ShineOn7 wrote: » Mark Twain — "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference" I'm going to take his advice and head back to the Vaccines thread where there's always intelligence and optimism Versus here; where man-children are almost crying because their "playground" is closed and they refuse to understand why it needs to be
dwainec wrote: » People only have themselves to blame. Shopping centres and Smyth's click and collect queues packed way before the inter county restrictions were lifted. No one wants a lockdown again but no one wants to follow the rules given either.
Neowise wrote: » What is your issue with smyths click and collect. Doing smyths click and collect is not breaking any rules, even at lvl 5.
retalivity wrote: » They were going to be closed anyway, so best to enjoy it while i can. Three months of nothing opened better than 4
Deleted User wrote: » Eh, no. All the gargle mongers are going to be responsible for a lot of cafe's, coffee shops and sensible restaurants being closed for months. But yeah, have fun in the interim.
vafankillar wrote: » was it announced they're closing before christmas eve? brilliant if so
stephenjmcd wrote: » They close after last orders Christmas eve according to reports not lunchtime
Eric Cartman wrote: » seeing scenes in shops vs the small amount of pubs allowed open, its definitely the shops, they're as packed as ever, people on top of each other. Atleast in a pub everyone sat down.
Degag wrote: » Lunchtime on Christmas Eve is just ridiculous. Are pubs realistically going to open at 11 or 12 and close at 1 or 2? Either close them or let them operate till at least 6pm.
gmisk wrote: » Do you have a link to that? Everything I have read is saying mid afternoon on Christmas eve
John O.Groats wrote: » You`re still living in fantasy land I see. What is it like there?
GT89 wrote: » What fantasy land I am only saying what I hope to happen not what I think will happen. I know there's gonna be another lockdown which will appease people like you.
John O.Groats wrote: » The fact that you even hope it happens is yet another sorry example of the mentality you have. No surprise there I guess. You have a long track record of posting the same sort of ****e at this stage.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Nail on the head. People want it every way but are going to have to live with the consequences now. It’s been a disgrace since the 5 ended.
drunkmonkey wrote: » What consequences? Going to house party's or the sheebeen instead of pubs and restaurants. Off licences will be the scapegoats for fuelling illegal gatherings after Christmas day. Small pot distilling will be all the range again come Valentine's day, expect a potato ban in march.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » We won’t have spuds because of Brexit apparently.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Great news to wake up to this morning. People have proven they can't be trusted. The cute hoors have to bend and break the rules, and take the proverbial and as a result the doors will be locked up probably until well after Paddy's day this time.Are you right there folks please?
stephenjmcd wrote: » Great news to wake up to... Have a bit of respect for those who are losing their jobs right before Christmas again will you. Must be great on that high horse.
Sofa King Great wrote: » Like the respect that all the people who broke the rules had? The respect that the pubs who didn't insist on serving food had? Or maybe the respect that the people who booked 3 restaurants so they could spread out their night had? If people had behaved in a responsible manner there would be no need to close hospitality. Unfortunately the minority of people and places that ripped the piss have ruined it for everyone
mightyreds wrote: » Wait till you see what happens Stephens day and New Years eve with no regulations in peoples houses. Just cause they shut the pubs the problem wont go away people have become less fearful and they will just organise house party's now, well they were probably people planning house party's anyway but i'd say more now are planning them.
Sofa King Great wrote: » I dont disagree but you can't regulate on the basis of "people will break the rules anyway"
end of the road wrote: » investigation ongoing apparently. hopefully he will be dealt with hard.
ShineOn7 wrote: » Thanks The Publican needs to be made a huge example of Last I read, the case count because of that Wake was at 150 and at least one fatality