Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ULSU Elections 2012 (Voting Thursday March 22)

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭freyners


    have to laugh at the cronyism comment when they are running on a "ticket", be fun to see how they work together then if one of the three didnt get in


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭shabouwcaw


    he branded me as a david hartery supporter and that my opinions didn't matter cause they went against what he thought.

    If you want to be a David Hartery supporter, I'd be glad to have you! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭wnolan1992


    Tighearnan wrote: »
    There is a RON option for people to vote on. Its in the constitution that it must be given as a choice.


    I know adam and dave so i thought i'd check out Eammon and see what his policies were as I've never heard of him before. I asked a few questions on his ideas and opinions and when he didn't have an answer or proof ( this is how it seems ) he branded me as a david hartery supporter and that my opinions didn't matter cause they went against what he thought. He has lost any chance of getting my vote and i doubt he'll get much support so i'll be considering the president election a two horse race.




    https://www.facebook.com/VoteEamonnHorganforULSUPresidentUPr/posts/192773924168688?notif_t=feed_comment_reply

    Link to the posts

    Screen capped just in case. That's a pretty stupid comment to make. Accusing someone a being a supporter of another candidate is just immature and doesn't actually answer anything. Will be hard to redeem himself in my eyes anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭djnr8


    Would just like to declare I shall be supporting Paddy Rockett, Adam Moursy and Cathal Ronan.

    Seems to me a few of the new faces have no idea what is actually involved in the job they are campaigning for and that's just from looking at their posters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭Catch15


    Tighearnan wrote: »

    That's a pretty poor start, all I took from reading the profile was that he's sound and everyone in the union is a waste of space and/or a bully.

    Haven't posted in here yet and in terms of declaring interest seeing as I ran in the same election as Paddy and Kelly I know them well enough, not to mention being to blame for bringing a young Adam Moursy onto a C&S committee. :P

    Best of luck to everyone involved, hope it's a clean fight and all that. Remember to not let the whole thing get to you and it will be one of the best weeks of your life, although my campaign manager will always remember it as a form of torture!

    Tom


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Merger


    djnr8 wrote: »
    Would just like to declare I shall be supporting Paddy Rockett, Adam Moursy and Cathal Ronan.

    Seems to me a few of the new faces have no idea what is actually involved in the job they are campaigning for and that's just from looking at their posters.

    Have you read all the Posters?

    I know that William Jennings has put up one that Tighearnan has given him a good Drilling lol.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭djnr8


    Merger wrote: »
    Have you read all the Posters?

    I know that William Jennings has put up one that Tighearnan has given him a good Drilling lol.

    I have looked at all posters that are currently available, through facebook at least. Still working my way through manifestos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Merger


    Is there any way of linking manifestos here?


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭djnr8




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    Tighearnan wrote: »
    There is a RON option for people to vote on. Its in the constitution that it must be given as a choice.

    Link to the posts

    Is this definitely true? I distinctly remember not having this an option last year. Am I mistaken or was it not implemented?


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    djnr8 wrote: »

    Kelly O' Brien -

    I got a manifesto from kelly on friday in the stables


    http://i.imgur.com/duTKg.jpg
    http://i.imgur.com/JXAsM.jpg

    they're quite big so i won't hot link them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭leaoj


    There most definitely was NOT a RON option last year.

    tbh I can probably already call who is going to win.

    easy wins for moursey rockett and o brien but stranger things have happened.

    That ''trio ticket'' have obviously lumped together because they know they are up against it and will hope to get votes from each other.

    I've never seen the ''tickets'' to really work in the past as people vote on how the individual candidate was to them, not on the fat that ''oh they're running together so i'll vote for all three of them''

    It's an ok plan, but smacks of desperation already before a poster has even been issued. they're already so under donfident in their chances of success as an individual that they're already lumping in with randomers they barely know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭bazkennedy


    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    Is this definitely true? I distinctly remember not having this an option last year. Am I mistaken or was it not implemented?

    Can't see any mention of it in the constitution and don't remember it being there last year (that said i wasn't looking out for it last year for obvious reasons)


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    leaoj wrote: »
    It's an ok plan, but smacks of desperation already before a poster has even been issued. they're already so under donfident in their chances of success as an individual that they're already lumping in with randomers they barely know.

    were the three of them not mates already?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    djnr8 wrote: »

    I am biased here, but that poster is gas.

    How does one 'think to the future'?

    The pose with the dog reminds me of Owen McLove.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭Nokia08


    And thinking to the Future, Jobs, Knowing your rights etc, Building up your current CV so that you look better to the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    Btw here's Cathal's poster. EDIT: My mistake, this is his manifesto.

    427114_263826047036537_262539770498498_602474_1959350774_n.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    Wow sounds like cathal could be cambridge's Manchurian candidate.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=77128611&postcount=41


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    Nokia08 wrote: »
    And thinking to the Future, Jobs, Knowing your rights etc, Building up your current CV so that you look better to the future.

    Hmmm?


  • Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭cjthecrow


    My manifesto:
    My name is Cathal Ronan. I am a 4th year BA (Joint Honours) student, studying Criminal Justice and Economics. You should vote for me as DP/Welfare Officer this Thursday because I am approachable, hard working and have a lot of low cost ideas that I think will improve the Welfare office and make it a more open union to all students.

    Sexual Health – Make Shag week like a second Charity Week. Go out at night handing out free condoms and leaflets to UL students. Make sexual health awareness a weekly campaign rather then once a semester.

    Mental Health – “Welfare on Wheels”. I plan to have a welfare couch on wheels and once a week go out and meet students, invite them for a quick chat making the welfare office more open and more approachable. Also I want to provide more help and advice for graduating students for when they face the real world. I would work with the Alumni office to create a forum where graduates could keep in contact.

    Physical Health – Physical health is key. It has a direct correlation on your mental and sexual health. I intend to have a weekly jog/walk to get people out and active. It’s a new way to meet people and helps build a good relationship between students and the Welfare office. I would also work with the ULSU Shop to create a meal plan for students. Students could buy the makings of a healthy dinner for a reasonable price, helping both the student and the SU.

    Accommodation – Students need to have more information about the accommodation they are choosing while they are students in UL. I want to develop a rating scheme on houses that is accessible to all students to view. Past tenants can leave their feedback on the house/land lord so that incoming tenants have a better idea of the accommodation they’re choosing.

    I want to create a union with more accountability and transparency. This is your union. You have the right to voice your opinions and know exactly what is going on in your union. Transparency is key therefore I will be publishing my activity at the end of each week allowing students to see how I am working for them. This activity will of course be private and the result will be two-fold. 1) Students see exactly what it is I do and 2) Students in similar situations will have information accessible to them online should they find it difficult to make the first step to talk. I will be accessible to students via all social media and face to face meetings.

    With the recent trouble in the SU change is needed. As your Welfare Officer I hold no political agenda and I have no ulterior motives for this job. My only concern is your welfare and nothing else.

    I have experience working with youths in summer camps in Barcelona and America. My main responsibility was the welfare of the youths while they were in my care. I firmly believe this experience coupled with my academic interest in human rights/civil liberties leaves me as a perfect candidate for this position.

    I will welcome any and all ideas to help better the union and do my best to put those ideas into action.
    Well done is better then well said.

    Choose your Future. Choose Ronan for Welfare


    This manifesto was issued by Deirdre Wilson, Campaign manager for Cathal Ronan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Btw here's Cathal's poster.
    Did anybody find something odd in the picture?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭wnolan1992


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Btw here's Cathal's poster. EDIT: My mistake, this is his manifesto.

    421274_10151407913870008_743020007_23296092_2073184018_n.jpg

    Please God tell me this is a piss take?

    The wording is just atrocious, and it doesn't actually say anything worthwhile.

    "Choose cheap nights out and wondering if you used a reliable condom on Monday morning." <-Suggests that worrying over whether the condom worked or not is a good thing.

    "Choose sitting on that couch watching mind numbing Home and Away repeats avoiding studying stress eating knowing that an officer is there for you" <- I'm sorry, WHAT?

    EDIT: Just saw the manifesto, which makes far more sense than this poster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭cjthecrow


    Jester252 wrote: »
    Did anybody find something odd in the picture?

    "Needin". That's the old picture, it has been fixed :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    wnolan1992 wrote: »

    EDIT: Just saw the manifesto, which makes far more sense than this poster.

    I got it wrong, twice :o

    Apologies for the confusion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭wnolan1992


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    I got it wrong, twice :o

    Apologies for the confusion.

    Don't worry about it :)

    Even as a poster it's very poor. A huge body of text like that won't catch people's attention. And there is no break down of what he's actually going to do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭djnr8


    wnolan1992 wrote: »
    Don't worry about it :)

    Even as a poster it's very poor. A huge body of text like that won't catch people's attention. And there is no break down of what he's actually going to do.

    I beg to differ, anybody who knows what the reference to would imo definitely stop to read it.

    More manifesto links added in my original post


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭leaoj


    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    were the three of them not mates already?

    no, i think on tighearnan's link your man admits they only met for the first time last wk after nominations were submitted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭wnolan1992


    djnr8 wrote: »
    I beg to differ, anybody who knows what the reference to would imo definitely stop to read it.

    More manifesto links added in my original post

    And those that don't? An election poster should give a clear indication at a glance of what the candidate stands for. An entire paragraph just saying "Choose X. Choose Y. Choose Z. Choose Bananas." doesn't do that. The manifesto is sound, some interesting things in there to think about.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 bambismom


    wnolan1992 wrote: »
    And those that don't? An election poster should give a clear indication at a glance of what the candidate stands for. An entire paragraph just saying "Choose X. Choose Y. Choose Z. Choose Bananas." doesn't do that. The manifesto is sound, some interesting things in there to think about.

    We have a more modified poster that does outline manifesto points, etc. They haven't been published yet as the ERB has to approve everything first. As soon as they get back to me, I will upload them here.

    Oh, I should probably state, I'm on the Ronan for Welfare team. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭bazkennedy


    djnr8 wrote: »
    I beg to differ, anybody who knows what the reference to would imo definitely stop to read it.

    unfortunately not, humans have a short attention span, students doubly so
    even fans of trainspotting wouldn't be bothered (its been done far to many times)

    TL DR - next time go for 3 bullet points rather than a big block of text


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    cjthecrow wrote: »
    "Needin". That's the old picture, it has been fixed :)

    Edited accordingly.
    wnolan1992 wrote: »
    Don't worry about it :)

    Even as a poster it's very poor. A huge body of text like that won't catch people's attention. And there is no break down of what he's actually going to do.

    Personally I think the Trainspotting idea was very clever. It'll be easily recognisable to those who know the film (plenty of those about) with 'Choose' throughout. It's something different from the normal run-of-the-mill posters you see around, something interesting. It will grab people's attention.

    Some of Cathal's ideas are summed up shortly in the poster, which are all in the manifesto above.


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    I actually think there is too much emphasis put on the contents of the election manifesto. Like it appears people really rate highly the 'promises' the candidates make. Like person A promises free condoms and person b offers a confidential phone service. People will argue which is most economically viable, which will benefit the students the most etc. i think it's a moot point. Firstly because statistics show hardly anyone delivers anything new during their tenure and secondly, it's not actually important most of the time.

    basically this is a job people are being interviewed for. and we, the electorate body, are making that decision on who gets the job. What we need to find out who will best do the role of the office as it currently stands, what they might bring to it in terms of bells and whistles isn't important.

    For example, Kelly O'Brien has a track record of delivering on one of her promises - a radio station. She organized the funding, got the resources, managed the volunteers, got some advertising, got the thing working. But what exactly was the end product? A radio station where people doing the music course get practice being presenters with a listener-ship of about 10 people per hour. So Kelly says she works 70 hours per week, how much of this time was spent messing around with the radio? What about the rest of the job - the important aspects.

    Let's just say KOB is elected and she does actually bring in the niteline confidential help line for students. How much of her time and energy will be put into it? What will it achieve? How many people will use it? how will she able to do the more important aspects of her job -
    • liaise with the college over the criteria and distribution of the access and hardship funds
    • deal with, but not counsel, students who have welfare problems, respecting confidentiality at all times
    • campaign on, and raise awareness of, issues relating to welfare as agreed by the executive committee e.g. debt, safe sex, drug/alcohol abuse, etc; distribute general welfare information
    • have responsibility for representing students in disciplinary or academic appeals cases

    Like, who cares if she gets cheap condoms or not as long as she does the above adequately and professionally? There are about 14 other things explicitly stated in the job spec too.

    I'm not singling Kelly out here just using her case as an example as I have her manifesto in front of me. i think it's important for students to realise these fluffy promises that people put on their manifesto matter for nothing, the real important aspects of the officer is how they adhere to their job spec.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Merger


    Its strange how someone has her leaflets.

    We were told none had theirs approved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    I think the college does a terrible job at transparency during elections. Kelly O'Brien is effectively in charge of every campus media outlet. In the other big colleges on this island, they have newspaper published by the SU and another published without SU interference.
    2x6O8.png

    I think we have an example of KOB using her editorial influence to gain advantage in the election. Tara feeney apparently took numerous photographs during the body shape awareness campaign. however, coincidentally Kelly O'Brien and her running mate David Hartery were selected to be published in the photo section of the elections edition of An focal side by side. Neither have ever been included (to the best of my knowledge before) in this section. i'm not saying this is a game changer, but it's obvious that KOB is using everything at her disposal to get her name and image out ahead of her opponents.


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    Merger wrote: »
    Its strange how someone has her leaflets.

    We were told none had theirs approved.

    are you saying KOB was dispersing unapproved election documents prematurely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    Do like how Rockett put ents into his campaign. Too bad he can't sit behind a desk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    Jester252 wrote: »
    Do like how Rockett put ents into his campaign. Too bad he can't sit behind a desk.

    who's campaign team are you on? all your posts are anti-rockett i have to question whether you're part of kob's team or your part of woods'? or are you just a concerned student?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    Kelly O'Brien's election video. A good idea, but can't say it's very arresting personally. (I'd have to say that though :o )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    who's campaign team are you on? all your posts are anti-rockett i have to question whether you're part of kob's team or your part of woods'? or are you just a concerned student?

    Pretty sure Jester's just an interested student.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    i thought the video was great, great music, great tone. comes across very natural, very trustworthy, doesn't take herself too seriously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭leaoj


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Pretty sure Jester's just an interested student.

    who happens to hate paddy rockett?


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Pretty sure Jester's just an interested student.

    well he obviously has a problem with rockett i'd be curious as to hear why


  • Registered Users Posts: 125 ✭✭Dante on Fire


    Hi Jester

    Thank you for throwing up your comment here.

    To clarify I am proposing 'Union forums' in terms of Issues that have been of primary concern to students in their broadest scale. They are essentially there for students to actively be involved in their progression and promotion.

    These three are the most engaging elements of the union as a whole.

    I would envisage that Keith (Ents Promotion manager) And Reiss Barren (Ents Councillor) spearhead this forum. I want nothing to do with ents only to know that its for students by students (and people are enjoying themselves!). I am more interested in the value of Union and University Forums as we can critically engage on issues that are clearly not making their way to us from Class Reps.

    I actually added that forum after researching the Leeds Union Forums and they have one where they actively work with Leeds Borough council in development of Leeds City - from what I have researched, there are poor attendance at these forums. And I looked at what students do engage with from my experience and thought its a very worthwhile project for the Union as a Team to take on to open up the place

    Myself as VP Academic - My interests are purely educational and related to the positive safe passage of my students through college.

    Thanks for the comment - glad you read the manifesto - Take a look at the Leeds Better Union Forums vid here and let me know what you think

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtMMF5fkg_U

    or

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmxZfh_9iyc


    Regards

    Paddy Rockett


  • Registered Users Posts: 125 ✭✭Dante on Fire


    @Roro

    Hi man thanks for quizzing above but Jester has the right to ask questions just like you. I Thank you for your defense though. I was interested to read your earlier posts and am glad that a student will take every effort to find out about the candidates that run.

    Any questions or comments that all you guys have I'll gladly answer

    I am posting my full manifesto here in the morning as i am adding the final four points to the facebook page.

    Reason for this is I want the points released staggered so that (A) people read them and add to any point they wish (b)Dont want to piss off people who like the page with long laborious Notes.

    Please have a look and don't hesitate to give me a shout.

    Paddy Rockett


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    @Roro

    Hi man thanks for quizzing above but Jester has the right to ask questions just like you.

    wasn't defending you. i am aware he's entitled to ask away, but i think it's important for this forum there is a bit of transparency on the questioners part too. i am still curious where, if any, jester's allegiances or loyalties lie.

    sceptre and petee are the only mods here i'm just wondering what his motives are. he's said the same thing 3 times about rockett and desks, it begs the question, does rockett have a problem with desks or is this someone continuously taking a swipe.

    if i was continuously going on about kob and her campus media machinas i'd expect ppl to question my motives too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    leaoj wrote: »
    who happens to hate paddy rockett?
    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    well he obviously has a problem with rockett i'd be curious as to hear why

    Up to Jester to come back on that!

    @Paddy, watched the video there, very good idea. Now whether it works in practice or not is another thing, but well worth giving it a try.


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    well luckily daly won't be involved this time telling residents to go **** themselves


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    Saying that I hate Rockett is a one hell of an overstatement. IMO and from dealing I had with Rockett he is very outgoing, which I am not saying is a bad thing, but in an office that is dealing more internal it might not suit someone who said that he doesn't like sitting at a desk. One interaction I had with him he told a group of 1st years that you can fail as many times that they what it doesn't matter you can always repeat. My first impression Jackie Wood is all so off. I don't know as much about her as I do Rockett and on this vote I am leaning towards Rockett but I have more of a second voice then the other officers. I also find it odd that the person calling me out has posted a lot of comments about KOB and said that he is running an anit-campaign


  • Registered Users Posts: 339 ✭✭roro1neil0


    i've been up front about my motives. everyone knows where i am coming from and what my intentions are.

    i was just curious to how you came to getting such strong opinions about rockett, perhaps i was in need of some investigation myself.

    perhaps we could perform an experiment and put him in his office behind a desk and time him to see how long it takes for him to get up and walk around and go talk to some people in person???


  • Registered Users Posts: 125 ✭✭Dante on Fire


    roro1neil0 wrote: »
    sceptre and petee are the only mods here i'm just wondering what his motives are. he's said the same thing 3 times about rockett and desks, it begs the question, does rockett have a problem with desks or is this someone continuously taking a swipe..

    Ah this is a link to what I said in the EGM about not enjoying a desk job. In response to that I would say that the Job does not have to be 100% emails and meetings especially in terms of engagement with students and recruitment of reps. I am quoted as being someone who can rally people. I will use this talent to get our faculty reps positions filled (by the end of this term) so we have a working group to crack on into the new term.

    What do you think?

    @Paddy, watched the video there, very good idea. Now whether it works in practice or not is another thing, but well worth giving it a try.

    It was requested at EGM and i researched how we could use it to our benefit and it is one that I will highly promote as we draw an end of this term and established at the start of the new one.

    Can you think of anything that may be amiss? I think its very open and more of a "Think Tank" idea than anything else.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement