Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aircoach Dublin-Cork express

18911131419

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Just looked at the Aircoach Facebook page earlier and what seems to be fake slurs against the company are now being posted I would hope vested interests are not at play here because that is a very bad thing to do and I would hope nobody would draw themselves down to this level.

    It looks a bit suspicious when someone posts a complaint about a bag being taken in Fermoy, where Aircoach do not stop, someone points this out, so the person changes their story, someone queries why the need to change the story and the fact the tone of the post does not sound like someone who has genuinely lost their bag and she deletes that and then posts another complaint.

    You then have another complaint about Aircoach making seven stops and Bus Eireann being the only true non stop service that gets liked by 25 people, and you start to wonder what really is going on.

    Edit: it seems she has deleted all of her posts now, presumably as she has been found out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭SandyfordGuy


    When someone has to repost something when someone replies to them because they don't want others to see the replies on their thread, there has to be some reason behind that as surely they would just edit their post, clearly the one outlined above looks very dodgy.

    This one looks a little suspect too:
    http://www.facebook.com/aircoach.ie/posts/356537924417190

    As has been posted, it is interesting that the poster promotes a Bus Eireann service that does not officially exist, claiming that it runs as advertised when it is not advertised at all, and just by chance her experience happens one day before the Aircoach non-stop service starts. Also as has been pointed out there are contradictions in her story.

    The great thing about telling the truth is you don't mix up any details as you don't need to remember what you said before.

    It seems the people making up stuff like dub_commuter and Dalkey Resident to try and harm the company have now made it to Facebook.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    devnull wrote: »
    The first Levante has now entered service complete with toilet. It has branding for the Dublin to Cork Service on the side.

    Great news, looks like a nice coach, can't wait to try it out.

    On their facebook page they say:
    At this point in time a few of the coaches have toilet facilities on the Cork route but we do hope to have all the Express Cork services to all have toilet facilities in the near future.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    It seems the people making up stuff like dub_commuter and Dalkey Resident to try and harm the company have now made it to Facebook.

    It's a mess this morning alright and looks a little suspect. They really need to moderate their page better, because it was that kind of behavior we had on boards not so long ago which led to numerous warnings and a few bans in the Patton thread.
    bk wrote: »
    Great news, looks like a nice coach, can't wait to try it out.

    On their facebook page they say:

    I still think they'd need a few more than 3-4 coaches which is all they are apparently getting of this type. Some peopl,e say these are not in the best condition inside as they have had 6 years of National Express work, but maybe they had some work done before they came to Dublin?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    devnull wrote: »
    I still think they'd need a few more than 3-4 coaches which is all they are apparently getting of this type. Some peopl,e say these are not in the best condition inside as they have had 6 years of National Express work, but maybe they had some work done before they came to Dublin?

    Oh, I agree, ideally all coaches on the direct intercity routes should have toilets on board.

    Cork first as it is somewhat less necessary to Belfast due to the shorter journey time.

    If they can get the 6 rumoured coaches for Cork, then that would cover the majority of peak services where it is most needed. For off-peak they can continue to stop at Urlingford and it wouldn't have as big an impact on schedule. However ideally all coaches should have it. Hopefully this is just a stop gap measure.

    On the other hand maybe they are doing this in the hope that it will stop GoBus from even launching their now very late service. Perhaps Aircoach won't go beyond the 4 - 6 coaches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    It is worth noting that the Levante's are 51 seater with toilets.

    Toilets excepted they will be a step down in comfort from the SHVs and Setras which are lower density with more legroom.

    For seat space and comfort they will be on a par (or below as PBs are generally regarded as superior to Levantes) with the Bus Eireann coaches that you have concluded are a poor alternative to the Aircoach standard.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    The Levante's are actually 49 seats with toilets, the 51 seaters are those without toilets.

    I haven't been on the Aircoach Levante's, but my experience on some of the newer National Express ones in the UK is that there is a little more room than the PB's, the first row of seating is closer to the front of the coach but there is not much in it. They're certainly better than the new SE's with Bus Eireann leg room wise which have less room than the PB's but the Levante's are not without their drawbacks, such as theatre seating layout, non slopping luggage racks.

    For sure the Setra's and Jonckheere's have more room though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    I see they have deleted the contentious thread on their facebook page. Probably right to do so as well. neither side were going to come out as a winner in that.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    That thread was a little odd, as the original poster appeared to claim the Aircoach service is not non-stop when the Bus Eireann one is and went on to contradict her original complaint. It seems others noticed this and pretty strongly argued with her about this.. She then accused them of working for Aircoach. Then had a rant about how much better public operators are than privates.

    To be honest I can see why both sides got worked up, the people who were sticking up for Aircoach were clearly a bit too defensive and looking for a confrontation to a degree, but then again some of the original posters complaint did seem to contradict itself and looked inaccurate. At the same time however the industry rant by the OP did look a little more tan simply a irate customer.

    As stated before, it was very similar to the kind of antics we've had on boards in the past on the Patton thread


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    agreed, I had actually posted on that thread to correct a few things in her post, I wasn't accused of being a shill thankfully though :)

    one of the profiles defending Aircoach was a bit iffy though. I had looked at their profile earlier in the night where their location was Belfast, that was then changed to Cork along with a new profile picture. Could have been innocent, but I can see how it could have been suspicious.

    I do think there is a bit of a PR war going on from both sides at the moment especially through Facebook recently. Interesting times!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I do think there is a bit of a PR war going on from both sides at the moment especially through Facebook recently. Interesting times!

    In the end all pretty pointless. I'm sure the people who have actually visited and liked the Aircoach facebook page have already used the service and know the truth.

    The reality is word of month is already spreading in Cork about how good the Aircoach service is. BE can try and bend the truth all they like, but the reality is most people know they are slower, much slower.

    Over time the Aircoach service is only going to gain customers, people who are currently using it will tell their family and friends how good it is, who will try it and in turn tell their friends and so on.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    All of the three late 2006 Aircoach vehicles from the UK are now in service, along with the white Setra which is also in service, that now makes four vehicles which have toilets. No news on any more coming as of yet.

    The word on GoBus is they will start next month, they have had a 2012 vehicle delivered which is similar to the Caeteno's Aircoach have but on a Mercedes chassis, apparently there may be a few more to come.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Saw one of the new Aircoach Caeteno's on the quays yesterday. Very nice looking. The baggage doors are automatic and make an announcement to watch your head when it closes.

    They also seem to have a 2006 Iziar, which I hadn't seen before.

    Great news about GoBus, hopefully they will fill that 5 hour gap in schedule from 7pm ex-Cork. I think a 9 or 10pm service would be quiet popular.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    They've had that 2006 Irizar for a few years now, it doesn't have a toilet or full leather seats (just part leather), they used to operate it on behalf of Citylink on Dublin to Galway commuter until that contract ended, the interior is to Citylink spec from 2006 when they had nothing but Scania Irizar's.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    On the new/old levante to Cork at the moment. The one with the black grill.

    It is great to have a toilet onboard, makes the trip much more pleasant. The toilet is large and comfortable and at ground level at the back of the bus.

    But surprisingly we have still stopped at Urlongford, wtf, why? At least the stop seemed quicker.

    Also no wifi on board.

    On the other hand the seats are very nice and comfortable, fully leather, reclining and nice and cushiony. But no tables.

    There are about 6 seats up front that have loads of leg room.

    So a nice improvement, but still a way go to make the service more consistent, specially if GoBus come along soon.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I'd send your comments off, either by Facebook or email and try and get answers to those questions, I'm guessing they haven't got around to installing Wifi yet as those coaches are only just in service, but maybe I am wrong.

    Does the coach look like it has been refurbished recently? The one with the black grill to me looks the roughest of the three by far externally, but I've not seen the inside of it. Unless GoBus are getting a few more Caetano's themselves, I'd say their fleet is going to be mix and match also.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Doesn't look like it has been refurbished internally.

    While yes GoBus might be a mixed fleet aren't all their buses equipped with a toilet anyway. Just down the steps.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Don't Gobus lease a lot of their fleet from Kavanagh in Kilkenny??

    They also have a high standard of CS, very pleasant and professional drivers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    bk wrote: »
    On the new/old levante to Cork at the moment. The one with the black grill.

    It is great to have a toilet onboard, makes the trip much more pleasant. The toilet is large and comfortable and at ground level at the back of the bus.

    But surprisingly we have still stopped at Urlongford, wtf, why? At least the stop seemed quicker.

    Also no wifi on board.

    On the other hand the seats are very nice and comfortable, fully leather, reclining and nice and cushiony. But no tables.

    There are about 6 seats up front that have loads of leg room.

    So a nice improvement, but still a way go to make the service more consistent, specially if GoBus come along soon.

    Frankly your second comment makes you sound like you have either a medical complaint or a toilet fetish.

    As for the rest - well I'm sure you don't need me to tell you where DOES have tables, wifi and large toilets?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    bk wrote: »

    It is great to have a toilet onboard, makes the trip much more pleasant. The toilet is large and comfortable and at ground level at the back of the bus.

    But surprisingly we have still stopped at Urlongford, wtf, why? At least the stop seemed quicker.

    .

    Bk,could you perhaps expand on the Toilet issue a little ?

    I have to admit I'm struggling with the concept of a "Large & Comfortable" Toilet on any form of road pasenger vehicle..

    On the second issue,could the Urlingford stop be where the Large & Comfortable Toilet is emptied perhaps ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭V_Moth


    Took the Aircoach from Dublin during the week and I was quite impressed. It stopped at Urlingford on the way down, but not on the way back. Journey times were 3:15 and 3:00 respectively to/from Westmoreland Steet.

    With a return fare of €22, I don't think I will use IrishRail considering prices can be at a minimum twice and at worst four times more expensive. The extra expense is just not worth it for 15 minutes less travel time.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    lxflyer wrote: »
    Frankly your second comment makes you sound like you have either a medical complaint or a toilet fetish.

    That is a stupid and unfair comment.

    Please remember, attack the post, not the poster.

    You know that I've always been of the opinion that intercity direct non stop services should have a toilet on board. I often make the journey in the past without using the toilet, but I know a lot of people who worry about getting caught short during the journey.

    I've some friends who say they would love to use this new service, so much cheaper, but won't until they have an onboard toilet. I think this is the last obstacle to Aircoach stealing a lot of customers from rail.

    Obviously Aircoach agree, or they wouldn't have bothered to get these new coaches which are older then their existing very nice 09 Jock coaches.
    lxflyer wrote: »
    As for the rest - well I'm sure you don't need me to tell you where DOES have tables, wifi and large toilets?

    And I'm also sure you don't need me to tell you what service is between 2 and 4 times more expensive?

    The wifi is just a temporary problem that I'm sure will be fixed. Now with toilets onboard I see no reason why I will ever use rail to Cork again now. The differences jsut aren't worth the price difference any more.

    I also don't need to tell you which service is far more convenient and flexible. Take my trip this weekend, friend in Cork rings me Saturday morning inviting me to a party in Cork last night. I say cool, get the bus into town and jump on the Aircoach to Cork after just a 5 minute wait for €22 return.

    This would not have happened if I was depending on Irish Rail as I would have had to pay the €80 walk up fee, which would have been far too much for a spur of the moment thing like this.

    Tonight I'll probably get the 1am or 3am ex-Cork service back to Dublin after hanging out with my friends. Again completely impossible with Irish Rail.
    AlexSmart wrote:
    I have to admit I'm struggling with the concept of a "Large & Comfortable" Toilet on any form of road pasenger vehicle..

    On the second issue,could the Urlingford stop be where the Large & Comfortable Toilet is emptied perhaps ?

    Alek, yes you are correct toilets on all public transport suck, I meant within the scope of public transport and in particular bus coaches.

    Toilets I've used on the coaches to Galway work, but aren't great, you have to walk down steps and it is very cramped, smaller then an airline toilet. But these new ones are on ground level, so easier to access and are larger. About twice the size of an airline toilet, but slightly smaller then the Irish Rail toilets.

    Just trying to give people an idea of the facility.

    No, they didn't empty the toilet in Urlingford. The coach stopped at the entrance to the petrol station and no pipe etc. was attached. I was walking around the coach at the stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    bk wrote: »
    That is a stupid and unfair comment.

    Please remember, attack the post, not the poster.

    You know that I've always been of the opinion that intercity direct non stop services should have a toilet on board. I often make the journey in the past without using the toilet, but I know a lot of people who worry about getting caught short during the journey.

    I've some friends who say they would love to use this new service, so much cheaper, but won't until they have an onboard toilet. I think this is the last obstacle to Aircoach stealing a lot of customers from rail.

    Obviously Aircoach agree, or they wouldn't have bothered to get these new coaches which are older then their existing very nice 09 Jock coaches.



    And I'm also sure you don't need me to tell you what service is between 2 and 4 times more expensive?

    The wifi is just a temporary problem that I'm sure will be fixed. Now with toilets onboard I see no reason why I will ever use rail to Cork again now. The differences jsut aren't worth the price difference any more.

    I also don't need to tell you which service is far more convenient and flexible. Take my trip this weekend, friend in Cork rings me Saturday morning inviting me to a party in Cork last night. I say cool, get the bus into town and jump on the Aircoach to Cork after just a 5 minute wait for €22 return.

    This would not have happened if I was depending on Irish Rail as I would have had to pay the €80 walk up fee, which would have been far too much for a spur of the moment thing like this.

    Tonight I'll probably get the 1am or 3am ex-Cork service back to Dublin after hanging out with my friends. Again completely impossible with Irish Rail.



    Alek, yes you are correct toilets on all public transport suck, I meant within the scope of public transport and in particular bus coaches.

    Toilets I've used on the coaches to Galway work, but aren't great, you have to walk down steps and it is very cramped, smaller then an airline toilet. But these new ones are on ground level, so easier to access and are larger. About twice the size of an airline toilet, but slightly smaller then the Irish Rail toilets.

    Just trying to give people an idea of the facility.

    No, they didn't empty the toilet in Urlingford. The coach stopped at the entrance to the petrol station and no pipe etc. was attached. I was walking around the coach at the stop.

    I was attacking the post. That part just came across as totally ludicrous.

    I have never seen anyone else go on and on and on about toilets.

    It is (to me) coming across as bordering on obsessive.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    lxflyer wrote: »
    I have never seen anyone else go on and on and on about toilets.

    It is (to me) coming across as bordering on obsessive.


    Then you are evidently missing the point.

    It is reasonable when planning a journey with elderly people or kids to assume that they will manage 'up to' 2 hours without a toilet break. This has meant that intercity journeys in Ireland have often not had buses 'in the mix' in the past as eg Bus Éireann could take 5 hours to reach Galway from Dublin as late as 2005. One took the train instead or a car. Alternatively the bus stopped to let people wee wees and disimproved journey times.

    Intercity journeys by express bus have improved times greatly but as Cork Dublin will take 3 hours and Cork Galway 2:30 hours the bus MUST have a toilet to attract people travelling with kids..or elderly people. This they do with professional operators. Under 2 hours ( Dublin - Belfast) one should be OK with no toilet if departing a coach station with one.

    Unsurprisingly buses ( with toilets) on the Galway Dublin route are a roaring success because people know they cannot be caught short any more. These buses stop in custom designed bus stations with pumpout facilities in Galway.

    I have never personally used the toilet on a Galway - Dublin bus...but if I need to. :)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    lxflyer wrote: »
    I was attacking the post.

    No you didn't you directly accused me of having a toilet fetish or a medial problem. That is attacking the poster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    re: the large/comfortable toilet thing - are there standards for on-bus toilets similar to those being imposed on railcars? Perhaps the newer buses with the larger toilets are adhering to newer standards?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    dowlingm wrote: »
    re: the large/comfortable toilet thing - are there standards for on-bus toilets similar to those being imposed on railcars? Perhaps the newer buses with the larger toilets are adhering to newer standards?

    Well the toilets are larger, they aren't wheelchair accessible like the ones on Irish Rail. I think the toilets on the latest levantes in the UK maybe.

    I think it is more just an evolution of facilities and levels of service over the years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,490 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    lxflyer wrote: »
    Frankly your second comment makes you sound like you have either a medical complaint or a toilet fetish.
    What is wrong with having a medical complaint?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Lucyn


    Both myself and my better half are now using this service regularly instead of the train. The flexibility is fantastic. We used to book the train online but if you miss it you have to pay extra to transfer your ticket to the next one. None of that nonsence with Aircoach. Buy your return ticket and used the return leg whenever suits you (within 12 months). Brilliant. It's always bang on time too which is so important for work, meetings, appointments or even just for the person who may be collecting you. I also find the drivers very pleasant and helpful. Long may this service last!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Lucyn


    Oh the irony!!! I should never have posted my last post. Talk about jinxing us! My better half has just phoned me to say that he (along with approx 15 others) couldn't get on the 7pm service at Westmoreland St because of all the Kilkenny supporters using the service. They're all getting it as far as Urlingford. He's now waiting til the 8pm service but who knows if he'll get on that one either. Now I totally understand the whole supply and demand thing espcially on a Croke Park Sunday but these people are not even travelling to Cork! They obviously boarded at Urlingford coming up. This should not be allowed. We're seriously cheesed off at Aircoach to put it mildly :mad: It's not even supposed to stop at Urlingford anyway. It's called the Cork/Dublin Express non stop or whatever it says on their blasted website.

    Right, lets see if Gobus can get it right. Obviously Aircoach are not interested in retaining existing customers. I'm off to their website to send them a strongly worded email (for all the good that'll do!) :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    IF they are indeed getting on/off at Urlingford then that is not on, and not just on the basis of fairness either. I would indeed write a strongly worded complaint about the situation and maybe post on their Facebook page also.

    What did the driver say about it, I'm just very interested to know because this is not on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Lucyn


    Well I'm only going on the phonecall he made to me and what he told me but he was chatting to a couple of the lads while they waited for the coach to arrive and they told him they were getting off at Urlingford. They were raving about how handy it was :rolleyes:. Obviously when I collect him, I'll get the whole story in detail and let you know. He's been working all day and is wrecked and could have done without this.

    Regarding your query about the driver - He gave those unable to board a handwritten piece of paper (back of receipt/till roll) and said they would be given priority on the next service. Oh he just rang again there now and said he's on the 8pm service and all those refused at 7pm got on first. He also said that the driver said there was nothing he could do and told them to write to the company if they weren't happy. However, he did announce that they would not be stopping in Urlingford and himslf says there is only one person on board with a Kilkenny jersey on (but she might be going to Cork in fairness) I told him to let me know if they do stop in Urlingford and if so, how many get off etc

    In the meantime, I've emailed aircoach customer service and informed them but really, what's the point? They don't give a monkeys. I'm not really offay with facebook but thanks for your suggestion, will def give it a go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭SandyfordGuy


    are you referring to the pm bus or the 8pm bus in relation to the one Kilkenny person and the not stopping?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Lucyn


    What 'pm' bus? The ones I am referring to are the 7pm and 8pm services. The 7pm service was full of Kilkenny supporters who stated they would be getting off in Urlingford. As a result, my husband was unable to get on. The 8pm service has one (visible) Kilkenny supporter on it whom as I stated may be travelling to Cork. The driver of the 8pm service annouced that they would not be stopping in Urlingford.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Lucyn


    Sandyfordguy,

    As you can see from the number of my posts, I'm not brilliant with technology so I am at a loss to know why I have received a email from boards.ie quoting a sarcastic post from you but it does not appear on the thread. This is the email I received:

    Here is the message that has just been posted:
    ***************

    ---Quote---
    My better half has just phoned me to say that he (along with approx 15 others) *couldn't get on the 7pm service at Westmoreland St because of all the Kilkenny supporters using the service*. They're all getting it as far as Urlingford.
    ---End Quote---

    ---Quote (Originally by Lucyn)---
    However, he did announce that they would not be stopping in Urlingford *and himslf says there is only one person on board with a Kilkenny jersey on (but she might be going to Cork in fairness) I told him to let me know if they do stop in Urlingford and if so, how many get off etc*
    ---End Quote---
    Interesting posts, had to check they were from the same person....

    When he has finished with his teleport or special vision goggles that allows him to see exactly what is happening in the bus which left one hour earlier without actually being on it, maybe he would like to share his secret of how he did it to some technology company, as clearly he has come up with a very good invention that will change the world.

    Once again, we see a fake complaint on boards, in line with what has been posted on here before, and also the Facebook thread that was pointed out just a few pages ago. It really is getting desperate.
    ______________________________________________________________

    Firstly Sandyfordguy, I apologise if I did not explain the situation clearly enough and secondly, this is not a fake complaint and who are you to state that it is? Who made you judge and jury?

    I attempted to contribute to a thread about a subject which both my husband and I have first hand practical experience of, in the attempt to assist others. I will not do so again. I've read on boards many times that we are to attack to post and not the poster so therefore i will say no more to you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭SandyfordGuy


    I originally misread the post - I thought you were refering to the 7pm bus, I re-read it and realised you were speaking about the 8pm, hence I edited my post and removed what I originally said because of the fact it was not appropriate because you were not saying things that contradicted yourself.

    I'm replying from a mobile phone and skim-read the post so I apologize for any offence which may have been caused. I don't believe it is a fake complaint and sorry if I gave you that impression, I edited my post very soon after I posted it realizing my error. So once again I'm sorry and will be more thorough and make sure I am not in a rush when replying! in future!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 58 ✭✭kieran4003


    This is a most bizzare incident. What baffles me is how the driver of the service they came up on stopped in Urlingford to pick them up and sell them tickets! I dont think it is the fault of Aircoach itself to be fair.

    It is unacceptable to expect customers to wait an extra hour. With BE, even if there is just one person who cannot be accomadated on the bus, an extra bus is provided. All passengers going the full length to Cork/Dublin will be put on one bus and this will run non stop. It is well and good to say there is great flexibility with Aircoach, but IE and BE will never turn a passenger away on an Intercity service.

    The service overall seems to be pulling good loads, I noted several buses on Friday and they were all nicely filled. Having said that the 07:30 train was standing room only, 370 odd in standard class and a nicely filled CityGold. The BE service is definately quieter, but I think that is because of the disasterous running time of the new X8. It usually arrives in Cork about 50 minutes late, making it only 5 minutes faster then the old service!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 367 ✭✭The Idyll Race


    It says a lot that "a bus - with a jax!" is the selling point latched onto here!

    Do we even get the Jolly Hostess selling Crisps and Tea?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    I think there are more selling points than that to be fair, the non stop nature, the very late and early departures, a direct connection to the airport, the Wifi as well as the price point are also attractions for many people.

    The train has other advantages also such as better for disabled people, tables, bigger toilets as well as the fact some people prefer to travel by train due to the buffet etc.

    The comments in relation to an extra bus, well the fact BE have so many vehicles, drivers and routes mean there is more flexibility as having a staff member or two on standby isn't going to make a huge difference when you have hundreds of drivers if not 1,000 working every day. But paying two people for a full day on the basis they may be required on a staff of around 50-60 is going to eat into margins much more, it's all economies of scale at the end of the day.

    Also don't forget the Aircoach depot is in the airport, even if another bus is required, it's going to take 30-40 minutes to get a driver ready and get the bus, if one is free, down to the city center, by which time the new bus is due anyway almost. BE have the luxury of having a staffed bus station at both ends of the routes to assess loads, with a depot close to the route in Cork and five minutes down the road in Broadstone. There is also nowhere near as much slack in the fleet I would suspect judging by the fact that AIrcoach were using hire-in's a few weeks ago to cover shortages.

    The situation isn't ideal but there is a huge gulf between the sizes of the companies you are comparing and the infrastructure they have. The best they can do in these situations is to analyse where they may be full and add extra capacity which has happened in the past when there has been GAA matches on for example. The other thing is to take online bookings to get an idea of demand, something that GoBus and Citylink along with others also do because this is the most cost effective way for an operation their size.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well I'm a big fan of the new Aircoach service, but I have to say this situation with people getting on and off at Urlingford is simply not on.

    It may even be in contravention of the NTA license.

    The flexibility of not having to book a seat is very handy, but as these services get more exposure they will get busier and sometimes they maybe full. People may need to start to think about getting booking online or accept that they may have to wait one hour for then next bus which isn't really the end of the world.

    However Aircoach need to improve their online booking, you can only book up to 5pm on the previous day, which isn't very flexible. Citylink seem to allow you to book up to 15 minutes before, which is much nicer.

    It will be less of an issue when/if GoBus launch, as there will be more capacity between the two of them and if one is full, you will only have a 30 minute wait for the next one.

    While I'm delighted Aircoach launched, their quality of service seems much more variable then GoBus and Citylink in Limerick. I can't wait for GoBus to launch to Cork, hopefully they will offer a better service.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Btw this posted from the 8am Aircoach ex-Cork on the wifi which is working well.

    I'd say about 3/4 full, so pretty good.

    It is the 06 Irizar, which is an interesting coach. It's seats aren't leather but still comfortable. The seats have small back of seats mesh pockets which work well and all seem to be clean.

    There is a nice armrest sort of thing built on the window. Another nice feature is they have two LCD screens which show video from outside the bus overlooking the luggage rack when open.

    Arrived in at 10:50, so 2 hours 50 minutes to O'Connell St. Nice and fast, about 20 to 30 minutes faster then by train to the same.

    Obviously no stop at Urlingford, which is good, but confusing as this coach had no toilet on board unlike the coach on Saturday that had the toilet, but still stopped in Urlingford !!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    bk wrote: »
    Well I'm a big fan of the new Aircoach service, but I have to say this situation with people getting on and off at Urlingford is simply not on. It may even be in contravention of the NTA license.

    Unless you actually see them getting off you can't say if it happened for sure. What I've seen happen in other countries is people depend on a pee/toilet stop at a particular place as it's happened in the past and want to get off at this place the driver tells them the bus does not stop there, but they think that it normally stops there so it won't be a problem, passengers buy ticket anyway as they're sure it will stop, so driver tells them a ticket to Cork, the bus doesn't stop at Urlingford like they expect and they go all the way to Cor and get really annoyed. Remember toilets are a relatively new thing to the route and such passengers are unlikely to have traveled on the route since such coaches became available.

    Also put yourself in the drivers place if they did stop at Urlingford, if they get off and say they are going for a break, he can't force them to get back on the bus. I agree if it is being done on purpose it is wrong and is not right at all but as I said if you dos top it's very hard to force someone to get back on a bus they don't want to get on, the way to get around this on National Express routes where you had a break always and wanted to initially travel to was in the place of the break, was to miss the bus after the break on purpose, as a driver are you going to hold everyone up whilst you try and find a passenger who does not want to get on the bus anyway?

    It is a difficult situation but when all of the vehicles have toilets, and they have no stops, people will start to realise such game isn't going to work as the Urlingford stop will be gone and the driver will not have to stop meaning the situation will not happen again.
    However Aircoach need to improve their online booking, you can only book up to 5pm on the previous day, which isn't very flexible. Citylink seem to allow you to book up to 15 minutes before, which is much nicer.

    That would require a huge investment in replacing ticket machines, IT systems, the website and back-end systems not to mention training costs. I believe the Citylink system previously was suspect to a high level of fake ticket fraud until they made some adjustements especially on passengers traveling from Dublin where the company would not have access to depot infrastructure and lists. It's very easy to fraud a ticket when there is no way for a driver to validate them

    There are rumours according to what I've read elsewhere of further Aircoach vehicles joining the fleet in the next few weeks, apparently it will be Plaxton based ones from the UK, which should feature toilets.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    devnull wrote: »
    That would require a huge investment in replacing ticket machines, IT systems, the website and back-end systems not to mention training costs. I believe the Citylink system previously was suspect to a high level of fake ticket fraud until they made some adjustements especially on passengers traveling from Dublin where the company would not have access to depot infrastructure and lists. It's very easy to fraud a ticket when there is no way for a driver to validate them

    Not necessarily.

    They could simply use cheap android tablets, like the new $200 Google one connected to the back end ticket system, allowing them to check the ticket and mark it as been used.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    bk wrote: »
    Not necessarily.

    They could simply use cheap android tablets, like the new $200 Google one connected to the back end ticket system, allowing them to check the ticket and mark it as been used.
    Even a company cellphone could do it if connected to the right back end:
    http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/capital-investment/article/e-ticketing-pilot-all-aboard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,574 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Tried this service for the first time this week (Cork - Dublin and back). Two of us went; I would normally drive but the bus cost is about half of petrol + tolls + parking.

    Got the 9am service from Cork on Monday. About 65% full. Afraid I didn't catch the model (it had dark leather seats if that helps) but I wasn't impressed with the bus. Room - both leg and side - was very poor and spent the journey pretty much wedged into position. WiFi was ok for light browsing, but forget it for any sort of streaming. However, the main problem was the toilet - which stank throughout the whole journey - and had done so since we boarded so the driver must have been aware of it. Arrived Dublin almost exactly 3 hours after leaving; no stop on the journey.

    Return service yesterday much better. 13.00 from Dublin; about 12 people on board. Much better leg room (this bus had orange and blue leather seats). Wifi pretty much unusable though. No toilet and didn't stop on way down. Arrived c. 5 mins early.

    All considered, I would consider using it again, but would strongly consider driving, even at twice the cost.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Got the 9am service from Cork on Monday. About 65% full. Afraid I didn't catch the model (it had dark leather seats if that helps) but I wasn't impressed with the bus. Room - both leg and side - was very poor and spent the journey pretty much wedged into position. WiFi was ok for light browsing, but forget it for any sort of streaming. However, the main problem was the toilet - which stank throughout the whole journey - and had done so since we boarded so the driver must have been aware of it. Arrived Dublin almost exactly 3 hours after leaving; no stop on the journey.

    Sounds like one of the Levante's that arrived from the UK a few weeks ago, that is the problem with toilets, if you have them they have the problem that they can stink from time to time which is the drawback, hence if you don't provide them people moan, if they stink people moan that the toilets are there, if you stop for a toilet break, people moan about getting delayed, if you don't stop for a break people moan about not being able to hold on for three hours.

    The problem with the Levante's with toilets is whilst they are by no means worse for leg-room than say your average coach, they are without a doubt a downgrade on the coaches without toilets that they are replacing interior wise. Aircoach built their brand on luxury coaches with lots of leg-room but as they don't have toilets they are having to find other coaches within their parent company that due fit that criteria, however unfortunately these coaches whilst having toilets are not as comfortable as the ones they are replacing even if they do have toilets and when the brand was built on the 'travel in luxury' slogan then it's not the best solution to the problem, although I suspect it is driven by not being able to finance the cost of new vehicles.
    Return service yesterday much better. 13.00 from Dublin; about 12 people on board. Much better leg room (this bus had orange and blue leather seats).

    Pretty much all of the coaches on the route were like that when the service launched in April, however due to the fact that people have continually asked for toilets to be provided, in the last few weeks they've started to replace these coaches with lower spec'd ones with toilets as outlined above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,574 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Personally I'd prefer more leg room than a 'bog on board' (could they put that slogan on the side of the bus?!) but I guess you can't please all of the people all of the time! The one on the trip to Dublin was bad though - very noticeable smell from the moment we got on the bus. Still, at the price I'd say the service is a godsend to weekly travellers. While I'd consider driving instead, there's no chance I'd opt for the train unless it was the same price or slightly more expensive.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Personally I'd prefer more leg room than a 'bog on board' (could they put that slogan on the side of the bus?!) but I guess you can't please all of the people all of the time!

    I would as well but if you look at the debate in this thread you will see that there is a raging debate about the benefits of a toilet versus the benefits of more leg-room!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭SandyfordGuy


    And this is exactly what I was pointing out previously, after all the clamour for the toilets on the vehicles, now we are having moaning because the toilets are too smelly and are meaning that there is less leg-room on the vehicles that feature them, unfortunately that is always a trade off with a toilet, especially a floor level one. With the toilet being on the same level of seats there is always going to be a bigger chance of a smell travelling the length of a bus, and that is why a sunken toilet, whilst less accessible, is better from this point of view.

    A floor level toilet also takes up around four seats on a vehicle which means less passengers can be carried, which is especially relevant on a two axle coach as it can reduce the capacity to a stage where ideally the vehicle doesn't carry as many passengers as it needs to really and this means a lot of the time there has to be compromises made with the spec of the bus to some degree.

    The Aircoach new vehicle spec has always been the blue and orange seats you refer to, with lots of legroom. However without a toilet these are seating 44 on a two axle coach and 51/53 on a three axle coach. Leaving aside the greater fuel consumption of a three axle coach, if you add a toilet in they are going to seat approx 40 and 47 respectively, which really isn't a fantastic amount of people at the end of the day. That is why you rarely see lots of legroom and a toilet specified on the same coach. Aircoach was always regarded as the biggest leg-room o their new vehicles than any other operator.

    However there is a historic context to this you need to bear in mind why we are seeing this compromised solution which I will outline below, which is related to the fleet procurement policies and the recession which has influenced the situation that Aircoach now find themselves in, and there is no simple solutions and they are not in the best of positions as a business at the moment so they are limited at what they can do with regards to the vehicles they have at their disposal.

    Cast your mind back to 2007. Aircoach business on it's Dublin area routes is booming, 2003/2004 44 seat high end luxury huge legroom Setra's are running close to capacity, the 2003 ones are suffering from chronic gearbox issues. The Irish economy is still in a good state. The company is making good profits for it's fourth year in a row. Aircoach decide that they need to serve the passengers they are leaving behind. They order 53 seat tri-axle coaches to serve that demand of a very similar spec to the Setra's. At this point non stop intercity services do not exist, and the City run are short enough not to need toilets.

    The coaches on a multi-year lease get delayed and do not arrive until 2008/2009, at which time the Irish economy is caving in demand is going down at a rapid rate and traffic at Dublin airport is dropping. The vehicles that have now arrived are not needed as the capacity is way in excess of the now much reduced demand, but they become a cost that has to be paid as the lease has been signed. Aircoach are left with high capacity coaches, which are not ideally suited to intercity work due to their lack of toilets. But have them for several years they do and they have to make do with them. They then need to adjust their business model to look at Intercity work, seeing as the airport routes are barely making any money.

    However at this point the company is loss making, has expensive lease rental payments it is contracted to pay on vehicles which are not reaching their potential and are too expensive because of the lack of demand on airport routes, and the lack of toilets for intercity routes, but they have to stick to the contracts they signed. As money is tight, leasing extra coaches in a business that is losing a good amount of money in the last 12 months is simply not an option at present I'd assume they believe. So therefore they ask their parent company in the UK, what can you offer us, and they are offered the best coaches that the UK have spare, at no cost to them as they are owned by the group.

    What I would expect to see is when the leases come up on the Setra's or the Jonckheere's they will asses the market to see what they can secure as replacements. I'm sure with the benefit of hindsight they would have specified the Jonckheere's with toilets, and if the Irish economy had not gone into recession, the fleet would have had an order for Intercity coaches with toilets at some point because all of the other assets would have been running at high frequencies on routes which have been cut back. Sadly those assets are spare because the demand isn't there, so we end with half baked solutions.

    The difference with GoBus is that they have little liabilities, and less risk in their business as it is not so dependent on airport travel, or short routes, so they've only ever needed one type of coach and passenger but Aircoach very much is a business that is geared up for Airport travel that is trying to now compete in the intercity market, despite the fact the fleet is not ideally suited to this, but they still have a large fleet which is on multi year leases which is being asked to do jobs that were never really intended of it. GoBus started from scratch during the recession and this was of benefit. Note Citylink originally had no toilets on board their coaches and were only able to replace them once the leases on the Scania's ran out.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    SandyfordGuy excellent explanation of the history and current situation with the market.

    Hopefully in time it will all improve.

    Quick question, would it be possible to retrofit toilets onto the 2009 Jonckheere's? Or is that simply impossible or too expensive?

    It is a pity because as you say the 2009 Joncks are excellent coaches.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement