Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford GAA Discussion Thread 2013- Mod Warning Post #1

13567201

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭lovelypoint


    Yep that's the long and short of it.

    I see that the Limerick asked HQ would there be grounds for appeal before organizing tonights meeting. Obviously they were told they could appeal.

    After what happened to Louth in 2010, the CCCC took no responsibility for the error and said Meath would have to offer a replay for one to be played.

    All I'll say is if I was a Louth fan I'd be livid tonight.

    Throw Kildare in there also. It would be grossly unfair for the CCCC or the GAA to set a precedent now, when those gross injustices went left unaddressed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    Put it this way. If waterford were in limericks shoes yesterday I wouldn't be happy. Cant blame them for appealling it.

    It turns out the error was made by someone from hawk eye who set the camera on Hill 16 end on 'football mode'. Oh dear...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭Thinkstoomuch


    They were unaware that decision was incorrect according to their manager until after the game. They had enough of a chance to win it,. They didn't, end of.

    Are we all going to look for replays now when a dodgy decision goes against us?

    Say the match was played in Thurles, and is waved wide and its clear from tv replays its over the bar and the game pans out like the minor game yesterday. Would that team be awarded a replay? Under no circumstances. It was a bad call but in the end Galway deserved to win that game and it would be grossly unfair to have it replayed.

    Your right,it was a joke of a call ,but i cant c a replay given now.o donovan rossa of Cork won the 92 club final all ireland beating Eire Og of Carlow in the replay ,when Haydens goal clearly crossed the line.

    Eire og of Carlow should have won.They even went to sky sports i think,and proved it was goal but none was given.

    Its awful on limerick,but hard to c it overturned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    They were unaware that decision was incorrect according to their manager until after the game. They had enough of a chance to win it,. They didn't, end of.

    Are we all going to look for replays now when a dodgy decision goes against us?

    Say the match was played in Thurles, and is waved wide and its clear from tv replays its over the bar and the game pans out like the minor game yesterday. Would that team be awarded a replay? Under no circumstances. It was a bad call but in the end Galway deserved to win that game and it would be grossly unfair to have it replayed.

    The bottom line is though that the game finished level after 60 mins and Limerick had a clear point disallowed. Whether they had the chances to win it or not is irrelevant as far as that is concerned. The difference in this scenario is that the GAA dont have to admit any error on their part. Hawk-eye have accepted responsibility so I think the GAA might actually grant the replay this time as their own ass is covered. The previous incidents mentioned while similar were errors by GAA officials and granting a replay would be an admission of a f**k up by them

    You can see why Limerick are appealling it too, if a replay is granted the momentum will very much be with them. Imagine how deflated the Galway lads will be having thought they were on their way to the AI final in Croke Park on Sept 8th only to find that they mightened be now. Equally however it is rough on the Limerick lads after the efforts in getting to Croke Park to have something like that let you down on the biggest day of your life.

    Look I hope it dosent go to a replay from a Waterford point of view as it wouldnt do us any favours the extra game will bring Galway on if they win and Limerick will be on a high going into the final if they were to come through, but I can definetly see this replay being strongly considered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭deiseach


    If we accept the logic of the appeal, i.e. that Limerick should be retrospectively awarded the point, then that means they won the match in normal time. I can't see the GAA allowing the appeal, and I don't think they should.


  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭lovelypoint


    robopaddy wrote: »
    The difference in this scenario is that the GAA dont have to admit any error on their part. Hawk-eye have accepted responsibility so I think the GAA might actually grant the replay this time as their own ass is covered.

    I'm not sure I agree with that at all, as it would presume Hawkeye was the sole arbiter of scores in Croke Park, and that we don't have two umpires at each goal like we have always had.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    I'm not sure I agree with that at all, as it would presume Hawkeye was the sole arbiter of scores in Croke Park, and that we don't have two umpires at each goal like we have always had.

    Pretty sure the umpires have to single to go upstairs as well. Even though they seemed to indicate it was over.

    Plus it turns out it was human error rather than software error that cause the mistake. So basically the same as a mistake by a referee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,922 ✭✭✭deisedude


    Leave them play again and tear strips off each other I say! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭InchicoreDude


    Limerick deserve a replay and hopefully common sense will prevail and good on the Limerick County board for taking this decision. A lot of work goes into preparing teams and a young minor team playing in Croke Park for the first time would be fazed by the occasion and something like a technology issue which was to eliminate any issues of scores then makes a major blunder over ruling a perfect score would have unsettled them. The matter of the referee siding with Hawk Eye also has to be questioned as it was clear for all and sundry to see that it was a point and the umpire signaled a point so what did the referee see? What instructions was the referee given? Surely he should have used his own discretion and signaled a point as I am assuming he also saw a point scored.

    In fairness, not one person sitting around me questioned it when "Miss" came up. And these were Limerick fans who questioned absolutely very other decision that went against them in the match! There is a difference between sitting in the comfort of your living room looking at the replay compared to being at the stadium looking at the big screen (e.g. you are a good distance away from the big screen for a start).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    In fairness, not one person sitting around me questioned it when "Miss" came up. And these were Limerick fans who questioned absolutely very other decision that went against them in the match! There is a difference between sitting in the comfort of your living room looking at the replay compared to being at the stadium looking at the big screen (e.g. you are a good distance away from the big screen for a start).

    The reaction of the crowd indicated they thought it was over, but then when it came up as miss there was a groan, but no booing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭alllcounty


    Galway have come out and said they are not agreeing to a replay. I guess that's the end of the matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    alllcounty wrote: »
    Galway have come out and said they are not agreeing to a replay. I guess that's the end of the matter.

    Far from it... Limerick have announced that they will be returning to training as normal tomorrow night


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭InchicoreDude


    The reaction of the crowd indicated they thought it was over, but then when it came up as miss there was a groan, but no booing.

    yeah, there was a groan. Everyone there seemed to just accept that it was right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭seananigans




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy



    Im sure he would drop everything in the morning if his native county came calling. But I think the co. board have pretty much told him in the past that they dont fancy him


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    robopaddy wrote: »
    Im sure he would drop everything in the morning if his native county came calling. But I think the co. board have pretty much told him in the past that they dont fancy him

    Being honest, looking at the candidates I have to say that if Derek McGrath is not interested at this time then really there's not much alternative there. It would well end up a scenario where Michael Ryan is reappointed as bizarre as that sounds. I just don't see who else will take it out of the viable candidates and then the others that are having their name thrown around.

    Jason Ryan= Can't see interest on either side
    Peter Queally= Hasn't achieved an awful lot though Passage are going well
    Kevin Ryan= Won't be offered the job
    Jockser= Doubt he'd leave Carrigtwohill for the pressure and unhappiness this job currently holds, got a good deal there
    Fergal= No way
    Sean Power= Even if they win the minor I dont see it

    And really after that theres not really many more names. I don't see Cusack in charge next year and not a hope with O'Grady and Sheedy either. Haven;t seen Chuck O'Connors name mentioned much but I wouldn't be in favour of him. Nor Paul Flynn either at this point.

    We haven't exactly got an abundance of options.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Given some of the names mentioned, I wonder would Colm Bonnar be useful in some capacity. Former Wexford manager, current WIT manager, living in Fenor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    hardybuck wrote: »
    Given some of the names mentioned, I wonder would Colm Bonnar be useful in some capacity. Former Wexford manager, current WIT manager, living in Fenor.

    Yea a candidate as much as any of the above, but noises arent great about him coming from a lot of players that have played under him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    robopaddy wrote: »
    Yea a candidate as much as any of the above, but noises arent great about him coming from a lot of players that have played under him.

    Same as Ryan so!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    hardybuck wrote: »
    Given some of the names mentioned, I wonder would Colm Bonnar be useful in some capacity. Former Wexford manager, current WIT manager, living in Fenor.

    Colm Bonnar or any of the names on the previous list are not an improvement on Michael Ryan and in alot of case's a step backwards, it makes the attempted ousting of Ryan all the more baffling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    Colm Bonnar or any of the names on the previous list are not an improvement on Michael Ryan and in alot of case's a step backwards, it makes the attempted ousting of Ryan all the more baffling.

    at this stage you would have to say it will more than likely be derek mcgrath.

    Im not saying whether or not he would be up to the task, I really dont know but its a shame to see a certain quota of players dictating the co. board and getting their own way but i guess thats just where we are at the minute.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    Colm Bonnar or any of the names on the previous list are not an improvement on Michael Ryan and in alot of case's a step backwards, it makes the attempted ousting of Ryan all the more baffling.

    Agreed, as I said still waiting for the outstanding candidate to appear.

    While I'm not gonna say Derek McGrath is not a better manager than Ryan or question his potential (because I just don't really know), he's not really achieved all that (yet) to suggest we should have be going through all this just to have him on board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    robopaddy wrote: »
    at this stage you would have to say it will more than likely be derek mcgrath.

    Im not saying whether or not he would be up to the task, I really dont know but its a shame to see a certain quota of players dictating the co. board and getting their own way but i guess thats just where were are at the minute.

    If the rumours are true that there is a divide between East/West players which seems plausible and also of course you will have players who wanted Ryan to stay are they really going to accept McGrath?

    Ideally you need an outside man, but between the fact that your county board is as broke as meself and none of the real top managers are available Waterford County Board really are caught between a rock and a hardplace.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    If the rumours are true that there is a divide between East/West players which seems plausible and also of course you will have players who wanted Ryan to stay are they really going to accept McGrath?

    Ideally you need an outside man, but between the fact that your county board is as broke as meself and none of the real top managers are available Waterford County Board really are caught between a rock and a hardplace.

    To be fair though, they haven't helped themselves in the slightest here. Tom Cunningham saying they've had no contact with the players, and then Ryan says that the county board had contacted him telling him there was gonna be a meeting on the Sunday.

    Then going straight to twitter to tell the world Ryan was resigning. Why like?

    I would imagine Michael Ryan was told by Connors that the players had voted that it would be best that they parted ways. I would be surprised if the details of the meeting were disclosed. And I think Michael Ryan's decision to leave was based on thinking it was unanimous and better off, but then after received support from several players that made him feel that maybe he could still take the team on next year.

    I also think looking at the Boards statement that they told him they wanted him to reapply too.

    So I think it's between Ryan and McGrath and I wouldn't rule out Michael Ryan returning yet. Obviously the big problem with that would be if Ryan is in charge you will have rumours and media speculation of unrest in the camp which would hang over the team for the year.

    Either way, we'll be massive favourites for relegation from 1A ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Ryan didn't exactly come in with a sparkling CV either. It was a mixed bag. He won ladies football titles, had been a selector for the Waterford senior hurlers, and had good success with De La Salle.

    Interestingly, despite winning a county title and a Munster title before being pipped in an All Ireland club semi to a side who walked the final, he was only retained for one year in De La Salle. I'm not sure what the full story is there, but you hear people saying that people like Derek McGrath had a very strong influence over the running of the team at that time.

    Very few counties will be in a position to appoint anyone with a perfect CV - there is a shortage of those people out there in general. A county like Waterford will have even more difficulty, and we may get used to that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    hardybuck wrote: »
    Very few counties will be in a position to appoint anyone with a perfect CV - there is a shortage of those people out there in general. A county like Waterford will have even more difficulty, and we may get used to that.

    Thats kind of my point though there is no better alternative and he is doing a good job, why change? Its the same as some Limerick fans calling for John Allens head after last Sunday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    Thats kind of my point though there is no better alternative and he is doing a good job, why change? Its the same as some Limerick fans calling for John Allens head after last Sunday.


    Is that actually happening? :eek: World's gone mad. Amazing how quickly things change after one bloody defeat. Even the most optimistic Limerick fan would have had an awful struggle trying to convince anyone they'd beat Tipp.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Thats kind of my point though there is no better alternative and he is doing a good job, why change? Its the same as some Limerick fans calling for John Allens head after last Sunday.

    There comes a point in every manager's tenure where a fresh voice is needed. On paper the alternative may not appear to be much better, but a fresh approach can have a positive, or indeed negative impact.

    If you took John Allen, was he any better on paper than Donal O'Grady when he took over Cork in 2005? A guy who started off as a team masseur, then selector, before working his way up?

    From the outside looking in, I would have thought that Ryan would have been able to hold the players together for another year at least, but that obviously has not been the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    hardybuck wrote: »
    There comes a point in every manager's tenure where a fresh voice is needed. On paper the alternative may not appear to be much better, but a fresh approach can have a positive, or indeed negative impact.

    If you took John Allen, was he any better on paper than Donal O'Grady when he took over Cork in 2005? A guy who started off as a team masseur, then selector, before working his way up?

    From the outside looking in, I would have thought that Ryan would have been able to hold the players together for another year at least, but that obviously has not been the case.

    Donal O'Grady resigned so thats not really a fair comparison Michale Ryan still wnats the job and two years is hardly time for a new voice when progress is obvious, Brain Cody never had that problem, infact Anthony Daly just had he's most sucessfull year after 6 years in charge.

    Your last para I agree with but where we might disagree with is who is to blame for this, and its alkso why apart from the money issue I can't imagine an outside manager worth he's salt taking a risk on these players.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    Thats kind of my point though there is no better alternative and he is doing a good job, why change? Its the same as some Limerick fans calling for John Allens head after last Sunday.

    He was found out a bit last Sunday though he was totally outfoxed by Davy on the sideline. He should have known the type of gameplan Clare would bring but didnt little or nothing to counteract it instead going for what won them the 2 games in Munster. Cant blame him for that I know, but Croke Park was always going to be a different story with different type of pressures than to the homecomforts of the Gaelic Grounds and they were caught very cold on the day. How they stood there looking at Hannon driving wide after wide before waiting until the second hlf before taking him off them is criminal as his apparant nervousness became infectious towards his teamates as well as the first half wore on. It obviously wasnt working for the lad and he should have been taken out of his misery after the 3rd one at the very latest. Then when Seamus Hickey went off injured they looked bereft of a Plan B and by the time they reverted to the usual strategy of bringing in players who are actually miles better than some of the players in the starting 15 it was too late.

    When you compare that to what we are alleged to have gotten rid of poor Mick Ryan for then if anyone would be to get the boot it would be Allen. But the Limerick players are too respectful of their manager to go off undermining I would imagine


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 420 ✭✭Mr Tibbs


    Its called a county board for a reason and that should mean a joint statement from all concerned who are involved in this debacle. Its early days yet but why allow rifts to fester with speculation about east and west in a small county for gods sake. Its getting to joke proportions now with all the rumours that are going around about what he said she said. The county chairman should have the cop to bring all sides together and resolve this situation, surely he has to have some input here otherwise what is he there for at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 488 ✭✭Ropaire


    robopaddy wrote: »
    When you compare that to what we are alleged to have gotten rid of poor Mick Ryan for then if anyone would be to get the boot it would be Allen. But the Limerick players are too respectful of their manager to go off undermining I would imagine

    Ask Justin how it worked out for him in Limerick.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    Ropaire wrote: »
    Ask Justin how it worked out for him in Limerick.

    Justin's time was up. when 2 counties refuse to play for you in the space of 18 months maybe it was time to call it a day


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭deiseach


    Ordinarily I'd be one for not letting a split like this fester, but even with the best will from both sides there's a chance this might erupt in open war like it did in Cork and Limerick. With that in mind, let's park it until after the Minor final. Never mind it interfering with the preparation of the team, I don't want it interfering in my enjoyment of the build-up! :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,922 ✭✭✭deisedude


    In a way its the best possible build up for the minors going into the final. All the media and public focus seems to be on the senior team


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    So many diversions it's amazing (and not a great thing in one respect, a great in another with relation to the minors) that there's so much talk here at this stage.

    What do people make of the county championship thus far?

    De La Salle clear favourites and hard to argue it. Impressive showings again this year and are coping well without Daniels. Dunno who's there to stop them, Lismore haven't been all guns blazing so far they';ll need to find another gear.

    Outside of that a lot of the contenders have key injuries, Ballygunner appear to have lost Hutchison now having had erratic form over the last two years anyway, Mount Sion have lost O'Neill, and Fourmile are missing a few most notably Shane Walsh and remains to be seen can achieve fitness this year.

    I don't see Dungarvan as outright winners, nor indeed Abbeyside despite quite a ressurgeance from them. Passage though are going very well. Lot of lads on County teams this year, coupled with having the likes of Kelly and Tommy Connors and even Conor Carey and they look a decent team. Bit late to be calling them dark horses given they're top of group 2 but they could well be there or thereabouts at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    deisedude wrote: »
    In a way its the best possible build up for the minors going into the final. All the media and public focus seems to be on the senior team

    And all the crap about the other semi aswell, its really falling kindly for Waterford.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 990 ✭✭✭robopaddy


    Passage though are going very well. Lot of lads on County teams this year, coupled with having the likes of Kelly and Tommy Connors and even Conor Carey and they look a decent team. Bit late to be calling them dark horses given they're top of group 2 but they could well be there or thereabouts at the end.

    Was thinking that myself, big chance for them this year as you say with a lot of other teams not going well with injuries and that. Kelly to be fair to him is unplayable when hes in the form hes in at the moment and if they could avoid DLS in the KO stages they are definetly capable of getting to a final and who knows after that


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    robopaddy wrote: »
    Was thinking that myself, big chance for them this year as you say with a lot of other teams not going well with injuries and that. Kelly to be fair to him is unplayable when hes in the form hes in at the moment and if they could avoid DLS in the KO stages they are definetly capable of getting to a final and who knows after that

    Yano I'd say DLS would be very hard to beat in a final to be honest. I reckon getting them before that is the time to beat them. Lismore nearly did it last year without Maurice Shanahan in the quarters. Say they took their eye off the ball. For a team that plays so many games that is pretty plausable.

    Be different in a final. Obviously we'll no more after the weekend, but I could see Abbeyside taking Dungavan this weekend. That would mean Ballygunner would be playing De La Salle I believe. Now that, would be interesting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    I can't see anything other than a comfortable win for DLS. There is no way the likes of Passage would have the quality to stop them if they turn out to be the best of the rest.

    Disappointing year for Dungarvan. Everyone expected them to push on after a great 2012, but I remember watching that final and wondering if the hammering might knock some of the young lads back, but 2nd year syndrome might be having some impact.

    Pretty surprised with the likes of Lismore, I thought they would be stronger. I'd expect Ballygunner to have another sting in their tail yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    hardybuck wrote: »
    I can't see anything other than a comfortable win for DLS. There is no way the likes of Passage would have the quality to stop them if they turn out to be the best of the rest.

    Disappointing year for Dungarvan. Everyone expected them to push on after a great 2012, but I remember watching that final and wondering if the hammering might knock some of the young lads back, but 2nd year syndrome might be having some impact.

    Pretty surprised with the likes of Lismore, I thought they would be stronger. I'd expect Ballygunner to have another sting in their tail yet.

    Dunno will Passage beat DLS themselves, but I certainly don;t think it's implausable that they might capitalize on somebody else doing it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Yano I'd say DLS would be very hard to beat in a final to be honest. I reckon getting them before that is the time to beat them. Lismore nearly did it last year without Maurice Shanahan in the quarters. Say they took their eye off the ball. For a team that plays so many games that is pretty plausable.

    Be different in a final. Obviously we'll no more after the weekend, but I could see Abbeyside taking Dungavan this weekend. That would mean Ballygunner would be playing De La Salle I believe. Now that, would be interesting.

    I'd agree with the above. In a final the DLS players will be used to the occasion, and probably relish it at this stage. For teams playing them in the final, it can probably be a bit daunting. They've dished out trimmings in the last few county finals if memory serves me correctly.

    Lismore proved that they can be caught off guard up to that point alright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Dunno will Passage beat DLS themselves, but I certainly don;t think it's implausable that they might capitalize on somebody else doing it.

    Hard to see who'll do it though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    hardybuck wrote: »
    I'd agree with the above. In a final the DLS players will be used to the occasion, and probably relish it at this stage. For teams playing them in the final, it can probably be a bit daunting. They've dished out trimmings in the last few county finals if memory serves me correctly.

    Lismore proved that they can be caught off guard up to that point alright.

    That's it really, they are winners and in a County final they have a chance to win trophies. The tedium of other games given they play so many means the same hunger wouldn't quite be there and they expect to be in finals.

    They won't be bet in a final.
    hardybuck wrote: »
    Hard to see who'll do it though.

    It is I guess in fairness, but we've had a plenty of upsets at this level before. A dodgy ref can have a big impact. And if DLS to go out, any of the quarter finalists could win it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭alllcounty


    I'd say it's DLS's to lose now, they're the best in the competition but there are 4 other teams that could beat them on the day. Expext Abbeyside to beat Dungarvan in the derby at the weekend, they're a big physical team and playing with alot more skill this year for the first time in a good few years. Dont think Roanmore will survive another year in senior, too many light lads on the team and An Ring have put in better performances so far this year, allthough neither are really senior material. As for who will be intermediate champs it's hard to call. If Clashmore put in as much effort in to the hurling as they do with the football at adult level then they could easily win the western title for the first time in he clubs history. I think portlaw will win out the east. As for junior I hope tramore make amends after last year's relegation but there are 4 junior teams in the west that are just as good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 497 ✭✭The blue blaa


    This Saturday in Walsh park the U14,15 and the U16 county teams each play Kilkenny in Walsh Park first up is the tony Forristal team there playing at 2pm U15 @3pm and U16 @4pm


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭seananigans




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭seananigans




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭doz


    hardybuck wrote: »
    Disappointing year for Dungarvan. Everyone expected them to push on after a great 2012, but I remember watching that final and wondering if the hammering might knock some of the young lads back, but 2nd year syndrome might be having some impact.

    I feel Dungarvan are suffering from a lack of freshness in the Senior Championship, mainly due to the team being so young. There are lads like Gavin Power, Kevin Daly and Patrick Curran playing minor, u21 and senior for club and minor for county and some playing football also. Ryan Donnelly and the other three Currans also playing a lot of games and some football also I believe. They landed a tough group bar Roanmore, particularly with Abbeyside making good strides under Darragh Duggan. Should be a great game next Sunday but if it comes down to tit for tat hurling I think Dungarvan will have the edge.

    Hard to see beyond De La Salle for county, simply too much quality there. Lismore could still have a run if they make quarters, I would give them a good chance against Mount Sion or Passage.

    Feel De La Salle are a bit shaky in full back line and will be punished if they progress to Munster.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement