only if the page is in front of you I find.

    I don't really care. Its not that figure. And It seems your not very familar with the area or bottlenecks.

    Enfiled and Kildare had traffic static or even decreasing for about 2/3 years prior to their bypasses. When these towns were bypass traffic grew by over 50%

    Kildare has over 33,000 a day. Pre bypass 22,000
    Enfield. has over 24,000 (9,000 avoiding toll) pre bypass just 23,000


    A large amount of traffic avoids Adare at peak times. In summer it swells to 20,000 a day. The NRA figures varies around 16,000 a day. It peaked to 17,700. Since traffic crawls through Adare traffic has not increased and like many counters near bottlenecks decrease. Adare has traffic levels higher than all the inter urbans yet they get grade separate interchanges and a full blown motorway.

    I would be happy with this just a HQDC to North oF Newcastlewest, after that type 2. I think its the best solution for the long term.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    mysterious wrote: »
    I don't trust figures from EIS schemes, because they are always lower than the actual figure. Its why they build roads with lower spec quality.
    hahahaha....have you not noticed the motorways being built all over the country with AADTs below 10k in some places? These roads would be S2 in the UK and you are complaining that we underspec roads based on AADT. :rolleyes:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    I don't really care. Its not that figure. And It seems your not very familar with the area or bottlenecks.

    LOL. Not caring will get me a Type One on my boreen by that logic.
    mysterious wrote:
    The NRA figures varies around 16,000 a day. It peaked to 17,700.

    It peaked EAST of Adare not WEST of Adare. Furthermore traffic can come from West of Adare INTO Adare and back out again.

    Those that are estimated as wanting to get AROUND ...not INTO.... Adare are 10500 per day of the present 12500 per day who enter the village from the west.

    You are nearly making a reasonable argument for extending the EXISTING dual carriageway R Road (as it will be) right up to to the eastern fringe of the Village there Mysterious :D
    mysterious wrote:
    Adare has traffic levels higher than all the inter urbans yet they get grade separate interchanges and a full blown motorway.

    What???? Adare gets more cars than the M1 at Swords or the M4 at Leixlip. Get real willya.
    I would be happy with this just a HQDC to North oF Newcastlewest, after that type 2. I think its the best solution for the long term.

    And yet you refuse time and again to prove that the traffic levels warrant that grade of road and instead you scream at me and accuse me of making numbers up and then you deliberately obfuscate traffic levels east of Adare with much lower traffic levels west of Adare.

    Get real, the only trumpet we will see around Adare is the one you blow hard into :(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    murphaph wrote: »
    hahahaha....have you not noticed the motorways being built all over the country with AADTs below 10k in some places? These roads would be S2 in the UK and you are complaining that we underspec roads based on AADT. :rolleyes:

    Then why are you for Schemes around Enniscorthy and New ross to higher spec and even motorway?
    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    LOL. Not caring will get me a Type One on my boreen by that logic.



    It peaked EAST of Adare not WEST of Adare. Furthermore traffic can come from West of Adare INTO Adare and back out again.

    Those that are estimated as wanting to get AROUND ...not INTO.... Adare are 10500 per day of the present 12500 per day who enter the village from the west.

    You are nearly making a reasonable argument for extending the EXISTING dual carriageway R Road (as it will be) right up to to the eastern fringe of the Village there Mysterious :D



    What???? Adare gets more cars than the M1 at Swords or the M4 at Leixlip. Get real willya.



    And yet you refuse time and again to prove that the traffic levels warrant that grade of road and instead you scream at me and accuse me of making numbers up and then you deliberately obfuscate traffic levels east of Adare with much lower traffic levels west of Adare.

    Get real, the only trumpet we will see around Adare is the one you blow hard into :(


    I'm sorry but I'm allergic to this kind of back and forth silly non sensical replies. My point is this. The Adare N21 doesn't drop 2.500 at either side of the village. Its a village. The N21 of 16,500 a day may dwindle down to about 15,500 or a figure more realistic. Anyway all road opening attract more traffic so your figures are just woefully twisted to negate the argument of the real facts.

    The fact is, no inter urban in this country deserves motorway status. Bar the Portlaoise to Dublin, Mullingar to Dublin, Galway to Claregalway. Limerick to Adare, Cork to Rathduff. Dublin to Dundalk.


    It's near Limerick, Adare, Newcastlwest are growing towns. Its the main route to the SW and it connects to Kilarney, Listowel, Tralee, Dingle and other towns.


    The Adare section would be better as Type 1 leaving the rest as Type 2 considering traffic will rise drastically on this route as its bypassing a major bottleneck. It should have the road standard as the Adare northern bypass section. Funny how you don't seem to mention that.

    I understand that you may not be familar with this area, but you don't call the shots or actually give the actual facts here. So lets keep it real. You have probably never even passed through the village.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    mysterious wrote: »
    Then why are you for Schemes around Enniscorthy and New ross to higher spec and even motorway?
    :rolleyes:
    Lol, I'm not saying they shouldn't be built as motorway, I'm saying that your assertion that EIS figures are used to water down schemes is patently rubbish!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Adare has traffic levels higher than all the inter urbans yet they get grade separate interchanges and a full blown motorway.

    Nonsense.

    The M1 at Dundalk bypass has 21908 and 13.8% HGV, other parts of the M1 nearer Dublin have much much more.
    http://www.nra.ie/NetworkManagement/TrafficCounts/TrafficCounterData/html/M01-6.htm

    North of Adare has 15543 and 6.2% HGV.
    http://www.nra.ie/NetworkManagement/TrafficCounts/TrafficCounterData/html/N21-20.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    murphaph wrote: »
    Lol, I'm not saying they shouldn't be built as motorway, I'm saying that your assertion that EIS figures are used to water down schemes is patently rubbish!


    Its not. It's blatant. Look at the Adare Northern bypass scheme which was a standard DC if not (HQDC) with no roundabouts.

    The 10.500 figure is a low based count to make this route upgrade pityful and not based on actual figures for actual needs.

    I know most people in Ireland don't see the logic of future proofing roads. But I don't design roads based on EIS non facts figures. i base road projects on a 20 year life span at least. With this project it would be more logical to just build a proper standard DC and none of the Type 2 crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,600 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Lads, cant we all just get along

    * Leaves guns and chainsaws onto the verbal battlefield * :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    Its a village. The N21 of 16,500 a day may dwindle down to about 15,500 or a figure more realistic.

    What does that mean ???? Only 1000 cars a day will bypass Adare and the other 15,500 will continue through ?????
    The fact is, no inter urban in this country deserves motorway status. Bar the Portlaoise to Dublin, Mullingar to Dublin, Galway to Claregalway. Limerick to Adare, Cork to Rathduff. Dublin to Dundalk.

    That means no Motorways should be built anywhere save a few small missing links north of Cork north of Galway and east of Adare....NOT West of Adare..... surely.
    The Adare section would be better as Type 1 leaving the rest as Type 2 considering traffic will rise drastically on this route as its bypassing a major bottleneck. It should have the road standard as the Adare northern bypass section. Funny how you don't seem to mention that.

    Funny how you never mentioned the SAC either and the reroute was driven primarily by that.

    From the EIS!
    It should be noted that in the intervening period since
    the initial route corridor assessment the boundaries of the Lower River Shannon Candidate Special Area of Conservation (cSAC:002165) were extended in January 2007 to the River Maigue bridge in Adare. As a result the route for Option 1 now crossed a designated Candidate Special Area of Conservation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    What does that mean ???? Only 1000 cars a day will bypass Adare and the other 15,500 will continue through ?????



    That means no Motorways should be built anywhere save a few small missing links north of Cork north of Galway and east of Adare....NOT West of Adare..... surely.



    Funny how you never mentioned the SAC either and the reroute was driven primarily by that.

    From the EIS!

    I made my point clear in my last post, maybe you should go back over it instead of taking it out context.


    The Adare bypass can demand a standard DC. West of Adare gets 2+2.

    If you think it doesn't why didn't you ever campaign agsinst other roads getting motorway status that have less traffic than this section of road. I'm not really bothered about the blue road status. I'm just basing my stance that common sense should prevail and a proper DC should be built that has grade seperated free flowing junctions.

    I mean in the next 20 years its very sensible to allow this section Type 1. Why are you so against proper future proofing? I didn't want the NRA to make the Nenagh bypass a S2 but what happens a few years later a total rebuild and millions in taxpayer money wasted. I wouldn't like to have you running our infrastructure to be quite frank.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    I wouldn't like to have you running our infrastructure to be quite frank.

    You won't find me writing the sleevenotes for Lady Gaga's Greatest Hits either :)

    Find those cars mysterious, you start right now at 10,500 and the 1,000 stargate premium. Target 20,000. Go for it my son.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    AS usual you resort to childish responses.

    Stick to the facts the ego patronizing trips don't suit you. Your the one that came up with traffic dropping drastically from east to west of Adare. Traffic drops to about to about 13,000 a day a NCW And west of Abbeyfeale its 12,000. It doesn't drop to 10.500 west of Adare. Your wrong. and your just twisting figures around for some sort of agenda that I'm not really interested in or bothered with

    The fact is the traffic at Adare is 16000 a day an when the bypass opens it will drastically rise as Adare is now a town not to avoid any onger with held ups. When the Tunnel and M7 and Gort motorways are finished it will also attract more traffic onto this road.

    NCW is a town on the N21 Which is one of the fastest growing towns in Ireland and is west o Adare. I don't why traffic would drop drastically at Adare like you posed..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    It doesn't drop to 10.500 west of Adare.

    It drops to 12500 of whom 2000 will enter ADARE and 10500 will bypass Adare according to the EIS you still won't read ( but that did not stop you giving out about it :D ) . In other words Adare (West) is not much busier than Barna (West) on the R336 and you do not see me ranting and raving about building Type 1 bypasses of Barna hereabouts. In fact a Type 2 would be overkill.

    Those numbers are the FACT that underpins the selection of a Type 2.

    I pulled another 1,000 out of a Stargate for you and now that is 11,500 Bypassing Adare.

    In order to justify the Type 1 you need to find another few 1,000 cars Mysterious, now where are they ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    In order to justify the Type 1 you need to find another few 1,000 cars Mysterious, now where are they ???

    Atlantis?


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    mysterious wrote: »
    Oh ffs, get real, the Type 1 and 2 is not going to make any extra impact on ripping up the countryside. If we are going to base your silly assumption on a motorway ripping up the country side, Why should we let a Type 2 DC rip up the countryside.

    Why did the inter urbans that has less traffic than this section get a motorway?


    They get a motorway because of the very fact they are interurbans.
    The Govt committed to providing a motorway to all the major cities

    You obviously don't know the difference between a type 1 and type 2.

    The vast vast majority of traffic trying to get to the West* side of Adare go through Adare. It the quickest way unfortunately. I know this because I go through the blasted place (no offence to Adare folk:D) twice a day and I've tried all the alternative routes.

    I suggest you "get real"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    They get a motorway because of the very fact they are interurbans.
    The Govt committed to providing a motorway to all the major cities

    You obviously don't know the difference between a type 1 and type 2.

    The vast vast majority of traffic trying to get to the east side of Adare go through Adare. It the quickest way unfortunately. I know this because I go through the blasted place (no offence to Adare folk:D) twice a day and I've tried all the alternative routes.

    I suggest you "get real"

    I do know the difference, your not in position to tell me what I don't know.

    Vast majority of traffic east of Adare go through Adare. Do you know everyone that drives that road?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    It drops to 12500 of whom 2000 will enter ADARE and 10500 will bypass Adare according to the EIS you still won't read ( but that did not stop you giving out about it :D ) . In other words Adare (West) is not much busier than Barna (West) on the R336 and you do not see me ranting and raving about building Type 1 bypasses of Barna hereabouts. In fact a Type 2 would be overkill.

    Those numbers are the FACT that underpins the selection of a Type 2.

    I pulled another 1,000 out of a Stargate for you and now that is 11,500 Bypassing Adare.

    In order to justify the Type 1 you need to find another few 1,000 cars Mysterious, now where are they ???

    Reading your posts is like trying to be serious but you just can't. The less I would say to you the better. Barna isn't even the topic here. Its Adare.

    Interesting how you never stopped any other road in this country getting motorways, but yet here you are ranting and raving about who and where things should be put and done. Adare has higher traffic than all the current interurbans that have been built.

    I made my point that Type 1 is sufficient to continue as it did in the previous bypass plans to allow future proofing since the opening year 2012 or whatever date will need type 1 anyway. Now its getting silly with alll these hairy references and assertions of this and that in this thread to make this look whatever way you want it to look.

    Do you know that roads are built in other countries to be future proofed. Of all roads been built in this country I don't see why they cant build a proper dual carriegway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    Its good to have you back :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    mysterious wrote: »

    Vast majority of traffic east of Adare go through Adare. Do you know everyone that drives that road?

    I don't need to know everyone.

    Are you seriously suggesting that more than the AADT through the Village uses an alternative route to get to the West side of Adare.


    tech2 wrote: »

    On the alternative route there is none but only narrow local roads. Some drivers take this route around 5-6 in the evening when traffic is backed up to the WS2 part on the Limerick side. I know that some people take the N20 to Croom and then go to Newcastle West via Ballingarry during the summer months to avoid the bottleneck in Adare. This would not be a significant amount however.

    1 more time mysterious- the quickest realistic way to the west side of Adare, is through Adare Village and the vast majority of traffic uses this route.

    A very small proportion take the alternative routes as tech2 has suggested.

    I'm basing this on facts and my experience commuting through the Village


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    1 more time mysterious- the quickest realistic way to the west side of Adare, is through Adare Village and the vast majority of traffic uses this route.
    I'm basing this on facts

    If it any <cough>help</cough> here is some further data from 2007. Facts are always nice and of course the experts around here may have some commentary to add , particularly on the bits I bolded.

    It strikes me that much of this bolded traffic is eminently explicable to an informed commentator in the context of school runs / secondary school runs and the location of supervalu shops.

    Existing Traffic Volumes

    Location Road Number 2007 AADT

    1 West of Abbeyfeale N21 9368
    2 East of Abbeyfeale N21 9897
    3 West of Newcastle West N21 10396
    4 East of Newcastle West N21 13777
    5 West of Rathkeale N21 13227
    6 East of Rathkeale N21 13731
    7 West of Abbeyfeale R555 2444
    8 North of Abbeyfeale R524 3683
    9 South of N21 R515 1336
    10 South of Newcastle West R522 4839
    11 South of Newcastle West R520 3657
    12 North of Newcastle West R521 4230
    13 North of N21 R523 1396
    14 South of Rathkeale R518 2238
    15 North of Rathkeale R518 2687

    16 West of Rathkeale R523 750
    17 East of Rathkeale R523 1088
    18 East of N21 Old N21 2526

    Note also

    Projected Traffic Volumes on N21

    Location Road Number 2027 AADT

    1 West of Abbeyfeale N21 13704
    2 East of Abbeyfeale N21 14478
    3 West of Newcastle West N21 15208
    4 East of Newcastle West N21 20154
    5 West of Rathkeale N21 19350
    6 East of Rathkeale N21 20087


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    So basing on traffic growth over two years Rathkeale would be from 13,,700 to about 15,000.

    Thats not Adare that Rathkeale, Which west of Croagh again... So the 10,500 figure again is not accurate.

    Bear in mind Type 1 motorway handles something in the region of 38,000. Type 1 wide lane motorway is 55,000. it seems really short sighted to stick with type 2 even at Rathkeale, never mind the higher volums at Adare,. The fact that Adare is so close to Limerick it makes sense to have it type 1. Especially given the fact that You have both national primary traffic and commuter traffic generated. Lets not forget the growth of towns such as Ballingary, NCW, Tralee, Kilarney etc from 2007 till now. NCW grew about 55% in the last census.
    That would have enormous impact on the future traffic volums counts.


    After Rathkeale it seems perfectly acceptable and reasonable to keep it 2+2. I am bewildered why your so against the idea of future proofing a short busier section of road that realistically does demand a motorway more than pretty much most sections of motorway's opened in this country in the last 10 years..

    Really strange Sponge Bob. Adare has traffic volumes of 16000. Over a 20 year period would be well over 32.000 if it were based on bypass figures with growth of the towns along the N21 and with the Limerick hinterland growing beyond Adare. Type 1 is needed at least to east of Rathkeale. Infact The Adare bypass should be given motorway status to its end at the M20 with the N21 joining as a fork to the M20. Leaving a another off slip to proceed onto a dumbell interchange to where the current planned junction of the Adare junction is planned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    If it any <cough>help</cough> here is some further data from 2007. Facts are always nice and of course the experts around here may have some commentary to add , particularly on the bits I bolded.

    It strikes me that much of this bolded traffic is eminently explicable to an informed commentator in the context of school runs / secondary school runs and the location of supervalu shops.

    Existing Traffic Volumes

    Location Road Number 2007 AADT

    1 West of Abbeyfeale N21 9368
    2 East of Abbeyfeale N21 9897
    3 West of Newcastle West N21 10396
    4 East of Newcastle West N21 13777
    5 West of Rathkeale N21 13227
    6 East of Rathkeale N21 13731
    7 West of Abbeyfeale R555 2444
    8 North of Abbeyfeale R524 3683
    9 South of N21 R515 1336
    10 South of Newcastle West R522 4839
    11 South of Newcastle West R520 3657
    12 North of Newcastle West R521 4230
    13 North of N21 R523 1396
    14 South of Rathkeale R518 2238
    15 North of Rathkeale R518 2687

    16 West of Rathkeale R523 750
    17 East of Rathkeale R523 1088
    18 East of N21 Old N21 2526

    Note also

    Projected Traffic Volumes on N21

    Location Road Number 2027 AADT

    1 West of Abbeyfeale N21 13704
    2 East of Abbeyfeale N21 14478
    3 West of Newcastle West N21 15208
    4 East of Newcastle West N21 20154
    5 West of Rathkeale N21 19350
    6 East of Rathkeale N21 20087

    Bear in mind existing traffic volumes is not the year 2007. We are now in 2010.

    Could you send me the link for the 2007 figures. I would look like to look at them.

    Thanks.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement