Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Jayesdiem wrote: » ......interim example. At least MMA doesn't have 4 champs in the same weight class UFC, WSOF, ONE FC, Bellator, Cage Warriors... that's 5 world champions for every weight class from 135 to heave weight.
Jayesdiem wrote: » ......interim example. At least MMA doesn't have 4 champs in the same weight class
mrkiscool2 wrote: » Yep, but you can't hold a Bellator and UFC title at the same time. You can hold a WBO and IBF title at the same time.
.ak wrote: » Pretty sad the "boxing" community refusing to acknowledge McGregor's achievements last night.
Lt Dan wrote: » MMA fans are being disparaged because they vomited out a lot of uneducated drivel in the last 3 months Oh, don't worry , the old time UFC people are all ready whinging about how titles fights are set up in the UFC. Just as well Conor proved himself, because many of the hardcore people were not happy one bit that he was fast tracked to a title fight so early. You had Aldo, disgracing himself in 13 seconds, not to mention his pathetic attempt to sell the fight, being offered a chance to win the interim belt despite Conor being the champion of that division. All he had to do was beat another journey man one time champion Edgar , whom he had already beaten. Until recently the doping was an issue that they wanted to hide.Imagine,Aldo had the power to kick testers out of Brazil when they came looking for him
normanoffside wrote: » Who are you talking about here? Walshb already stated that Conor did very well. I think the same. He showed some decent skills in there. I just don't think he would make it to world level as a pro up against guys his size (154-160lbs).
johnpatrick81 wrote: » But he didn't land one punch of note. Not one. He only won the first 2 rounds cos Floyd let him. Floyd literally did nothing. If he felt in any way threatened he woulda fought back then. McGregor gets zero boxing credit from me. Huge amount of financial credit though. This was a cash grab. We learned absolutely nothing about Conor as a boxer.
mrkiscool2 wrote: » If you're not a boxing fan, you probably know little about boxing. So, you aren't really in a position to talk about how well Conor did.
.ak wrote: » At the end of the day the gulf of class wasn't evident in the way we were told it would be. Conor gave a good account of himself I felt. He'll learn a lot from this.
johnpatrick81 wrote: » We learned absolutely nothing about Conor as a boxer.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » In reference to money he bet Schuab.https://twitter.com/ChaelSonnen/status/901758450031509504
Zero-Cool wrote: » I just saw Chael is following 0 people on twitter, he's a gas man.
chewythefirst wrote: » did no one else notice that floyed turned his back every time conor got the upper hand so the ref would brake them up and when conor got the lovely body shot and started raining down punishment floyed again turned his back to get the ref to step in and conor kept going cos that was the 16-17 time floyed turned his back on him and the ref separated them long enough so floyed would have time to recover.
.ak wrote: »
Asus X540L wrote: » Nah nineties Irish rugby was the heyday of moral victories.
johnpatrick81 wrote: » You're bitter and can't see the "fight" as the farce it was? Oh ya, and there is no Santa Claus.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Nobody was saying it was a farce middle to the end of Round 3...... fcuking fight thread was littered with comments saying Conor was doing really well. Now after the event everyone is acting like it was obvious he would gas. Like fcuk was it.