MrStuffins wrote: » Weird how MMA moves on. This statement would have been laughed at 24 months ago.
yourdeadwright wrote: » Cowboy at Welter weight is stupid on McGregor behalf ,His team have not thought this thorugh very well Now in this fight McGregor will be much smaller welter weight , It will suit Cowboy down to the ground , he will have a more gas ,better durability and more power than he does at lightweight , plus retain his length advantage he normally losses at welter weight, Cowboys last 4 losses at this weight are Leon Edwards, Till , Lawlor, Masvidal all former Middle weights and MASSIVE welter weights Cowboy wins because of the weight this fight is at, McGregor has made a foolish mistake,
Hector Savage wrote: » Whats the story with the weight ? is it a lower weight class for Conor ?
pastorbarrett wrote: » All in all, the weight class makes this fight way more interesting.
derfderf wrote: » Imagine saying back then that Conor couldn't beat a guy that lost to Al Iaquinta.
bmcc10 wrote: » The funniest part of all this is just how overrated Masvidal has become.
Mellor wrote: » This is just two LWs who agreed to not having to cut weight.
Sofiztikated wrote: Yay, here come the crowds to tell us how much of a ****heel Conor is, and that he has no chance.
eagle eye wrote: » Wtf are you on about. It's the likes of you that is constantly bickering and ruining threads for the rest of us. People have a right to air their opinion whether you like it or not. I'm a fan of Conor for many years but I don't like the heel character he has acted as over the past four or so years. I want to see Conor win but I'm concerned with him fighting at welterweight. I think he should beat Cowboy but beyond that I'd be very concerned for him at that weight. I don't like the fact that it appears he is chasing that worthless belt like some sort of gangsta.
Tazzimus wrote: » Ssshh don't be making sense in here.
pastorbarrett wrote: » Recall Cowboy saying he used to walk around approx 180 for LW - this several years back. It's possible he's over that now. Not a sizeable WW, but a WW nevertheless.
Tazzimus wrote: » He's fighting at his natural weight, sans weight cut. He nearly always weighs 170, or close to it, in fights. It's not like he's facing some 200lb welterweight cutting down for it.
Ush1 wrote: » But it obviously makes a difference in the fight, hence they are fighting sans weight cut. That's why this seems like a pointless thing unless he thinks he can be WW champ.
Tazzimus wrote: » Conor walks around at 170, possibly may be more now. Most of the lightweights are natural welterweights
eurokev wrote: » Only a couple of years ago I had so so much admiration for him. I used to feel like I knew him and routed for him so much. I used to be constantly checking for news about him and the lead up to his fights would almost consume me. Now he just fills me with disgust, embarrasses our culture on a worldwide stage, and makes me angry that he fooled me for so long.
Tazzimus wrote: » Likely neither fancy having a lean Christmas so decided on a "welterweight" fight so they wouldn't have to cut.
pastorbarrett wrote: » Given the gulf in UFC weight-classes, it's not unusual to have size discrepancy come fight night. If it was boxing, they'd likely naturally be a weight class apart. It's probably reasonable to say that Cowboy is going to attempt to make the most of something of a size advantage on McGregor. 155 would seem to favour McGregor more for this fight.
Ush1 wrote: » Possibly but my point is that people who are saying they are just lightweights without a weight cut, so what? Weight cuts make a huge difference and could easily favour one fighter more over another. Same goes for lack of a weight cut. I'd question there long term motivation also if they just don't want to cut weight because it's Christmas but sure we don't know if that's the case.
Tazzimus wrote: » Weight cutting sucks balls, especially over Christmas. I imagine that's their main motivation for it.They're both in or around the same weight out of camp, so it shouldn't have a huge effect. Both might have a tiny cut to hit 170, but it won't be like Till trying to make it or that.
Ush1 wrote: » Maybe in terms of the weight difference but it can make a huge difference in the fight. I personally think McGregor looks better with a weight cut, I believe both him and JK have said as much in the past.
eagle eye wrote: » McGregor was unstoppable at featherweight, not as strong at lightweight, don't see how welterweight will be good for him.
Sweet.Science wrote: » Weird how the UFC announced it and not him .Its strange how silent he is. Seems like they are forcing his hand to me