Gael23 wrote: » Who’s going to take AZ from now on? Going to take slot of work to win back confidence
is_that_so wrote: » I don't think it'll have a huge effect, if you're vaccine hesitant in any way you're not changing your mind. Most others should accept the move on it. I wouldn't push the bad PR too hard as a whole lot of that is hindsight. Like the virus itself the approach has been novel!
Gael23 wrote: » I’m not anti fax in any way but I no longer trust AZ
stephenjmcd wrote: » And why is that ? I mean no offence here but your not going to have a choice as to which one is offered to you (unless specified by a medical professional that you can't take one of them for whatever reason) They're all effective vaccines
Deleted User wrote: » They are not having a good run of it and for the average person who is consuming this information as it's filtered through the media, it isn't likely to be very reassuring.
Russman wrote: » Just on that, by the time the last couple of cohorts are being done, do you think there will be any element of choice ? We could be overflowing with vaccines by then in theory. Could it evolve into Mass Vaccination Centre A is dishing out Pfizer and Moderna, Centre B has, say, Pfizer only, your GP has AZ & Janssen etc ?
stephenjmcd wrote: » Well you've to schedule people in again & then distribute supplies, can't start that process until Thursday or Friday once they get the go ahead so yeah it'll be over the weekend into early next week.
Deleted User wrote: » Come on now, personally I will snatch the opportunity to take any vaccine offered but surely you can see why some people will feel uneasy about AZ. The poor trial design that meant they were short on clear data for efficacy in all age groups and the muddied way they stumbled to the correct dosing regime. EMA approval dragged out as they sought out "more data". German media reporting it had no efficacy in seniors. Macron's "Quasi ineffective" comments. Most of the EU only approving use in under 70s initially. Now it's use being suspended (which I completely disagree with). They are not having a good run of it and for the average person who is consuming this information as it's filtered through the media, it isn't likely to be very reassuring.
astrofool wrote: » I'd say they'll do all they can to limit picking and choosing, all vaccines will be used, any excess will start being supplied to other countries. It's not a good look having some Irish eejit dithering over taking proven vaccines while vulnerable in Asia and Africa get nothing.
Deleted User wrote: » Come on now, personally I will snatch the opportunity to take any vaccine offered but surely you can see why some people will feel uneasy about AZ. The poor trial design that meant they were short on clear data for efficacy in all age groups and the muddled way they stumbled to the correct dosing regime. EMA approval dragged out as they sought out "more data". German media reporting it had no efficacy in seniors. Macron's "Quasi ineffective" comments. Most of the EU only approving use in under 70s initially.
brickster69 wrote: » And how many lives has that decision cost to the most at risk ? No mention of that eh ? Anyone want to guess ?
Le Bruise wrote: » Agreed that the average person who only follows snippets of the news may have concerns about AZ now. But the poster who said they don't trust it has been following this thread for months!
Deleted User wrote: » I don't think there is any point guessing really, but it has inevitably cost lives. That's why I disagree with the current suspension being applied on the "precautionary principle", it's seems to be a misunderstanding of the principle given we know how many people are currently being infected and have therefore a good idea of how many will become seriously ill or die. I would have thought the application of such a principle (during a period where infection was still fairly rampant) would encourage continued use, until more substantial evidence of any danger was available.
Gael23 wrote: » How many of these new Pfizer doses will we get?
mick087 wrote: » That's absolutely fine if someone don't trust a particular vaccine. Once they don't hold up the queue up for those who will take it i see no reason to worry. Maybe for them who wish to pick and choose which vaccine they would like to take, arrangements could be made for them after everyone else on the planet have been vaccinated.
Thrombocytopenia usually has no symptoms and is picked up on a routine complete blood count. Some individuals with thrombocytopenia may experience external bleeding such as nosebleeds, or bleeding gums.
Russman wrote: » You don't think it would be an idea to maybe try to convince them and explain to them why they should take it or why its safe ? Just tough sh1t if you have any doubts buddy, step aside ?
The latest vaccine was developed jointly by Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The team finished phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials in October and is currently conducting the last phase of trials in Uzbekistan, Pakistan and Indonesia, according to the statement. The vaccine was approved for use in Uzbekistan on 1 March. It’s a three-dose shot that is spaced out with one month each between shots