Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Seen & Found

1246720

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭bawn79


    http://binged.it/SSVMVL Listed as an enclosure of drystone construction with Large facing stones... Could it be a Stone Circle?

    That does look very circular doesn't it. Tom Fourwinds on his site reckons he found an unrecorded stone circle on the western side of these hills
    http://www.megalithomania.com/show/site/1680/knockanaffrin_stone_circle.htm
    so it is possible that even stone circles can be missed / misidentified.

    This I assume is the description on Archaeology.ie Description: Situated on a gentle SE-facing slope in the upper Tay river valley. Subcircular area (int. dims. 28m E-W; 23.5m N-S) defined by a grass-covered stone spread (Wth 2m) with large stones (dims. 1m x 0.4m; H 0.7m) on the outer face, particularly W-NE. The out-turned entrance (Wth 5.4m) at SE (downslope) might not be original and a dry-stone built structure (int. diam. 1.3m) against the inner face of the E wall is secondary. The interior supports dense rush growth in places. It is within field system (WA014-040----), but not connected with any of its walls.

    Some interesting sites described on this guys website in the waterford area.
    http://www.prehistoricwaterford.com/sites-a-z/

    Has some pictures of enclosures in the general area etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/PUm1JZ - Earthwork remains of the Medieval Town of Kilbixy in Westmeath

    http://binged.it/PUmETM - Extensive earthworks around Abbeyshrule, Longford..

    http://binged.it/PUnQXs - Extremely interesting this one.. Huge circular feature 250m in diameter.... You can make out two/three concentric Ditches in the Northern portion of it, and a concentric raised bank demarking the south edge of it... Lots of other associated earthworks.. Quite the massive feature... There's a listing of a couple of barrows a bit to the south on the monument record, but no listing of this earthwork.. I'm thinking no one knows about it... Any thoughts!? I'm thinking along the lines of a Fortified Iron Age Settlement....

    314120_10151231523230832_2054466542_n.jpg

    Got some feedback on this site today, an archaeologist from the NMS paid it a visit:
    I carried out fieldwalking in the area that you highlighted from google maps. The earthworks that you identified appear to form part of an extensive field system formed by curving drainage channels located between two streams. The curving earthworks do not form a circular enclosure but instead represent drainage channels that are curving around the base of a low hill forming the partial double enclosing ditches that you see you see on the aerial photographs. The fields that these earthworks are located are very wet and the ditches are an attempt to provide small slightly raised dry paddocks for agricultural purposes. When these are traced on the ground you can see clearly that they terminate where they hit naturally dry ground and therefore do not form an enclosing element around the base of this low hill. However within this pattern of drainge channels and small fields there is a raised circular platform c. 30m in diameter and c. 2m high similar to a type of monument known in Ireland as a raised rath or platform ringfort which is an unrecorded monument dating from the early Christian period. I have plotted and surveyed this new monument which will be uploaded in the near future onto our website www.archaeology.ie
    A Good Result methinks!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Here's what Aidan O'Sullivan said in the Sunday Times article (28/10/12) on the discovery at Tara.
    Just as amateur astronomers use telescopes in back gardens to identify distant galactic objects and then contact professional astronomers to get confirmation, so too could amateur archaeologists....
    ...With ordinary people working with institutes, universities like UCD, or museums, the prospect for archaeological discoveries is great.
    Congratulations, Simon.d :)

    (I had a feeling the ditches were connected with drainage one way or the other)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/YENGUd - No listing, an assortment of rectilinear features in Co. Waterford


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/VNkRGA - Interesting (listed) motte site in Wexford, can make out some surrounding earthworks

    http://binged.it/SXlYl3 - Another great Kilkenny fortress


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/YENGUd - No listing, an assortment of rectilinear features in Co. Waterford
    They're odd.
    First thought was that they were field walls but each one is discrete. Walled gardens perhaps? The layout is not dissimilar to a formal knot garden.
    The nearby house seems not to be the sort that would have had such gardens.
    There is no sign of earlier field boundaries aligning with the earthworks, nor indeed any depiction of walled gardens, on either the 1st or 2nd edition maps.
    I think we can rule out their being modern on the basis that they exist only as crop marks in the 2005 orthophotography.

    The house has 'a pump' noted in the 2nd edition map.
    Might this give a clue - could they be remnants of ponds?

    227923.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/VO2RMk - Bivallate hillfort near ballyragget, Co. Kilkenny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    slowburner wrote: »
    The house has 'a pump' noted in the 2nd edition map.
    Might this give a clue - could they be remnants of ponds?

    Could be.. Not real idea's as to what it is.. No historical references to a big a house in that townland that I can find..


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »

    Could be.. Not real idea's as to what it is.. No historical references to a big a house in that townland that I can find..
    Time for some footwork, methinks (if you think the site is sufficiently interesting).

    I'm sure a chat with the current occupiers of the house would reveal a great deal about what was going on, and when.

    My gut instinct is late C.19th landscaping, but the possibility of earlier works, possibly connected to the 2nd edition map reference to the pump, could be of local historical interest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    slowburner wrote: »
    Time for some footwork, methinks (if you think the site is sufficiently interesting).

    I'm sure a chat with the current occupiers of the house would reveal a great deal about what was going on, and when.

    My gut instinct is late C.19th landscaping, but the possibility of earlier works, possibly connected to the 2nd edition map reference to the pump, could be of local historical interest.

    Could even be associated features still standing above ground in and around that farmyard... A bit of local knowledge could be very helpful.......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/VO2RMk - Bivallate hillfort near ballyragget, Co. Kilkenny
    Is there the hint of a third ring around the site to the north? The elevations on the old 6" maps show the profile of the hill quite well.
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,647494,671039,7,7


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    I found this on Ballydurn, in case you hadn't seen it.
    http://landedestates.nuigalway.ie:8080/LandedEstates/jsp/property-show.jsp?id=4201

    I'm further West so not of much help to you, unless I got a chance to go to the library, there are records available to peruse there. If I do I'll post on here, but I'm pretty busy so unlikely in near future :(

    there must have been a big house, just found this : http://www.munster-express.ie/community-notes/stradbally/captain-james-barron/
    Other fine houses with the Barron’s were; Carrigbarahane House, Georgestown House, Hermitage alias Abbey Lodge, Seafield(Later the birth place of Mark Anthony),Durrow(home of Philip Barron Irish Scolar), Ballyneale (Bishop Barron), Ballydurne and Ballymacart(Old Parish)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    Probably totally unrelated but Ballydurn also comes up in relation to point to point races held there in 2009 if that's any bit useful info.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    slowburner wrote: »
    They're odd.
    First thought was that they were field walls but each one is discrete. Walled gardens perhaps? The layout is not dissimilar to a formal knot garden.
    The nearby house seems not to be the sort that would have had such gardens.
    There is no sign of earlier field boundaries aligning with the earthworks, nor indeed any depiction of walled gardens, on either the 1st or 2nd edition maps.
    I think we can rule out their being modern on the basis that they exist only as crop marks in the 2005 orthophotography.

    The house has 'a pump' noted in the 2nd edition map.
    Might this give a clue - could they be remnants of ponds?
    The site is on quite a steep northwest facing slope. Not ideal for gardens, and not sufficient stream flow for fish ponds.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Looking at the Bing bird's eye view, I agree that the site is unsuited to ponds.
    This view is approximately from the north west.

    227962.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    Coles wrote: »
    Is there the hint of a third ring around the site to the north? The elevations on the old 6" maps show the profile of the hill quite well.
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,647494,671039,7,7

    Indeed! .. If so it could have been a huge enclosure, giving a radius on that side of 400m. Assuming it continued around the site, the total enclosed area would have approached 120 acres....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/UArc2t - Square feature (possible norman moated site), not listed.. Close to Ballyragget. Alot going on in the surronding landscape, some of which is listed, including "Barney Church" ruins to the south.

    http://binged.it/UArhDg - Same site, looks like the road used to continue into this field (not on OSI maps, so probably pre-1800s), think I can make out a small square feature too..

    http://binged.it/SWyhOq - Listed enclosure in same complex


    http://binged.it/UAtfDK - Unlisted earthworks in Firoda Upper, Kilkenny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    I found this on Ballydurn, in case you hadn't seen it.
    http://landedestates.nuigalway.ie:8080/LandedEstates/jsp/property-show.jsp?id=4201

    I'm further West so not of much help to you, unless I got a chance to go to the library, there are records available to peruse there. If I do I'll post on here, but I'm pretty busy so unlikely in near future :(

    there must have been a big house, just found this : http://www.munster-express.ie/community-notes/stradbally/captain-james-barron/


    Found a map from c1750 of the county by Charles Smith.. The little house symbol is defined in the legend as a Seat, and as you can see there's one at "Ballydawn".. The Civil survey of c1650 lists no building in the townland, so It's looks like the chronology fits in well with that article on the Barrons.. So could be the remnants of a big house that was built c1700, that fell into ruin before that century came to a close..
    vMfN8.jpg?1754

    John Barron, born 1718, (Grandson of Captain James Barron referenced in the article above), who lived in Ballydurne: http://www.thepeerage.com/p26692.htm#i266911 .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/UAXtX6 - Any thoughts on this strange marking?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/UAXtX6 - Any thoughts on this strange marking?
    They are footprints of animal feeders, rotated about a central feed locus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    Was out this morning at Crooke Castle ( http://binged.it/RuG43D ), a one time Templar Knight stronghold in Waterford. The following is a stiched image, made up of many combined photos automatically assembled. The low lying winter sun helped in highlighting the many linears (and circulars?)(high res image here):

    8175383014_d4fe60cedf_b.jpg

    Output from a photogrammetric model of the site. The animation shows a changing light angle, to show up the different features:
    animation.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    I would like to have your opinions on this spot ? Apologies Slowburner, I posted this before, but this seems to be an updated (2012) aerial view, and now I see a lot more than I saw before (that is, nothing !) :eek:

    This is listed as "earthworks" not visible from ground level. There is actually a standing stone in that field which I think could have been preserved and re-erected by the land owners ? (no record of it)
    The local folklore (obviously derived from the name of the place) has it that it was a fort. There are several ringforts to the East (Tooraneena area) and it appears on the 6" map as a ringfort.

    Some individual fenced trees have been planted at the foot of a ridge on the left hand side, just before the forestry/wood line, other than that, the field is undulating a bit. Might take a ground level view soon if this might help.

    http://binged.it/W1Rxrf


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/

    WA013-009 has it as...
    'Marked faintly as a circular enclosure (diam. c. 35m) on the 1840 ed. of OS 6-inch map, and situated in pasture on an E-facing slope.
    It is not visible at ground level.'
    "Archaeological Inventory of Waterford" 1999 Rev. 2009
    .

    The 'dog's leg in the field boundary to the East, points very nicely to the enclosure.
    228169.png


    The enclosure may still be visible in the Bing image today.

    228168.png



    The second edition map shows a lime kiln, just south across the Doon (?) road, so perhaps some of the other earthworks in the field were connected to the workings of the lime kiln.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    you're probably right. The pocmarks (spelling :confused:) could simply be rain draining from the hill to the left, there are a few around the area, albeit usually muddier and smaller.
    I think the standing stone is around the location of that little circular mark, not sure though, I need to stop and look (and click) again.

    The area is full of lime kilns, never really saw any earthworks associated with them though.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    you're probably right. The pocmarks (spelling :confused:) could simply be rain draining from the hill to the left, there are a few around the area, albeit usually muddier and smaller.
    I think the standing stone is around the location of that little circular mark, not sure though, I need to stop and look (and click) again.

    The area is full of lime kilns, never really saw any earthworks associated with them though.
    The standing stone is probably there to serve the needs of animals - it's probably not from antiquity.
    That said, I like the possibility that it came from the enclosure.

    This is a brilliant time of year for photographing earth shapes.
    Early morning, and evening low angle sunlight can often reveal more than aerial views. If you can get to a slightly more elevated vantage point - when the shadows are lengthening - it can be a revelation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭bawn79


    Simon.d wrote: »
    Was out this morning at Crooke Castle ( http://binged.it/RuG43D ), a one time Templar Knight stronghold in Waterford. The following is a stiched image, made up of many combined photos automatically assembled. The low lying winter sun helped in highlighting the many linears (and circulars?)(high res image here):


    Output from a photogrammetric model of the site. The animation shows a changing light angle, to show up the different features:
    animation.gif

    Was that the balloon and the camera again Simon? Its a great job.

    Do you have a look at bing systemically or how do you go about it?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    @Simon d. - our photographics whizkid ;)

    Can you share with us how you stitched those images together?
    Another thing I'd love to be able to do, is lay one image over another with a controllable degree of transparency - a transparency overlay similar to the OSI site. It would be very useful indeed.

    Any suggestions?

    >>

    And here's a simple image of a field.
    With low angle winter sunlight, four or five old field walls are revealed, as well as a double ditch and bank, and old plough ridges.
    These features are not visible under any other light conditions.

    228373.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    bawn79 wrote: »
    Was that the balloon and the camera again Simon? Its a great job.
    Very happy with the detail I must say.. I do it with a remote controlled plane with a small camera strapped to it's belly.. So much more fun than a balloon! Fly above the site for 15 minutes or so, with camera snapping every 5 seconds, and then head home to process the results... My main enemy with this type of setup is motion blur, so good light and minimal speed is critical to get this level of detail..
    slowburner wrote: »
    @Simon d. - our photographics whizkid wink.png

    Can you share with us how you stitched those images together?
    Another thing I'd love to be able to do, is lay one image over another with a controllable degree of transparency - a transparency overlay similar to the OSI site. It would be very useful indeed.

    Any suggestions?

    Stiching I did with Microsoft's "Image Composite Editor".. Very easy to use..

    For layering images I use GIMP (a free photoshop clone).. There's a transparency bar for each layer, so you've full control.. Take's a bit of getting used to though, but it's great software when you get the hang of it.. And free!.. The GIF animation above was also generated using this program..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    Any thoughts on these oddities? Possibly beside a small enclosure? They seem to be all over the place... http://binged.it/SZTnKK


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Coles wrote: »
    Any thoughts on these oddities? Possibly beside a small enclosure? They seem to be all over the place... http://binged.it/SZTnKK
    Not at a desktop right now, but they look like sandpits.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    There must be plenty of sand/gravel around there, there are loads of sandpits shown on the first edition 6" map, with no sign of an enclosure.

    228498.png


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Just thought I'd share this.
    Here's a screenshot of something which looks remarkably like a faint drawing of an enclosure.

    228499.png

    But I think it's just a blob.
    No sign of it in the coloured edition.
    Any thoughts?

    228500.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/UDZWpz - Think I've found something quite significant here!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    Not to distract from the above contribution, but it's interesting to see how the yellow field of rape-seed highlights the features underground. A couple of interesting things, but the small perfectly round circle looks interesting.

    East of Trim, Co. Meath.

    Also to add that the mapviewer on BiodiversityIreland.ie is great for measuring area and distance and also for checking soil and subsoil types, and geology.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Coles wrote: »
    Not to distract from the above contribution, but it's interesting to see how the yellow field of rape-seed highlights the features underground. A couple of interesting things, but the small perfectly round circle looks interesting.

    East of Trim, Co. Meath.

    Also to add that the mapviewer on BiodiversityIreland.ie is great for measuring area and distance and also for checking soil and subsoil types, and geology.
    Could well be a barrow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/UDZWpz - Think I've found something quite significant here!
    What do you think is there?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »
    http://binged.it/UDZWpz - Think I've found something quite significant here!
    You mean the orthogonal feature?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    Coles wrote: »
    What do you think is there?

    No idea! Norman complex maybe?
    slowburner wrote: »
    You mean the orthogonal feature?

    That coupled with the well defined rectangular feature to the south, and the potential mound to the West..


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »


    That coupled with the well defined rectangular feature to the south, and the potential mound to the West..
    There's no sign of it on the OSI 1st or 2n editions - I think it makes sense to conclude that the orthogonal feature (actually two orthogonals) is post 1860.

    More than likely later C.19th landscaping - that's my humble, but I formally request a second opinion.

    For a moment, I thought you'd found conclusive evidence of a Roman villa, or some such.

    Interesting area all the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    slowburner wrote: »
    There's no sign of it on the OSI 1st or 2n editions - I think it makes sense to conclude that the orthogonal feature (actually two orthogonals) is post 1860.

    More than likely later C.19th landscaping - that's my humble, but I formally request a second opinion.

    For a moment, I thought you'd found conclusive evidence of a Roman villa, or some such.

    Interesting area all the same.

    I'm thinking it predates c1850 for the simple reason that the field boundary that seems to cut the feature has remained unchanged over the two OSIs.

    Found this historical reference to a potential castle in the townland

    bKToi.jpg

    I've found a 13th century reference to a Norman by the name of Sir Thomas de Wancy, who acted as a witness to legal proceedings in the Kilkenny area.. Seems to fit with the name Wansestown....


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Could well predate the OSI mapping.
    I'm not seeing any field walls intersecting the feature on the osi maps - am I looking at the right thing at all?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭bawn79


    slowburner wrote: »
    Just thought I'd share this.
    Here's a screenshot of something which looks remarkably like a faint drawing of an enclosure.

    228499.png

    But I think it's just a blob.
    No sign of it in the coloured edition.
    Any thoughts?

    228500.png

    If it was something by the looks of it, it would be huge. I assume you have checked it with bing?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭demakinz


    8187603759_a532518708_c.jpg

    8188685172_ebe30ba0d7_c.jpg

    This is Carbury castle just outside of Edenderry. What do you think the round features are?

    Are the lines seen around the site old tracks or building?

    The ruins of the castle is still on the site, can be seen on the right of the first picture casting a shadow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Mountainsandh


    Simon.d I'd love to know how you operate : do you pick an area at random ? somewhere you know/near you ? and then investigate... or do you research a specific area and then decide to check out the aerial view ?

    I like to hover aimlessly over places near me ... :)

    I spotted this very broken up field near enough me, it comes up with a tortuous wall in the 6" map, but nothing recorded in Archeology.ie.
    But I'm trying to match that tortuous wall to what I see, and it seems like there maybe a bit more to it ?

    Here are the links
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,624028,606278,7,7
    http://binged.it/W9JM2v


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    slowburner wrote: »
    Could well predate the OSI mapping.
    I'm not seeing any field walls intersecting the feature on the osi maps - am I looking at the right thing at all?

    I'm sure you are looking at the same thing.. Possibly just overly optimistic on my end... I've passed on the info to an NMS Archaeologist, who said he'd go and have a look.. So will keep ye posted..
    I like to hover aimlessly over places near me ... smile.png

    Pretty much the same here, pick a region and scan around...No real method beyond that...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭cfuserkildare


    #19 cfuserkildare
    Registered User
    blue_star_3.gif

    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 646
    Adverts | Friends


    Unlisted finds
    Hi All,

    A while back I noticed a feature and contacted the natural History Museum with details regarding my find, However the results were a little dissapointing, they suspected it was a duck pond but no-one gave it a proper examination.

    These are the co-ordinates using Google Earth:-

    52º59'30.01" N

    6º03'32.78" W

    Apparently it was in a field that may have been marshy.

    Have a look.
    user_online.gifreport.gif

    Can anybody have a look into this? Much more interesting than previously thought.
    quote.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    demakinz wrote: »
    8187603759_a532518708_c.jpg

    8188685172_ebe30ba0d7_c.jpg

    This is Carbury castle just outside of Edenderry. What do you think the round features are?

    Are the lines seen around the site old tracks or building?

    The ruins of the castle is still on the site, can be seen on the right of the first picture casting a shadow.

    There's alot going on methinks..

    The heavier recti/linear markings look to be field boundarys, while the less defined parallell markings look to be the remnants of plough furrows. The large circular enclosure could be ecclesiastical, the smaller ones look to be ring forts... Very busy & well preserved site!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Simon.d


    http://binged.it/XKa1le - Motte of Monacoghlan in Co. Laois. There's a reference to the following survey from the 18th century in it's NMS listing:

    High Res

    Ex3wjl.jpg


    Found this nearby.. Not listed but looks to be a Moated site: http://binged.it/XKdK2r

    http://binged.it/XKe8O8 - Listed Anglo Norman Castle site a short hop to the North..


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner



    Unlisted finds
    Hi All,

    A while back I noticed a feature and contacted the natural History Museum with details regarding my find, However the results were a little dissapointing, they suspected it was a duck pond but no-one gave it a proper examination.

    These are the co-ordinates using Google Earth:-

    52º59'30.01" N

    6º03'32.78" W

    Apparently it was in a field that may have been marshy.

    The NMS website is always worth checking.
    Potential finds should be reported to the National Museum, not the Natural History Museum.
    Not quite sure what you mean by 'a proper examination'.
    The enclosure has indeed been visited, and the conclusion drawn that it is a,

    'relatively modern feature, not earlier than the 18th century; possibly a landscape feature associated with duck shooting.'

    (SMR no. W1025-089, 30th October 2012)

    There is no record of the feature on either edition of the OSI historic maps, so it's quite probable that the enclosure is a recent construction.
    The drainage ditch connecting the pond with the tidal waters of the Murrough was dug much earlier. It was probably used to provide water for the pond, and is more than likely the reason the pond was situated in that particular spot.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,221 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Simon.d wrote: »


    Found this nearby.. Not listed but looks to be a Moated site: http://binged.it/XKdK2r
    Have a look here http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,619499,671422,7,8
    However, it doesn't quite align with the feature in the Bing image.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement