Harry Palmr wrote: » Well if that's not a bad sign about his character...he does seem a bit thin skinned.
Agent Coulson wrote: » Timo Werner unfollowed RB Germany on Twitter after they posted those two gifs of him as a reaction to Liverpool losing. He now follows no one on Twitter.
Steyr 556 wrote: » Ah it was a weak league :pac:
Thidp wrote: » Yes, but numbers aside... that Arsenal might be in fact a better team. The quality they had was something out of this world.
dogbert27 wrote: » The Invincibles managed 9 wins in a row. We doubled that.
Utopia Parkway wrote: » The more points you win the better if you ask me. The whole point of a league is to accumulate points. City's 100 point season a couple years ago was much more impressive than the "Invincibles" even though they actually lost twice. I think a side went unbeaten in Serie A in the late 70's and actually finished 2nd.
Bowlardo wrote: » Lads which teams do u think will go down and who do you think we will buy from them? We have had some success in recent years Robertson fro hull Shaqiri from stoke Gini from Newcastle
~Rebel~ wrote: » The bigger question is why was our fourth choice playing when by all accounts our third choice was fit? Kind of have to look at Klopp for this one. He obviously saw Deeney as a danger, and thought Lovren's physicality was the best option to deal with him. Hindsight has shown that to be wrong. Elsewhere, I see a lot of downplaying of Arsenal's invincible season... I don't really understand that. Their 12 draws are kind of irrelevant to the point - they went a full 38 league game season without having an off-day bad enough to lose. That's genuinely incredible, and deserves the reverence it's held in. I mean, we know how good this current Liverpool team is and how consistent they've been, just getting the job done week-in week-out, and even they couldn't do that. It just takes one bad day for that challenge to fail - we couldn't do it, Arsenal could. Fair play to them I say. Ultimately, it's a side achievement, you don't get any extra points for it, and it doesn't mean you're a better team - but it does mean you've managed a level of continuous performance that is to be admired.
dogbert27 wrote: » I guess what's irritating is that people are now saying this team is not as good as the Arsenal Invincibles.We could win every game for the rest of the season, finish on 109 points and the one loss will be seen as a blemish in some quarters. The Invincibles managed 9 wins in a row. We doubled that.
~Rebel~ wrote: » Yes, but that's the point. It stands out. It's instantly searchable. It's a thing that makes it different from any other team coming second, or in Arsenal's case, someone winning. It's literally extra-ordinary.
dogbert27 wrote: » ~Rebel~ wrote: » This sort of sums it up really - it doesn't mean you're the best team, but it is an incredible thing to do, and is the sole reason why you know who finished second in Serie A in 1978/1979.[ Not really, google told me today, otherwise I didn't have a clue! :pac:
~Rebel~ wrote: » This sort of sums it up really - it doesn't mean you're the best team, but it is an incredible thing to do, and is the sole reason why you know who finished second in Serie A in 1978/1979.[
~Rebel~ wrote: » This sort of sums it up really - it doesn't mean you're the best team, but it is an incredible thing to do, and is the sole reason why you know who finished second in Serie A in 1978/1979.[/QUOTE] Not really, google told me today, otherwise I didn't have a clue! :pac:
dogbert27 wrote: » In 1978/79 Perugia went through the season unbeatan in Serie A. They won 11 and drew 19 finishing second to AC Milan who lost 3 games. Putting undefeated in perspective.
Owl. wrote: » I'm afraid to watch that because I nearly cringed myself to death watching the Paisley ones.
~Rebel~ wrote: » After some seriously dodgy ads with a CGI Bob Paisley, Standard Chartered have really upped their game with a great one; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qK_Sg1QQgQ
Bowlardo wrote: » It’s important to note we are an amazing construct d team for relatively cheap but every player relies heavily on other player to improve their game TAA without hendo drops a level Robertson without mane drops a level Mane without Salah drops a level Vvd without Gomez drops a level All other cvs with out VVD drop several level Lovren when he plays drops everyone’s level Firming doesn’t play Mo and mane drops a level When we have our best 11 on the bitch we are the best team in the world Sancho and Werner are must haves . We have to get both