alwald wrote: » It's great to login here for 5 minutes on this glorious bank holiday, and see that most anti lockdown restrictions merchants are confined in their homes debating waffling all day long...the lockdown is working :pac::D.
Penfailed wrote: » Why is it assumed that the problems in nursing homes are hampering the easing of restrictions?
Sebastian Dangerfield wrote: » I got stopped and warned by the guards a couple of weeks back for driving my kids to the back 1.5km away (theyre 2 and 3). The beach was allowed as it was within the 2km zone, but driving there apparently wasnt as it wasnt an essential journey. By that logic and with golf courses reopening, can people only play if the course is 2km from their house, and do they have to walk there? Im struggling to understand how opening these things take effect if the "non-essential journey" isnt redefined
retro:electro wrote: » That makes the sum total of minus sense. Surely driving there with your kids is actually safer and putting yourself and your children, as well as others, at less risk since it avoids you all congregating together on the journey to the beach? More makey uppy rules for the sake of making rules and they couldn’t be less practical if they tried
hmmm wrote: » It lowers the risk of widespread geographical spread of the virus, and most people in local communities don't want outsiders visiting them right now. It also avoids having the roads full of cars, and people on here saying things like "everyone else is ignoring this, let's get the kids and go to the beach. Throw a set of golf clubs into the boot in case we're stopped."
Benimar wrote: » Technically he is correct. Of course what he doesn’t mention is that it is only on 4 islands, who have had no new cases in a while. It also only relates to OUTDOOR areas and they can only have 30% occupancy of those outdoor areas. Not exactly comparing apples with apples.
conor2469 wrote: » But he was a member of the local community? He said he lived 1.5km from the beach? Yet according to his post the garda insisted that he make his 2 and 3 year old walk the 1.5 kms because of some technicality that I havent seen written in the plan. I have searched a lot and nowehere does it say that the KM restriction for exercise needs to be entirely on foot. If so, then that means cyclists can't go out for a cycle.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Like i said before, why is it unsafe for me to go to the barbers today, if my barber wears mask and single use gloves? Like i will sit there, i wont be touching furniture or anything really, just use my card for contact less payment and i am out. Will this cause SPIKE in infections and deaths?
easypazz wrote: » I said some bars are opening today in Spain. SOME. I was accused of telling a lie. Many more are opening next Monday with, as you said 30% occupancy outdoors. But here in Ireland it is August 10th with social distancing restrictions in place.
Discodog wrote: » Pubs appealing to open early & proposing social distancing.https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/vintners-propose-radical-plan-that-would-let-pubs-reopen-in-june-997536.html
Benimar wrote: » Now, do you accept that opening an outdoor section of a Spanish pub isn’t the equivalent to opening up an indoor Irish pub?
Benimar wrote: » And I said you are technically correct. Now, do you accept that opening an outdoor section of a Spanish pub isn’t the equivalent to opening up an indoor Irish pub?
hmmm wrote: » If the barber was outside, neither of you was speaking, neither of you was symptomatic, both of you wearing respirator masks, and cutting your hair with some sort of tree lopper from a few metres away, it's probably 100% safe. Anything else increases the risk of the virus being transmitted and the government will be acting on health advice.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Spain does not have the same drinking culture/problem so it's far less risk for them. Problem with pubs here is not distancing measures, its alcohol and the practicality of applying measures. Distancing would be out the window by 9 pm and good luck to staff trying to keep things in order. Too much aggravation, won't work. Also, advocating 6 to a table in fact means no changes because you see less than that around tables in pubs in Temple Bar on a nightly basis. It's totally disingenuous.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Does anyone know of the distance measures in other countries? In the last 4 months I havent heard of any country restricting movement of up to 2km or any sort of limit. Ive heard of France Spain & Italy whereby you cant leave your house kind of thing. But actual distance restrictions?
easypazz wrote: » You are right, better off sticking to gatherings in housing estates and house parties where there is no oversight at all.:rolleyes:
Deleted User wrote: » That will remain the case until there is a vaccine, if we ever find one. So what’s the solution? Lockdown forever? Time to get on with things and accept the risk.
Penfailed wrote: » How many people on here bitching about the restrictions have actually done anything constructive about it? How many of you have lobbied your local TD? How many of you have contacted your local councillor to speak to a TD on your behalf? If the sum total of your frustration is posting on Boards, then you have achieved nothing.
seamusk84 wrote: » Still don't get it. Tomorrow can I drive to a non essential shop in my 5km radius? Lets say I want to go to pick up food in the Italian I like but which is further away from a closer one I don't like. IE: Can I make unnecessary car journeys within a 5km radius of my gaf? What do I say to the Garda if I get stopped. Can I say: I'm out for a drive but am within a 5km radius of my house so jog on.
growleaves wrote: » You post is clever but silly. Travel restrictions are how pandemics were dealt with in the past, i.e. people were prevented from entering a country or if let in they were quarantined. They didn't have airports in the past. Doesn't really alter what we're talking about.