tuxy wrote: » I would love if this happened but it won't under the current government and probably won't when FF get in next election. The whole insurance industry is badly in need of reform but for now the cartel is supported at government level.
creedp wrote: » What EU countries mandate compulsory insurance for cyclists?
Johnboy1951 wrote: » Have many such cases gone through the system?
Johnboy1951 wrote: » I suspect not in the present circumstances ...... because electric scooters are not legislated for. .
[Deleted User] wrote: » In fact Cyclists are leaving themselves open by not having insurance
liamog wrote: » Rather than mandating cyclist, escooter or even pedestrian insurance shouldn't these be covered under a general personal liability insurance?
liamog wrote: » Two to my knowledge, they were pushed back to the 9th of December so we should have a formal legal opinion soon. [url] https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/first-cases-of-riding-e-scooters-without-insurance-brought-to-court-1.4057797[/url]
[Deleted User] wrote: » Worst case is a fine even if it is deemed illegal. Back next day with another scooter.
liamog wrote: » The penalty for driving without insurance is up to 6 months in prison and a fine of up to €5,000. I suspect they'll get a much lower sentence.
Deleted User wrote: » Shane Ross wants to impose a 25 Km/hr limit like electric bikes , this is a useless speed for an ebike at least. should be 32 Km/hr
Lumen wrote: » 24kph is the average speed of a leisure cyclist. So how is 25kph useless for a bicycle with a motor?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Shane Ross wants to impose a 25 Km/hr limit like electric bikes , this is a useless speed for an ebike at least. should be 32 Km/hr So 25 Km/hr is not a suitable speed for footpaths and crowded streets so what are they going to do ? Only answer is to just build proper cycle lanes for cyclists, ebikes and scooters. What's the normal speed limit for these scooters anyway ?
tuxy wrote: » None that I know of but I would love if I could obtain optional insurance for myself, I'm not recommending forcing it on others.
Deleted User wrote: » Not a hope of a 5K fine for not paying insurance, prob 300 max from what I read in the papers and certainly no jail for a minimal offence.
Deleted User wrote: » The idea is to make the bikes more practical. Ebikes are heavier and can sometimes cause mechanical drag when power to the motor is cut, this is a limit where you can find yourself fighting with the motor to keep a speed above 25 Km/hr and can be a pain in the ass and you might actually find yourself going slower on an ebike on level ground than you would on a normal road bike.
tuxy wrote: » If you have a driving licence isn't it 5 points added to that also?
Deleted User wrote: » I wouldn't imagine so if they don't even know what category these vehicles fall into. It's a bit pointless if someone has no license.
grogi wrote: » Ability to cycle uphill with decent pace and without spitting your lungs out is more practical in my book.
Deleted User wrote: » ....... Back to the speed limit, most cycalists can cycle faster than 25 km/hr, I also could when I was cycling but at the point of motor cut off it causes a lot more drag due to the heavier bike and also the resistance in the pedals when the power was off so I found myself going slower than I normally would and I seriously don't think 30-33 Km/hr is too fast for motor cut off, it's good enough in the US and other parts of the world.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » Does the power cut off suddenly, or reduce gradually over a speed range? A gradual reduction over say a range of 5 km/h would seem to be ideal.
tuxy wrote: » EU Directive is for the power to be progressively reduced as the bike nears 25 km/h No idea if they actually work like that but it sounds safer than an instant power cutoff.
tuxy wrote: » I had to take some time off the bike and came back fat as ****(90kg)
tuxy wrote: » Are you are talking about tax categories which I don't think is needed for conviction? Shane Ross has said as of now these scooters are considered mechanically propelled vehicles and are subject to the same penalties under road traffic laws, including fixed charge notices, penalty points, fines and possible seizure of the vehicle. If the minster has make this clear is there any reason they would not try to secure prosecution under these laws?
Deleted User wrote: » Fat as **** at 90 Kg ? is that fat as **** ? lol
creedp wrote: » Did Ross explain how penalty points are issued to those without a driving licence? But of course given Ross's hatred of everything car related I'm sure he would see this as yet another way of getting car drivers off the road