KrustyUCC wrote: » Representative from Irish Spa Association on Radio 1 at lunchtime seeking meeting with government They want to open in June not July 20th 25,000 employed in the industry apparently Government will come under pressure from the likes of hairdressers as well
seamus wrote: » I won't be wearing a mask unless there's proper guidance on the type of mask that works, and evidence that it works. I'm not going to wear some crappy mask that's 1% effective so that some combeen can come up and cough in my face. I'll stand 2m away without a mask, thanks.
na1 wrote: » I won't be wearing mask unless I've been given one. buying a mask for 10 euro which normally cost 1 euro - no, thanks.
[Deleted User] wrote: » The instructions wont be for masks. They will be for face coverings. Fabric is better as can be washed every day after use. And I imagine that they will be mandatory in certain circumstances, like on public transport. So best start fashioning your bandana!
Loozer wrote: » 25000?
facehugger99 wrote: » I would love to know what is going to be different from the situation we have now on the 18th of May or the 08th June of the 29th of June. It's absolutely criminal that we still have these lockdown measures in place. We have crippled the economy and added 10's of billions to our national debt for fcuk all benefits.
Loozer wrote: » Some change in the level of activity today Cars and people everywhere
bloodless_coup wrote: » Great to see, life moving on and leaving the doomsdayers lock up in their houses wearing tinfoil hats.
phormium wrote: » You forgot the overweight and obese, they are turning out to be a very at risk group once they get it, 73% according to UK tv this morning of all people in critical condition fit into that category and not confined to any age group as such.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Wow. There must be a lot of non believers in this shambles of a plan. Its a question of how many jobs we ll lose at this stage. :S
Rodin wrote: » One thing I noticed about many of the younger deaths who had "no underlying health condition" is that they were almost universally obese... no cardiovascular reserve at all
Deleted User wrote: » The government, the medical experts and nobody supporting the lockdown seems to be able to answer this question. If less than 100 in ICU = lockdown for 2 more weeks, what numbers need to be achieved to enter phase 1 or even 5?
Sweet.Science wrote: » When does Leo face questions over this farcical plan of his ?
easypazz wrote: » Another €700 covid payment in our bank today. My bank balance is stable. I know a house getting €1050, one of them had a full time job, partner and over 18 kid both part timers. They earn more now than when they were all working and they have far smaller outgoings. You couldn't make it up.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I agree with you on this. My post was defending Jacinda Ardern (wasn't me who brought Charlie Haughey into it :rolleyes:). She is far from a raving lunatic, she is one of the most respected leaders in the world currently.
is_that_so wrote: » Are you referring to their plan or the roadmap? Nothing stopping any group proposing alternatives to the roadmap but any measures will have to tick the boxes. Roadmap was needed . What parts do you think should be done differently.
road_high wrote: » The fact it covered part timers fully and not a pro rata to to match their p/t earnings was/is lunacy. A license to burn money
the kelt wrote: » No one knows. Its part of the beauty of the roadmap. All going well we get through this within that timescale or who knows maybe even sooner depending on how our numbers are. Ok cool, what do our numbers need to be Emmmmmm mumbles as low as possible!