Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Seen & Found

Options
1202123252632

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 419 ✭✭bawn79


    Dr Strange wrote: »
    Probably the wrong thread but I have "seen" this on adverts.ie:

    http://www.adverts.ie/other-antiques-collectables/georgian-irish-cannon-balls-wreck-find/9525259?fm

    Shouldn't this be reported under the NMA? Also, they describe it as a wreck find.

    Gone now - if anyone sees anything like that make sure and screenshot it so that it can be recorded.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 11,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭Meteorite58


    JJayoo wrote: »
    This hole is approx 6 inch across and 4-5 deep. The bottom is flat and slightly sloped,assuming erosion as it usually has some stones in it and is covered during floods.

    We assumed it was for making wheels for carts, but could it be a Ballaun stone

    I was interested in this, was thinking it could be a tyreing station too, maybe dislodged in a flood or platform eroded over time. There is a fine preserved example of a tyreing platform in Ardfert. Co Kerry with a stream running beside it ( can see it over the wall above the cartwheel, closed in now behind the metal railing ). This is close to a former Landlords house who liked to 'restore and preserve' ancient sites so I presume it has got a bit of a makeover in the past. Credit due to the how well it is currently preserved and presented. One thing I notice is that the hole in the picture is more then 6 inches, probably more like 10 approx, so maybe your stone was a millstone ?

    hMmcSUy.jpg?1

    20RPW5L.jpg?1

    uhDswCy.jpg?1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Hotei


    24748383753_421fce4d03_c.jpg

    From left to right: a flint core, a 'keeled' convex end scraper, a pointed blade and a large chert blade.


    A well worked out flint core (measures only 35 mm. at its widest):

    25255097162_e0f5abf9fb_c.jpg

    The striking platform of the core:

    25005959149_9c9f90855e_c.jpg



    A lovely, intact 'keeled' convex end scraper. These typically date from the Late Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Oval in shape, it measures 54 mm. x 43 mm. There's a noticeable shiny or polished look to the bulb of percussion which may suggest this tool was used, i.e. handheld at the proximal end using the abruptly retouched distal end for scraping:

    24642589164_fbfea3e655_c.jpg

    25155014742_f3738da280_c.jpg

    25273268665_2ec2890f3f_c.jpg

    24745006894_97556d801c_c.jpg

    The term 'keeled' derives from its shape in profile. In this case the distal end is downturned, while the distal end on the dorsal face is raised higher than the opposite proximal end (which bears invasive retouch):

    25180117351_de30db1c42_c.jpg



    A chert blade measuring 100 mm. in length. The blade has a large bulbar scar at the proximal end on the ventral face which has effectively removed the bulb of percussion; this and the visible step/hinge fractures (probably deliberately applied) at the proximal end on the dorsal face would have made this blade ideal for hafting. There is retouch visible along the lateral edges:

    25247481596_febd253674_c.jpg

    25247482116_b7feee29c7_c.jpg

    24643067694_2f06ac17da_c.jpg


    A pointed flint blade (54 mm. x 15 mm.):

    25281194751_9e4f766c28_c.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Aelfric


    Nice! The Chert blade is intriguing though - are you 100% certain it's Chert? It looks a little basaltic to me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Hotei


    I've been led to believe it is Chert (one of the country's most senior archaeologists believes so), but have had my doubts just as you too have.
    It could be silicified Dolomite, a mineral rock with a relatively high Iron content, which may account for the staining (but that could just be from the soil though).

    Here's a couple more 'Chert' finds. Some of these do look more convincingly Chert-like:

    25259694665_06411a7416_c.jpg

    25233784836_9a9c37ce73_c.jpg

    The two smallest flakes (on the far right in the images above) look similar to Chert that had been quarried during the Mesolithic at Lough Derravaragh (Co.Westmeath), some of which is on display in the National Museum on Kildare street.

    If anyone else has an opinion on what the material is likely to be, I'd be glad to hear it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    I assume these are Irish finds and if so, that the National Museum of Ireland has been informed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Hotei


    slowburner wrote: »
    I assume these are Irish finds and if so, that the National Museum of Ireland has been informed.

    Done and dusted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Aelfric


    Hmm...some of the dark Chert lithics do look a little like banded Chert, though much darker than normal. Dolerite could be a possibility. Steve Mandal is the guy to ask


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Hotei


    Aelfric wrote: »
    Hmm...some of the dark Chert lithics do look a little like banded Chert, though much darker than normal. Dolerite could be a possibility. Steve Mandal is the guy to ask

    Yeah, the banded Chert on display in the NMI is a lighter colour all right.
    I don't know Steve Mandal - how/where would I get in touch with him?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Silicified limestone?
    It seems to be turning up in quite a few assemblages these days.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Fantastic finds! :eek: :) the first thing that jumped out for me was that your blade above…

    25247482116_b7feee29c7_c.jpg

    is very similar in layout to the "left handed" version of a French Neolithic made from Grand Pressigny flint example I have laying about*.

    sy1642.jpg

    Pretty much the exact same size too.

    2urnsi0.jpg
    Percussion bulb side.

    Small world or wha? :)



    *I got it as a neolithic outlier as part of a "job lot" of Mousterian/Neandertal pieces from an ex local French museum collection. TBH I have only a couple of the later Sapiens lithics and if I ever feel a similar pang of recognition with other pieces you may find, we may just rewrite the textbooks… ;-)

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Hotei


    Thanks Wibbs.
    Wow! Your blade is remarkably similar looking. Is the notch I can see on your blade a more recent chip do you think, or is it retouch? There's two notches visible on my blade (opposite each other on both lateral edges) which looks like retouch, and I can only think this was done deliberately to help secure the blade onto a handle with deer tendon or such material. I could be wildly wrong though!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Oh the notch is defo a planned thing alright H. The GP flint* can be hard enough to tell in fairness as it doesn't seem to patina up nearly as much as other cherts, even after hundreds of thousands of years, but the texture is a tell and the overall "design" is original(the tip is a more recent break).



    *The Grand Pressigny source material is gorgeous, very consistent in structure with little to catch out the unwary knapper, so was valued from Homo Erectus onwards. Ancient Irish folks really had to know how to work the local material, which is generally of far lower quality.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    Few bits from today a few miles outside macroom towards millstreet.

    1.Peniel church(thats what it says on the sign. Dont know much about them tbh).
    2. Inside peniel church looking at some sort of altar?
    3. Stone circles. The peniel church is otherside that small bit of wood in distance. Very close.
    4. Two more stones. One has loads of quartz and very different from rocks in area. Maybe tomb stones?
    5. Single stone a few meters from the two above. I think the hole is from weathering.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    A grave stone in Brannockstown, Co. Kildare. Anyone have any further information on these Kavanaghs?

    IMG_20160319_143824415_zps8fs3fg1v.jpg


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Coles wrote: »
    A grave stone in Brannockstown, Co. Kildare. Anyone have any further information on these Kavanaghs?

    IMG_20160319_143824415_zps8fs3fg1v.jpg
    18th century headstone are beautiful things and valuable documents of the period in their own right, but you might have more luck with this form of enquiry in the Genealogy forum.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    Thanks, I'll do a bit more reading around and see what I come up with. The above stone nicely captures the letters u/v/w/ph evolving at the time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    The following was recently posted on a local history facebook group here in Waterford, and are described as being associated with Waterford City. The tunnel is said to fork at points and includes at least one chamber. Not sure of location yet, but any thoughts on the images?

    https://goo.gl/photos/r4cvcX124rCa9wzb6


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Resolution up to 25cm - 1 pixel equals 25cm on the ground. Compare this to the existing resolution where 1 pixel equals 1m on the ground.

    Hopefully, the imagery will be added to the online mapviewer and will not be just 'a buy to view' product.
    If so, it should be worth the wait and will almost certainly lead to fresh discoveries.

    http://www.osi.ie/blog/new-cameras/


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    16 times more resolution would be absolutely brilliant. Any idea what the Bing aerial photos are?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭mirrors


    Can anyone identify what animal this is?
    https://s3.postimg.io/upn47hyrl/IMG_20160817_160001.jpg


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I'd say goat.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    It's hard to distinguish a sheep's skull from a goat's skull with just the rear view so I'm inclined to think sheep simply because they greatly outnumber goats.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    mirrors wrote: »
    Can anyone identify what animal this is?
    https://s3.postimg.io/upn47hyrl/IMG_20160817_160001.jpg

    Pretty sure it's dead


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    A nice flint scraper (neolithic?) found on the surface recently.

    Flint20scraper1_zpsvtqmavkk.jpg


    A useful link: "A guide to the identification of man made flint & tool types".

    And a really excellent site: StoneAgeTools.co.uk


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Nice find and on its way to the museum, I hope.
    It's a nice example of the almost uniquely Irish hollow scraper and is iconically Neolithic. Probably used for scraping bark from branches, or meat from bone - that sort of thing. Usually the arc is closer to a semi-circle, but the retouched curve on this example (upper edge in photo) is quite moderate compared to the norm.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    Thanks for the information Slowburner. I'll ensure it ends up in the right hands.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    A spear point? Any thoughts?

    Spear%20point_zpshucjhmzr.jpg

    I found it protruding from the side of a peat hag 800m up in the Wicklow Mountains. The peat hag was about 2m high and the stone was located about half a metre or less from the bedrock underneath.

    As best I can judge it it's feldspar with small quartz crystals. It's about 45mm long.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Coles wrote: »
    A spear point? Any thoughts?

    Spear%20point_zpshucjhmzr.jpg

    I found it protruding from the side of a peat hag 800m up in the Wicklow Mountains. The peat hag was about 2m high and the stone was located about half a metre or less from the bedrock underneath.

    As best I can judge it it's feldspar with small quartz crystals. It's about 45mm long.

    It is natural, I'm sorry to say. The petrology is unsuitable, and there are no immediately obvious signs of percussion or retouch.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Coles


    slowburner wrote: »
    It is natural, I'm sorry to say. The petrology is unsuitable, and there are no immediately obvious signs of percussion or retouch.
    Yeah, I suspected that might be the case. It is quite brittle, but I was going by the theory that anything within the peat layer had to be the result of human activity.


Advertisement