Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Mod Warning: NO ADS)

Options
1…345346347348350

Comments

  • Options
    #10472
    frustratedTC
    Registered Users Posts: 337 ✭✭frustratedTC


    EU is Wednesday??? Its equity tomorrow - someone confirm this!!!


  • Options
    #10473
    doing
    Registered Users Posts: 178 ✭✭doing


    frustratedTC wrote: »
    EU is Wednesday??? Its equity tomorrow - someone confirm this!!!

    Criminal tomorrow. EU Wednsday, Equity Thursday.

    Almost had a heart attack reading the last two posts.


  • Options
    #10474
    sorchauna
    Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭sorchauna


    doing wrote: »
    Criminal tomorrow. EU Wednsday, Equity Thursday.

    Almost had a heart attack reading the last two posts.

    Me to!!


  • Options
    #10475
    LavenderLemon
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭LavenderLemon


    Oops! Sorry, have my days all mixed up! I'm secretly a troll here to cause panic :P


  • Options
    #10476
    Henry Minogue
    Registered Users Posts: 33 ✭Henry Minogue


    any tips for crim tommorow? think defence of the dwelling act 2011 might come up given to came into force last year.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #10477
    kelmchugh
    Registered Users Posts: 15 ✭kelmchugh


    Mission accomplished, almost had heart attack also!


  • Options
    #10478
    chops018
    Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Reminds me of the time last year that guy came on before the Property exam and said that Succession wasn't going to come up that sitting.


  • Options
    #10479
    Gibbonw2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Gibbonw2


    Please, is regulation 1612/68 in the blackstones manual? Cant find it?


  • Options
    #10480
    john.han
    Closed Accounts Posts: 258 ✭✭john.han


    Gibbonw2 wrote: »
    Please, is regulation 1612/68 in the blackstones manual? Cant find it?
    Directive 2004/38


  • Options
    #10481
    Gibbonw2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Gibbonw2


    I assumed they were different? They are referenced distinctly in loads of sources. Are you 100 % sure. Legal dictum relies on both sources separately


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #10482
    sorchauna
    Registered Users Posts: 188 ✭✭sorchauna


    Gibbonw2 wrote: »
    I assumed they were different? They are referenced distinctly in loads of sources. Are you 100 % sure. Legal dictum relies on both sources separately

    I don't think its in there. The 2004 one has largely replaced the 68 one, but the 68 isnt in the treaty. It seems every addition it gets bigger so they remove the older ones.


  • Options
    #10483
    notjessica
    Registered Users Posts: 2 ✭notjessica


    Do you think I'd be set doing direct effect, member state liability, judicial review, and all of the fundamental freedoms?


  • Options
    #10484
    crosshair12
    Registered Users Posts: 35 ✭crosshair12


    So...do we want the snow to stop and clear altogether, or get so heavy they postpone the rest of the exams?!?


  • Options
    #10485
    dinemo6
    Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭dinemo6


    Postpone the exams..... I wish!


  • Options
    #10486
    ShamblesB
    Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭ShamblesB


    hey could anyone help me with the free movement question (question 6) in the October 2011 paper please! What are the issues in part i and ii? Thanks for any help! :)


  • Options
    #10487
    ElleWoods
    Registered Users Posts: 14 ✭ElleWoods


    I'm learning general principles at the moment, have done proportionality, supremacy and subsidiarity but is it necessary to do legitimate expectations, legal certainty and transparency? How does he even ask that does anyone know?


  • Options
    #10488
    Get Carter
    Registered Users Posts: 10 ✭Get Carter


    Hello can someone tell me what the issues were in question two on the criminal paper. I know that the middle part regarded complicity but I wasnt sure about the first paragraph where it said Henry suffered from attention deficit disorder. I know theres no point in post mortems but Id feel a bit better studying for EU tomorrow if I thought I had criminal. Thanks


  • Options
    #10489
    HughLane
    Registered Users Posts: 2 ✭HughLane


    sorry, long time lurker on this thread but just had to sign up to post this. saw it on twitter earlier and loled. https://twitter.com/DonnchaKnow/status/313965740485132289


  • Options
    #10490
    UberStressed
    Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭UberStressed


    What are people concentrating on for equity?? My main topics are trusteeship, charitable trusts, prop estoppel, 3 certainties, tracing, undue infl, resulting trusts(re Andrews/joint acc/quistclose) rectification, DMC, cy pres & specific performance... I'm purposely leaving out injunctions because I really hate them.. Is that a bad idea? Any other big/tipped topic I should be covering?


  • Options
    #10491
    GusherING
    Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭GusherING


    ShamblesB wrote: »
    hey could anyone help me with the free movement question (question 6) in the October 2011 paper please! What are the issues in part i and ii? Thanks for any help! :)

    Read Laval un Partnieri for part i. Collective Action by a trade union (i.e. a picket) may be a justifiable restriction on freedom to provide services under Art 56, but in this case (which is closely followeed in the question) it was held to be a disproportionate restriction as the relevant EU directive already provided certain minimum safeguards for workers.

    Part ii: not entirely sure myself!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #10492
    Amre17
    Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭Amre17


    HughLane wrote: »
    sorry, long time lurker on this thread but just had to sign up to post this. saw it on twitter earlier and loled. https://twitter.com/DonnchaKnow/status/313965740485132289
    Love it!


  • Options
    #10493
    Happychicky7
    Registered Users Posts: 38 ✭Happychicky7


    HughLane wrote: »
    sorry, long time lurker on this thread but just had to sign up to post this. saw it on twitter earlier and loled. https://twitter.com/DonnchaKnow/status/313965740485132289

    A day in the life eh! Most importantly, did he pass them in the end?? :D


  • Options
    #10494
    sofakingood
    Registered Users Posts: 31 ✭sofakingood


    Does anybody have an up to date grid for contract that they would be willing to share?

    I have a few sample answers that I would exchange.


  • Options
    #10495
    Fe1exams
    Registered Users Posts: 120 ✭✭Fe1exams


    Get Carter wrote: »
    Hello can someone tell me what the issues were in question two on the criminal paper. I know that the middle part regarded complicity but I wasnt sure about the first paragraph where it said Henry suffered from attention deficit disorder. I know theres no point in post mortems but Id feel a bit better studying for EU tomorrow if I thought I had criminal. Thanks

    mental disorder ” includes mental illness, mental disability, dementia or any disease of the mind but does not include intoxication;

    Is adhd a disease of the mind for the purpose of the Criminal law Insanity Act 2006 as the defence? it is a mental disability

    -s15 false imprisonment...maybe
    -s4 assault
    -s3 assault
    -crim damage offences...
    -s5 threat to kill
    -accessory before and after the fact 7(1), 7(2) 1997 act

    seems like too many issues - i think he is usually looking for 4.... what does anyone else think??


  • Options
    #10496
    PTfan
    Registered Users Posts: 9 ✭PTfan


    Fe1exams wrote: »
    mental disorder ” includes mental illness, mental disability, dementia or any disease of the mind but does not include intoxication;

    Is adhd a disease of the mind for the purpose of the Criminal law Insanity Act 2006 as the defence? it is a mental disability

    -s15 false imprisonment...maybe
    -s4 assault
    -s3 assault
    -crim damage offences...
    -s5 threat to kill
    -accessory before and after the fact 7(1), 7(2) 1997 act

    seems like too many issues - i think he is usually looking for 4.... what does anyone else think??

    When i went for this one, went for assault under S3 and S4, and went for attempted murder when he tried to set him on fire, although he was unconscious, could be wrong. went for irresistible impulse for the initial hammer strike.

    As for Sean, went for incitement, and accessory after the fact S 7(2) and S 7(3)

    Never even thought of criminal damage, or false imprisonment


  • Options
    #10497
    Get Carter
    Registered Users Posts: 10 ✭Get Carter


    Cheers. I started with the insanity defence. Mentioned assault causing serious harm and false imprisonment and had the liability as accessory part. I was running out of time at that stage. Relief to know I didnt miss the mark. Bring on EU


  • Options
    #10498
    LavenderLemon
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭LavenderLemon


    Good luck to everyone doing EU tomorrow...*ahem*


  • Options
    #10499
    Caoileann
    Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭Caoileann


    Please god let this be a nice EU paper.. could use a bit of luck!
    Information overload I hope it all comes back.
    Good luck to everyone :)


  • Options
    #10500
    RandolphEsq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    UberStressed wrote: »
    What are people concentrating on for equity?? My main topics are trusteeship, charitable trusts, prop estoppel, 3 certainties, tracing, undue infl, resulting trusts(re Andrews/joint acc/quistclose) rectification, DMC, cy pres & specific performance... I'm purposely leaving out injunctions because I really hate them.. Is that a bad idea? Any other big/tipped topic I should be covering?
    I am too afraid to leave out injunctions myself given its size!

    My main topics (based on my own predictions);
    - Maxims
    - Constructive Trusts
    - Express Trusts
    - Resulting Trusts
    - Tracing
    - Injunctions

    Secondary;
    - Rectification
    - Specific Performance
    - Trustees

    Ignoring;
    - Rescission
    - Secret Trusts
    - Purpose Trusts
    - Satisfaction
    - Proprietary Estoppel

    Predicting, and therefore strongly hoping for;
    - Maxims
    - Constructive Trusts (Problem Q; Knowing receipt and dishonest assistance, tracing)
    - Injunctions (any aspect)
    - Express Trusts (any aspect)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #10501
    chops018
    Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    Well EU was a disaster.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement