Quantum Erasure wrote: » It'll never be paid off, the ECB should give unconditional loans to cover it
[Deleted User] wrote: » “We will have to, in some way, pay for this in the future”. Pascal I wonder how far into the future he means. Maybe next month?
easypazz wrote: » Open the fcuking country. Improve testing. Shield the vulnerable groups Social distance as much as is practical. Temporary hospital capacity available at a realistic price, and available at short notice, as in have access to parts of state owned facilities Army to store sufficient medical equipment so that additional hospital capacity can be made available at short notice. Do it all by the end of June, this July 20th to travel 20kM and August 10th to partial opening of bars etc. is not a realistic plan at all.
Deleted User wrote: » “We will have to, in some way, pay for this in the future”. Pascal I wonder how far into the future he means. Maybe next month?
LiquidZeb wrote: » Well the banks seemed to do alright after the last crisis they seem to weather every storm. If you don't want to question your betters that's up to you to tug your forelock.
jmayo wrote: » As with all your posts so far you are talking a lot out of your ass. In fact we do produce ventilators, primarily for export and we do purchase ventilators from US based companies. Medtronic, formerly Covidien Healthcare, in Galway was aiming to knock out 1000 ventilators a week. Now both of these are in theory Irish based companies since HQed here, but really they are US founded and US run. But that doesn't negate from fact we do build ventilators and a fooking lot of them. Hell isn't trump bellowing that medical production needs to be brought back to US from China and Ireland. Now due to way world works the ones we build are going somewhere else and the ones we use are coming from somewhere else. That is modern trade. And as for your patriotic cr** and seeing language as some sort of binding agent for a nation. Maybe just stay off the sauce.
hopalongcass wrote: » Well i am assuming you to be reasonably intelligent,and now i noticed your profile is since 2008 so if you are of a certain age and have reasonable intelligence,how can you not have seen what this government and all previous governments in your lifetime have done?It could be simply cognitive dissonance but the absolute contempt these politicians have shown toward its own people is on a level rarely seen in the world. I personally think losing our language leaves us with little in common patriotically speaking and half of us have secret desires to be British.While a lot of other countries have their own common language it makes them a bit more patriotic towards their brethren and don't inflict the kind of misery on their own people if they can possibly avoid it,whereas its the first option for our leaders. While spending their way out a recession will work for Britain and America since they have plenty of their own production so while they are borrowing and spending they are buying a lot of their PPE and ventilators from companies in their respective countries thus stimulating their economies,this won't work for us we cannot even pick strawberries or manufacture face masks let alone ventilators. We have to send hundreds and hundreds of millions to China for simple masks,i wouldn't even like to hazard a guess on how much we are paying the British and Americans for ventilators,sad fact is we are unable to produce anything at this point ,we rely on being a tax haven and manufacture practically nothing indigenously,so spending isn't helping our economy in any way.We are just building other economies on the backs of our children its shameful and anyone endorsing this as an Irish person should be ashamed. As for printing money just i don't know if you are serious or not but you cannot just print money ad infinitum without consequences,money is just a representation of value,you can only print so much money.And even if that were true and worked Germany holds all the power in that area and they ain't coming to anyone's rescue.
alwald wrote: » Your motivation to open up everything ASAP is clearer now!!
Ginger n Lemon wrote: Boy i'd love this. I got to fly to Spain end of August, would be pretty handy to get such test, hopefully I've had covid and off I go enjoying beer in south of Spain without any fears of being stopped at checkpoints for mask inspection whatnot.
stephenjmcd wrote: » https://twitter.com/AP_Europe/status/1258068581260103680?s=19
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » You have a vivid imagination if you believe that will happen.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » More good news, for us this time " A COVID-19 antibody test, said to be 99.8% accurate, could soon be available in Ireland. The test has been developed by Swiss giant Roche Diagnostics and has already been approved for use in the US. The company, which has a base in Dublin, said its Elecsys test has a specificity greater than 99.8% and sensitivity of 100% - meaning it gives no false negative results and only one in 500 false positives. The antibody test indicates whether a patient has been exposed to the virus and recovered."Boy i'd love this. I got to fly to Spain end of August, would be pretty handy to get such test, hopefully I've had covid and off I go enjoying beer in south of Spain without any fears of being stopped at checkpoints for mask inspection whatnot.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » More good news, for us this time " A COVID-19 antibody test, said to be 99.8% accurate, could soon be available in Ireland. The test has been developed by Swiss giant Roche Diagnostics and has already been approved for use in the US. The company, which has a base in Dublin, said its Elecsys test has a specificity greater than 99.8% and sensitivity of 100% - meaning it gives no false negative results and only one in 500 false positives. The antibody test indicates whether a patient has been exposed to the virus and recovered." Boy i'd love this. I got to fly to Spain end of August, would be pretty handy to get such test, hopefully I've had covid and off I go enjoying beer in south of Spain without any fears of being stopped at checkpoints for mask inspection whatnot.
boring accountant wrote: » Nature was always going to take its course. Nature is still taking its course even with the lockdown in place. Shutting down businesses is a massively disproportionate infringement on our rights compared to the dangers posed. The lockdown/cocooning should be made voluntary. Then all but the most shrill authoritarians will get what they want.
Deleted User wrote: » Long outdated economic theory.
partyguinness wrote: » Okay I have no idea what you are going on about as it is a rather confused post but kudos for shoehorning SF into the debate.
Deleted User wrote: » Tell me, what do you understand a shill to be, because I have no link or relationship, personal, professional or otherwise with any organisation in individuals you seem to suggest I am a shill for. I formulate my own opinion on what I see, read and listen to. And my view is the the recovery from this should see a fundamental reorganisation in the global monetary system more radical than the abandonment of the gold standard and the acceptance that debt on a sovereign level is not a negative but the fundamental underpinning of a countries ability to formulate policy and look after its citizens. Only way out of this from an economic standpoint is to spend, and as long as we can maintain a productive workforce and economy, the level of debt will never matter as we can just refinance ad infinitum (print more money). ECB have already started this with 750bn at a negative rate. Also, as much as we hate bankers, the only way to adequately ensure this liquidity gets distributed to those who need it is through a functional and well regulated banking system
pjohnson wrote: » Ah the "sheep" card. The ultimate trick to refute any modern science or education. Honourable mention to the "old vote young tweet" line regularly used pre election to guarantee SF wouldnt get a significant vote. And we saw how that turned out.
hmmm wrote: » Your concern for the elderly is touching, but is in stark contrast to your liking a post about reopening where we are told the elderly and sick "are well beyond their economic use". So maybe spare us the heart strings.
gozunda wrote: » Nope. You must have missed this bit. The point is kids were not "bunkered" as claimed. Painting the current pandemic as a conflict of interests of the selfish old and the powerless youth is absolute rubbish and helps nothing.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Ah but sure some people here believe you should just let nature takes its course with the elderly and sick who are of no longer of economic use, or was that just you?
partyguinness wrote: » And why wouldn't I be? Just because a few Holy Mary's got a basic lessen in law and economic theory which they did not like I should all of a sudden back track? That says more about you than me with your sheep mentality. I stand by my convictions.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Put yourself in shoes of an 85 year old granddad with 3 grandchildren, he cant hug them now according to govt guidance, there is no indication when he can hug them, and if he asks - he is going to be told "wait for vaccine". This is seriously depressing for any individual. Regardless if they are in good health or bad health.
peasant wrote: » An interesting bit of news there ... Pharmacies, which at no point were affected by the lockdown and always open for business are in financial trouble: I would have thought they are doing better than ever, but there you go...https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/business/covid-19-pharmacies-hit-with-surging-costs-lay-off-staff-997888.html