Wibbs wrote: » Maybe, but I've long suspected that most of the resistance to masks is almost entirely down to "I dont want to look like a gobsh1te/different to anyone else" and anxiety and claustrophobia. Even if tomorrow every single expert and medical body on the planet showed masks reduced your risk of catching any respiratory virus to zero, it would take a while to shift the first reason for resistance and longer for the second as the easily spooked would be looking for "medical reasons" from their GP to avoid them. Literally billions of East Asians don't seem to have any problem, but apparently a large proportion of the Irish psyche can't handle it, or have "medical issues" that your Asians(and many Europeans) don't. Well East Asian cultures don't have the embarrassment as there are social pressures going the other way to wear them. And as humans are social animals and herd creatures that covers that. Pretty much. Unless you have an actual medical condition like an autistic child or actually compromised lungs it's down to practice. I've worn P3 half face respirators down the years for various don't want to get poisoned reasons and they do restrict airflow to achieve that level of filtration, and yes initially your reptile brain is going "ah here sunshine, what gives??" but after a few goes it goes silent and you get very quickly used to it. And I'm a smoker so hardly have the lungs of Usain Bolt. At surgical mask level filtration level the breathing resistance is bugger all and almost all in the mind.
weldoninhio wrote: » Nobody who is anxious will be made to wear a mask to use public transport. I'd get a letter from your doctor and just keep it with you. I very much doubt this will be policed in any serious way.
khalessi wrote: » You totally are but I am used to that
polesheep wrote: » If you are used to being misunderstood, you should consider how you express yourself. Why so argumentative?
Wibbs wrote: » I'm fully aware of what anxiety can do to people, but if a significant proportion of your population is anxious to that degree then something in your society needs serious attention, because something is not right.
GreeBo wrote: » Why on earth not? When does your anxiety trump my right to not be infected?
polesheep wrote: » Anxiety can be a very serious medical illness. It's not an affectation.
Electric Sheep wrote: » It can be a medical issue, but it is more often an affectation. Particularly when it manifests as embarrassment at taking precautions that everyone else is taking.
xhomelezz wrote: This thread is becoming a mess, seriously. Plenty trolling and it looks like plenty people need a medical help. So please ring your GP's and get the letters to excuse you from wearing any kind of face coverings and sorted.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » So I found out online that a face shield protects the wearer and gives them 96% protection. A face shield may not protect others though because droplets can still get out from under and the sides. I was going to wear a face shield in rainy weather hoping it keeps my face and mask dry but if it gives more protection, I might be better going with both all the time while I'm out. Am I wasting my time with both though? My housemates couldn't give two fcuks about this and they can pick it up and bring it into the house. So what's the point?
McGiver wrote: » Today's Irish Independent: 45% people didn't reply calls made to check on their location where they self-isolate for 14 days as required when coming from abroad. The remaining 55% can of course sit on the beach and lie they're at home self-isolating. So it doesn't matter. The self-isolation isn't mandated, noncompliance can't be enforced or fined so it's pointless anyway. Let's see how this goes on lads. With no masks anywhere to be seen, almost everything back to business as usual, I expect spikes rather pronto via imported cases. As I said let's talk late August and September. Global cases - 10.6M as of today - this week's increase has been the highest so far +700k cases.
sheepsh4gger wrote: » I went outside. No social distancing. Also the streets are busy as hell, out of maybe 60 people I saw: 1 guy wearing a cloth mask 2 people who coughed in public without covering their mouth when I passed them. The normies think this is now over.
This time with style wrote: » I'm seeing more and more people being careless and throwing caution to the wind now. I think they just couldn't be arsed with it anymore and would just rather forget about it and move on. Unfortunately there's a bad second wave coming I'd say.
Seanergy wrote: » That bogus article supplies numbers given to a reporter journalist for just Aldi and Lidl, Super Value did not provide numbers, neither did Dunnes or Tesco, once again not all and not all big. Your posting sloppy opinion and presenting it as fact. There is no source for your claims. I want to stay on topic and not be having to pull you up for BS'ing on thread.
sheepsh4gger wrote: » My prediction is that 2 weeks from now the number of cases will increase and they will roll back the loosening of restrictions. My second prediction is that the true _second_ _wave_ will hit in mid to late September when everyone goes back to school/work after summer is over. Screencap this and we'll see who was right.
CalamariFritti wrote: » Bogus article. Opinion. Ok Sean, we'll leave it at that. Mask away.
fr336 wrote: » As someone who suffers from extreme anxiety myself, I find the we can't wear masks because people may get anxious argument laughable. Sure if it's coming from anxious people themselves, but 80-90% of society is not anxious at all. Probably more. So what's their excuse? It's all about the herd and not wanting to stand out - I guarantee if mask wearing reached a certain %, the rest of the population would fall in line. It is tragic that even in a once in a lifetime pandemic what scares people more than anything else is looking strange. So much for the western notion of the individual