boring accountant wrote: » Tell that to the Gardaí outside my estate every other day.
KrustyUCC wrote: » OK I take your point Majority of other countries have plans in place thoughhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rte.ie/amp/1135935/ Portugal should have less ICU capacity than us Our ICU capacity due to COVID is 103 of the 312 beds we originally had Apparently we should now have 800+ beds Even considering non COVID ICU cases that Shoukd be a good buffer
nelly17 wrote: » The Meeting with NPHET is 3pm so Leo will probably be on the 6 one news - hes due on the Late Late tonight also
gozunda wrote: » So we are just to give up and surrender yes?
Roanmore wrote: » The one thing that annoys me here is people saying I'm going to listen to the medical experts over you. A medical expert messed up my wife's surgery and left her with permanent nerve damage. A medical expert presided over the Cervical Check controversy. A medical expert presided over Hep C scandal. A medical expert presided over the symphysiotomy scandal Medical experts are presiding over the trolley numbers. Yes of course listen to Medical experts, take on board what they say but this blind allegiance and look down attitude of some to people who question medical experts is nauseating and then when somebody is questioned they pull out the "dead relative" card.
gozunda wrote: » As was pointed our previously- its just as well a lot of just 'live with it' brigade weren't around during ww2. So we are just to give up and surrender yes? No restrictions and if someones dies of the disease tough titty? Glad I dont live in your world ...
snotboogie wrote: » and have thousands of people policing the hundreds of border crossings with the North? No more entering Ireland at all for the foreseeable future?
JPCN1 wrote: » Should have realised he'd be on the Late Late, he does love the limelight. Will scold us again? Prefer him to explain why we had one of the lowest ICU capacities in the EU at the outset of this... Maybe how he couldn't pay a dignified wage to the army and other frontline workers but now can throw 115 million a month for empty private hospitals. How is he going to sort out the waiting lists which will have grown hugely over the period.. Trivial stuff like that. I guess it'll be more Churchillian rhetoric and a bit of Heaney.
gozunda wrote: » I'd disagree. Never took you for a Boris fan tbh. But no matter. If the hat fits then wear it. The analogy is closest to home with a small self serving number of individuals suggesting we should throw certain categories of people under the bus and give up even trying to control the rate of infection and stopping the health services been overwhelmed. And yes the analogy stands - i reckon the same would have been cheering on the Vichy republic. But to remind those who've forgotten again - it's not just the HSE and Ireland. This is a global problem and thankfully not one to be decided by self serving idiots.
RugbyLad11 wrote: » I'm expecting the announcement tonight to be bad so he will be on the late late show to try win the public over
na1 wrote: » I'm bit out of the loop, so what's the story with stay-at-home until 5th of May rule? Is it going to be announced today? should it be published on gov.ie or any other resource?
sterz wrote: » Where did you see it'll be at 6:30?
Juwwi wrote: » They misled us all ,, they meant 5th of May 2021 . Tonight at 6:30pm leo doing another announcement
easypazz wrote: » You should learn to read and try to understand other peoples viewpoints before constantly throwing your toys out of your pram.
Juwwi wrote: » Apologies I read it earlier that it was 6:30 Just double checked and now it's saying expected to be sometime between 19:00 and 21:00 on Dublin live news site
gozunda wrote: » So it's better to listen / take the opinion of to some random 'expert' on boards then? Right you are ...
Mental Mickey wrote: » Source?
rusty the athlete wrote: » I suppose if an expert told you to put your head in the fire you would blindly and without question or any kind of critical thought go and do it. Try common sense for a change, it works wonders.
tobefrank321 wrote: » I'm not sure why you keep misrepresenting what people are saying or how you are allowed to do so. No-one here has said anything about throwing anyone under the bus. Most people have said nursing and care homes need to be targeted with better measures such as far better PPE, removing positive cases immediately and isolating them in a centre similar to City West, banning the movement of care staff between facilities and isolating care staff from the rest of the community as much as possible. This will be costly but worth it far more than sticking 1 million people on the dole to deal with a very concentrated issue in care homes. Others will have cocoon too.Sticking 1 million on the dole is not the answer. A short term lockdown was a good idea to give us time to come up with a better more sustainable long term plan and that long term plan should not include a highly generalised lockdown. As for your WW2 analogies they are tiresome at this stage. But if you do want to use one, try this - If American, British and Russian soldiers, decided to sit at home and listen to the radio rather than go out an fight and confront the enemy, where would we be now?The front line in this "war" is nursing homes, care homes and those with underlying conditions. These people need to be targeted for protection. That hasn't happened. And yes they have been thrown under the bus by a government who are more interested in stopping people going about their daily business than specifically helping those most at risk. Thousands of gardai to patrol checkpoints. 200 staff sent out to nursing homes in crisis. Says it all.
niallo27 wrote: » Looking at this graph, Sweden must be absolutely ****ed. They will have 100k deaths going by this graph and the models the Irish government is using.
RugbyLad11 wrote: » Look around you, most of the counties around the world are beginning to open up.You can stay locked inside your room for the next few years while the rest of us get on with life.You compare it with ww2 but lad you would've not lasting a day back day. In ww2 people just got on with life and were sent to battlefield were they knew they mostly likely would never return
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » I wonder what movie will be quoted from this time
gozunda wrote: » The difference is that most countries 'opening up" now especially in Europe had much stricter restrictions
gozunda wrote: » The difference is that most countries 'opening up" now especially in Europe had much stricter restrictions than anything here. That and the fact that the outbreak here was later than in most other countries. It has been made quite clear the restrictions will be removed over time. But the screamers appently want it NOW. So no I'm not sitting inside my room but I'd suggest you get out of the basement and see the light for a change. Btw just to set you on the right track- it's not a comparison with WW2 and has nothing to do with 'lasting a day' during that war. For your information those who stayed at home lived under huge restrictions for years and got on with it without constant bitching. The analogy however has a lot to do as a comparison with a very small number of individuals who seem to believe part of the population is expendable. Sorry if some dont like being pointed out.