Van.Bosch wrote: » Let them see them as in through windows or actually visit people’s houses?
ChikiChiki wrote: » How people behave this weekend will play a huge part in the lifting of restrictions. The seismic activity data will be analysed early next week.
easypazz wrote: » Not everywhere relies on the car park though, Kilkee has a lot of residential streets nearby where people can park. You could have 5000 people milling around providing ample photo ops for the twitter shamers.
BanditLuke wrote: » Yes. Longer if required
robbiezero wrote: » If the guards can police a 2KM restriction to whatever extent they have, they can surely police the areas that are likely to suffer from "idiot-swamping".
Deleted User wrote: » I constantly see people who cannot understand that action taken to mitigate a problem resulting in a positive outcome does not mean that problem never existed. Y2K needs to be added to curricula worldwide since it's the perfect way of teaching this concept. "What a waste of money! Nothing happened at midnight!" is the exact same as saying "What a waste of money! ICU isn't even full!". Massive effort is sometimes required to avoid disaster.It's remarkable how grown adults cannot connect the dots and realise the problem was avoided. It seems that every successful proactive measure taken in the history of humanity has had some guy pipe up and say "Sure nothing happened! What was the point?!" while everyone else stands around awkwardly feeling sorry for his parents.
Unelected CMO wrote: » I’ll answer that: as Bandit most likely doesn’t have a job and relies on the State to fund him, dwelling in his council house basement posting on boards all day and trying to tell people what to do has most likely been the most fun he’s had in years. So yeah, I’d say the lockdown is his happy place
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » There are always ****ing eejits that ignore expert advice. A lot of you sound like the same ****ing eejits that were calling for the likes of Morgan Kelly and David McWilliams to be "silenced" because they were "talking down" the economy back in 2008 when they correctly called the recession.
easypazz wrote: » People are going back to work though. Companies who had work from home are now having small numbers of staff return. A lot of them are getting ready to reopen as well in some form, so cleaners in etc. This was fine for a couple of weeks but companies need to start getting people back in the office.
LessOutragePlz wrote: » Going to say that you're in the minority there, most sane and rational people wouldn't be willing to bear another 2 months of this lockdown and to ask them to do so would be very unreasonable.
FintanMcluskey wrote: » We have 2 weeks of pointless restrictions now. Restrictions which are of no health benefit as of last week.
easypazz wrote: » Tony cervicalcheck Holohan.Time to muzzle him.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Absolutely. Some genius on this forum stated the other day that the Y2k threat was a load of scaremongering, a load of hype over nothing etc.. You have to shake your head at people with this sort of mentality.
facehugger99 wrote: » It's a sad state of affairs where a man is abused for having a couple of pints with his friends. Welcome to the Ireland of the Lockdown Nazis
khalessi wrote: » There is probably no health benefit to you or I following them but I presume the benefit is in not having hospitals over run. If we had done nothing we would be in a very different place
FintanMcluskey wrote: » The people who ignored them were the same ones who blindly listened to Bertie and co. The equivalent is today is following advice from unelected Dr's of Doom. Some of us have now, and had then , functioning brain cells to question the narrative we were given. We have 2 weeks of pointless restrictions now. Restrictions which are of no health benefit as of last week.
titan18 wrote: » Hopefully fines start getting handed out like other more responsible countries had. That'll put some of the selfish idiots back in line
easypazz wrote: » 6 lads sitting around a couple of metres apart, in an area with no cases, none of them expressing symptoms, having been following the rules for over a month. If its that contagious we are all screwed.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Especially when this imaginary drinking session never took place other than in said poster`s head.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » And from your posts here, you were probably one of them.
fleet_admiral wrote: » I've worked in pubs mostly non stop since 1996, I know a lot of publicans in Dublin and I can tell you its happening. Maybe not that guy that you are talking about but its definitely happening. One pub near me is only closed in the sense that the shutters on the front are closed, the entrance at the back lane is open for regulars. I had a few pints myself on Thursday but the owner was strict about social distance and hygiene
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Your talking past tense here. What health benefits will exist as of today?
