Rodin wrote: » Is she Jacinda's sister?
Nickindublin wrote: » Dont know if they can call a budget as there is no government. The bailout for business they announced needs a new government.
Deleted User wrote: » We’ve gone from close to 100% employment to over 20% unemployed and relying on state benefits. More and more people need the Covid payment but we are running out of money to pay it. Don’t be surprised if an emergency budget is called. We’ll be told we all need to come together, by paying way more taxes. We haven’t even saved a life. We’re only delaying a virus with no vaccine. Most of those people we are saving will probably still get the virus and die anyways, just a bit later. And then we have all the deaths of the recession in addition. Cocooning the hell out of the elders and getting back to normality would have been the way to go.
road_high wrote: » I'd say Leo and his spin unit must have been furious with the Justine Arderne references to Ireland today. Probably be a call or email heading their way, got quite a bit of coverage
ixoy wrote: » Some posters seem to want to continue the lockdown as is indefinitely, which is what I would take issue with. I've repeatedly been for a gradual re-opening. Now it's fair to ask whether the government plan is a good one or not and using other countries plans, and their successes, it's perfectly valid to ask: "Why them and why not us" and hope for an answer.
lord quackinton wrote: » The uk death numbers are 28734 Population of 66 million Sweden 2854 10 million Just get the average and round up 2500 max
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Approx 24,657 people died today from hunger related diseases. If western economies crash, this figure will sky rocket per day easily to 50,000. We need a healthy economy to be able to contribute and save lives all over the planet not just down the street. Surely if you worry about UK deaths, you worry about deaths on other continents too?
timmy_mallet wrote: » Yep. Still awful. When in reality it's the selfish, obese and unhealthy elderly that have caused it. Kids bear the full brunt of this when they are the least at risk, the least likely to acquire and the least likely to spread. Lock them all down to save Jimmy Hamburger and his 20 smokes.
LiquidZeb wrote: » Did you actually read the articles or did you snobbishly dismiss them. The 'Torygraph' is a paper of record. Maybe stick to the Beano for your news.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The Spectator and the Torygraph - lol
KrustyUCC wrote: » 211 cases is encouraging Hopefully we can keep the cases on a downward trend
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The Spectator and the Torygraph - lol 693 deaths today in the UK and 4,404 new cases.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The big problem for our finances is not the lock down, it is that key markets are closed to us. I'm not concerned at all regarding the measures. The most damaging thing for our economy is allowing the virus to run riot. This will only lead to another lock down and far greater damage reputationally. It's better to lance the boil now and keep the foot down.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » I am unsure whether thats what we want. Say we get down our daily cases to 10. And then phase 2 kicks in and our daily cases will be 40. Did we just have a fourfold increase in cases?I am fearful Leo will shut us down in that case and we will spend another 3 months on these forums all the way up to October :S
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » I am unsure whether thats what we want. Say we get down our daily cases to 10. And then phase 2 kicks in and our daily cases will be 40. Did we just have a fourfold increase in cases? I am fearful Leo will shut us down in that case and we will spend another 3 months on these forums all the way up to October :S
AdamD wrote: » 1200 posts in the Coronavirus forum, I actually think you're enjoying this.
Nermal wrote: » https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/herd-immunity-may-only-need-a-10-per-cent-infection-rate/amphttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/funds-will-vaccine-coronavirus-really-possible/ Tick tock, tick tock. Never too late to admit we made the wrong decision.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The economy is going to be hit really badly regardless of a lock down. Markets around the world are suffering. We are an open economy, we don't avoid that. What would be even worse is having to go through the exact same thing again in a couple of months time.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The economy is going to be hit really badly regardless of a lock down. Markets around the world are suffering. We are an open economy, we don't avoid that. What would be even worse is having to go through the exact same thing again in a couple of months time. What we have here is a small group of posters who are clearly vulnerable, desperate for change. I understand that. It does not change the facts. We need to keep the rate of infection down as low as possible to give us the best platform later on. Then we can avoid having to implement some of the measures again. This will lead to a much quicker recovery.