Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Homeless animals in Galway

24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭doubleglaze


    softmee wrote: »
    freezingdog.jpg
    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    QUOTE]

    Softmee, did you take this photo and, if so, was this a dog in Galway? If you want a helping hand with the dog rescue side of things, please let me know by PM and I'll help in any way I can.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    softmee wrote: »
    QUOTE]

    Softmee, did you take this photo and, if so, was this a dog in Galway? If you want a helping hand with the dog rescue side of things, please let me know by PM and I'll help in any way I can.

    Oh no, thanks god it wasnt, i just took it from some website trying to speak to some peoples imagination..it looks like some still think animals cant feel cold and hunger and its sooooooo funny to think about their freezing paws. :/
    Thanks for your offer anyway, i hope i wont see more this winter.
    There is a cat too somwhere around our house i am not sure if its homeless, i just left some cats food in case it is. He was miaowing (is that the word?) the whole morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 603 ✭✭✭dapto1


    softmee wrote: »
    .it looks like some people still think animals cant feel cold and hunger and its sooooooo funny to think about their freezing paws. :/

    Where did anyone say that?

    Edit: Sorry DB! :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭doubleglaze


    Dapto, you have incorrectly attributed the above comment to me: please fix your quote:D

    Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭magentas


    softmee wrote: »
    I think their approach to the adoption is crazy. I understand they have to check who they are giving animal to, but people who are willing to take one shouldnt feel like they are suspected of treating them bad in the future. This is very discouraging and i am sure most of the people who even think of adopting one have a very good intentions.
    the main reason for home-checks and allt he questions would be that the shelter does not want to see an already abandoned/neglected/abused animal ending up back in the shelter after all the effort of re-homing them the first time!

    do you really think MADRA or EGAR actually want to keep these animals in shelters? they are absolutely packed to capacity this time of year especially with the local pounds closing down for their Christmas holidays meaning every dog in there will be PTS:(:mad:

    all involved in these centres work very very hard and get very little in return and it's not fair to give them a bad rap.

    Home-checks and the criteria for adopting is for your benefit as well as the shelters, if you're not serious or maybe don't realise the work that's involved when you take on a rescue animal, then they would rather wait for the right owner to come along.

    all of these animals had an owner/ a home at some stage and they ended up abandoned...it takes more than that, on top of basic neccessities like food, water and a roof over their heads,they need exercise(proper walking and playtime), training, socializing, love, attention and cuddles!
    ok so I'm mainly talking about dogs here but it's the same principles for any animal really

    of course, there are exceptions and I know GSPCA won't re-home to a family if there's children under 7 and stuff like that but the likes of MADRA and EGAR look at each application individually and will always work with you to find a suitable pet whereby both animal and owner will have a permanant happy home!

    IMO if you are serious about adopting, you should be able to understand why they ask these questions and do home-checks and appreciate it instead of viewing it as a barrier:)

    For anyone looking to adopt or even foster a pet, here's some contacts:

    http://www.madra.ie/ contact tara or marina

    http://www.egar.org/ contact sarah

    http://www.galway-spca.com/home.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    First of all -what makes you think you have to explain this all to me???
    I've heard it all several times and i do agree with some of your/their points, but i was talking through my own experience.
    I am experienced dog owner and i am aware of everything what makes a happy dog and my dog is a very happy one.

    I wont change my opinion -there is something wrong with their policy and their approach and if it would be different and more flexible one dog would have a loving home now. This is very frustrating.

    -and i was only talking about GSPCA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 152 ✭✭crally


    http://www.facebook.com/update_security_info.php?wizard=1#!/pages/Galway-Horse-Welfare/112768462129528

    hi here is the horse welfare, galway bay have feed for the horses if people let us know where the horses are. a few of the ones on the headford road have been removed. a few near me are being fed and i am taking water to the poor things. I am embarrased to be Irish!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    crally wrote: »
    http://www.facebook.com/update_security_info.php?wizard=1#!/pages/Galway-Horse-Welfare/112768462129528

    hi here is the horse welfare, galway bay have feed for the horses if people let us know where the horses are. a few of the ones on the headford road have been removed. a few near me are being fed and i am taking water to the poor things. I am embarrased to be Irish!!!

    If any animal does not have access to water then you should be phoning the Guards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 603 ✭✭✭dapto1


    crally wrote: »
    hi here is the horse welfare, galway bay have feed for the horses if people let us know where the horses are. a few of the ones on the headford road have been removed. a few near me are being fed and i am taking water to the poor things. I am embarrased to be Irish!!!
    Plenty of other countries treat animals like crap, unfortunately it isn't specifically an Irish thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    dapto1 wrote: »
    Plenty of other countries treat animals like crap, unfortunately it isn't specifically an Irish thing.
    Ah but as long as its for a good cause, apparently you're allowed to paint millions of people with a broad brush in casual conversation.

    Dog control is in the hands of the local authorities, so talk to your local councillor if you want reform on that. Dog owners are required to have an identification tag on the collars. Short of legislative changes perhaps charities could talk to An Post or whoever hands out licences and ask them to hand out a leaflet about spaying at the same time, perhaps even offering the service themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    21 European Countries signed the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals including Romania, Azerbaijan & Turkey in 1989/1990. Ireland has still not signed it.

    Per population we kill 10 times more dogs than the UK.

    We have ineffectual legislation because we don't consider it important enough for political groups to put it on their manifestos. So I will paint the majority with the same brush.

    "Dog Control" is considered as waste disposal. Local Councillors do not make law & it is the law that needs to change. Like the Greens the proposed Animal Welfare Bill is now history so we will remain one of the very few countries in Europe that have not introduced such a Bill or are planning to do so.

    It's the owners that need controlling not the dogs.

    When the Greens introduced the Dog Breeding Bill they were roundly criticised for putting Puppy Farming ahead of more pressing matters. Brian Cowen even represented the biggest Puppy Farmer in Ireland.

    I spent two hours of my Christmas Day trying to reunite a Christmas Puppy, that was left to roam on a main road, with it's owner. They had bought him a fancy collar but couldn't be bothered with a name tag or microchip. The man who's car went into a spectacular skid, terrifying his family, to avoid the dog desperately wanted to meet the owner - luckily he didn't especially as the owners thought that it was all "a fuss about nothing".

    The leaflet with license idea ignores the point that thousands don't buy licenses. Galway Coucil issued 8000 licenses in 2009 as opposed to 11000 in 2004. They only issued 9 on the spot fines in 2009 & didn't prosecute anyone - so why would anyone bother with a license especially when it is clear that the money does not go to dog welfare. Most dog owners that I know would rather give money to rescues.

    The first time that I went to buy a license the Post Mistress had to blow the dust off of a shoebox that contained the licenses. Mine was the first one that she had issued in three years !.

    I wonder if some Irish people equate neutering with human birth control as our neutering figures are very low. My own Vet has told me many times that she has a real problem in persuading people to neuter. The biggest neutering campaign here to date has been by Pedigree Petfoods, any English company & the Dog's Trust, an English charity.

    So I won't paint millions but I will paint the majority until they prove me otherwise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Discodog wrote: »
    "Dog Control" is considered as waste disposal. Local Councillors do not make law & it is the law that needs to change.

    The leaflet with license idea ignores the point that thousands don't buy licenses. Galway Coucil issued 8000 licenses in 2009 as opposed to 11000 in 2004. They only issued 9 on the spot fines in 2009 & didn't prosecute anyone - so why would anyone bother with a license especially when it is clear that the money does not go to dog welfare. Most dog owners that I know would rather give money to rescues.

    The first time that I went to buy a license the Post Mistress had to blow the dust off of a shoebox that contained the licenses. Mine was the first one that she had issued in three years !.
    As far as that goes, it would seem the legislation is in place, its just laxly enforced. Since the local authorities are in charge of enforcing them, its your local authorities that need to be pressured; the usual route to do so is through your councillor.
    Under the Control of Dogs Act 1986 as amended by the Control of Dogs (Amendment) Act 1992 all local authorities in Ireland are responsible for the control of dogs. Local authorities have the power to appoint dog wardens, provide dog shelters, seize dogs, impose on-the-spot fines and take court proceedings against owners.
    Discodog wrote: »
    We have ineffectual legislation because we don't consider it important enough for political groups to put it on their manifestos. So I will paint the majority with the same brush.

    So I won't paint millions but I will paint the majority until they prove me otherwise.
    The majority are millions. You can't paint the majority with a broad brush because the majority have no idea about any of this stuff, and the majority don't own any sort of animal at all. Raising political awareness of any kind of national level issues is very difficult in Ireland because the single transferable vote system encourages a hyper focus on the local level to the detriment of all else, and believe me I would know better than most.

    However you won't get very far ranting and raving about widespread cruelty among "Irish people" - identify the places you need to put pressure, the channels through which information can be spread, and deal with it practically rather than turning people off what you're trying to say by being negative.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    Discodog wrote: »
    If any animal does not have access to water then you should be phoning the Guards.

    Are you serious? They would be more interested if i call them and say somebody stole my socks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 glasto


    dapto1 wrote: »
    Plenty of other countries treat animals like crap, unfortunately it isn't specifically an Irish thing.

    No, it isn't just an Irish thing. But compared to many other countries, for example the UK, we have a long way to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Demonique


    Its not always possible to put in farm animals. Once they are well fed and have water, which involves bringing them water when the pipes are frozen they are happy enough. They are a lot tougher than humans. We have all our stock of cows and calves in the fields at the moment and also have horses out, with blankets on. Our animals are very well treated and I'd take offense to anyone who said we were being cruel by having them outside.

    Its not much if any warmer in a shed either in this weather, especially slatted sheds where the animals lie on concrete.



    We had to take our guinea pigs in to the study and put them in one of the 50 litre RUB boxes I use for my cornsnakes and geckos (minus the snakes and geckos of course) as it was so cold in the shed the water froze in their bottle.

    Some breeds of ponies cope with harsh weather quite well. The shetland isles are located further north than Ireland and the ponies are equipped to deal with the weather, they start to resemble pony shaped versions of Cousin It from The Addams Family.

    Most of the pony breeds native to the UK and Ireland would be able to much better cope with the weather than a human would. Most important thing for them would to make sure that their water supply remains unfrozen and a regular supply of hay and perhaps a supplement feed if the hay isn't providing adequate nutrition.

    A walk-in shed would make a good shelter for horses and ponies but even a single tall concrete or stone wall would provide them something to hide behind


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Since the local authorities are in charge of enforcing them, its your local authorities that need to be pressured

    The majority are millions. You can't paint the majority with a broad brush because the majority have no idea about any of this stuff, and the majority don't own any sort of animal at all.

    However you won't get very far ranting and raving about widespread cruelty among "Irish people" - identify the places you need to put pressure, the channels through which information can be spread, and deal with it practically rather than turning people off what you're trying to say by being negative.

    We vote in our local councillors. If the majority cared about animal welfare then we would vote for Councillors who support welfare. Again you will never see the subject mentioned in election material.

    "The Majority don't know about this stuff" - are you serious ?. Would the majority know that you don't allow a child to roam on a road ?. Or that being outside in -10c feels cold ?. Or that horses in Galway have to eat & drink ?. None of this is rocket science. If you think that the majority don't know don't know then you are reinforcing the unintelligent stereotype.

    Most Europeans know that animal cruelty is morally wrong. They don't have to be persuaded. I am presenting the facts. Some of those who campaigned against clerical child abuse or crooked bankers were accused of ranting & raving.
    softmee wrote: »
    Are you serious? They would be more interested if i call them and say somebody stole my socks.

    Whether they are interested is irrelevant. If you have evidence that an animal is being denied water you can report it as cruelty as per the 1911 Cruelty to Animals Act. Cruelty is defined as causing unnecessary suffering. A lack of water is so serious that the public are allowed, by law, to enter a Pound if dogs are not given water every 6 hours & food every 12 hours.

    If the Guard refuses to act then report the matter to their Superintendent & the Garda Ombudsman.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Discodog wrote: »
    We vote in our local councillors. If the majority cared about animal welfare then we would vote for Councillors who support welfare. Again you will never see the subject mentioned in election material.
    You won't see it in the election material because most people don't know about it. Make it an election issue via education.
    Discodog wrote: »
    "The Majority don't know about this stuff" - are you serious ?. Would the majority know that you don't allow a child to roam on a road ?. Or that being outside in -10c feels cold ?. Or that horses in Galway have to eat & drink ?. None of this is rocket science. If you think that the majority don't know don't know then you are reinforcing the unintelligent stereotype.
    What unintelligent stereotype? I'd really like clarification on that. Yes the majority don't know, since most people don't own a pet of any sort, much less a horse. Of the fifty or so houses in my immediate vicinity, there are a grand total of three with pets, and believe me those dogs are well taken care of. My only gripe is that the owners are a bit patchy about cleaning up after them.

    So if less than say ten percent of Irish people own pets, beyond fish and budgies, and they are extremely unlikely to stumble across the issues at random in their day to day lives, I've no idea how you expect the remaining ~90% to magically be aware of these problems.
    Discodog wrote: »
    Most Europeans know that animal cruelty is morally wrong. They don't have to be persuaded. I am presenting the facts. Some of those who campaigned against clerical child abuse or crooked bankers were accused of ranting & raving.
    Did you just compare animal neglect to mass child abuse by priests? To be honest you really need to rethink how you are getting your message out there, or perhaps find someone with a better understanding of the reality of the situation to do it for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    You won't see it in the election material because most people don't know about it. Make it an election issue via education.

    Our abuse of animals has been all over the TV news & Papers. The Star have a whole page today dedicated to it & even the New York Times & Al Jazeera have featured Irish animal neglect recently. RTE & TV3 showed the Galway horses, RTE ran a series on SPCA's. If people don't know then they must be blind. You don't have to look far to see a stray dog or feral cat. It's easy to find a donkey with overgrown feet or a dog left to sleep outside on a chain.
    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    What unintelligent stereotype? I'd really like clarification on that. Yes the majority don't know, since most people don't own a pet of any sort,

    The "thick Irish Paddy joke" stereotype that plagued us for so long. You think that 10% own a dog ?. The real figure is 35.6% according to the Pet food suppliers & they should know. Now add on the Cat owners, Horse owners, Rabbit owners etc etc & the percentage becomes even higher
    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Did you just compare animal neglect to mass child abuse by priests? To be honest you really need to rethink how you are getting your message out there, or perhaps find someone with a better understanding of the reality of the situation to do it for you.

    Yes & for one simple reason. Mass abuse of any kind can only occur if the population know & accept it. I understand reality because I have been involved in Animal rescue for years. I have also spent a lot of time in the UK & Europe. It is only when you return here that you realise just how bad we are.

    The appeal to find homes for the few Headford Road horses is struggling. In contrast, in the UK, hundreds of people offered homes for the 85 Spindle Farm Horses.

    The simple fact is that the majority of Irish people do not view animal abuse & neglect in the same way that it is viewed in most of Europe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭doubleglaze


    I have lived abroad in an affluent country and the treatment of pets was MUCH better there than here. The difference in attitudes between those people and the Irish was like night and day in those days.

    However, things are improving in Ireland. More and more people are attending to the social and intellectual needs of their dogs and not just feeding and watering them. Pets get better health care than before.

    We are still significantly behind the other country I'm familiar with in terms of pet care, but the gap is closing and I reckon if we continue to make progress in pet care at the rate we have in the last few years, we will have caught up in the next two decades or so.

    Táim bródúil as mo thír agus as mo chultúr ar go leor bealaí - ná ceapaigí nach bhfuil meas agam ar mo mhuintir - ach caithfidh mé aontú le Madra Dioscó thuas agus - mar a déarfadh lucht an Bhéarla - "spáid a ghlaoch ar spáid".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Discodog wrote: »
    Our abuse of animals has been all over the TV news & Papers. The Star have a whole page today dedicated to it & even the New York Times & Al Jazeera have featured Irish animal neglect recently. RTE & TV3 showed the Galway horses, RTE ran a series on SPCA's. If people don't know then they must be blind. You don't have to look far to see a stray dog or feral cat. It's easy to find a donkey with overgrown feet or a dog left to sleep outside on a chain.
    I wouldn't know where to find either. There are other things occupying people's minds at the moment, and given the limited time most have to watch the news, stories about the collapsing economy or political scandals are naturally going to get priority.

    I'll tell you one thing for a writ large in stone fact though - you won't get anywhere by insulting people.
    Discodog wrote: »
    The "thick Irish Paddy joke" stereotype that plagued us for so long.
    Anyone that takes paddy jokes seriously or views an entire nation as being of sub par intelligence has significant mental problems all on their own, so it shouldn't plague people in the slightest. You'll always get knuckle draggers that like to blame entire ethnic identities for their problems, best just to laugh at them in my experience.
    Discodog wrote: »
    You think that 10% own a dog ?. The real figure is 35.6% according to the Pet food suppliers & they should know. Now add on the Cat owners, Horse owners, Rabbit owners etc etc & the percentage becomes even higher
    That's complete nonsense. One person in three owns a dog? Even one household in three is rubbish. Every estate and apartment block in the country would be overrun with dogs, and this is clearly not the case.
    Discodog wrote: »
    Mass abuse of any kind can only occur if the population know & accept it.
    Given that most people have never even owned a dog never mind a horse, there is once again no understanding of the problems among the public. Also, you're treading near to collective responsibility here, which is a dangerous route to take. Or are you saying that the Irish people as a whole are somehow responsible for the abuse of children by religious figures?
    Discodog wrote: »
    The simple fact is that the majority of Irish people do not view animal abuse & neglect in the same way that it is viewed in most of Europe.
    If a poll was to be taken, do you think that the majority would vote to support animal abuse? Of course not. Its just not an issue that regularly if ever crosses their minds.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    I agree that it is getting better but slowly. I know of two new Vets that have opened near Galway this year. The number of dogs in our Pounds reduced considerably in 2009 - thanks in no small part to the Dogs Trust who took nearly 1000 additional dogs off of the 2008 figures.

    However we still allow 10,000 Greyhounds to die every year for "sport". The "racing industry" is dying in the UK but here it receives massive government support. We also promote Hare coursing, when it is banned in most of Europe. Even the Spanish are changing - there is a big movement to ban bullfighting.

    Unfortunately we do not teach Pet care in schools. My neighbours got a kitten & fed it on bread & milk. They now don't feed it as it's "job" is to catch mice. They are both school teachers !.


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭doubleglaze


    Discodog wrote: »
    I agree that it is getting better but slowly. I know of two new Vets that have opened near Galway this year. The number of dogs in our Pounds reduced considerably in 2009 - thanks in no small part to the Dogs Trust who took nearly 1000 additional dogs off of the 2008 figures.

    However we still allow 10,000 Greyhounds to die every year for "sport". The "racing industry" is dying in the UK but here it receives massive government support. We also promote Hare coursing, when it is banned in most of Europe. Even the Spanish are changing - there is a big movement to ban bullfighting.

    Unfortunately we do not teach Pet care in schools. My neighbours got a kitten & fed it on bread & milk. They now don't feed it as it's "job" is to catch mice. They are both school teachers !.

    Unfortunately, sociopathic behaviour can be found at every level of society. :mad:

    Hopefully, in the absence of conscience, good parental models and school programmes, threads such as this will play a role in educating these animal abusers. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,393 ✭✭✭inisboffin


    Lads, I am *assuming* that all of ye on this thread calling the majority of Irish people 'worse' (in terms of animal mistreatment and cruelty), are vegans and vegetarians?

    I assume this because Ireland has an agricultural tradition, and you have done research into the comparative animal farming methods and treatment versus the rest of the 'civilised' world? Then still found Ireland worse?

    I assume you have done comparisons in terms of wastage from animal slaughter versus amount used for human consumption in other countries vs Ireland, and the latter was worse.

    I assume that it is cruelty to *all* animals ye are concerned with, not just the ones that Disney favours?


    Because if you haven't/aren't/didn't then speaking about the comparative 'mistreatment' of animals here vs elsewhere, would at very least, be misinformed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭doubleglaze


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    That's complete nonsense. One person in three owns a dog? Even one household in three is rubbish. Every estate and apartment block in the country would be overrun with dogs, and this is clearly not the case.


    In the estate I live in, I'd say that there is STATISTICALLY SPEAKING one dog for every three HOUSES (not people). Many of the households that own a dog (less than one in three) would have two or - less frequently - three dogs.

    Very few of them are allowed roam and many are only rarely to be spotted as their owners bundle them into their cars en route to a walk in the park (or perhaps simply keep them in the back gardens or their houses all the time.:mad:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,252 ✭✭✭✭Madame Razz


    My 0.02 on this. I have a number of pets, all rescue animals bar one. Two were obtained via shelters, and two were obtained via private rescue(one of these was via Boards actually). My eldest cat I got via the GSPCA. Their home check process was nothing short of being borderline ludicrous. These people do not live in the real world, they have issue it seems, with rehoming animals to ANYBODY, yet at the same time complain that their resources are stretched and that they are overcrowded. I understand them not wishing to give rescue animals to just anyone, but their criteria is completely OTT, and really doesn't do them any favours. They turn down genuine people willing to give animals a good home(and who would give them a very good home) in preference to the dog staying a cold concrete cubicle in Killimor; sorry, but that makes no sense to me. This sort of policy actually actively discourages people from seeking to adopt rescue dogs, and compounds the problem we have in this country with the large volume of animals needing homes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    I agree 100% with above post. I know mysefl at least 2 people and myself who would make a great home for some dog and were rejected - one young couple, because they have 3 years old daughter!
    Dog in a house with children is no problem if people are responsible and know they should watch -both dog and a child. Actually its very good for kids too -to learn how to treat living creature.
    I have no words for this nonsens and i think i will write a letter to local newspaper about it.
    Something has to be change there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    In the estate I live in, I'd say that there is STATISTICALLY SPEAKING one dog for every three HOUSES (not people). Many of the households that own a dog (less than one in three) would have two or - less frequently - three dogs.

    Very few of them are allowed roam and many are only rarely to be spotted as their owners bundle them into their cars en route to a walk in the park (or perhaps simply keep them in the back gardens or their houses all the time.:mad:)
    Thats geat but still an anecdote - anecdotally, the few dogs in our neighbourhood are treated very well and exactly as they should be, a (ridiculously friendly) gun dog let roam a bit more openly, a toy breed kept warm indoors. This nonsense about one third of people or households owning a large animal like a dog is clearly rubbish, and every dog owner I know is very responsible towards their pet. Of the dozens of dog owners I know, not one has more than one dog. All true, and all anecdotal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭Tranceypoo


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Thats geat but still an anecdote - anecdotally, the few dogs in our neighbourhood are treated very well and exactly as they should be, a (ridiculously friendly) gun dog let roam a bit more openly, a toy breed kept warm indoors. This nonsense about one third of people or households owning a large animal like a dog is clearly rubbish, and every dog owner I know is very responsible towards their pet. Of the dozens of dog owners I know, not one has more than one dog. All true, and all anecdotal.

    Well, you must live in a happy sunny place where everyone treats their dogs really well, mate there are at least 4 families I know round here where we live (I'm ashamed and embarassed to say including my in-laws) where the dogs are left outside all day and night, never ever walked, some are tied up (again, including one of my in-laws dogs who they claim is vicious and bites people, even though he never bites me and behaves like a perfect, albeit slightly hyper, dog when I take him for walks), one neighbour got a puppy for her teenage daughter and he is left to sleep outside in a shed IN THIS WEATHER despite being less than a year and a beagle so small and short coated and despite my 'accidental' bumping into her out walking and asking after dog and suggesting as firmly as I could that perhaps, just for this cold spell, they could let the dog inside at night, last time I saw him he was wearing one of those hideous electric shock collars because they were complaining he 'kept running off' (that's what happens when you leave a dog outside, don't walk it or talk to/interact with it). I'm afraid in my 3/4 years experience of working with dog rescues in Ireland, this is the reality for a lot, if not most, of 'pet dogs' in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    I'll tell you one thing for a writ large in stone fact though - you won't get anywhere by insulting people.

    That's complete nonsense. One person in three owns a dog? Even one household in three is rubbish. Every estate and apartment block in the country would be overrun with dogs, and this is clearly not the case.

    Or are you saying that the Irish people as a whole are somehow responsible for the abuse of children by religious figures?

    If a poll was to be taken, do you think that the majority would vote to support animal abuse? Of course not. Its just not an issue that regularly if ever crosses their minds.

    If the presentation of fact is insulting then feel insulted. I am stating facts unlike you who state your suppositions. Where is your evidence to show that only 10% of the Irish population own a Pet. My figure comes from the people that supply pet food. Now unless the recession has forced us to eat dogfood their info should be pretty reliable. 200,000 dog licenses were issued in 2009 - even that is hardly 10% & most people don't get a license.

    I am not going to move off topic with child abuse but yes I believe that elected politicians knew & so did a lot of the population.

    Of course people would not vote for animal abuse but neither are they clamouring for a poll to vote against it or even offering any support to those that are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    These people do not live in the real world, they have issue it seems, with rehoming animals to ANYBODY

    I may not their biggest fan but the GSPCA do rehome over 1000 dogs per year which is impressive. So they cannot be turning down everybody.

    My gripe is that they investigated 5000 cruelty cases in 2008/2009 but I suspect that very few were prosecuted.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,414 ✭✭✭kraggy


    Discodog wrote: »
    I may not their biggest fan but the GSPCA do rehome over 1000 dogs per year which is impressive. So they cannot be turning down everybody.

    My gripe is that they investigated 5000 cruelty cases in 2008/2009 but I suspect that very few were prosecuted.

    The Gspca are a voluntary WELFARE organisation. They have no legal power.

    It's very difficult to get prosecutions in a country where the Gardai, for the most part, have no interest in animal rights/protection.

    Even if a case is brought to court, a suspended sentence is the norm.

    It's digusting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    inisboffin wrote: »
    Lads, I am *assuming* that all of ye on this thread calling the majority of Irish people 'worse' (in terms of animal mistreatment and cruelty), are vegans and vegetarians?

    I assume that it is cruelty to *all* animals ye are concerned with, not just the ones that Disney favours?

    Because if you haven't/aren't/didn't then speaking about the comparative 'mistreatment' of animals here vs elsewhere, would at very least, be misinformed.

    The thread is about homeless animals which are not generally farmed. Why should someone's dietary habit prevent them for being concerned about cruelty ?. The regulations that govern the treatment of farm animals are far tougher that those that protect domestic pets.

    We don't slaughter 10,000 cows for no reason in the way that we kill Greyhounds. We don't kill 6500 sheep to incinerate their bodies because they are unwanted like our Pound dogs. A farmer will feed an animal because it is worth money to him. A person will abuse a dog because, to them, it is worth nothing.

    On the majority issue. The After Hours board here has a sticky listing the recommended funniest threads. One of them is a thread started by a guy claiming that he had just killed his dog with a stun gun - the majority thought it to be hilarious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,393 ✭✭✭inisboffin


    Discodog wrote: »
    The thread is about homeless animals which are not generally farmed. Why should someone's dietary habit prevent them for being concerned about cruelty ?. The regulations that govern the treatment of farm animals are far tougher that those that protect domestic pets.

    We don't slaughter 10,000 cows for no reason in the way that we kill Greyhounds. We don't kill 6500 sheep to incinerate their bodies because they are unwanted like our Pound dogs. A farmer will feed an animal because it is worth money to him. A person will abuse a dog because, to them, it is worth nothing.

    On the majority issue. The After Hours board here has a sticky listing the recommended funniest threads. One of them is a thread started by a guy claiming that he had just killed his dog with a stun gun - the majority thought it to be hilarious.

    I agree, the thread DID start off about homeless animals and their mistreatment, then the conversation meandered to the mistreatment of animals in general in Ireland. So killing is ok? So if someone decides they can't keep a puppy it is grand to slit its throat and eat it? I am frankly sick to death of this double standard of some animals humanlike, some animals not. Cruelty is cruelty, full stop. I am not on the side of cruelty, I just thing we are myopic if we think that Ireland is so far behind in terms of treatment to all animals. With CJD who had to slaughter MILLIONS of cattle because of their feeding practices. Not Ireland.
    If everyone on here ranting about how cruel the whole of Ireland (no sorry, wait, the majority) is compared to the UK etc, if all those people are vegan / vegetarian OR raise their own meat and know it doesn't support cruel farming practice, then I would be more likely to listen to that argument.

    Some people would argue, discodog, that eating meat IS cruelty to animals, in that it is unnecessary. That is not my personal opinion, but when I see these sweeping statements about the majority of Ireland, and unnecessary cruelty, I feel like people are missing the bigger picture. For the record, I do think people need more awareness and education, but you're not going to get anywhere by quoting statistics and damning 'most of Ireland. We all know that statistics are skewed, including those of pet food companies, dog licenses etc.

    After hours HAS to be taken with a large grain of salt, no? People post on there to get a rise out of folks more often than any other forum imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    kraggy wrote: »
    The Gspca are a voluntary WELFARE organisation. They have no legal power.

    It's very difficult to get prosecutions in a country where the Gardai, for the most part, have no interest in animal rights/protection.

    Even if a case is brought to court, a suspended sentence is the norm.

    It's digusting.

    I disagree. The GSPCA & all the other SPCA's are operating the way that the RSPCA did years ago. The emphasis is on welfare & advising rather than prosecuting. The RSPCA found that prosecutions were a powerful deterrent & now pursue offenders more actively.

    The GSPCA need to concentrate on evidence which is always Veterinary evidence in cruelty cases. The horses are a prime example. If they are neglected & did not die of natural causes then a Vet can easily confirm this. The Guards & Prosecution Service are not going to turn down a case if there is good expert witness evidence. A Vet is a very powerful witness & in my experience their evidence is accepted by Judges & Juries. To prove cruelty you need a Vet to state that the animal was subjected to "unnecessary suffering".

    Irish judges have handed out prison sentences. If you don't prosecute then the Judiciary will rarely see a cruelty case & will tend to treat it as an exception. If they see more cases they will tend to issue harsher sentences as a deterrent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    All true, and all anecdotal.

    Great way to run a political party. I have heard that it's true so it must be !.

    From your website:

    "We seek to join and surpass our fellow European nations in modernity"

    By killing many times more unwanted animals than they do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    Discodog wrote: »
    I may not their biggest fan but the GSPCA do rehome over 1000 dogs per year which is impressive. So they cannot be turning down everybody.

    My gripe is that they investigated 5000 cruelty cases in 2008/2009 but I suspect that very few were prosecuted.

    I think they could rehome 3 times as many if they would be more open and flexible.
    They should ask every person to sign agreement saying if they cant for some reason keep the dog or there is something wrong, this person has to return dog to them.
    This way there would be much bigger chance of dogs not ending up on the streets again and they wouldnt lose opportunity of potential succesful rehoming.
    This is unbelivable that they think life behind the crates is better then life without a garden or life with small kids. I just cant get over it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    softmee wrote: »
    They should ask every person to sign agreement saying if they cant for some reason keep the dog or there is something wrong, this person has to return dog to them.

    I don't know about the GSPCA but every other rescue that I know already does this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    Aaah, Christmas time, peace and goodwill to all and all that :D.

    I have followed this thread with interest and actually sat on my hands on a number of posts.

    I've done rescue in this country for the past 14 years. I've seen things that would make your toenails curl or make you p*ke your guts out.

    I have seen dogs with cut off ears, doused in diesel and set alight, tied to a tree in the forest and left to starve, I've seen donkeys with curled hooves barely able to walk, I've seen horses so emaciated the only body part they could still move were their eyes. And THAT WAS IN THE GOOD TIMES!

    Ireland is so far behind Animal Welfare that it isn't even funny. Yes, we have *Control of Dogs Act* and we have *Control of Horses Act*, but were are the Welfare Acts? Oh wait, that one is going to celebrate its birthday next year : it's 100th birthday which renders it, in fact, British law as it pre-dates the formation of the Irish Republic.

    Lots of Control and very little Welfare!

    Ireland is also the capital of Europe's puppymillers. And the legislation for it: a joke! Half-baked ideas to legislate to get more revenue, again, no mention of welfare and oh, the hunting kennels and the Greyhound Industry get a special deal on that one as well. Hmmm...

    And don't get me started on foxhunting...

    So, yes, Ireland is extremely backwards when it comes to the care of its animals. And I am in a good position to judge this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    EGAR wrote: »
    Ireland is also the capital of Europe's puppymillers. And the legislation for it: a joke! Half-baked ideas to legislate to get more revenue, again, no mention of welfare

    From the Irish Times:

    The penalties provided under the Dog Breeding Establishments Bill were criticised by Fine Gael environment spokesman Phil Hogan.


    “Penalties of up to €5,000, to be imposed on people for very minor offences, are onerous,” he said.

    Oh good so we can rely on our new FG government to make things better :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    And as to Cowen, we have to rely on non-irish press to inform us:

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/ireland/article7107319.ece

    And for those who don't know who Mr. Boland is (again - non-irish article!) :

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1050747/How-tiny-handbag-dogs-bred-conditions-horrific-cruelty.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    inisboffin wrote: »
    So if someone decides they can't keep a puppy it is grand to slit its throat and eat it? I am frankly sick to death of this double standard of some animals humanlike, some animals not. Cruelty is cruelty, full stop.

    Some people would argue, discodog, that eating meat IS cruelty to animals, in that it is unnecessary.

    No because they are not qualified to kill it humanely & there are animal protein alternatives.

    Eating meat is not cruelty. Humanely killing an animal never constitutes cruelty - every Vet would be guilty. It is the quality of life that constitutes cruelty in farming such as battery hens, veal calves etc. The excellent organisation Compassion in World Farming show that you can farm without being cruel.

    If we killed Cows the way that we kill foxes, by chasing them with a pack of dogs, then very few people would eat beef.

    If I am wrong about us Irish then I assume that we buy lots of free range foods - do we ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    EGAR wrote: »

    So, yes, Ireland is extremely backwards when it comes to the care of its animals. And I am in a good position to judge this.

    I lived in few european coutries and just to let you know -i have to admit the country where i come from ( Poland) is even worse unfortunately.. and i dont know if its good or bad, but i the cities there is much more many homeless animals, maybe because cities are bigger and its harder to control it, i dont know. I remember country holidays and all the dogs tied to the kennels with chains with no water during extremely hot summers ,no shadow - nothing. I was always fighting with farmers about it and they just didnt care. Their simple minds just dont get it. Animals are made for humans to use them and thats it. (Discodog neighours philosophy).
    Anyway this thread probably will be moved to animal issues, so to avoid this i would suggest keeping it open for some reason. We could use it to share news about homeless/mistreated animals .
    It should be easier to react and help if there is need for this. I know now i wont get help from officials and rescues are not always able to help, so this might be the other way of helping.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,393 ✭✭✭inisboffin


    Discodog wrote: »
    No because they are not qualified to kill it humanely & there are animal protein alternatives.

    Eating meat is not cruelty. Humanely killing an animal never constitutes cruelty - every Vet would be guilty. It is the quality of life that constitutes cruelty in farming such as battery hens, veal calves etc. The excellent organisation Compassion in World Farming show that you can farm without being cruel.

    If we killed Cows the way that we kill foxes, by chasing them with a pack of dogs, then very few people would eat beef.

    If I am wrong about us Irish then I assume that we buy lots of free range foods - do we ?

    Right, I can see that we fundamentally see animal welfare differently. By your own statement, we do not need to eat *any animals*, therefore killing them (however humanely) is just for our own profit and unnecessary. I never said eating meat is cruelty. But the fact that you are telling me the meat industry is completely 'humane' in the western world is at best dubious.
    There is a lot of cruelty in mass farming, and that's pretty common knowledge.

    In terms of the farming industry, I think we have a lot less 'mass farming' here, where livestock are fed hormones and ground up versions of the same species than other places. But again, I am assuming that everyone on here has researched their facts if they are accusing the majority of the nation of animal cruelty. You tell me.

    If it were simply about eating 'humanely' killed animals, then there would be no reason why you couldn't get dog steak at the butchers. It is about double standards. Just like we treat humans with differences unequally.

    The irony is I agree with you about many atrocities like fox hunting and letting animals starve, I just think we conveniently turn a blind eye when it doesn't suit our 'needs' like the meat industry. I honestly don't care whether a farmer takes care of his cows well for money reasons or takes care of his horse well for reasons of compassion, as long as the animal IS well cared for.

    I don't want this thread to be closed because of going way off topic, so please feel free to pm me if you want to. The important thing is not who is worse, but how we can fix it here. In our country, with our issues and our temperament and our resources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    I am not Irish, softmee and Poland is still battling with the poverty that was rampant during the Iron Curtain age - none of that applies to Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,918 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    inisboffin wrote: »
    . The important thing is not who is worse, but how we can fix it here. In our country, with our issues and our temperament and our resources.

    Most of Europe has the same issues & pro rata resources. The English & Welsh population donated €140 million to the RSPCA in 2008 so that's about €3 per person. If the Irish followed suit then the ISPCA would get €14 million but I bet that they don't.

    So maybe it is an issue of temperament. Maybe to avoid injuring our Irish pride we should keep quiet & hope it gets better - where have we heard that before ?.

    A friend of mine farms mountain sheep in Wales. They graze in the remotest areas. If one of his sheep develops a limp he will hear about it within hours because someone will spot it, maybe a tourist/walker, they will phone the RSPCA who will call my friend. How long could you leave a sheep with a limp in Ireland before someone reported it ?.

    You can't make people care. Ireland will improve but it will take decades to reach the standards of much of Europe & by then they will of become even better. If the majority here cared about animal welfare we could turn it around in 12 months.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11 NatalieA


    About strays. Ireland has far less stray animals that some european contries. And it's different everywhere. Ever seen stray cats in Spain? They strong and fit, they catch birds for dinner!
    In Latvia lots of cats outside, hard to tell, strays or not, majority has no collars and well fed. But some are wild, they live in bacements and have kittens there. People feed them, but it's hard to catch a kitten. Some try if want a pet to live at home. People love cats. Lots of people have more than 1 cat, they run free but come home to eat. Also people feed homeless cats and any cats that seem hungry, outside, if can't take them home. So some cats get fed by few households. :) Knew a cat that was visiting few apartments, eat and sleep there, then go outside, visit another family. :) 2 ladys couldn't decide whos pet it is :) Visited when was hot, like in Spain, near appartments on the grass there were 5+ cats and some dogs, laying down on the grass, in close proximity too hot to be bothered to bark or hiss. :)
    In Ireland it's hard to spot a cat. I wanted one, no pet shop has them only was able to adopt a kitten from a pet farm. Lots of people don't know how to keep a cat, how to train it. When somebody visits with children, they usually scared of the cat , but find it so interesting, poor kitty can't find a place to hide. :) Cat is so good with my children. I feel sorry for those who never had a cat or dog as a child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    Natalie, Ireland is RIPE will feral cat colonies which alot of rescues like myself try to reduce by trapping, neuter and release (TNR) and WHY on earth should cats be sold in petshops? Give me strength...

    Do you have any idea how many adult dogs and pups end up in pounds every year? Obviously not, as per capita Ireland has a HUGE stray problem.

    And it is yet again obvious that education is sadly lacking in those areas..


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 17,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭Das Kitty


    My Mam was telling me that the Guards removed all the horses from Carrowbrowne during the week. Apparently they were left without food and water (and shelter obviously) during the freeze and a foal and mare died :(

    I'm glad the horses were removed but I doubt there will be any convictions arising from it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,393 ✭✭✭inisboffin


    Discodog wrote: »


    A friend of mine farms mountain sheep in Wales. They graze in the remotest areas. If one of his sheep develops a limp he will hear about it within hours because someone will spot it, maybe a tourist/walker, they will phone the RSPCA who will call my friend. How long could you leave a sheep with a limp in Ireland before someone reported it ?.

    Are you really asking this question? Are we ok with anecdotal evidence now, in which case my experience is very different to yours. To answer your question I have one family member and one friend who are sheep farmers, one in Galway one in NW, and they DO get calls about injured sheep.

    Please can you stop talking about the 'majority' of Irish people not caring about animals. It is a sweeping statement, and 'caring' is obviously a word we use very differently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,393 ✭✭✭inisboffin


    Das Kitty wrote: »
    My Mam was telling me that the Guards removed all the horses from Carrowbrowne during the week. Apparently they were left without food and water (and shelter obviously) during the freeze and a foal and mare died :(

    I'm glad the horses were removed but I doubt there will be any convictions arising from it.

    Do you know if any were re-homed? I know someone had offered to take in two of the mares but didn't hear any more.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement